Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-11
How followers’ emotional stability and cultural value orientations moderate the impact of health-promoting leadership and abusive supervision on health-related resources
Health-related resources at work are crucial for followers to stay healthy and to cope with job demands. This study investigates the impact of health-promoting leadership as well as abusive supervision on followers’ social and task resources as antecedents of their health. Moreover, it examines whether the impact of leadership on followers’ health-related resources depends on the followers’ emotional stability and cultural value orientations (i.e. power distance and collectivism). A total of 503 employees from Austria, Germany and Slovenia took part in this online study and provided information on their leaders’ health-promoting behaviour and abusive supervision as well as on their own emotional stability, perceived power distance and collectivism. The results of a hierarchical regression analysis strongly support the importance of simultaneously assessing health-promoting leadership and abusive supervision when predicting task and social resources. Abusive supervision added incremental variance above health-promoting leadership when followers’ task resources were predicted. Moreover, the results suggest that followers benefit from or suffer differently under perceived leadership: high power distance enhances the positive effect of health-promoting leadership on followers’ social resources, while collectivism strengthens the negative impact of abusive supervision on followers’ social resources. Finally, emotionally stable followers who are working with highly abusive leaders experience a stronger threat to their resources compared to emotionally stable followers who are working with less abusive leaders. These results contribute to a deeper understanding of how leaders impact those resources known to influence followers’ health. They further show that follower personality and cultural value orientations determine the impact of leadership behaviour on health-related resources.
AirilaAHakanenJSchaufeliWB, et al. (2014) Are job and personal resources associated with work ability 10 years later? The mediating role of work engagement. Work & Stress28(1): 87–105.
2.
Alimo-MetcalfeBAlban-MetcalfeJBradleyM, et al. (2008) The impact of engaging leadership on performance, attitudes to work and wellbeing at work: A longitudinal study. Journal of Health Organisation and Management22(6): 586–598.
3.
BakkerABDemeroutiE (2007) The Job Demands–Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology22(3): 309–328.
4.
BakkerABDemeroutiEEuwemaMC (2005) Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology10(2): 170–180.
5.
BambergerPABacharachSB (2006) Abusive supervision and subordinate problem drinking. Taking resistance, stress and subordinate personality into account. Human Relations59(6): 723–752.
6.
BergnerSNeubauerACKreuzthalerA (2010) Broad and narrow personality traits for predicting managerial success. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology19(2): 177–199.
7.
BrebnerJ (2001) Personality and stress coping. Personality and Individual Differences31(3): 317–327.
8.
DemeroutiEBakkerABNachreinerFSchaufeliWB (2001). The Job Demands–Resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology89(3): 499–512.
9.
DorfmanPWHowellJP (1988) Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited. Advances in International Comparative Management3(1): 127–150.
10.
DunklAJiménezPŠarotar ŽižekS, et al. (2015) Similarities and differences of health-promoting leadership and transformational leadership. Naše gospodarstvo [Our Economy] 61(4): 3–13.
11.
ErgeneliAGoharRTemirbekovaZ (2007) Transformational leadership: Its relationship to culture value dimensions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations31(6): 703–724.
12.
FelfeJSchynsB (2006) Personality and the perception of transformational leadership: The impact of extraversion, neuroticism, personal need for structure, and occupational self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology36(3): 708–739.
13.
FelfeJSchynsB (2010) Followers’ personality and the perception of transformational leadership: Further evidence for the similarity hypothesis. British Journal of Management21(2): 393–410.
14.
FelfeJYanWSixB (2008) The impact of individual collectivism on commitment and its influence on organizational citizenship behaviour and turnover in three countries. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management8(2): 211–237.
15.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measuement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50.
16.
FrankeFFelfeJ (2011) How does transformational leadership impact employees’ psychological strain? Examining differentiated effects and the moderating role of affective organizational commitment. Leadership7(3): 295–316.
17.
FrankeFFelfeJPundtA (2014) The impact of health-oriented leadership on follower health: Development and test of a new instrument measuring health-promoting leadership. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung28(1–2): 139–161.
18.
GoodwinRDFriedmanHW (2006) Health status and the five-factor personality traits in a nationally representative sample. Journal of Health Psychology11(5): 643–654.
19.
HalbeslebenJRB (2006) Sources of social support and burnout: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources model. The Journal of Applied Psychology91(5): 1134–1145.
