ArangurenM-JMagroEWilsonJR (2017) Regional competitiveness policy in an era of smart specialisation strategies. In: HugginsRThompsonP (eds) Handbook of Regions and Competitiveness, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 546–564.
2.
Baumgartner FR and Jones BD (2010) Agendas and Instability in American Politics. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
BennettCJHowlettM (1992) The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Science25: 275–294.
4.
BorrásS (2011) Policy learning and organizational capacities in innovation policies. Science and Public Policy38: 725–734.
5.
BulkeleyH (2000) Discourse coalitions and the Australian climate change policy network. Environment and Planning C18: 727–748.
6.
CookeP (1992) Regional innovation systems: Competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum23(3): 365–382.
7.
CookeP (1998) Introduction: Origins of the concept. In: BraczykH-JCookePHeidenreichM (eds) Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governances in a Globalized World, London, UK: UCL Press, pp. 2–27.
8.
CookeP (2004) Evolution of regional innovation systems – Emergence, theory, challenge for action. In: CookePHeidenreichMBraczykH-J (eds) Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governances in a Globalized World, 2nd ed. Abingdon, UK and New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 1–18.
9.
DawleyS (2014) Creating new paths? Offshore wind, policy activism, and peripheral region development. Economic Geography90(1): 91–112.
10.
EbbekinkMLagendijkA (2013) What’s next in researching cluster policy: Place-based governance for effective cluster policy. European Planning Studies21: 735–753.
11.
EssletzbichlerJ (2012) Evolutionary economic geographies. In: BarnesTPeckJSheppardE (eds) The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Economic Geography, Chichester, Cheltenham: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 183–198.
12.
European Commission (2012) Guide for Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialization (RIS3), Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
13.
FagerbergJ (2017) Innovation policy: Rationales, lessons and challenges. Journal of Economic Surveys31(2): 369–659.
14.
FlanaganKUyarraE (2016) Four dangers in innovation policy studies – And how to avoid them. Industry and Innovation23(2): 177–188.
15.
FlanaganKUyarraELaranjaM (2011) Reconceptualising the “policy mix” for innovation. Research Policy40: 702–713.
16.
ForayD (2014) Smart Specialisation: Opportunities and Challenges for Regional Innovation Policy, Abingdon, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.
17.
ForbesT (2012) Institutional entrepreneurship in hostile settings: Health and social care partnerships in Scotland, 2002–05. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy30(6): 1100–1115.
18.
Garud R and Karnøe, P (2001) Path creation as a process of mindful deviation. In: Garud R and Karnøe P (eds) Path Dependence and Creation. London: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 1–38.
19.
GertlerMS (2010) Rules of the game: The place of institutions in regional economic change. Regional Studies44: 1–15.
20.
HassinkRLagendijkA (2001) The dilemmas of interregional institutional learning. Environment and Planning C19: 65–84.
21.
KarnøePGarudR (2012) Path creation: Co-creation of heterogeneous resources in the emergence of the Danish Wind Turbine Cluster. European Planning Studies20: 733–752.
22.
KayA (2006) The Dynamics of Public Policy: Theory and Evidence, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
23.
KernF (2011) Ideas, institutions, and interests: Explaining policy divergence in fostering “system innovations” towards sustainability. Environment and Planning C29: 1116–1134.
24.
KingdonJW (1984) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, New York: Harper Collins.
25.
LanahanLFeldmanMP (2015) Multilevel innovation policy mix: A closer look at state policies that augment the federal SBIR program. Research Policy44: 1387–1402.
26.
LaranjaMUyarraEFlanaganK (2008) Policies for science, technology and innovation: Translating rationales into regional policies in a multi-level setting. Research Policy37: 823–835.
27.
LundvallBA (1992) National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London, UK and New York, NY: Pinter.
28.
Maskell P and Malmberg A (2007) Myopia, knowledge development and cluster evolution. Journal of Economic Geography 7(5): 603–618.
29.
McCannP (2015) The Regional and Urban Policy of the European Union: Cohesion, Results-Orientation and Smart Specialisation, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
30.
MagroENavarroMZabala-IturriagagoitiaJM (2014) Coordination-mix: The hidden face of STI policy. Review of Policy Research31(5): 367–389.
31.
MagroEWilsonJR (2013) Complex innovation policy systems: Towards an evaluation mix. Research Policy42: 1647–1656.
32.
MartinB. R. (2016) R&D policy instruments – A critical review of what we do and don’t know. Industry and Innovation23(2): 157–176.
33.
MastroeniMTaitJRosielloA (2013) Regional innovation policies in a globally connected environment. Science and Public Policy40: 8–16.
34.
MytelkaLKSmithK (2002) Policy learning and innovation theory: An interactive and co-evolving process. Research Policy31(8–9): 1467–1479.
35.
NelsonR (1993) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford, UK and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
36.
PerkmannM (2007) Policy entrepreneurship and multi-level governance: A comparative study of European Cross-Border Regions. Environment and Planning C25: 861–879.
37.
PorterME (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations, London, UK and New York, NY: MacMillan and Free Press.
38.
PorterME (1998) Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review76(6): 77–91.
39.
PorterME (2003) The performance of regions. Regional Studies37(6/7): 549–578.
40.
PorterME (2008) On Competition, Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
41.
SimmieJ (2012) Path dependence and new technological path creation in the Danish Wind Power Industry. European Planning Studies20: 753–772.
42.
SmithA (2000) Policy networks and advocacy coalitions: Explaining policy change and stability in UK industrial pollution policy?Environment and Planning C18: 95–114.
43.
SotarautaM (2012) Policy learning and the “cluster-flavoured innovation policy” in Finland. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy30: 780–795.
44.
SotarautaMMustikkamäkiN (2015) Institutional entrepreneurship, power, and knowledge in innovation systems: Institutionalization of regenerative medicine in Tampere, Finland. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy33(2): 342–357.
45.
SotarautaMPulkkinenR (2011) Institutional entrepreneurship for knowledge regions: In search of a fresh set of questions for regional innovation studies. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy29: 96–112.
46.
SteenM (2015) Reconsidering path creation in economic geography: Aspects of agency, temporality and methods. European Planning Studies24(9): 1605–1622.
47.
SternbergRKieseMStockingerD (2010) Cluster policies in the US and Germany: Varieties of capitalism perspective on two high-tech states. Environment and Planning C28: 1063–1082.
48.
Streeck W and Thelen K (eds) (2005) Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49.
TomaneyJMarquesP (2013) Evidence, policy, and the politics of regional development: The case of high-speed rail in the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning C31: 414–427.
50.
UyarraEFlanaganK (2010) From regional systems of innovation to regions as innovation policy spaces. Environment and Planning C28: 681–695.
51.
UyarraEFlanaganK (2013) Reframing regional innovation systems: Evolution, complexity and public policy. In: CookeP (eds) Re-Framing Regional Development: Evolution, Innovation and Transition, London: Routledge.