Beim Wertsteigerungsmanagement werden organisatorische Gestaltungsansätze vornehmlich hinsichtlich ihrer Vorteilhaftigkeit bei der Wertgenerierung bewertet. Transparente Strukturen stellen hierbei eine notwendige Voraussetzung zur Erfüllung von Effizienz- und Effektivitätskriterien und damit letztlich für die Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der Wertschöpfung dar. Das wertorientierte Management etabliert deshalb zunehmend intraorganisatorische Organisationskonzepte, die einerseits eine marktförmige, preissystemische Koordination (bspw. über interne Verrechnungspreise) ermöglichen, und andererseits die organisationale Transparenz erhöhen (bspw. mit Hilfe von Performance Measurement-Systemen). Durch die Fokussierung der Wertgenerierung entsteht aber die Gefahr, dass bezüglich der beteiligten Anspruchsgruppen personalführungsrelevante Aspekte der Wertaneignung und -verteilung vernachlässigt werden. Gleichzeitig wird eventuell ein für Innovationen kritischer Schwellenwert an organisationaler Offenheit überschritten. Unter diesem Blickwinkel ist ein gewisser Grad an Intransparenz bzw. kausaler Ambiguität für Innovationen unabdingbar.
BourgeoisL.J.III (1984): Strategic management and determinism. In: Academy of Management Review9, 586–596.
6.
ButtrickJ. (1952): The inside contract system. In: The Journal of Economic History12, 205–221.
7.
CoffR.W. (1997): Human assets and management dilemmas: Coping with hazards on the road to resource-based theory. In: The Academy of Management Review22, 374–402.
8.
CoffR.W. (1999a): How control in human-asset-intensive firms differs from physical-asset-intensive firms: A multi-level approach. In: Journal of Managerial Issues11, 389–405.
9.
CoffR.W. (1999b): When competitive advantage doesn't lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. In: Organization Science10, 119–133.
10.
CrainW.M.ZardkoohiA. (1980): X-Inefficiency and nonpecuniary rewards in a rent-seeking society: A neglected issue in the property rights theory of the firm. In: The American Economic Review70, 784–792.
11.
DavenportTh.O. (1999): Human capital: What it is and why people invest it. San Francisco.
12.
DenrellJ.MarchJ.G. (2001): Adaption as information restriction: The hot stove effect. In: Organization Science12, 523–538.
13.
DonaldsonTh.PrestonL.E. (1995): The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. In: The Academy of Management Review20, 65–91.
14.
FarjounM. (2002): Towards an organic perspective on strategy. In: Strategic Management Journal23, 561–594.
15.
FenoalteaSt. (1975): Authority, efficiency, and agricultural organization in medieval England and beyond: A hypothesis. In: The Journal of Economic History35, 693–718.
16.
FosterR.KaplanS. (2001): Creative destruction: Why companies that are built to last underperform the market–and how to successfully transform them. New York.
17.
GhoshalS.MoranP. (1996): Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. In: The Academy of Management Review21, 13–47.
18.
GrossmanH.I. (1994): Production, appropriation, and land reform. In: The American Economic Review84, 705–712.
19.
GulatiR.SinghH. (1998): The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. In: Administrative Science Quarterly43, 781–814.
20.
GutenbergE. (1929): Die Unternehmung als Gegenstand betriebswirtschaftlicher Theorie. 1. Aufl. Berlin, Wien.
21.
HartleD.G. (1983): The theory of ‘rent seeking’: Some reflections. In: The Canadian Journal of Economics16, 539–554.
22.
HendersonR.M.ClarkK.B. (1990): Architectural innovation: The reconfiguring of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. In: Administrative Science Quarterly35, 9–30.
23.
HennartJ.-F. (1993): Explaning the swollen middle: Why most transactions are a mix of, market” and, hierarchy”. In: Organization Science4, 529–547.
24.
HillCh.W.L. (1990): Cooperation, opportunism, and the invisible hand: Implications for transaction cost theory. In: The Academy of Management Review15, 500–513.
