Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objectives:

We studied the prevalence of atherosclerosis among ischaemic stroke patients ≤60 years and controls at the time of the index stroke, and its association with occurrence of new cardiovascular events (CVEs) and mortality at a 5-year follow-up.

Methods:

Prevalent atherosclerosis was assessed for 385 patients and 260 controls in seven vascular areas by electrocardiogram (ECG), ankle–arm index (AAI) and measurement of right and left carotid and femoral intima-media thickness (cIMT and fIMT) and abdominal aorta plaques (AAP). Clinical end-points were any new CVE (stroke, angina, myocardial infarction or peripheral arterial disease) or death from any cause at 5-year follow-up. All results were sex- and age-adjusted; logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were applied.

Results:

Young patients ≤49 years had prevalent atherosclerosis in 1/2 of males and 1/3 of females. Compared with controls, young female patients showed significantly higher prevalent atherosclerosis, p = 0.024. Ischaemic ECG and mean cIMT were higher in young and middle-aged female patients (p = 0.044, p = 0.020, p = 0.023 and p <0.001, respectively). Mean fIMT was higher in middle-aged female patients (p <0.001). Cardiovascular events were associated with ischaemic ECG; AAI ≤0.9, fIMT ≥0.9 mm and increased number of areas with atherosclerosis (NAA) among patients, and with AAP, cIMT ≥0.9 mm, fIMT ≥0.9 mm and NAA among controls. Mortality was associated with higher age, ischaemic ECG and NAA among patients, and cIMT ≥0.9 mm among controls.

Conclusion:

Atherosclerosis is highly prevalent even in young stroke patients. Some areas and increasing NAA are associated with CVEs and death.

Keywords

Young ischaemic stroke atherosclerosis carotid intima-media thickness femoral intima-media thickness ankle–arm index abdominal aorta plaques cardiovascular events mortality long-term outcome Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST)

Introduction

The 15 cities young stroke study showed smoking, dyslipidemia and hypertension as the three most frequent risk factors (RF) for cardiovascular events (CVEs), without regional differences in Europe.¹ Several European long-term young stroke studies have shown high rates of recurrent CVEs, such as ischaemic stroke (IS), angina, myocardial infarction (MI), peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and mortality mainly due to coronary atherosclerosis (CA).^2,3 Autopsy studies have also shown high prevalence of CA, predominantly in young healthy male populations.^4,5

The 15 cities study found 39.6% stroke of undetermined cause (SUC) and 9.3% large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA) based on the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) classification, requiring ≥50% artery stenosis.⁶

Combining knowledge of the high rates of recurrent CVEs and mortality in young stroke patients,⁷ worst prognosis for patients with atherosclerosis,⁸ high rates of cryptogenic stroke among young patients,⁹ and knowledge showing that plaque instability is more important than the degree of stenosis for coronary and cerebral CVEs,^10,11 we wanted to investigate the extent of atherosclerosis in young stroke patients. Staging of arterial vascular areas, with a more scrutineous detection of atherosclerosis, became a main pillar for the Norwegian Stroke in the Young Study (NOR-SYS). Our hypothesis is that atherosclerosis is far more present among young and middle-aged patients than the TOAST definition of atherosclerosis with at least 50% stenosis¹² is able to show, and arterial staging is the first step to understand the extent of established artery wall disease. The aims of this study are the detailed presentation of seven predefined vascular areas at study inclusion, and their association with new CVEs and mortality at 5-year follow-up.

Methods

Participants

From 1st September 2010 to 31st December 2015, 385 stroke patients aged 15–60 years, and 260 partners, serving as controls aged 21–69 years, were included. NOR-SYS design and ultrasound protocol,¹³ and methods and results of inclusion have been published.¹⁴ Verified acute ischaemic stroke diagnosis was done by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 98.5% among patients or by computed tomography (CT) alone in case of contraindications. The majority of stroke patients were admitted within a few days after symptom onset (Table 1). However, in some cases, inclusion in NOR-SYS was delayed, often when patients got the stroke at other sites in Norway or abroad.

Table 1.

Overview over time of admission to our hospital from acute stroke symptom onset and inclusion into the Norwegian Stroke in the Young Study.

Time of admission	Patients, n (%)
<24 h (h)	256 (66.5)
≥24 h to <72 h	59 (15.3)
≥72 h to <1 week	21 (5.4)
≥1 week to <1 month	27 (7.0)
≥1 month	22 (5.7)

Longest time delay appeared mainly due to first admission to other hospitals in Norway or abroad.

Baseline procedures

A 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was verified by a cardiologist to identify signs of acute or previous myocardial ischaemia. Detailed information about the NOR-SYS ultrasound protocol has been published before.¹³ In brief, ankle–arm index (AAI) ≤0.9 indicated PAD. High quality measurements of mean carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and femoral intima-media thickness (fIMT) were obtained at predefined segments from the common carotid artery, carotid bifurcation, internal carotid artery, common femoral artery and superficial femoral artery. In the analyses, the maximum of any mean IMT segment value was used, and plaques were included in the IMT measurements. Mean IMT values ≥0.9 mm were considered pathological,¹⁵ and mean IMT values ≥1.5 mm were defined as atherosclerosis.¹⁶ The abdominal aorta was assessed by ultrasound for detection of abdominal aorta plaques (AAP).

