Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Implementation of numerical strategy and neural networking paradigm to inspect ternary nanofluid flow over a radiated paraboloid surface with Arrhenius activation energy: A comparative study
Remarkable advantages of the newly introduced composition of nanoparticles by combining three distinctively natural nanometric-sized particles have been demonstrated to improve the energy efficiency of the advanced mechanisms. Some diversified and effective utilizations of the currently conducted exploration have been noticed in thermal exchange systems, solar and power plants, material engineering, manufacturing and metallic extrusion procedures, renewable energy resources, and many more. Subsequently, this work involved an innovative domain called the paraboloid surface, on which a very small number of studies have commenced. Therefore, the primary motive for articulating this effort is to envision the hydrothermal and mass attributes of a viscous base liquid characterized by ethylene glycol (C2H6O2) with a suspension of aluminum oxide (Al2O3), cobalt iron oxide (CoFe2O4), and titanium oxide (TiO2). The significance of magnetic field improvisation, along with the radiative flux and activation energy, are also examined. The leading mathematical model is based on a partial differential system involving the thermophysical characteristics of dispersed particles. A set of similar variables is chosen to transmuted the fundamental expressions into a dimensionless ordinary differential structure. The attained set of dimensionless ODEs is resolved numerically by executing computations based on shooting and RK procedures using a MATLAB-based code. The results are extracted in a comparative form to inspect the performance of ternary nanoparticle induction over mono and hybrid compositions. The momentum, thermal, and concentration distributions are sketched in a graphical version, and in comparison, the format against the involved parameters. The prediction of outcomes for the associated quantities was evaluated using a backpropagated ANN strategy. The fit of the data was also confirmed by presenting regression plots. From the insight of the calculated outcomes, it is revealed that the heat flux coefficient and skin friction factors increased with the addition of ternary nanoparticles, irrespective of the change in parameters. Furthermore, the skin friction factor escalates up to 49% with the magnetic field effect compared to its absence. Increment in the magnitude of heat flux coefficient up to 5% is perceived in the occurrence of radiation effect, while heat flux coefficient diminishes up to 23% with heat generation/absorption.
PrandtlL.über Flüssigkeitsbewegung bei sehr kleiner Reibung. Verhandlungen des III. Internationalen Mathematiker Kongresses, Heidelberg, 8-13 August1904.
2.
CortellR.Effects of viscous dissipation and work done by deformation on the MHD flow and heat transfer of a viscoelastic fluid over a stretching sheet. Phys Lett A2006; 357: 298–305.
3.
AliME.On thermal boundary layer on a power-law stretched surface with suction or injection. Int J Heat Fluid Flow1995; 16: 280–290.
4.
XuHLiaoSJ.Series solutions of unsteady magnetohydrodynamic flows of non-Newtonian fluids caused by an impulsively stretching plate. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech2005; 129: 46–55.
5.
SakiadisBC. Boundary-layer behavior on continuous solid surfaces: I. Boundary-layer equations for two-dimensional and axisymmetric flow. AIChE J1961; 7: 26–28.
6.
CebeciTBradshawP.Momentum transfer in boundary layers. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing, 1977.
7.
CebeciTBradshawP.Physical and computational aspects of convective heat transfer. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 1988.
8.
GrassJA.The influence of boundary layer turbulence on the mechanics of sediment transport. In: Mechanics of sediment transport. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2020, pp.3–17.
9.
GreeneBRKralSTChilsonPB, et al. Gradient-based turbulence estimates from multicopter profiles in the Arctic stable boundary layer. Bound-Layer Meteorol2022; 183: 321–353.
10.
TongC.Boundary layer thickness and friction velocity by symmetry arguments. Phys Rev Lett2024; 132: 204001.
11.
SalahuddinTAliZAwaisM, et al. A flow behavior of Sutterby nanofluid near the catalytic parabolic surface. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf2022; 131: 105821.
12.
KhanMSalahuddinTMalikMY, et al. Numerical modeling and analysis of bioconvection on MHD flow due to an upper paraboloid surface of revolution. Phys A Stat Mech Appl2020; 553: 124231.
