BatageljVMrvarA (1998) Pajek – Program for large network analysis. Connections21(2): 47–57.
2.
BeisheimMCampeS (2012) Transnational public–private partnerships’ performance in water governance: Institutional design matters. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy30(4): 627–642.
3.
da CruzNFSimõesPMarquesRC (2013) The hurdles of local governments with PPP contracts in the waste sector. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy31(2): 292–307.
4.
De NooyWMrvarABatageljV (2011) Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek, New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
EdlerJGeorghiouL (2007) Public procurement and innovation – Resurrecting the demand side. Research Policy36(7): 949–963.
6.
EdquistCVonortasNSZabala-IturriagagoitiaJMet al. (2015) Public Procurement for Innovation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
7.
EdquistCZabala-IturriagagoitiaJM (2012) Public procurement for innovation as mission-oriented innovation policy. Research Policy41(10): 1757–1769.
8.
Foray D, Goddard J, Beldarrain XG, et al. (2012) Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisations (RIS 3). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
9.
FreemanL (1977) A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness. Sociometry40: 35–41.
10.
GrimseyDLewisM (2007) Public Private Partnerships: The Worldwide Revolution in Infrastructure Provision and Project Finance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
11.
Hodge GA, Greve C and Boardman AE (eds) (2010) International Handbook on Public-Private Partnerships. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
12.
KeYWangSChanAPet al. (2009) Research trend of public-private partnership in construction journals. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management135(10): 1076–1086.
13.
KlijnEHKoppenjanJFM (2000) Public management and policy networks: Foundations of a network approach to governance. Public Management an International Journal of Research and Theory2(2): 135–158.
14.
KlijnEHKoppenjanJFM (2016) The shift toward network governance: Drivers, characteristics and manifestations. In: Van de WalleSGroeneveldS (eds) Theory and Practice of Public Sector Reform, London: Routledge, pp. 158–177.
15.
KortMBVerweySKlijnEH (2016) In search for effective public-private partnerships: An assessment of the impact of organizational form and managerial strategies in urban regeneration partnerships using fsQCA. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy34(5): 777–794.
16.
MarsilioMCappellaroGCuccurulloC (2011) The intellectual structure of research into PPPs: A bibliometric analysis. Public Management Review13(6): 763–782.
17.
PrykeSD (2004) Analysing construction project coalitions: Exploring the application of social network analysis. Construction Management and Economics22: 787–797.
18.
PrykeSD (2005) Towards a social network theory of project governance. Construction Management and Economics23(9): 927–939.
19.
PrykeSD (2012) Social Network Analysis in Construction, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
20.
ReevesE (2013) The not so good, the bad and the ugly: Over twelve years of PPP in Ireland. Local Government Studies39(3): 375–395.
21.
ReganMSmithJLoveP (2011) Infrastructure procurement: Learning from private-public partnership experiences ‘Down Under’. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy29(2): 363–378.
22.
RobertsDJSiemiatyckiM (2015) Fostering meaningful partnerships in public-private partnerships: Innovations in partnership design and process management to create value. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy33(4): 780–793.
23.
RoumboutsosASaussierS (2014) Public-private partnerships and investments in innovation: The influence of the contractual arrangement. Construction Management and Economics32(4): 349–361.
24.
SiemiatyckiM (2015) Public-private partnerships in Canada: Reflections on twenty years of practice. Canadian Public Administration58(3): 343–362.
25.
SabidussiG (1966) The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika31: 581–603.