Prevalent atherosclerosis

Atherosclerosis was defined prevalent at seven chosen areas by the following: presence of ischaemic ECG signs; AAI ≤0.9; right and left mean cIMT and fIMT $\geq$ 1.5 mm, respectively, and presence of AAP. Presence of atherosclerosis on each vascular area was assigned a value of 1. Atherosclerosis was defined as number of affected vascular areas 0–7.

Stroke classification

Stroke aetiology was classified according to TOAST criteria, independent from the results of the ultrasound research protocol.

Follow-up data

Patients and controls visited our outpatient clinic from 1^st September 2015 to 31^st December 2020 for a 5-year follow-up. Primary end-points were occurrence of any new CVE (ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke; angina or MI; and PAD), and death of any cause. Study participants were interviewed about occurrence of any CVE during the follow-up period, and new CVEs were verified by medical records for those who attended the follow-up. ECG were performed. For mortality analysis, we chose the date of 31st August 2020. In Norway, mortality data appears in medical records, connected to each citizen’s 11-digit personal identification number.

Ethical considerations

The study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and is approved by the Regional Ethics Committee (REK-Vest 2010/74). Written consent is present for all study participants. The Regional Ethics Committee did not allow to follow dropouts apart from the dead–alive state and causes of death.

Statistics

The mean and standard deviation (SD) were used for descriptive statistics. Study participants were dichotomised into young (≤49 years) and middle-aged (≥50 years). Analyses were adjusted by age and sex. To avoid systematic bias, univariate comparisons of vascular areas between patients and controls were done within the four sex and age strata using the unpaired t-test and the Fisher’s exact test. For the unadjusted comparison of all patients to their controls, McNemar’s test of symmetry was used. Mean cIMT and fIMT values were compared between patients and controls by relative change (RC). The number of vascular areas affected by atherosclerosis was compared between TOAST subgroups using the Kruskal–Wallis rank test. To adjust for confounding and matching, logistic regression and Cox models were used to estimate the risk of new CVE and mortality, with respect to age, sex and vascular areas. The results were reported as odds ratios (OR) and hazard ratios (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Two-sided p-values ≤0.05 were considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed in Stata SE 16.0.

Results

Study population

At inclusion, patients had a mean age of 49.5 years, and controls had a mean age of 50.3 years (Table 2). The majority of patients were males (68.6%), and the majority of controls were females (70.0%). Young age ≤49 years were present for 39.5% of patients and 39.2% of controls.

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of patients and controls at inclusion and at 5-year follow-up.

		NA n	All	Male ≤49 years	Male ≥50 years	Female ≤49 years	Female ≥50 years
At inclusion
Patients, n (%)	P		385 (100.0)	94 (35.6)	170 (64.4)	58 (47.9)	63 (52.1)
Controls, n (%)	C		260 (100.0)	28 (35.9)	50 (64.1)	74 (40.7)	108 (59.3)
Age (y), mean (SD)	P	0	49.5 (9.8)	40.5 (8.2)	55.9 (3.0)	38.4 (8.9)	55.8 (2.9)
Age (y), mean (SD)	C	0	50.3 (8.6)	42.0 (6.7)	57.5 (4.9)	41.7 (6.6)	55.0 (3.2)
Unpaired T-test, p^a			0.001*	0.312	0.028	0.019	0.102
Ischaemic ECG, n (%)	P	0	40 (10.4)	9 (9.6)	17 (10.0)	6 (10.3)	8 (12.7)
Ischaemic ECG, n (%)	C	4	7 (2.7)	1 (3.6)	2 (4.1)	1 (1.4)	3 (2.8)
Fisher’s exact test, p			0.002**	0.450	0.259	0.044	0.020
AAI ≤0.9, n (%)	P	23	17 (4.7)	2 (2.3)	9 (5.7)	2 (3.6)	4 (6.8)
AAI ≤0.9, n (%)	C	5	7 (2.7)	1 (3.7)	3 (6.3)	1 (1.4)	2 (1.9)
Fisher’s exact test, p			1.000**	0.559	1.000	0.577	0.188
AAP, n (%)	P	39	162 (46.8)	29 (33.0)	90 (58.8)	13 (25.0)	30 (56.6)
AAP, n (%)	C	13	87 (35.2)	5 (18.5)	29 (61.7)	9 (12.7)	44 (43.1)
Fisher’s exact test, p			0.002**	0.158	0.865	0.097	0.129
At 5-year follow-up
Patients, n (%)	P	62	323 (83.9)	82 (36.1)	145 (63.9)	47 (49.0)	49 (51.0)
Controls, n (%)	C	41	219 (84.2)	21 (35.6)	38 (64.4)	64 (40.0)	96 (60.0)
Deceased, n (%)	P	0	21 (5.5)	1 (1.1)	13 (7.6)	2 (3.4)	5 (7.9)
Deceased, n (%)	C	0	9 (3.5)	0 (0.0)	5 (10.0)	1 (1.4)	3 (2.8)
Fisher’s exact test, p			0.524**	1.000	0.560	0.582	0.146
Any CVE, n (%)	P	2	44 (13.7)	10 (12.3)	22 (15.3)	7 (14.9)	5 (10.2)
Any CVE, n (%)	C	0	9 (4.1)	1 (4.8)	2 (5.3)	0 (0.0)	6 (6.3)
Fisher’s exact test, p			0.001**	0.451	0.172	0.002	0.509
Stroke^b, n (%)	P	2	26 (8.1)	7 (8.6)	10 (6.9)	6 (12.8)	3 (6.3)
Stroke^b, n (%)	C	0	0 (0.0)	0 (0.0)	0 (0.0)	0 (0.0)	0 (0.0)
Fisher’s exact test, p			< 0.001**	0.340	0.218	0.005	0.037
Angina and/or MI, n (%)	P	2	16 (5.0)	5 (6.1)	8 (5.6)	2 (4.3)	1 (2.04)
Angina and/or MI, n (%)	C	0	8 (3.6)	1 (4.8)	2 (5.1)	0 (0.0)	5 (5.2)
Fisher’s exact test, p			0.002**	1.000	1.000	0.177	0.664
PAD, n (%)	P	1	11 (3.4)	1 (1.2)	8 (5.6)	1 (2.1)	1 (2.1)
PAD, n (%)	C	0	1 (0.4)	0 (0.0)	0 (0.0)	0 (0.0)	1 (1.0)
Fisher’s exact test, p			0.07**	1.000	0.363	0.423	1.000

