In light of the trend towards the Anglo-Saxon model of structured PhD education we analyze whether the positive relation between supervisor research productivity and young researcher productivity does persist in research groups where several PhD and postdoctoral students are supervised by a team of cooperating senior researchers. Our empirical analysis is based on a data set of 86 research training groups from different disciplinary fields funded by the German Research Foundation. We find that the positive relation between supervisor and student productivity also holds on group level. Controlling for group composition with respect to students' study background and demographics (age, gender and cultural background), we find evidence for age and gender diversity effects. Our results prove to be robust to a whole set of additional control variables such as group size, disciplinary field and advisor-student ratio.
AbramoG.D'AngeloC. A.Di CostaF. (2009). Research collaboration and productivity: Is there correlation?Higher Education, 57(2), 155–171.
2.
AlexanderJ.NucholsB.BloomJ.LeeS.-Y. D. (1995). Organizational demography and turnover: An examination of multiform and nonlinear heterogeneity. Human Relations, 48(12), 1455–1480.
3.
AllenT. J. (1970). Communication networks in R&D laboratories. R&D Management, 1(1), 14–21.
4.
AllisonP. D.LongJ. S. (1987). Interuniversity mobility of academic scientists. American Sociological Review, 52(5), 643–652.
5.
AllisonP. D.LongJ. S. (1990). Departmental effects on scientific productivity. American Sociological Review, 55(4), 469–478.
6.
BerningE.FalkS. (2004). Promotionsstudium - ein Beitrag zur Eliteförderung. Beiträge zur Hochschulforschung, 26(3), 54–76.
7.
BlackburnR. T.BehymerC. E.HallD. E. (1978). Research note: Correlates of faculty publications. Sociology of Education, 51(2), 132–141.
8.
BlauP. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.
9.
BourdieuP. (1980). Le capital social. Notes provisoires. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 31(1), 2–3.
10.
BowenW. G.RudenstineN. L. (1992.). In pursuit of the Ph.DPrinceton: Princeton University Press.
11.
BoxmanE. A. W.de GraafP. M.FlapH. D. (1991). The impact of social and human capital on the income attainment of Dutch managers. Social Networks, 13(1), 51–73.
12.
BuchmuellerT. C.DominitzJ.HansenW. L. (1999). Graduate training and the early career productivity of Ph.D. economists. Economics of Education Review, 18(1), 65–77.
13.
ByrneD. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
14.
CarayolN.MattM. (2004). Does research organization influence academic production? Laboratory level evidence from a large European university. Research Policy, 33(8), 1081–1102.
15.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94(special issue), 95–120.
16.
CraneDiana (1965). Scientists at major and minor universities: A study of productivity and recognition. American Sociological Review, 30(5), 699–714.
17.
CummingsJ.KieslerS. (2007). Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations. Research Policy, 36(10), 1620–1634.
18.
DavisJ. C.PattersonD. M. (2001). Determinants of variations in journal publication rates of economists. The American Economist, 45(1), 86–91.
19.
DickA. (1992). Die Problematik der Koedukation im mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht. In GraboschA.ZwölferA. (Eds.), Frauen und Mathematik. Die allmähliche Rückeroberung der Normalität? (S. 114–133). Tübingen: Attempto.
20.
DundarH.LewisD. L. (1998). Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 39(6), 607–631.
21.
FabelO.HeinM.HofmeisterR. (2008). Research productivity in business economics: An investigation of Austrian, German and Swiss Universities. German Economic Review, 9(4), 506–531.
22.
FiedlerM.WelpeI. M.LindlbauerK.SattlerK. (2008). Denn wer da hat, dem wird gegeben: Publikationsproduktivität des BWL-Hochschullehrernachwuchses und deren wissenschaftlicher Betreuer. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 78(5), 477–508.
23.
GoodwinT. H.SauerR. D. (1995). Life cycle productivity in academic research: Evidence from cumulative publication histories of academic economists. Southern Economic Journal, 61(3), 728–743.
24.
GruenfeldD. H.MannixE. A.WilliamsK. Y.NealeM. A. (1996). Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 1–15.
25.
HambrickD. C.MasonP. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.
26.
HarrisonD. A.KleinK. J. (2007). What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199–1228.
27.
HilmerC. E.HilmerM. J. (2007.). On the relationship between the student-advisor match and early career research productivity for agricultural and resource economics Ph.D.sAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89(1), 162–175.