13.
ReddyJVRSugunammaVSandeepN.Enhanced heat transfer in the flow of dissipative non-Newtonian Casson fluid flow over a convectively heated upper surface of a paraboloid of revolution. J Mol Liq2017; 229: 380–388.
14.
DavisRT.Numerical solution of the Navier–Stokes equations for symmetric laminar incompressible flow past a parabola. J Fluid Mech1972; 51: 417–433.
15.
MatherDJ.The motion of viscous liquid past a paraboloid. Q J Mech Appl Math1961; 14: 423–430.
16.
AbegunrinOAAnimasaunIL.Motion of Williamson fluid over an upper horizontal surface of a paraboloid of revolution due to partial slip and buoyancy: boundary layer analysis. Defect Diffus Forum2017; 378: 16–27.
17.
ZeeshanAAliZGorjiMR, et al. Flow analysis of biconvective heat and mass transfer of two-dimensional couple stress fluid over a paraboloid of revolution. Int J Mod Phys B2020; 34: 2050110.
18.
ChoiSUSEastmanJA. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles, no. ANL/MSD/CP-84938; CONF-951135-29. Argonne, IL: Argonne National Lab (ANL), 1995.
19.
BuongiornoJVenerusDCPrabhatN, et al. A benchmark study on the thermal conductivity of nanofluids. J Appl Phys2009; 106: 12–18.
20.
DanielYSAzizZAIsmailZ, et al. Slip role for unsteady MHD mixed convection of nanofluid over stretching sheet with thermal radiation and electric field. Indian J Phys2020; 94: 195–207.
21.
DanielYSAzizZAIsmailZ, et al. Stratified electromagnetohydrodynamic flow of nanofluid supporting convective role. Korean J Chem Eng2019; 36: 1021–1032.
22.
WangXQMujumdarAS.Heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids: a review. Int J Therm Sci2007; 46: 1–19.
23.
DanielYSAzizZAIsmailZ, et al. Entropy analysis in electrical magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) flow of nanofluid with effects of thermal radiation, viscous dissipation, and chemical reaction. Theor Appl Mech Lett2017; 7: 235–242.
24.
DanielYSAzizZAIsmailZ, et al. Double stratification effects on unsteady electrical MHD mixed convection flow of nanofluid with viscous dissipation and Joule heating. J Appl Res Technol2017; 15: 464–476.
25.
MurshedSMSEstelléP. A state of the art review on viscosity of nanofluids. Renew Sustain Energ Rev2017; 76: 1134–1152.
26.
DanielYSAzizZAIsmailZ, et al. Thermal stratification effects on MHD radiative flow of nanofluid over nonlinear stretching sheet with variable thickness. J Comp Des Eng2018; 5: 232–242.
27.
DanielYSAzizZAIsmailZ, et al. Effects of slip and convective conditions on MHD flow of nanofluid over a porous nonlinear stretching/shrinking sheet. Aust J Mech Eng2018; 16: 213–229.
28.
MuneeshwaranMSrinivasanGMuthukumarP, et al. Role of hybrid-nanofluid in heat transfer enhancement – a review. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf2021; 125: 105341.
29.
DanielYSAzizZAIsmailZ, et al. Impact of thermal radiation on electrical MHD flow of nanofluid over nonlinear stretching sheet with variable thickness. Alex Eng J2018; 57: 2187–2197.
30.
CoetzeeDVenkataramanMMilitkyJ, et al. Influence of nanoparticles on thermal and electrical conductivity of composites. Polymers2020; 12: 742.
31.
AcharyaNMaboodFShahzadSA, et al. Hydrothermal variations of radiative nanofluid flow by the influence of nanoparticles diameter and nanolayer. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf2022; 130: 105781.
32.
AdhikariRDasS.Biological transmission in a magnetized reactive Casson–Maxwell nanofluid over a tilted stretchy cylinder in an entropy framework. Chin J Phys2023; 86: 194–226.
33.