Abbreviations: NA: not available, missing data; n: number of subjects; y: years; P: patients; C: controls; SD: standard deviation; ECG: electrocardiogram; AAI: ankle–arm index; AAP: abdominal aorta plaques; MI: myocardial infarction; PAD: peripheral artery disease.

*Paired T-test; ** Exact McNemar’s test of symmetry.

^ap-values are comparisons between patients and controls.

^bStroke included haemorrhagic and ischaemic stroke. Two patients had haemorrhagic stroke.

Clinical and ultrasonographic findings

Compared to controls, young aged and middle-aged female patients had higher prevalence of ischaemic ECG (p = 0.044 and p = 0.020) and higher mean cIMT (p = 0.023 and p < 0.001), as shown in Tables 2 and 3. Mean fIMT was higher in middle-aged female patients (p <0.001). Abdominal aorta plaques presence and pathological AAI did not differ in any comparisons between patients and controls. The prevalence of atherosclerosis among male patients and controls did not differ for clinical and ultrasonographic variables.

Table 3.

Ultrasound protocol on mean IMT^a from carotid and femoral arteries of patients and controls.

		NA n	All	Male ≤49 years	Male ≥50 years	Female ≤49 years	Female ≥50 years
Patients, n (%)			385 (100.0)	94 (35.6)	170 (64.4)	58 (47.9)	63 (52.1)
Controls, n (%)			260 (100.0)	28 (36.4)	50 (64.1)	74 (40.4)	108 (59.3)
Carotid arteries, cIMT
Relative change % (95% CI)			22 (13, 31)	6 (−16, 30)	10 (−8, 28)	17 (2, 32)	31 (16, 46)
Mean cIMT (SD)	P	2	1.35 (0.90)	1.02 (0.57)	1.60 (0.94)	0.90 (0.55)	1.59 (1.13)
Mean cIMT (SD)	C	1	1.05 (0.52)	0.95 (0.37)	1.44 (0.71)	0.74 (0.17)	1.10 (0.47)
Unpaired t-test, p			<0.001**	0.578	0.278	0.023	<0.001
CCA
Relative change % (95% CI)			10 (5, 15)	2 (−10, 13)	2 (−8, 11)	2 (−4, 8)	15 (6, 24)
Mean CCA-IMT (SD)	P	2	0.84 (0.29)	0.74 (0.21)	0.94 (0.30)	0.64 (0.14)	0.90 (0.34)
Mean CCA-IMT (SD)	C	1	0.75 (0.21)	0.73 (0.14)	0.92 (0.27)	0.62 (0.09)	0.77 (0.19)
Unpaired t-test, p			<0.001**	0.777	0.758	0.485	0.001
BIF
Relative % change, 95% CI			18 (10, 26)	1 (−18, 20)	8 (−9, 24)	12 (−14, 25)	26 (11, 42)
Mean BIF-IMT (SD)	P	3	1.19 (0.73)	0.90 (0.38)	1.41 (0.75)	0.79 (0.40)	1.42 (0.96)
Mean BIF-IMT (SD)	C	1	0.98 (0.46)	0.90 (0.35)	1.30 (0.54)	0.70 (0.17)	1.04 (0.46)
Unpaired t-test, p			<0.001**	0.945	0.345	0.079	<0.001
ICA
Relative % change, 95% CI			25 (14,−35)	9 (−18, 36)	12 (−12, 35)	18 (1, 36)	35 (17, 53)
ICA-IMT (SD)	P	9	1.00 (0.79)	0.81 (0.56)	1.15 (0.85)	0.70 (0.51)	1.17 (0.99)
ICA-IMT (SD)	C	3	0.75 (0.44)	0.73 (0.26)	1.02 (0.73)	0.57 (0.15)	0.77 (0.37)
Unpaired t-test, p			<0.001**	0.506	0.329	0.042	<0.001
Femoral arteries, fIMT
Relative % change, 95% CI			31 (21, 42)	28 (−5, 60)	14 (−6, 34)	15 (−6, 37)	31 (13, 49)
Mean fIMT (SD)	P	7	1.42 (1.08)	1.13 (0.92)	1.82 (1.19)	0.75 (0.51)	1.42 (0.96)
Mean fIMT (SD)	C	1	0.98 (0.76)	0.82 (0.47)	1.57 (0.99)	0.64 (0.44)	0.97 (0.73)
Unpaired t-test, p			<0.001**	0.095	0.176	0.164	<0.001
CFA
Relative % change, 95% CI			31 (20, 42)	26 (−6, 58)	14 (−6, 34)	15 (7, 37)	31 (13, 49)
Mean CFA-IMT (SD)	P	7	1.41 (1.08)	1.11 (0.90)	1.81 (1.19)	0.75 (0.51)	1.41 (0.96)
Mean CFA-IMT (SD)	C	1	0.97 (0.77)	0.82 (0.47)	1.56 (0.99)	0.64 (0.44)	0.97 (0.73)
Unpaired t-test, p			<0.001**	0.115	0.170	0.169	0.001
SFA
Relative % change, 95% CI			20 (10, 30)	15 (−11, 41)	17 (−8, 43)	12 (2, 22)	10 (−1, 21)
Mean SFA-IMT (SD)	P	8	0.60 (0.47)	0.56 (0.37)	0.70 (0.62)	0.47 (0.18)	0.54 (0.13)
Mean SFA-IMT (SD)	C	2	0.48 (0.19)	0.47 (0.13)	0.58 (0.22)	0.42 (0.07)	0.49 (0.22)
Unpaired t-test, p			<0.001**	0.254	0.184	0.014	0.072

