BeyerJaniceM.ChanoveRolandG.FoxWilliamB. (1995): The review process and the fates of manuscripts submitted to AMJ. In: Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1219–1260.
2.
GillilandStephenW.CortinaJosé (1997): Reviewer and editor decision making in the journal review process. In: Personnel Psychology, 50, 427–452.
3.
HarrisonDavid (2002): From the editors: Obligations and obfuscations in the review process. In: Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1079–1084.
4.
LabandDavidN. (1990): Is there value-added from the review process in economics? Preliminary evidence from authors. In: The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105, 341–352.
5.
NeffBryanD.OldenJulianD. (2006): Is peer review a game of chance? In: BioScience, 56, 333–340.
TsangEricW. K.FreyBrunoS. (2006): The as-is journal review process: Let the authors own their ideas. Working Paper No. 280, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, Zürich.