20.
HansezIChmielN (2010) Safety behavior: Job demands, job resources, and perceived management commitment to safety. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology15(3): 267–278.
21.
HarmanHH (1967). Modern Factor Analysis. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
22.
HenleCGrossM (2014) What have I done to deserve this? Effects of employee personality and emotion on abusive supervision. Journal of Business Ethics122(3): 461–474.
23.
HobfollSE (1989) Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist44(3): 513–524.
24.
HobfollSE (2001) The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conversation of resource theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review50(3): 337–421.
25.
HofstedeG (2001) Culture’s Consequences: Company Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations, 2nd edn.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26.
HouseRJavidanMHangesPDorfmanP (2002) Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: An introduction to project GLOBE. Journal of World Business37(1): 3–10.
27.
HuH (2012) The influence of employee emotional intelligence on coping with supervisor abuse in a banking context. Social Behavior and Personality40(5): 863–874.
28.
JiménezPKallusWK (2016) RESTQ-Work. The Recovery-Stress-Questionnaire for Work. In: KallusWKKellmannM (eds) RESTQ. The Recovery-Stress Questionnaire. Frankfurt am Main: Pearson Assessment & Information GmbH, pp. 335–353.
29.
JiménezPBregenzerAKallusKW, et al. (2017a) Enhancing resources at the workplace with health-promoting leadership. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health14(10): 1264. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14101285
30.
JiménezPDunklAKallusWK (2016) Recovery–stress questionnaire for work. In: KallusKWKellmannM (eds) The Recovery–Stress Questionnaires: User Manual. Frankfurt am Main: Pearson Assessment GmbH, pp. 158–187.
31.
JiménezPMilfelnerBŠarotar ŽižekSDunklA. (2017b) Moderating effects between job insecurity and intention to quit in samples of Slovene and Austrian workers. Naše gospodarstvo [Our Economy] 63(1): 27–37.
32.
JiménezPWinklerBBregenzerA (2017c) Developing sustainable workplaces with leadership. Feedback about organizational working conditions to support leaders in health-promoting behavior. Sustainability9(11): 1944. DOI: 10.3390/su9111944
33.
JiménezPWinklerBDunklA (2017d) Creating a healthy working environment with leadership: The concept of health-promoting leadership. The International Journal of Human Resource Management28(17): 2430–2448.
34.
JudgeTAPiccoloRF (2004) Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology89(5): 755–768.
35.
KarasekRA (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly24(2): 285–308.
36.
KernanMCWatsonSChenFFKimTG (2011) How cultural values affect the impact of abusive supervision on worker attitudes. Cross Cultural Management18(4): 464–484.
37.
KirkmanBChenGFarhJ, et al. (2009) Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal52(4): 744–764.
38.
KorekSFelfeJZaepernick-RotheU (2010) Transformational leadership and commitment: A multilevel analysis of group-level influences and mediating processes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology19(3): 364–387.
39.
LeiterMPMaslachC (2003) Areas of worklife: A structured approach to organizational predictors of job burnout. In: PerrewePLGansterDC (eds) Research in Occupational Stress and Well-Being, vol. 3. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 158–187.
40.
LemmonGGlibkowskiBCWayneSJ, et al. (2016) Supervisor-provided resources: Development and validation of a measure of employee resources. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies23(3): 288–308.
41.
LinWWangLChenS (2013) Abusive supervision and employee well-being: The moderating effect of power distance orientation. Applied Psychology62(2): 308–329.
42.
LoockC (2008) Evaluation der deutschen Version eines Fragebogens zu despotischer Führung [Evaluating the German version of a questionnaire on despotic leadership]. Master’s Thesis, RWTH Aachen University, Germany.
43.
LoughlinCMercerD (2014) Designing healthy workplaces. In: DayAKellowayEKHurrellJJ (eds) Workplace Well-being: How to Build Psychologically Healthy Workplaces. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 299–323.
44.
MartínPSalanovaMPeiróJM (2007) Job demands, job resources and individual innovation at work: Going beyond Karasek’s model?Psicothema19(4): 621–626.
45.
MartinkoMJHarveyPBreesJRMackeyJ (2013) A review of abusive supervision research. Journal of Organizational Behavior34(S1): 120–137.
46.