Abbreviations: NA: not available, missing data; n: number of subjects; y: years; cIMT/fIMT/IMT: carotid/femoral intima-media thickness; CI: confidence interval; SD: standard deviation; P: patients; C: controls; CCA: common carotid artery; BIF: carotid bifurcature; ICA: internal carotid artery; CFA: common femoral artery; SFA: superficial femoral artery.

**Paired t-test.

^aMean IMT measurements units were millimetres, and were obtained bilaterally from 1 cm segment at four standardised angles for CCA using Meijer’s Carotid Arc® and at one angle for BIF, ICA, CFA and SFA. Among several measurements at any segmental level, the maximal IMT value was used.

Eight (5.1%) of 157 patients with fIMT ≥0.9 mm in their right femoral artery (FA) had previously performed percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with access from their right FA.

Missing data

Ultrasonography was not performed in two patients due to terminal unconsciousness at admission and morbid obesity causing insufficient imaging quality, respectively. Main reasons for other missing data (Table 3) were arterial occlusion due to atherosclerosis or dissection, bad imaging quality, air (AAP) or anatomical reasons. Good quality measurements of at least 70% segmental analysis for cIMT and fIMT were averagely achieved in 96.7%.

Prevalence of atherosclerosis

The prevalence of atherosclerosis was higher in young female patients (32.7% vs 14.3%, p = 0.024) compared with young female controls (Figure 1). The prevalence did not differ between patients and controls among young male patients (49.4% vs 32.0%, p = 0.167), middle-aged male patients (77.6% vs 78.6%, p = 1.000) and middle-aged female patients (62.7% vs 52.5%, p = 0.229). The prevalence was higher in middle-aged patients than in younger patients (male 77.6% vs 49.4%, p <0.001, female 62.7% vs 32.7%, p = 0.026) and higher in male patients than in female patients (67.4% vs 48.0%, p = 0.014). Maximum number of affected vascular areas were six among patients and five among controls.

Figure 1.

Prevalence of atherosclerosis at different vascular areas^a among 324 stroke patients and 238 controls. Abbreviations: P: patients; C: controls; y: years. (a) Atherosclerosis was evaluated in seven vascular areas by electrocardiogram, ankle–arm index and by ultrasonography of abdominal aorta and right and left carotid and femoral arteries for intima-media thickness (IMT) measurements. Among several measurements at any segmental level, the maximum IMT value was used.

Stroke classification

LAA was found among 28 (7.3%) of patients according to the TOAST classification (Table 4). Atherosclerosis was present among all of the patients in LAA group, and least present by 34.4% among patients of stroke with other determined cause (SOC) (p <0.001), Figure 2. In the SUC group ≤49 years, 71.4% of males and 37.5% of females had prevalent atherosclerosis.

Table 4.

Stroke subtypes according to TOAST classification in young stroke patients related to gender and age group.