28.
HofstedeG. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
29.
HollingsworthJ. R. (2002). Research organizations and major discoveries in twentieth-century science: A case study of excellence in biomedical research. Retrieved 01.06.2011, from http://skylla.wzb.eu/pdf/2002/p02–003.pdf.
30.
HorstkemperM. (1992). Koedukation in mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Fächern – zweifelhafter Gewinn für die Mädchen oder Entwicklungschance für alle? In GraboschA.ZwölferA. (Eds.), Frauen und Mathematik. Die allmähliche Rückeroberung der Normalität? (S. 114–133). Tübingen: Attempto.
31.
HouseRobertJ.HangesP. J.Ruiz-QuintanillaS. A.DorfmanP. W.FalkusS. A.AshkanasyN. M. (1999). Cultural influences on leadership and organizations: Project GLOBE. In MobleyWilliam H.GessnerM. J.ArnoldV. (Eds.), Advances in global leadership. (S. 171–233). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
32.
HuntingtonS. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon & Schuster.
33.
IsmailM.RasdiR. M. (2007). Impact of networking on career development: Experience of highflying women academics in Malaysia. Human Resource Development International, 10(2), 153–168.
34.
JacksonS. E.JoshiA.ErhardtN. L. (2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29(6), 801–830.
35.
KieserA. (2012). JOURQUAL – der Gebrauch, nicht der Missbrauch, ist das Problem. Die Betriebswirtschaft – Business Administration Review, 72(1), 93–110.
36.
KyvikS.Marheim LarsenI. (1994). International contact and research performance. Scientometrics, 29(1), 161–172.
37.
LongJ. S.McGinnisR. (1985). The effects of the mentor on the academic career. Scientometrics, 7(3–6), 255–280.
38.
LongR. G.BowersW. P.BarnettT.WhiteM. C. (1998). Research productivity of graduates in management: Effects of academic origin and academic affiliation. Academy of Management Journal, 41(6), 704–714.
39.
MarantoC. L.StreulyC. A. (1994). The determinants of accounting professors' publishing productivity - the early career. Contemporary Accounting Research, 10(2), 387–407.
40.
MillikenF. J.MartinsL. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 402–433.
41.
PoracJ. F.WadeJ. B.FischerH. M.BrownJ.KanferA.BowkerG. (2004). Human capital heterogeneity, collaborative relationships, and publication patterns in a multidisciplinary scientific alliance: A comparative case study of two scientific teams. Research Policy, 33(4), 661–678.
42.
RauberM.UrsprungH. W. (2008). Life cycle and cohort productivity in economic research: The case of Germany. German Economic Review, 9(4), 431–456.
43.
RodgersR. C.MarantoC. L. (1989). Causal models of publishing productivity in psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 636–649.
44.
SchneiderP.SadowskiD. (2010). The impact of new public management instruments on PhD education. Higher Education, 59(5), 543–565.
45.
SimonsT.PelledL. H.SmithK. A. (1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 662–673.
46.
StephanP. E. (1996). The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(3), 1199–1235.
47.
TajfelH. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information, 13(2), 65–93.
48.
TaylorS. W.FenderB. F.BurkeK. G. (2006). Unraveling the academic productivity of economists: The opportunity costs of teaching and service. Southern Economic Journal, 72(4), 846–859.
49.
TrompenaarsF. (1993). Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Cultural Diversity in Business. London: The Economist Books.
50.
TurnerJ. C. (1975). Social comparison and social identity: Some comparisons for intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5(1), 5–34.
51.
TurnerL.MairesseJ. (2005). Individual productivity differences in public research: How important are non-individual determinants?An econometric study of French physicists' publications and citations (1986–1997). Retrieved 14.01.2011. from http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/fichiers/semina/lunch/Turner2005.pdf.
52.
UngerB. (2010). Heterogenität und Performance von Forschernachwuchsgruppen. Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel von DFG-geförderten Graduiertenkollegs. München, Mering: Rainer Hampp Verlag.
53.
UngerB.PullK.Backes-GellnerU. (forthcoming). Composition and performance of research training groups. In JansenD. (ed.), The changing governance of higher education and research – comparative perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
54.
WilliamsK. Y.O'ReillyC. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20(20), 77–140.
55.
WilliamsonI. O.CableD. M. (2003). Predicting early career research productivity: The case of management faculty. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 25–44.