25.
JonesR.H.VilleS.P. (1996): Efficient transactors or rent-seeking monopolists? The rationale for early chartered trading companies. In: The Journal of Economic History56, 898–915.
26.
KaplanR.S.NortonD.P. (1996): The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston, Mass.
27.
KaplanR.S.NortonD.P. (2001): The strategy-focused organization: How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Boston, Mass.
28.
KimberlyJ.R.MilesR.H. (Hg.) (1980): The organizational life cycle. San Francisco.
29.
Knyphausen-AufseßZuD. (1997): Organisation als Erfolgspotential: Ansätze zu einem, Organisationscontrolling”. In: Zeitschrift für Planung8, 375–394.
30.
KruegerA.O. (1974): The political Economy of the rent-seeking society. In: The American Economic Review64, 291–303.
31.
LeibensteinH. (1966): Allocative efficiency vs., X-efficiency”. In: The American Economic Review56, 392–415.
32.
LepakD.P.SnellS.A. (1999): The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. In: The Academy of Management Review24, 31–48.
33.
MachlupF. (1980): Knowledge: Its creation, distribution and economic significance, Vol. 1, Princeton1980.
34.
MahoneyTh.A. (1979): Organizational hierarchy and position worth. In: The Academy of Management Journal22, 726–737.
35.
MaitlandI.BrysonJ.Van de VenA. (1985): Sociologists, economists, and opportunism. In: The Academy of Management Review10, 59–65.
36.
MalcomsonJ.M. (1984): Work incentives, hierarchy, and internal labor markets. In: Journal of Political Economy92, 486–507.
37.
MarglinSt. A. (1974): What do bosses do? In: The Review of Radical Political Economics6, 60–112.
38.
MillerD.FriesenP.H. (1978): Archetypes of strategy formulation. In: Management Science24, 921–933.
39.
MosakowskiE. (1997): Strategy making under causal ambiguity: Conceptual issues and empirical evidence. In: Organization Science8, 414–442.
40.
MurphyK.M.ShleiferA.VishnyR.W. (1993): Why is rent-seeking so costly to growth? In: The American Economic Review83, 409–414.
41.
NeubergerE. (1966): Libermanism, computopia, and visible hand: The question of informational efficiency. In: The American Economic Review56, 131–144.
42.
OuchiW.G. (1980a): A framework for understanding organizational failure. In: KimberlyJ.R.MilesR.H. (Hg.): The organizational life cycle. San Francisco, 1980, 395–429.
PerrowCh. (1979): Complex organizations: A critical essay. 2. Aufl. Glenview, Ill. 1979.
45.
PfefferJ. (1994): Competitive advantage through people: Unleashing the power of the work force. Boston.
46.
PfefferJ.SalancikG.R. (1978): The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York.
47.
PolanyiM. (1958): Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. London.
48.
PrendergastC. (1999): The provision of incentives in firms. In: Journal of Economic Literature37, 7–63.
49.
RadnerR. (1992): Hierarchy: The economics of managing. In: Journal of Economic Literature30, 1382–1415.
50.
RappaportA. (1986): Creating shareholder value: A guide for managers and investors. New York.
51.
RascheCh. (2001): Ressourceninduzierte Renten: Optionen der Generierung, Protektion und Appropriation. Vortragsfolien zum 2. Workshop Strategisches Kompetenz-Management an der Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz am 27.09.2001.
ReedR.DeFillippiR.J. (1990): Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. In: The Academy of Management Review15, 88–102.
54.
WilliamsonO.E. (1973): Markets and hierarchies: Some elementary considerations. In: The American Economic Review63, 316–325.
55.
WilliamsonO.E. (1975): Markets and hierarchies. New York.
56.
WilliamsonO.E. (1985): The economic institutions of capitalism. New York.
57.
WilliamsonO.E. (1996): Economic organization: The case for candor. In: The Academy of Management Review21, 48–57.