	All n = 385	Men		Women
Stroke subtypes, n (%)	All n = 385	≤49 years n = 94	≥50 years n = 170	≤49 years n = 58	≥50 years n= 63	p-value sex	p-value age group
LAA	28 (7.3)	2 (2.1)	17 (10.0)	4 (6.9)	5 (7.9)
CE	100 (26.0)	36 (38.3)	40 (23.3)	17 (29.3)	7 (11.1)
SAO	73 (19.0)	17 (18.1)	29 (17.1)	6 (10.3)	21 (33.3)	0.385	<0.001
SOC	41 (10.6)	16 (17.0)	10 (5.9)	11 (19.0)	4 (6.3)
SUC	143 (37.1)	23 (24.5)	74 (43.5)	20 (34.5)	26 (41.3)

Abbreviations: TOAST: Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; LAA: large-artery atherosclerosis; CE: cardiac embolism; SAO: small artery occlusion; SOC: stroke of other determined cause; SUC: stroke of undetermined cause; p-value: from Chi-square test.

Figure 2.

Prevalence of atherosclerosis at different vascular areas^a among 324 stroke patients related to TOAST classification. Abbreviations: TOAST: Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; LAA: large-artery atherosclerosis; CE: cardiac embolism; SAO: small artery occlusion; SOC: stroke of other determined cause; SUC: stroke of undetermined cause; y: years. (a) Atherosclerosis was evaluated in seven vascular areas by electrocardiogram, ankle–arm index and by ultrasonography of abdominal aorta and right and left carotid and femoral arteries for intima-media thickness (IMT) measurements. Among several measurements at any segmental level, the maximum IMT value was used.

Follow-up data

The average duration of our outpatient clinical follow-up was 5.3 years for all participants. There were 323 (83.9%) patients and 219 (84.2%) controls participating in the 5-year follow-up. Three patients had telephone interviews. During follow-up, 44 patients (13.7%) and 9 controls (4.1%) experienced any CVE (p = 0.001), and occurrence of CVE was higher in young female patients than controls (p = 0.002). In total, 21 (5.5%) patients and 9 (3.5%) controls died (p = 0.524). No difference was found after adjustment for age and sex. Seven patients died within 1 month after hospital admission due to malign oedema (4), basilarisocclusion (2) and subarachnoidal haemorrhage (1). Regarding 14 patients who died after the first month after hospital admission, and within 31th August 2020, when dead–alive state was checked, the causes of deaths were recurrent stroke (1), coronary heart disease (1), lung embolism (1), cancer (4), infection (3), dementia (1) and unknown cause (3). The causes of death among controls were cancer (4), infection (1), respiratory failure after lung transplant (1) and unknown cause (3).

CVEs and mortality

Adjusted for sex and age, occurrence of CVEs was associated with ischaemic ECG (OR 3.48; p = 0.005), AAI ≤0.9 (OR 5.15; p = 0.004), fIMT ≥0.9 mm (OR 2.48; p = 0.019) and increased number of areas with atherosclerosis (NAA) (OR 1.31; p = 0.025) among patients, and with presence of AAP (OR 7.41; p = 0.023), cIMT ≥0.9 mm (OR 11.17; p = 0.042), fIMT ≥0.9 mm (OR 9.69; p = 0.010) and increased NAA (OR 1.81; p = 0.014) among controls (Table 5). Adjusted for all variables, we did not find any significant results with occurrence of CVEs. No interactions were found between sex, age and vascular areas. Adjusted for sex and age, mortality was associated with higher age (HR 1.08; p = 0.036), ischaemic ECG (HR 3.51; p = 0.009) and increased NAA (HR 1.36; p = 0.047) among patients, and with cIMT ≥0.9 mm (HR 8.26; p = 0.013) among controls (Table 6). Adjusted for all variables, mortality was associated with increased NAA (HR 1.98; p = 0.047) among patients, and with cIMT ≥0.9 mm (HR 8.51; p = 0.014) among controls.

Table 5.

Results from logistic regression of any new cardiovascular event within 5-year follow-up of 323 patients and 219 controls.

Groups		Adjusted for sex and age			Adjusted for all variables
Variables	n	OR	95% CI	p-value	OR	95% CI	p-value
Patients						n = 273
Male sex	321	0.93	(0.45, 1.92)	0.851	1.30	(0.55, 3.08)	0.544
Age at inclusion (y)	321	1.03	(0.99, 1.07)	0.125	1.02	(0.97, 1.07)	0.486
Ischaemic ECG	321	3.48	(1.45, 8.33)	0.005	2.28	(0.61, 8.44)	0.218
AAI ≤0.9	309	5.15	(1.68, 15.84)	0.004	3.29	(0.79, 13.71)	0.103
AAP	288	1.45	(0.70, 3.02)	0.318	0.96	(0.33, 2.80)	0.947
cIMT ≥0.9 mm	321	1.82	(0.80, 4.14)	0.155	0.92	(0.36, 2.39)	0.869
fIMT ≥0.9 mm	317	2.48	(1.16, 5.30)	0.019	2.22	(0.79, 6.20)	0.129
NAA^a	260	1.31	(0.00, 0.32)	0.025	1.09	(0.73, 1.63)	0.685
Controls						n = 197
Male sex	219	0.82	(0.19, 3.49)	0.789	1.80	(0.37, 8.71)	0.465
Age at inclusion (y)	219	1.05	(0.95, 1.16)	0.311	0.95	(0.84, 1.09)	0.473
Ischaemic ECG	210	0.00	—	—	0.00	—	—
AAI ≤0.9	216	3.81	(0.36, 40.05)	0.265	2.07	(0.09, 47.96)	0.650
AAP	208	7.41	(1.32, 41.59)	0.023	3.37	(0.39, 29.21)	0.270
cIMT ≥0.9 mm	218	11.17	(0.00, 6.30)	0.042	5.53	(0.48, 63.30)	0.169
fIMT ≥0.9 mm	218	9.69	(1.71, 55.03)	0.010	4.16	(0.62, 27.97)	0.143
NAA^a	202	1.81	(1.13, 2.91)	0.014	1.05	(0.48, 2.33)	0.898