DasSAliA.Dynamical phenomena developed by a spiralling stretchable sheet in magnetized Casson-spinel ferrite nanofluid. Heliyon2023; 9: 52.
34.
DanielYSAzizZAIsmailZ, et al. Numerical study of entropy analysis for electrical unsteady natural magnetohydrodynamic flow of nanofluid and heat transfer. Chin J Phys2017; 55: 1821–1848.
35.
DanielYSAzizZAIsmailZ, et al. Thermal radiation on unsteady electrical MHD flow of nanofluid over stretching sheet with chemical reaction. J King Saud Univ Sci2019; 31: 804–812.
36.
DanielYSAzizZAIsmailZ, et al. Slip effects on electrical unsteady MHD natural convection flow of nanofluid over a permeable shrinking sheet with thermal radiation. Eng Lett2018; 26: 24–43.
37.
DanielYSAzizZAIsmailZ, et al. Entropy analysis of unsteady magnetohydrodynamic nanofluid over stretching sheet with electric field. Int J Multiscale Comput Eng2017; 15: 122–143.
38.
KhanduriUSharmaBKSharmaM, et al. Sensitivity analysis of electroosmotic magnetohydrodynamics fluid flow through the curved stenosis artery with thrombosis by response surface optimization. Alex Eng J2023; 75: 1–27.
39.
SharmaMSharmaBKKhanduriU, et al. Optimization of heat transfer nanofluid blood flow through a stenosed artery in the presence of Hall effect and hematocrit dependent viscosity. Case Stud Therm Eng2023; 47: 103075.
40.
KumarASharmaBKGandhiR, et al. Response surface optimization for the electromagnetohydrodynamic Cu-polyvinyl alcohol/water Jeffrey nanofluid flow with an exponential heat source. J Magn Magn Mat2023; 576: 170751.
41.
SharmaPKSharmaBKMishraNK, et al. Impact of Arrhenius activation energy on MHD nanofluid flow past a stretching sheet with exponential heat source: a modified Buongiorno’s model approach. Int J Mod Phys B2023; 37: 2350284.
42.
GandhiRSharmaBKMishraNK, et al. Computer simulations of EMHD Casson nanofluid flow of blood through an irregular stenotic permeable artery: application of Koo-Kleinstreuer-Li correlations. Nanomaterials2023; 13: 652.
43.
MishraNKSharmaMSharmaBK, et al. Soret and Dufour effects on MHD nanofluid flow of blood through a stenosed artery with variable viscosity. Int J Mod Phys B2023; 37: 2350266.
44.
SharmaBKGandhiRMishraNK, et al. Entropy generation minimization of higher-order endothermic/exothermic chemical reaction with activation energy on MHD mixed convective flow over a stretching surface. Sci Rep2022; 12: 17688.
45.
SharmaBKKumarAGandhiR, et al. Entropy generation and thermal radiation analysis of EMHD Jeffrey nanofluid flow: applications in solar energy. Nanomaterials2023; 13: 544.
46.
SharmaBKKhanduriUMishraNK, et al. Analysis of Arrhenius activation energy on magnetohydrodynamic gyrotactic microorganism flow through porous medium over an inclined stretching sheet with thermophoresis and Brownian motion. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E J Process Mech Eng2023; 237: 1900–1914.
47.
SharmaBKKhanduriUMishraNK, et al. Combined effect of thermophoresis and Brownian motion on MHD mixed convective flow over an inclined stretching surface with radiation and chemical reaction. Int J Mod Phys B2023; 37: 2350095.
48.
AlhowaityABilalMHamamH, et al. Non-Fourier energy transmission in power-law hybrid nanofluid flow over a moving sheet. Sci Rep2022; 12: 10406.
49.
PuneethVManjunathaSMakindeOD, et al. Bioconvection of a radiating hybrid nanofluid past a thin needle in the presence of heterogeneous–homogeneous chemical reaction. J Heat Transf2021; 143: 042502.
50.
ShahSAAAhammadNAElSayedMTED, et al. Bio-convection effects on Prandtl hybrid nanofluid flow with chemical reaction and motile microorganism over a stretching sheet. Nanomaterials2022; 12: 2174.
