Planning as a barrier for growth: Analysing storylines on the reform of the Danish Planning Act

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate how the discourse ‘planning as a barrier for growth’ has been structured in the public debate in Denmark, and how this discourse has created a political pressure to reform the Planning Act. We identify three main storylines, which support the discourse that planning constitutes a barrier for growth in the most rural areas of Denmark, framed as ‘Outer Denmark’ in the public debate. We argue that the contemporary critique of planning in Denmark has a distinct spatial dimension, in which planning deregulation is rationalised as a means to boost development in the economic periphery and combat increasing socio-spatial inequalities. Whilst the ideology and rationality behind the storylines calling for deregulation of planning can be interpreted as rooted in social welfarism, we argue that the framing of Outer Denmark is merely being used in the public debate to legitimise the (neo)liberalisation of spatial planning in Denmark. Nevertheless, the case of planning deregulation in Denmark is illustrative of how spatialities are discursively (re)constructed and enacted in order to challenge and transform the role of planning in the context of neoliberalism.

Keywords

Denmark deregulation neoliberalism planning regulation spatial planning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allmendinger

(2011) New Labour and Planning. From New Right to New Left, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Allmendinger

Haughton

(2013) The evolution and trajectories of English spatial governance: ‘Neoliberal’ episodes in planning. Planning Practice & Research 28: 6–26.

Andersen

Pløger

(2007) The dualism of urban governance in Denmark. European Planning Studies 15: 1349–1367.

Berlingske (2013a) Store omkostninger for lavere priser. Berlingske, 30 May.

Berlingske (2013b) Planloven koster danskerne milliarder om året. Berlingske, 10 June.

Berlingske (2015) Det er ikke planloven, der skævvrider. Berlingske, 4 October.

Brenner

Peck

Theodore

(2010) Variegated neoliberalization: Geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks 10: 182–222.

Byplan Nyt (2014) Vejledningerne rager mig en høstblomst!. Byplan Nyt 5: 7–9.

Carter H (2011) Compelled to compete? Competitiveness and the small city. PhD Thesis, Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University, Aalborg.

10.

Carter

(2015) Peripheralization through planning: The case of a golf resort proposal in Northern Ireland. In: Lang

Henn

Sgibnev

et al. (eds) Understanding Geographies of Polarization and Peripheralization, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 98–111.

11.

Carter

Larsen

Olesen

(2015) A planning palimpsest: Neoliberal planning in a welfare state tradition. European Journal of Spatial Development 58: 1–20.

12.

Christensen

Pristed Nielsen

(2013) Udkantsdanmark: Avisernes (med)production af Nordjyllands territorielle stigma. Praktiske Grunde 7: 5–20.

13.

Danish Government (2010) Danmark i Balance i en Global Verden, Copenhagen: Danish Government.

14.

Danish Government (2015a) Bedre Vilkår for at Drive Virksomhed i Yder- og Landkommunerne, Copenhagen: Danish Government.

15.

Danish Government (2015b) Bedre Vilkår for at Bo og Arbejde i Yder- og Landkommunerne, Copenhagen: Danish Government.

16.

Danish Government (2015c) Vækst of Udvikling i hele Denmark, Copenhagen: Danish Government.

17.

Danish Planning Act (2016) Forslag til Lov om ændring af lov om planlægning. Copenhagen: Danish Government.

18.

Dannestam

(2008) Rethinking local politics: Towards a cultural political economy of entrepreneurial cities. Space and Polity 12: 353–372.

19.

European Commission (1997) The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

20.

Fainstein

(1991) Promoting economic development: Urban planning in the United States and Great Britain. Journal of the American Planning Association 57: 22–33.

21.

Falleth

Saglie

(2011) Democracy or efficiency: Contradictory national guidelines in urban planning in Norway. Urban Research & Practice 4: 58–71.

22.

Fisker

Finke

Hjalager

(2015) Erhvervsmæssige Potentialer i Landistrikterne med Planloven som Medspiller. Anayse af eksempler fra tre kommuner, Esbjerg: Danish Centre for Rural Research, University of Southern Denmark.

23.

Grange

(2013) Shaping acting space: In search of a new political awareness among local authority planners. Planning Theory 12: 225–243.

24.

Grønt Miljø (2015) Loven skal give bedre mening. Grønt Miljø 1: 16–17.

25.

Gunder

(2016) Planning’s “failure” to ensure efficient market delivery: A Lacanian deconstruction of this neoliberal scapegoating fantasy. European Planning Studies 24: 21–38.

26.

Gunn

Hillier

(2014) When uncertainty is interpreted as risk: An analysis of tensions relating to spatial planning reform in England. Planning Practice & Research 29: 56–74.

27.

Hajer

(1995) The Politics of Environmental Discourse, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

28.

Hajer

(2005) Coalitions, practices, and meaning in environmental politics: From acid rain to BSE. In: Howarth

Torfing

(eds) Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 297–315.

29.

Hajer

Versteeg

(2005) A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 7: 175–184.

30.

Harvey

(1989) From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler B 71: 3–17.

31.

Allmendinger

Haughton

(2016) Think tanks and the pressures for planning reform in England. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 34: 1676–1692.

32.

Haughton

Allmendinger

Counsell

et al. (2010) The New Spatial Planning: Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

33.

Inch

(2010) Culture change as identity regulation: The micro-politics of producing spatial planners in England. Planning Theory & Practice 11: 359–374.

34.

