At a time where neighbourhood ties seem to be declining, society’s expectations remain high that such local relations can be mobilized to manage a range of social issues. From a policy perspective, can the neighbourhood do more? Analyzing five waves of pooled cross-sectional data from Singapore between 2001 and 2009, we observe significant variations in neighbouring activity across residential contexts (e.g. public vs. private) as well as across time. By using the exceptional case of Singapore (small country, strong administrative capacity and high levels of public housing ownership), our study highlights the importance of public housing allocation and provision policies in fostering higher rates of neighbouring and neighbourly sentiments (compared to private housing estates); the positive connection between neighbourhood sentiment and national sentiment; and the sustainability of such effects over time.
AllenJCarsG (2001) Multiculturalism and governing neighbourhoods. Urban Studies38: 2195–2209.
3.
BaileyNPillM (2015) Can the state empower communities through localism? An evaluation of recent approaches to neighbourhood governance in England. Environment and Planning C33: 289–304.
4.
Beaumont J (2008) Faith action on urban social issues. Urban Studies 45: 2019–2034.
5.
BoltGvan KempenR (2013) Introduction Special Issue: Mixing neighbourhoods: Success or failure. Cities35: 391–396.
6.
BoonstraB (2016) Mapping trajectories of becoming: Four forms of behaviour in co-housing initiatives. Town Planning Review87: 275–296.
7.
Chua BH (1997) Communitarian Ideology and Democracy in Singapore. London: Routledge.
8.
ChuaBHTanJE (1999) Singapore: Where the new middle class sets the standard. In: PinchesM (ed.) Culture and Privilege in Capitalist Asia, London: Routledge, pp. 138–159.
9.
ColeIGoodchildB (2001) Social mix and the ‘balanced community’ in British housing policy – A tale of two epochs. Geojournal51: 351–360.
10.
CséfalvayZWebsterC (2012) Gates or no gates? A cross-European enquiry into the driving forces behind gated communities. Regional Studies46: 293–308.
11.
Fallov MA (2010) Community capacity building as the route to inclusion in neighbourhood regeneration? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 34: 789–804.
GohR (2005) Contours of Culture: Space and Social Difference in Singapore, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
14.
Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–1380.
15.
GrantJMittelsteadtL (2004) Types of gated communities. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design31: 913–930.
16.
GuestAWierzbickiS (1999) Social ties at the neighbourhood level: Two decades of GSS evidence. Urban Affairs Review35: 92–111.
17.
HageG (1996) The spatial imaginary of national practices: Dwelling-domesticating/being-exterminating. Environment and Planning D14: 463–485.
18.
Healey P (2006) Transforming governance: Challenges of institutional adaptation and a new politics of space. European Planning Studies 14: 299–320.
19.
HeineltHKüblerD (2005) Governance – Capacity, democracy and the dynamic of places. In: HeineltHKüblerD (eds) Metropolitan Governance: Capacity, Democracy and the Dynamics of Place, London: Routledge.
20.
HenningCLiebergM (1996) Strong ties or weak ties? Neighbourhood networks in a new perspective. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research13: 3–26.
HullRBLamMVigoG (1994) Place identity: Symbols of self in the urban fabric. Landscape and Urban Planning28: 109–120.
23.
KährikA (2006) Tackling social exclusion in European neighbourhoods: Experiences and lessons from the NEHOM project. Geojournal67: 9–25.
24.
KennettPForrestR (2006) The neighbourhood in a European context. Urban Studies43: 713–718.
25.
LaiAE (1995) Meanings of Multiethnicity: A Case Study of Ethnicity and Ethnic Relations in Singapore, New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
LaurierEWhyteABucknerK (2002) Neighbouring as an occasioned activity: Finding a lost cat. Space and Culture5: 346–367.
27.
MadanipourA (2001) How relevant is ‘planning by neighbourhoods’ today?Town Planning Review72: 171–191.
28.
MannPH (1954) The concept of neighborliness. American Journal of Sociology60: 163–168.
29.
MeeganRMitchellA (2001) ‘Its not community round here, its neighbourhood’: Neighbourhood change and cohesion in urban regeneration policies. Urban Studies38: 2167–2194.
30.
PhillipsonCBernardMPhillipsJet al. (1999) Older people’s experiences of community life: Patterns of neighbouring in three urban areas. The Sociological Review47: 715–743.
31.
PowCP (2009) Public intervention, private aspiration: Gated communities and the condominisation of housing landscapes in Singapore. Asia Pacific Viewpoint50: 215–227.
32.
PowCP (2011) Living it up: Super-rich enclave and transnational elite urbanism in Singapore. Geoforum42: 382–393.
33.
RainieLWellmanB (2012) Networked: The New Social Operating System, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
ReadBL (2012) Roots of the State: Neighborhood Organization and Social Networks in Beijing and Taipei, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
35.
RuiuML (2014) Differences between cohousing and gated communities. A literature review. Sociological Inquiry84: 316–335.
36.
RuiuML (2016) The social capital of cohousing communities. Sociology50: 400–415.
37.
ScanlonKFernández ArrigoitiaMWhiteheadCM (2015) Social housing in Europe. European Policy Analysis17: 1–12.
38.
SeawrightJGerringJ (2008) Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu for qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly61: 294–308.
SkeyM (2013) Why do nations matter? The struggle for belonging and security in an uncertain world. British Journal of Sociology64: 81–98.
42.
SmetsP (2011) Community development in contemporary ethnic-pluriform neighbourhoods: A critical look at social mixing. Community Development Journal46: ii15–ii32.
WaltonJ (1992) Making the theoretical case. In: RaginCBeckerH (eds) What is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 121–138.
47.
WooldridgeJ (2013) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 5th ed. Cincinnati, OH: South Western, Cengage Learning.
48.
WuF (2010) Gated and packaged suburbia: Packaging and branding Chinese suburban residential development. Cities27: 385–396.
49.
YoungAFRussellAPowersJR (2004) The sense of belonging to a neighbourhood: Can it be measured and is it related to health and well being in older women?Social Science and Medicine59: 2627–2637.
50.
ZhuYFuQ (2017) Deciphering the civic virtue of communal space: Neighborhood attachment, social capital, and neighborhood participation in urban China. Environment and Behavior49: 161–191.