MaslachCLeiterMP (2008) Early predictors of job burnout and engagement. The Journal of Applied Psychology93(3): 498–512.
47.
MontanoDReeskeAFrankeFHüffmeierJ (2016) Leadership, followers’ mental health and job performance in organizations: A comprehensive meta-analysis from an occupational health perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior38(3): 327–350.
48.
NahrgangJDMorgesonFPHofmannDA (2011) Safety at work: A meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. The Journal of Applied Psychology96(1): 71–94.
49.
PiccoloRFBonoJEHeinitzK, et al. (2012) The relative impact of complementary leader behaviors: Which matter most?The Leadership Quarterly23(3): 567–581.
50.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJPodsakoffNP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879–903.
51.
RammstedtBJohnOP (2005) Kurzversion des Big Five Inventory (BFI-K). Entwicklung und Validierung eines ökonomischen Inventars zur Erfassung der fünf Faktoren der Persönlichkeit [Short version of the Big-Five Inventory BFI-K: Development and validation of an economic inventory to assess the five factors of personality] Diagnostica51(4): 195–206.
52.
SchaubroeckJLamSChaSE (2007) Embracing transformational leadership: Team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology92(4): 1020–1030.
53.
SchaufeliWB (2015) Engaging leadership in the job demands–resources model. Career Development International20(5): 446–463.
54.
SchaufeliWBBakkerABVan RhenenW (2009) How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism. Journal of Organizational Behavior30(7): 893–917.
55.
SchynsBSchillingJ (2013) How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly24(1): 138–158.
56.
ShaoLWebberS (2006) A cross-cultural test of the ‘five-factor model’ of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Business Research59(8): 936–944.
57.
ShaoPResickCJHargisMB (2011) Helping and harming others in the workplace: The roles of personal values and abusive supervision. Human Relations64(8): 1051–1078.
58.
StockerDJacobshagenNKringsR, et al. (2014) Appreciative leadership and employee well-being in everyday working life. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung28(1–2): 73–95.
59.
SuleaCFineSFischmannG, et al. (2013) Abusive supervision and counterproductive work behaviors: The moderating effects of personality. Journal of Personnel Psychology12(4): 196–200.
60.
TepperBJ (2000) Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal43(2): 178–190.
61.
TepperBJ (2007) Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management33(3): 261–289.
62.
TepperBJSimonLParkHM (2017) Abusive supervision. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior4(1): 123–152.
63.
ThoroughgoodCNPadillaAHunterSTTateBW (2012) The susceptible circle: A taxonomy of followers associated with destructive leadership. Leadership Quarterly23(5): 897–917.
64.
TimsMBakkerADerksD (2013) The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology18(2): 230–240.
TuckeyMRNeallAM (2014) Workplace bullying erodes job and personal resources: Between- and within-person perspectives. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology19(4): 413–424.
67.
Van EmmerikIHEuwemaM (2007) Who is offering a helping hand?Journal of Managerial Psychology22(6): 530–548.
68.
WangWHarmsPDMackeyJD (2015) Does it take two to tangle? Subordinates’ perceptions of and reactions to abusive supervision. Journal of Business Ethics131(2): 487–503.
69.
WangWMaoJWuWLiuJ (2012) Abusive supervision and workplace deviance: The mediating role of interactional justice and the moderating role of power distance. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources50(1): 43–60.
70.
WendtHEuwemaMVan EmmerickIJH (2009) Leadership and team cohesiveness across cultures. The Leadership Quarterly20(3): 358–370.
71.
WinklerEBuschCClasenJVowinkelJ (2014) Leadership behavior as a health-promoting resource for workers in low-skilled jobs and the moderating role of power distance orientation. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung28(1–2): 96–116.
72.
WuTHuC (2009) Abusive supervision and employee emotional exhaustion: Dispositional antecedents and boundaries. Group & Organization Management34(2): 143–169.
73.
XanthopoulouDBakkerABDemeroutiESchaufeliWB (2009) Work engagement and financial returns: A diary study on the role of job and personal resources. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology82(1): 183–200.
74.
ZellarsKTepperBDuffyM (2002) Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior. The Journal of Applied Psychology87(6): 1068–1076.
75.
ZwingmannIWeggeJWolfS, et al. (2014) Is transformational leadership healthy for employees? A multilevel analysis in 16 nations. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung28(1–2): 24–51.