Inch

(2012) Deconstructing spatial planning: Re-interpreting the articulation of a new ethos for English local planning. European Planning Studies 20: 1039–1057.

35.

Information (2015) Vi skal investerer i landområder. Information, 3–4 January.

36.

Jensen

(2007) Culture stories: Understanding cultural urban branding. Planning Theory 6: 211–236.

37.

Jørgensen

Kjærsdam

Nielsen

(1997) A plan of hope and glory: An example of development planning in Denmark after Maastricht. In: Healey

Khakee

Motte

et al. (eds) Making Strategic Spatial Plans: Innovation in Europe, London: UCL Press, pp. 39–58.

38.

Jyllandsposten (2011) Livslang kamp for mere liv på landet. Jyllandsposten, 14 May.

39.

Jyllandsposten (2013) Flertal smækker døren i for en Bilka i Randers. Jyllandsposten, 20 March.

40.

Jyllandsposten (2014) Både by og land kæmper mod planloven. Jyllandsposten, 10 September.

41.

Klosterman

(1985) Arguments for and against planning. Town Planning Review 1: 5–20.

42.

Local Government Denmark (2014a) Barrierer for Vækst i den Fysiske Planlægning, memorandum 12 May 2014. Copenhagen: Local Government Denmark.

43.

Local Government Denmark (2014b) Borgmestre i oprør mod planlov. Momentum 16.

44.

Local Government Denmark (2015) Danmark i Vækst og Balance – 32 Konkrete Løsningsforslag for den Fysiske Planlægning, Copenhagen: Local Government Denmark.

45.

Lord

Tewdwr-Jones

(2014) Is planning “under attack”? Chronicling the deregulation of urban and environmental planning in England. European Planning Studies 22: 345–361.

46.

Lund Hansen

Andersen

Clark

(2001) Creative Copenhagen: Globalization, urban governance and social change. European Planning Studies 9: 851–869.

47.

Mäntysalo

Jarenko

Nilsson

et al. (2015) Legitimacy of informal strategic urban planning – Observations from Finland, Sweden and Norway. European Planning Studies 23: 349–366.

48.

Ministry of Business and Growth (2015) Et Løft af Kyst- og Naturturisme i Danmark, press release 30 October 2015. Copenhagen: Ministry of Business and Growth.

49.

Ministry of the Environment (2007) Spatial Planning in Denmark, Copenhagen: Ministry of the Environment.

50.

Ministry of the Environment (2010) Danmark i Balance i en Global Verden – Eksempelsamling, Copenhagen: Ministry of the Environment.

51.

Ministry of the Environment (2012) Notat om Lovforslag til Ændring af Planloven – Nye Muligheder i Landdistrikterne, memorandum 15 November 2012. Copenhagen: Ministry of the Environment.

52.

Ministry of the Environment (2014a) Kommissorium for Analyse af Planloven, mandate 16 September 2014. Copenhagen: Ministry of the Environment.

53.

Ministry of the Environment (2014b) Brosbøl: Kystkommuner Skal Tænke Stort, press release 18 September 2014. Copenhagen: Ministry of the Environment.

54.

Ministry of the Environment (2015) Fakta om Lempelser i Planloven, memorandum 07 May 2015. Copenhagen: Ministry of the Environment.

55.

Næss

(2009) Nyliberalisme i byplanlægningen. In: Lundkvist

(ed.) Dansk Nyliberalisme, Copenhagen: Frydenlund, pp. 213–242.

56.

Olesen

(2012) Soft spaces as vehicles for neoliberal transformations of strategic spatial planning? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 30: 910–923.

57.

Olesen

(2014) The neoliberalisation of strategic spatial planning. Planning Theory 13: 288–303.

58.

Olesen

Richardson

(2012) Strategic planning in transition: Contested rationalities and logics in twenty-first century Danish planning experiments. European Planning Studies 20: 1689–1706.

59.

Peck

Tickell

(2002) Neoliberalizing space. In: Brenner

Theodore

(eds) Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 33–57.

60.

Politiken (2011) Kun få kommuner vil bygge ved kysterne. Politiken, 11 July.

61.

Politiken (2013) Ryd op i unødig regulering. Politiken, 31 May.

62.

Productivity Commission (2013) Konkurrence, Internationalisering og Regulering. Analyserapport 2, Copenhagen: Productivity Commission.

63.

Productivity Commission (2014) Det Handler om Velstand og Velfærd. Slutrapport, Copenhagen: Productivity Commission.

64.

Richardson

Jensen

(2003) Linking discourse and space: Towards a cultural sociology of space in analysing spatial policy discourse. Urban Studies 40: 7–22.

65.

Roodbol-Mekkes

van den Brink

(2015) Rescaling spatial planning: Spatial planning reforms in Denmark, England, and the Netherlands. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 33: 184–198.

66.

Schön

Rein

(1994) Frame Reflection: Towards the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies, New York: Basic Books.

67.

Theodore

Peck

Brenner

(2011) Neoliberal urbanism: Cities and the rule of markets. In: Bridge

Watson

(eds) The New Blackwell Companion to the City, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 15–25.

68.

Throgmorton

(1993) Planning as a rhetorical activity: Survey research as a trope in arguments about electric power planning in Chicago. Journal of the American Planning Association 9: 334–346.

69.

Waterhout

Othengrafen

Sykes

(2013) Neo-liberalization processes and spatial planning in France, Germany, and the Netherlands: An exploration. Planning Practice & Research 28: 141–159.