51.
ZangooeeMRHosseinzadehKGanjiDD.Hydrothermal analysis of hybrid nanofluid flow on a vertical plate by considering slip condition. Theor Appl Mech Lett2022; 12: 100357.
52.
WangJXuYPQahitiR, et al. Simulation of hybrid nanofluid flow within a microchannel heat sink considering porous media analyzing CPU stability. J Pet Sci Eng2022; 208: 109734.
53.
NadeemMSiddiqueIAwrejcewiczJ, et al. Numerical analysis of a second-grade fuzzy hybrid nanofluid flow and heat transfer over a permeable stretching/shrinking sheet. Sci Rep2022; 12: 1631.
54.
ChuYMBashirSRamzanM, et al. Model-based comparative study of magnetohydrodynamics unsteady hybrid nanofluid flow between two infinite parallel plates with particle shape effects. Math Methods Appl Sci2023; 46: 11568–11582.
55.
AliADasSJanaRN.Oblique rotational dynamics of chemically reacting tri-hybridized nanofluids over a suddenly moved plate subject to Hall and ion slip currents, Newtonian heating and mass fluxes. J Indian Chem Soc2023; 100: 100983.
56.
SharmaBKSharmaPMishraNK, et al. Bayesian regularization networks for micropolar ternary hybrid nanofluid flow of blood with homogeneous and heterogeneous reactions: entropy generation optimization. Alex Eng J2023; 77: 127–148.
57.
SharmaBKSharmaPMishraNK, et al. Darcy-Forchheimer hybrid nanofluid flow over the rotating Riga disk in the presence of chemical reaction: artificial neural network approach. Alex Eng J2023; 76: 101–130.
58.
KarmakarPDasSMahatoN, et al. Dynamics prediction using an artificial neural network for a weakly conductive ionized fluid streamed over a vibrating electromagnetic plate. Eur Phys J Plus2024; 139: 407.
59.
DasSKarmakarPSarkarS, et al. Temporal evolution of an optically dense fluid adjacent to an oscillated vertical plate with slip condition. Arch Civil Mech Eng2024; 24: 122.
60.
DasSSarkarSAliA, et al. Exploration of magnetically influenced flow dynamics of a dusty fluid induced by the ramped movement of a thermally active plate. Arch Appl Mech2024; 94: 407–433.
61.
CortellR.Fluid flow and radiative nonlinear heat transfer over a stretching sheet. J King Saud Univ Sci2014; 26: 161–167.
62.
ShehzadSAHayatTAlsaediA, et al. Nonlinear thermal radiation in three-dimensional flow of Jeffrey nanofluid: a model for solar energy. Appl Math Comput2014; 248: 273–286.
63.
DanielYSDanielSK.Effects of buoyancy and thermal radiation on MHD flow over a stretching porous sheet using homotopy analysis method. Alex Eng J2015; 54: 705–712.
64.
DanielYS.Laminar convective boundary layer slip flow over a flat plate using homotopy analysis method. J Inst Eng Ser E2016; 97: 115–121.
65.
JamshedWGoodarziMPrakashM, et al. Evaluating the unsteady Casson nanofluid over a stretching sheet with solar thermal radiation: an optimal case study. Case Stud Therm Eng2021; 26: 101160.
66.
AbbasAIjazIAshrafM, et al. Combined effects of variable density and thermal radiation on MHD Sakiadis flow. Case Stud Therm Eng2021; 28: 101640.
67.
Adnan AshrafWKhanI, et al. Thermal transport investigation and shear drag at solid–liquid interface of modified permeable radiative-SRID subject to Darcy–Forchheimer fluid flow composed by γ-nanomaterial. Sci Rep2022; 12: 3564.
68.
BejawadaSGNandeppanavarMM.Effect of thermal radiation on magnetohydrodynamics heat transfer micropolar fluid flow over a vertical moving porous plate. Exp Comput Multiph Flow2023; 5: 149–158.
69.