Abbreviations: n: number of subjects; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; y: years; ECG: electrocardiogram; AAI: ankle–arm index; AAP: abdominal aorta plaque; cIMT/fIMT: carotid/femoral intima-media thickness.

^aNAA = number of vascular areas with atherosclerosis, indicating whether there is increasing trend with increasing NAA.

Table 6.

Results of Cox regression of mortality risk within 5-year follow-up of 385 patients and 260 controls.

Groups		Adjusted for sex and age			Adjusted for all variables
Variables	n	HR	95% CI	p-value	HR	95% CI	p-value
Patients						n = 323
Male sex	383	1.24	(0.50, 3.09)	0.642	1.51	(0.47, 4.84)	0.487
Age at inclusion (y)	383	1.08	(1.00, 1.15)	0.036	1.09	(0.99, 1.19)	0.081
Ischaemic ECG	383	3.51	(1.36, 9.07)	0.009	1.52	(0.33, 7.04)	0.596
AAI ≤0.9	360	2.90	(0.64, 13.09)	0.165	0.77	(0.12, 5.13)	0.786
AAP	345	1.08	(0.41, 2.81)	0.880	0.35	(0.06, 1.94)	0.231
cIMT ≥0.9 mm	381	0.59	(0.23, 1.52)	0.271	0.36	(0.08, 1.56)	0.171
fIMT ≥0.9 mm	376	0.85	(0.33, 2.19)	0.734	0.59	(0.11, 3.10)	0.533
NAA^a	310	1.36	(1.00, 1.84)	0.047	1.98	(1.01, 3.86)	0.047
Controls						n = 219
Male sex	239	2.84	(0.61, 13.21)	0.183	3.42	(0.73, 16.02)	0.119
Age at inclusion (y)	239	1.07	(0.98, 1.16)	0.132	1.01	(0.92, 1.12)	0.776
Ischaemic ECG	235	3.36	(0.44, 25.98)	0.245	2.67	(0.23, 31.55)	0.436
AAI ≤0.9	235	0.00	(0,−)	1.000	0.00	—	—
AAP	227	0.98	(0.30, 3.20)	0.972	0.76	(0.12, 4.88)	0.776
cIMT ≥0.9 mm	238	8.26	(1.57, 43.41)	0.013	8.51	(1.55, 46.72)	0.014
fIMT ≥0.9 mm	238	1.09	(0.32, 3.74)	0.886	0.60	(0.13, 2.74)	0.507
NAA^a	219	1.14	(0.71, 1.83)	0.578	1.13	(0.48, 2.69)	0.776

Abbreviations: n: number of subjects; HR: hazards ratio; CI: confidence interval; y: years; ECG: electrocardiogram; AAI: ankle–arm index; AAP: abdominal aorta plaque; cIMT/fIMT: carotid/femoral intima-media thickness.

^aNAA: number of vascular areas with atherosclerosis, indicating whether there is increasing trend with increasing NAA.

Discussion

Prevalent atherosclerosis

To our knowledge, this is the first study of young and middle-aged acute IS patients and controls which has described the state of the arteries at different vascular areas, regardless of the cause of stroke. The overall result is that atherosclerosis is prevalent even in young patients and controls, and middle-aged males are most affected, confirming established knowledge. Detailed assessment demonstrated atherosclerosis in half of young male patients and one third of young female patients. Young patients had numerically more atherosclerosis than controls had, but there was a statistical difference only between young female patients and controls.

Our findings are in line with other studies showing that clinical CVEs are only ‘the tip of the iceberg’,¹⁷ and that subclinical and clinical atherosclerosis starts in early life, and increases with age, particularly in males.² The Aragon Workers’ Health Study assessed 1423 males, aged 40–59 years, for coronary artery calcium score and carotid and femoral plaques, and reported subclinical atherosclerosis in 72% of participants.¹⁸ Hormonal influences are assumed to contribute to the delayed development of atherosclerosis in females.¹⁹

