AndriopoulosC.LewisM. W.
(2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational
ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization
Science, 20(4),
696–717.
2.
BrandlJ.NeyerA.-K.
(2009). Applying cognitive adjustment theory to
cross-cultural training for global virtual teams. Human Resource
Management, 48(3),
341–353.
3.
CaldwellR.
(2003). The changing roles of personnel managers: Old
ambiguities, new uncertainties. Journal of Management
Studies, 40(4),
983–1004.
4.
EhnertI.
(2009). Sustainable human resource management: A conceptual and
exploratory analysis from a paradox perspective. Physica-Verl.:
Springer.
5.
EhnertI.
(2014). Paradox as a lens for theorizing sustainable
HRM. In EhnertI.HarryW.ZinkK. J.
(Eds.), Sustainability and human resource management: Developing sustainable
business organisations (pp. 247–272).
Heidelberg:
Springer.
6.
EvansP. A. L.PucikV.BjörkmanI.
(2011). The global challenge: International Human Resource
Management. New York:
McGraw-Hill Irwin.
7.
GrantA. M.ChristiansonM. K.PriceR. H.
(2007). Happiness, health, or relationships? Managerial
practices and employee well-being tradeoffs. The Academy of
Management Perspectives, 21(3),
51–63.
8.
GuestD. E.WoodrowC.
(2012). Exploring the boundaries of human resource managers'
responsibilities. Journal of Business Ethics,
111(1),
109–119.
9.
HoedemaekersC.KeeganA.
(2010). Performance pinned down: Studying subjectivity and
the language of performance. Organization Studies,
31(8),
1021–1044.
10.
JanssensM.SteyaertC.
(2009). HRM and performance: A plea for reflexivity in HRM
Studies. Journal of Management Studies,
46(1),
143–155.
11.
JarzabkowskiP.LêJ.Van de VenA.
H. (2013). Responding to
competing strategic demands: How organizing, belonging, and performing paradoxes
coevolve. Strategic Organization,
1–36.
12.
KeeganA.BoselieP.
(2006). The lack of impact of dissensus inspired analysis on
developments in the field of human resource management. Journal
of Management Studies, 43(7),
1491–1511.
13.
KeeganA.FrancisH.
(2010). Practitioner talk: The changing textscape of HRM and
emergence of HR business partnership. International Journal of
Human Resource Management, 21(6),
873–898.
14.
KeenoyT.
(1999). HRM as hologram: A polemic.
Journal of Management Studies, 36(1),
1–23.
15.
LeggeK.
(1978). Power, innovation and problem-solving in personnel
management. London:
McGraw-Hill.
16.
RamsayH.ScholariosD.HarleyB.
(2000). Employees and high-performance work systems: Testing
inside the black box. British Journal of Industrial
Relations, 38(4),
501–531.
SheehanC.De CieriH.GreenwoodM.Van BurenH. J.
(forthcoming). HR professional role tensions: Perceptions and responses of
the top management team. Human Resource
Management.
19.
SiebenB.HaunschildA.
(2012). Paradoxes of luxury work.
Zeitschrift für Personalforschung,
26(2),
189–194.
20.
SmithW.LewisM.
(2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium
model of organizing. Academy of Management Review,
36(2),
381–403.
21.
WhittakerS.MarchingtonM.
(2003). Devolving HR responsibility to the line – threat,
opportunity or partnership?Employee Relations, 25(3),
245–261.
22.
ZanoniP.JanssensM.
(2007). Minority employees engaging with (diversity)
management: An analysis of control, agency, and micro-emancipation.
Journal of Management Studies, 44(8),
1371–1397.