This work analyzes an unsteady triple-diffusive nanofluid flow on a spinning sphere under the influence of a time-dependent magnetic field and Hall current. Liquid hydrogen (H2(l)) and ammonia (NH3) are considered as diffusive species to model practical cryogenic and chemical applications. The classical Fourier and Fick laws are generalized through the Cattaneo–Christov model, and the resulting nonlinear equations are solved using a similarity transformation and the bvp4c method in MATLAB. The Taguchi method is applied to optimize heat transfer performance. Results demonstrate that raising the magnetic parameter accelerates velocity in the x-direction but decelerates it in the z-direction, with the Hall current compounding these effects. The rotation parameter promotes thermal diffusion, causing faster cooling of the fluid. The ANOVA results show that the magnetic parameter M has a dominant impact (92.43%) to heat transmission whereas the thermal relaxation parameter βT has a minimal effect (0.04%). These findings highlight crucial control factors for optimizing magnetohydrodynamic nanofluid systems used in cryogenic, reactor and biomedical cooling applications.
HussainSMehmoodKSagheerM, et al. Numerical simulation of double diffusive mixed convective nanofluid flow and entropy generation in a square porous enclosure. Int J Heat Mass Transf2018; 122: 1283–1297.
2.
DasKChakrabortyTKunduPK.Lie group transformation for double-diffusive free convection nanofluid flow over an inclined plane. Proc Natl Acad Sci India A Phys Sci2019; 89: 387–396.
3.
PatilPMShashikantAHiremathPS.Influence of liquid hydrogen and nitrogen on MHD triple diffusive mixed convection nanoliquid flow in presence of surface roughness. Int J Hydrogen Energy2018; 43: 20101–20117.
4.
UmavathiJCAliHMPatilSL.Triple diffusive mixed convection flow in a duct using convective boundary conditions. Math Methods Appl Sci2020; 43: 9223–9244.
5.
DeebaniWRazaJLundLA, et al. Optimization and sensitivity analysis of heat transfer rate of tri-hybrid nanofluid of stagnation point flow. J Algorithms Comput Technol2025; 19: 1–16.
6.
PatilPMKulkarniM.Analysis of periodic magnetohydrodynamics effects on triple diffusive nonlinear mixed convective flow of Eyring–Powell nanoliquid. Asia-Pac J Chem Eng2023; 18(1): 2844.
7.
GhachemKKhanSUSafraI, et al. Modeling and analysis of the triple diffusion unsteady flow of couple stress nanofluid with variable viscosity and distinct thermal sources. AIP Adv2024; 14: 045223.
8.
MondalPMahapatraTRParveenR.Entropy generation in nanofluid flow due to double diffusive MHD mixed convection. Heliyon2021; 7: e06143.
9.
ShutaywiMRazaJAbualnajaKM, et al. Integrated Taguchi–GRA–PCA for optimizing the heat transfer performance of trihybrid Casson nanofluid flow over stretching sheet with quadratic velocity. J Radiat Res Appl Sci2025; 18: 101570.
10.
StokesGG. On the theories of the internal friction of fluids in motion, and of the equilibrium and motion of elastic solids. In: WhiteRE (ed.) Classics of elastic wave theory. 3rd ed.Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 1845, pp. 125–162.
11.
AnilkumarDRoyS.Self-similar solution of the unsteady mixed convection flow in the stagnation point region of a rotating sphere. Heat Mass Transf2004; 40: 487–493.
12.
El-ShaarawiMAIAhmadNTKodakZ.Mixed convection about a rotating sphere in an axial stream. Numer Heat Transf A Appl1990; 18: 71–93.
13.
MalvandiA.The unsteady flow of a nanofluid in the stagnation point region of a time-dependent rotating sphere. Therm Sci2015; 19: 1603–1612.
14.
KumarADashAPRayAK, et al. Unsteady mixed convective flow of hybrid nanofluid past a rotating sphere with heat generation/absorption: an impact of shape factor. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow2023; 33: 3691–3715.
15.
RazaJAshfaqA.Optimization of heat transfer in two-phased nanofluid flow over a biaxial sheet using Taguchi–GRA method. Multiscale Multidiscip Model Exp Des2025; 8: 124.