Surrogate markers for atherosclerosis

Since atherosclerosis is regarded as a risk factor for CVEs and mortality, various non-invasive surrogate markers for atherosclerosis have been identified.²⁰ We found that all of the investigated vascular areas were associated with CVEs in patients as well as controls. We found that increased fIMT was common vascular area among patients and controls that predicted CVEs. Previous studies have associated fIMT with extent of coronary atherosclerosis²¹ and carotid atherosclerosis,²² and regarded fIMT as a surrogate marker for atherosclerosis.²³ Kocygit et al. followed 215 subjects (mean age 54.85 years) for a median of 24 months and found that femoral plaques were independent predictors for CVEs.²⁴ Giannoukas et al. reported that fIMT separately or in combination with cIMT was related to cardiovascular disease.²⁵

CIMT and AAI are well-established surrogate markers for subclinical atherosclerosis and strong predictors of future CVEs and mortality.^20,26,27 In the ARIC (Atherosclerosis risk in communities) study, cIMT predicted CVEs or death in participants recruited from four communities in the United States.²⁷ A meta-analysis has shown that increased cIMT by 0.10 mm is associated with an increased risk of 18% for stroke and 15% for myocardial infarction.²⁶ Our study confirms that cIMT predicts increased risk of CVEs and mortality among controls and that AAI is strongly related to CVE among patients.

Another important finding in our study is that ischaemic ECG predicts CVEs and mortality among patients, regardless of age and sex. Also, Bacquer et al. reported that major abnormalities in ECG are strongly associated with CVE and mortality in both sexes.²⁸ Furthermore, ECG findings revealing silent ischaemia has been a powerful and independent predictor for cardiac mortality in another study.²⁹

Regarding AAP, we found a positive association with CVEs among controls. Li et al. reported higher prevalence of AAP in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), compared to those without CAD.³⁰ In the Rotterdam study, AAP, measured by X-ray in 6389 subjects, was associated with MI.³¹

Stroke classification by TOAST

The TOAST classification is most widely used by date, but there is the problem of the big group of up to 33–40% of young stroke patients with SUC,^6,32 and this is in line with our results.

Strengths and limitations

The major strength of NOR-SYS is the population-based design with inclusion of consecutive acute IS patients and comprehensive vascular work-up based on a standardised protocol. The number of unobtainable IMT measurements was low. We used mean IMT measurements, which provide information on cardiovascular risk even in absence of plaques.³³ PCI of the FA is associated with haematoma, intimal dissection or arterial occlusion.³⁴ However, in our study, only few patients with increased fIMT on the right side had undergone PCI.

An important study limitation was inequality of sex group sizes, with a high number of male patients and relatively low number of male controls. Our controls were partners of included patients, selected as such to improve the three-generation design of NOR-SYS, and also including joint offspring. We expected higher risk factor matching between patients and partners compared with controls selected by random.³⁵ We chose not to include intracranial arterial pathology analysis due to uncertainties in defining the cause and degree of stenosis by common imaging methods.³⁶ Another limitation was the low number of outcome events, especially numbers of deaths.

Conclusion

Atherosclerosis is highly prevalent in our study population, being found in half of the young male patients and one third of the young female patients ≤49 years. Comprehensive investigation reveals a far higher prevalence of atherosclerosis than found by TOAST criteria.

In oncology, staging of tumours has for decades been the first step to tailor individual treatment. Staging arteries of young stroke patients should be performed, accordingly. This would contribute to potential early individual-tailored secondary prophylaxis, and selection of patients to targeted and reasonable treatment, and future more targeted genetic diagnostics in order to search for why we do find serious early arterial disease (LAA) in some patients, while other patients are protected from development of atherosclerosis despite of a high number of risk factors. Ultrasound images of good quality were used in this study as teaching tool to explain interested patients the findings and importance of life-style changes, and to take and continue medication that we evaluate necessary for secondary prevention. Randomised future studies could show if this could contribute significantly to reach important treatment goals.

Footnotes

Acknowlegdements

We are indebted to our study nurses, Linn Elin Rødal, Maria Sætveit Stokkan and Toril Synnøve Sormerud, and the secretary, Jeanette Haveland Antoniazzi, for their dedication and help.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

This research was funded by the Western Norway Health Trust, which had no influence on the study design, data collection and presentation or the conclusions made.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics, western Norway (REK-VEST 2010/74).

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects before the study.

Trial registration

The study was registered in NCT01597453

Guarantor

UWA

Contributorship

UWA conceived the study, and gained the ethical approval. Protocol development was done by UWA, and RM and MB were also involved in the ultrasound protocol. Data collection was done by BN, AF, HØ, KMS and UWA. Data interpretation of electrocardiograms were done by SS. TOAST classification of stroke was done by HN. BN did literature search and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Statistical analysis was done by BN and GEE. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript, and approved the final version.

ORCID iD

Beenish Nawaz

References

Putaala

Yesilot

Waje-Andreassen

, et al. Demographic and geographic vascular risk factor differences in European young adults with ischemic stroke: the 15 cities young stroke study. Stroke 2012; 43: 2624–2630.

Putaala

. Ischemic stroke in the young: Current perspectives on incidence, risk factors, and cardiovascular prognosis. Eur Stroke J 2016; 1: 28–40.

Schneider

Vibo

Taba

, et al. Mortality in young adult patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 2020; 141: 242–249.

