Using a large dataset from the China Educational Panel Survey (CEPS) of 2013–2014 (n=1,593), this paper identifies possible reasons that affect the academic achievement of students in grades 7 and 9 who come from migrant families, and explores whether schools with high teaching quality can remedy disadvantages of low socioeconomic backgrounds. Results of regression analyses show that, against common wisdom, we found that neither family finance nor father’s occupation significantly influence student academic performance. In addition, school type, either public or private (including special schools for children from migrant families), did not have significant influences on the achievement of those migrant children; only school ranking did. We conclude that public school resources cannot remedy the disadvantages of family background of migrant children, and migrant children do replicate the fate of their parents.
BormanG. D.BensonJ.OvermanL. T. (2005). Families, schools, and summer learning. The Elementary School Journal, 106(2), 131–150.
2.
BreenR. (2010). Educational expansion and social mobility in the 20th century. Social Forces, 89(2), 365–388.
3.
DaviesS.AuriniJ. (2013). Summer learning inequality in Ontario. Canadian Public Policy, 39(2), 287–307.
4.
HaiW.YuF.LiangZ. (2014). 农民工随迁子女教育政策分析——基于对北京市的调研 [Analysis of educational policy of accompanying children of migrant workers: Based on fieldwork in Beijing]. 教育学术月刊 [Education Academic Monthly Journal], 8, 53–64.
5.
HoffmannJ. P.DufurM. J. (2008). Family and school capital effects on delinquency: Substitutes or complements?Sociological Perspectives, 51(1), 29–62.
6.
LiC. (2003). 社会政治变迁与教育机会不平等 [Socio-political changes and inequality of educational opportunity]. 中国社会科学 [China Social Science], 3, 86–98.
7.
LiY. (2006). 制度变迁与教育不平等的产生机制——中国城市子女的教育获得(1966–2003)[Institutional change and educational inequality: Mechanisms in educational stratification in urban China (1966–2003)]. 中国社会科学 [China Social Science], 4, 97–109.
8.
LinZ. (2014). Embedded liberal education in a risk society: Exploring the relationship between education and work. Wuhan, China: Wuhan University Press.
9.
LiuJ (2006). 高等教育扩展与入学机会差异: 1978–2003 [Expansion of higher education in China and inequality in entrance opportunities: 1978–2003]. 社会[Society], 3, 158–179.
10.
LiuL.HuZ. (2012). 个人教育获得: 学校取代抑或延续了家庭的影响——两种理论视野的比较 [Do schools replace or continue family effects on personal educational attainment? Comparison between two theories]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版 [Journal of South China Normal University (Social Science Edition)], 1, 21–28.
11.
LuH.LiangY.HouY (2015). 流动儿童的教育与阶级再生产 [Education and reproduction of migrant children]. 山东社会科学 [Shandong Social Sciences], 3, 79–87.
12.
LuY.TreimanD. J. (2008). The effect of sibship size on educational attainment in China: Period variations. American Sociological Review, 73, 813–34.
13.
MareR. D. (1980). Social background and school continuation decisions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 295–305.
14.
ShapiraM. (2012). An exploration of differences in mathematics attainment among immigrant pupils in 18 OECD countries. European Educational Research Journal, 11(1), 68–95.
15.
ShaoS. (2010). 社会分层与农民工子女教育: ”两为主”政策博弈的教育社会学分析 [Social stratification and the education for children of migrants: Sociological analysis on the games of two main policies in education]. 教育发展研究 [Education Development Research], 11, 6–11.
16.
SirinS. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417–53.
17.
TaoH.YangD. (2007). 北京市”流动儿童”教育面临的问题与对策 [Problem and countermeasure of migrant children education in Peking]. 江西教育科研 [Jiangxi Education Research], 1, 61–63.
18.
TaoX. (2012). 我国流动儿童教育问题的制约因素和政策出路 [Limiting factors and policy of providing a solution to the problem of migrant children’s education]. 教育科学研究 [Education Science Research], 5, 5–9.
XiongC.LiuH. (2014). 制度性自我选择与自我放弃的历程——对农民工子弟学校文化的个案研究 [The process of self-selection and self-disqualification in an institutional context: A case study of culture in migrant children schools]. 北京大学教育评论 [Peking University Education Review], 12(4), 48–71.
21.
XiongY. (2010). 底层、学校与阶级再生产 [Lowest hierarchy, school and class reproduction]. 开放时代 [Opening Time], 1, 94–110.
22.
XiongY.YangX. (2012). 学校类型对农民工子女价值观与行为模式的影响——基于上海的实证研究 [School types’ impact on values and behavior patterns of migrant children: An empirical research in Shanghai].青年研究 [Youth Studies], 1, 71–82.
23.
YangD.TaoH. (2007). 改善农民工子弟教育需要观念更新和制度创新 [Renewal ideas and institution innovation of improving farmer-workers’ children education]. 中国教育学刊 [Journal China Education], 12, 17–20.
24.
ZhangH.GongX.YaoH (2011). 流动儿童学业表现及影响因素分析 – 来自北京的调研证据 [The determinants of the academic performance of migrant children at compulsory education level in Beijing]. 北京大学教育评论 [Peking University Education Review], 9(3), 121–136.
25.
ZhouH.WuX (2008). 流动儿童的教育绩效及其影响因素: 多层线性模型分析 [Educational accountability and influence factors of migrant children: Hierarchical linear model]. 人口研究 [Population Research], 4, 22–32.