16.
GulTAliBAlghamdiW, et al. Mixed convection stagnation point flow of the blood based hybrid nanofluid around a rotating sphere. Sci Rep2021; 11: 7460.
17.
AlharbiKAMBilalMAliA, et al. Stagnation point flow of hybrid nanofluid flow passing over a rotating sphere subjected to thermophoretic diffusion and thermal radiation. Sci Rep2023; 13: 19093.
18.
AliBAliMSamanI, et al. Tangent hyperbolic nanofluid: significance of Lorentz and buoyancy forces on dynamics of bioconvection flow of rotating sphere via finite element simulation. Chin J Phys2022; 77: 658–671.
19.
PatilPMBenawadiSShankerB.Influence of mixed convection nanofluid flow over a rotating sphere in the presence of diffusion of liquid hydrogen and ammonia. Math Comput Simul2022; 194: 764–781.
20.
ShutaywiMRazaJLundLA, et al. Optimization of heat transfer in a channel with stretching walls using a magnetized tetra-hybrid nanofluid. Adv Mech Eng2024; 16: 1–19.
21.
AjithkumarMLakshminarayanaPVajraveluK. Diffusion effects on mixed convective peristaltic flow of a bi-viscous Bingham nanofluid through a porous medium with convective boundary conditions. Phys Fluids; 35: 032008.
22.
FourierJBJ. Théorie analytique de la chaleur. F. Didot, 1822.
23.
CattaneoC.Sulla Conduzione del Calore. Atti Sem Mat Fis Univ Modena1948; 3: 83–101.
24.
ChristovCI.On frame indifferent formulation of the Maxwell–Cattaneo model of finite-speed heat conduction. Mech Res Commun2009; 36: 481–486.
25.
NegiSRawatSKKumarM.Cattaneo–Christov double-diffusion model with Stefan blowing effect on copper–water nanofluid flow over a stretching surface. Heat Transf2021; 50: 5485–5515.
26.
KunduPKChakrabortyTDasK.Framing the Cattaneo–Christov heat flux phenomena on CNT-based Maxwell nanofluid along stretching sheet with multiple slips. Arab J Sci Eng2018; 43: 1177–1188.
27.
ReddyMVVajraveluKAjithkumarM, et al. Numerical treatment of entropy generation in convective MHD Williamson nanofluid flow with Cattaneo–Christov heat flux and suction/injection. Int J Model Simul2024; 15: 1–18.
28.
Ali MadkhaliHHaneefMEl-ShafayAS, et al. Mixed convective transport in Maxwell hybrid nano-fluid under generalized Fourier and Fick laws. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf2022; 130: 105714.
29.
WaseemMJawadMNaeemS, et al. Regression analysis of Cattaneo–Christov heat and thermal radiation on 3D Darcy flow of Non-Newtonian fluids induced by stretchable sheet. Case Stud Therm Eng2024; 61: 104959.
30.
ChakrabortyTMajumderSKunduPK.Generalized aspects of Fourier’s and Fick’s laws through Cattaneo–Christov model on nanofluid flow with multiple convective conditions and chemical reaction: a statistical approach. Eur Phys J Plus2024; 139: 484.
31.
SarfrazMKhanM.Cattaneo–Christov double diffusion based heat transport analysis for nanofluid flows induced by a moving plate. Numer Heat Transf A Appl2024; 85: 351–363.
32.
SagheerMSajidZHussainS, et al. Cattaneo–Christov double diffusion model for the entropy analysis of a non-Darcian MHD Williamson nanofluid. Numer Heat Transf A Appl2024; 85: 1–27.
33.
Punith GowdaRJNaveen KumarRKumarR, et al. Three-dimensional coupled flow and heat transfer in non-newtonian magnetic nanofluid: an application of Cattaneo–Christov heat flux model. J Magn Magn Mater2023; 567: 170329.
34.
Vinodkumar ReddyMSucharithaGVajraveluK, et al. Convective flow of MHD non-Newtonian nanofluids on a chemically reacting porous sheet with Cattaneo–Christov double diffusion. Waves Random Complex Media2025; 35: 10215–10234.