PatilABPatilVSHumanePP, et al. MHD-driven chemically active and thermally radiative Prandtl hybrid nanofluid flow on stretching device with Ohmic heating, dissipation, and diffusion effects. Numer Heat Transf A Appl2024; 85: 2165–2182.
70.
AkramSAtharMSaeedK, et al. Role of thermal radiation and double-diffusivity convection on peristaltic flow of induced magneto-Prandtl nanofluid with viscous dissipation and slip boundaries. J Therm Anal Calorim2024; 149: 761–776.
71.
IrfanMKhanWAKhanM, et al. Influence of Arrhenius activation energy in chemically reactive radiative flow of 3D Carreau nanofluid with nonlinear mixed convection. J Phys Chem Solids2019; 125: 141–152.
72.
AlsaadiFEUllahIHayatT, et al. Entropy generation in nonlinear mixed convective flow of nanofluid in porous space influenced by Arrhenius activation energy and thermal radiation. J Therm Anal Calorim2020; 140: 799–809.
73.
BestmanAR.Natural convection boundary layer with suction and mass transfer in a porous medium. Int J Energy Res1990; 14: 389–396.
74.
MakindeODOlanrewajuPOCharlesWM.Unsteady convection with chemical reaction and radiative heat transfer past a flat porous plate moving through a binary mixture. Afr Mat2011; 22: 65–78.
75.
KhanSUUsmanAl-KhaledK, et al. Implication of Arrhenius activation energy and temperature-dependent viscosity on non-Newtonian nanomaterial bio-convective flow with partial slip. Arab J Sci Eng2022; 128: 1–12.
76.
KumarRMRajuRSVenkateswarluB, et al. Influence of cross-diffusion and activation energy on MHD Williamson nanofluid flow over a nonlinear stretching sheet. Numer Heat Transf B Fund2024; 106: 1–21.
77.
KhanMIQayyumSNigarM, et al. Dynamics of Arrhenius activation energy in flow of Carreau fluid subject to Brownian motion diffusion. Numer Methods Partial Differ Equ2023; 39: 4468–4488.
78.
AwaisMSalahuddinT.Radiative magnetodydrodynamic cross fluid thermophysical model passing on parabola surface with activation energy. Ain Shams Eng J2024; 15: 102282.
79.
RamyaDRajuRSRaoJA, et al. Boundary layer viscous flow of nanofluids and heat transfer over a nonlinearly isothermal stretching sheet in the presence of heat generation/absorption and slip boundary conditions. Int J Nanosci Nanotechnol2016; 12: 251–268.
80.
SalahuddinTJavedAKhanM, et al. The impact of Soret and Dufour on permeable flow analysis of Carreau fluid near thermally radiated cylinder. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf2022; 138: 106378.
81.
PriyadharshiniPArchanaMVShahNA, et al. Ternary hybrid nanofluid flow emerging on a symmetrically stretching sheet optimization with machine learning prediction scheme. Symmetry2023; 15: 1225.
82.
AbbasMKhanNAlshomraniAS, et al. Performance-based comparison of Xue and Yamada–Ota models of ternary hybrid nanofluid flow over a slendering stretching sheet with activation energy and melting phenomena. Case Stud Therm Eng2023; 50: 103427.
JakeerSRupaMLReddySRR, et al. Artificial neural network model of non-Darcy MHD Sutterby hybrid nanofluid flow over a curved permeable surface: solar energy applications. Propuls Power Res2023; 12: 410–427.
85.
McCullochWSPittsW.A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biophys1943; 5: 115–133.
86.
IshakA.Unsteady MHD flow and heat transfer over a stretching plate. J Appl Sci2010; 10: 2127–2131.
87.
ReddyMGPadmaPShankarB.Effects of viscous dissipation and heat source on unsteady MHD flow over a stretching sheet. Ain Shams Eng J2015; 6: 1195–1201.
88.
AnimasaunILSandeepN.Buoyancy induced model for the flow of 36 nm alumina-water nanofluid along upper horizontal surface of a paraboloid of revolution with variable thermal conductivity and viscosity. Powder Technol2016; 301: 858–867.