35.
WaseemMAlgehyneEAAl-AtawiNO, et al. Non-similar analysis of suction/injection and Cattaneo–Christov model in 3D viscoelastic non-Newtonian fluids flow due to Riga plate: a biological applications. Alex Eng J2024; 103: 121–136.
36.
AlgehyneEAAlamraniFMSeadaMM, et al. Influence of Cattaneo–Christov heat and mass flux model on water-based hybrid nanofluid flow past a stretching surface with multiple slip conditions. J Radiat Res Appl Sci2025; 18: 101794.
37.
HallE.University and Educational Intelligence. Nature1880; 21: 361–361.
38.
KrishnaMVAnandPVSChamkhaAJ.Heat and mass transfer on free convective flow of a micropolar fluid through a porous surface with inclined magnetic field and Hall effects. Spec Top Rev Porous Media2019; 10: 203–223.
39.
AjithkumarMLakshminarayanaPSucharithaG, et al. Investigation of convective peristaltic flow of non-Newtonian fluids through a non-uniform tapered porous conduit with Ohmic heating and viscous dissipation. Int J Model Simul2024; 22: 1–14.
40.
AcharyaNBagRKunduPK.Influence of Hall current on radiative nanofluid flow over a spinning disk: a hybrid approach. Phys E Low Dimens Syst Nanostruct2019; 111: 103–112.
41.
RazaJMustafaFLundLA, et al. Optimization of heat transfer rate of trihybrid nanofluid embedded between two horizontal coaxial cylinders by RSM. Case Stud Therm Eng2024; 60: 104637.
42.
RazaJLundLAAshrafH, et al. Fuzzy TOPSIS optimization of MHD trihybrid nanofluid in heat pipes. Case Stud Therm Eng2024; 64: 105493.
43.
ElattarSHelmiMMElkotbMA, et al. Computational assessment of hybrid nanofluid flow with the influence of Hall current and chemical reaction over a slender stretching surface. Alex Eng J2022; 61: 10319–10331.
44.
ElsaidEMAlShurafatKS.Impact of Hall current and Joule heating on a rotating hybrid nanofluid over a stretched plate with nonlinear thermal radiation. J Nanofluids2023; 12: 548–556.
45.
AliJRamzanMSaleelCA, et al. Significance of Hall current and Ion slip in a three-dimensional Maxwell nanofluid flow over rotating disk with variable characteristics and gyrotactic microorganisms. Numer Heat Transf B Fundam2024; 85: 587–603.
46.
AliBJubairSMahmoodZ, et al. Analysis of unsteady MHD fluid flow across two parallel discs with uniform fluctuation subject to modified Hall and activation energy. Int J Mod Phys B2024; 38(31): 241.
47.
AcharyaNDasKKumar KunduP.Fabrication of active and passive controls of nanoparticles of unsteady nanofluid flow from a spinning body using HPM. Eur Phys J Plus2017; 132: 323.
48.
GamachuDIbrahimWBijigaLK.Nonlinear convection unsteady flow of electro-magnetohydrodynamic Sutterby hybrid nanofluid in the stagnation zone of a spinning sphere. Results Phys2023; 49: 106498.
49.
DasSTarafdarBSarkarBC, et al. Rotational magneto-hydrodynamic Couette flow of nanofluids with Hall effects. J Nanofluids2019; 8: 604–619.
50.
DehnadK.Quality control, robust design, and the Taguchi method. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
51.
BementTR. Taguchi techniques for quality engineering. Technometrics1989; 31(2): 253–255.
52.
RanaPGuptaG.Heat transfer optimization of Marangoni convective flow of nanofluid over an infinite disk with Stefan blowing and slip effects using Taguchi method. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf2022; 130: 105822.
53.
OlagunjuDO. Local similarity solutions for boundary layer flow of a FENE-P fluid. Appl Math Comput2006; 173: 593–602.
54.
RahmanMM. Locally similar solutions for hydromagnetic and thermal slip flow boundary layers over a flat plate with variable fluid properties and convective surface boundary condition. Meccanica2011; 46: 1127–1143.