Joseph

Ackerman

Talley

, et al. Manifestations of coronary atherosclerosis in young trauma victims--an autopsy study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 459–467.

Thiripurasundari

Sreekumari

Aravindan

. Autopsy-based morphometric study of coronary atherosclerosis in young adults. Indian J Med Res 2019; 150: 592–597.

Yesilot Barlas

Putaala

Waje-Andreassen

, et al. Etiology of first-ever ischaemic stroke in European young adults: the 15 cities young stroke study. Eur J Neurol 2013; 20: 1431–1439.

Waje-Andreassen

Thomassen

Jusufovic

, et al. Ischaemic stroke at a young age is a serious event--final results of a population-based long-term follow-up in Western Norway. Eur J Neurol 2013; 20: 818–823.

Rutten-Jacobs

Arntz

Maaijwee

, et al. Cardiovascular disease is the main cause of long-term excess mortality after ischemic stroke in young adults. Hypertension 2015; 65: 670–675.

Putaala

Martinez-Majander

Saeed

, et al. Searching for Explanations for Cryptogenic Stroke in the Young: Revealing the Triggers, Causes, and Outcome (SECRETO): Rationale and design. Eur Stroke J 2017; 2: 116–125.

10.

Lee

Kil

Kim

, et al. Usefulness of plaque magnetic resonance imaging in identifying high-risk carotid plaques irrespective of the degree of stenosis. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg 2017; 19: 291–300.

11.

Zhou

Chew

Ravn

, et al. Plaque pathology and coronary thrombosis in the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndromes. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 1999; 230: 3–11.

12.

Adams

Bendixen

Kappelle

, et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke 1993; 24: 35–41.

13.

Fromm

Thomassen

Naess

, et al. The Norwegian Stroke in the Young Study (NOR-SYS): Rationale and design. BMC Neurol 2013; 13: 89.

14.

Nawaz

Eide

Fromm

, et al. Young ischaemic stroke incidence and demographic characteristics - The Norwegian stroke in the young study - A three-generation research program. Eur Stroke J 2019; 4: 347–354.

15.

Simova

. Intima-media thickness: appropriate evaluation and proper measurement, described. E-journal ESC Counc Cardiol Pract 2015; 13(21).

16.

Touboul

Hennerici

Meairs

, et al. Mannheim carotid intima-media thickness and plaque consensus (2004-2006-2011). An update on behalf of the advisory board of the 3rd, 4th and 5th watching the risk symposia, at the 13th, 15th and 20th European Stroke Conferences, Mannheim, Germany, 2004, Brussels, Belgium, 2006, and Hamburg, Germany, 2011. Cerebrovasc Dis 2012; 34: 290–296.

17.

Toth

. Subclinical atherosclerosis: what it is, what it means and what we can do about it. Int J Clin Pract 2008; 62: 1246–1254.

18.

Laclaustra

Casasnovas

Fernández-Ortiz

, et al. Femoral and carotid subclinical atherosclerosis association with risk factors and coronary calcium: the AWHS Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 67: 1263–1274.

19.

Arnold

Cassis

Eghbali

, et al. Sex hormones and sex chromosomes cause sex differences in the development of cardiovascular diseases. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2017; 37: 746–756.

20.

Patel

Rajaram

Pandya

, et al. Emerging, noninvasive surrogate markers of atherosclerosis. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2004; 6: 60–68.

21.

Kirhmajer

Banfic

Vojkovic

, et al. Correlation of femoral intima-media thickness and the severity of coronary artery disease. Angiology 2011; 62: 134–139.

22.

Bedi

Nagra

Fukumoto

, et al. Detection of subclinical atherosclerosis in peripheral arterial beds with B-mode ultrasound: a proposal for guiding the decision for medical intervention and an artifact-corrected volumetric scoring index. Glob Heart 2014; 9: 367–378.

23.

de Groot

Hovingh

Wiegman

, et al. Measurement of arterial wall thickness as a surrogate marker for atherosclerosis. Circulation 2004; 109: III33–III38.

24.

Kocyigit

Gurses

Taydas

, et al. Role of femoral artery ultrasound imaging in cardiovascular event risk prediction in a primary prevention cohort at a medium-term follow-up. J Cardiol 2019; 75(5): 537–543.

25.

Giannoukas

Antoniou

Saleptsis

, et al. Common femoral artery intima-media thickness as marker for cardiovascular disease in asymptomatic adults. Vasa 2009; 38: 147–154.

26.

Lorenz

Markus

Bots

, et al. Prediction of clinical cardiovascular events with carotid intima-media thickness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation 2007; 115: 459–467.

27.

Nambi

Chambless

Folsom

, et al. Carotid intima-media thickness and presence or absence of plaque improves prediction of coronary heart disease risk: the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55: 1600–1607.

28.

De Bacquer

De Backer

Kornitzer

, et al. Prognostic value of ECG findings for total, cardiovascular disease, and coronary heart disease death in men and women. Heart 1998; 80: 570–577.

29.

Deedwania

Carbajal

. Silent ischemia during daily life is an independent predictor of mortality in stable angina. Circulation 1990; 81: 748–756.

30.

Luo

, et al. Association between abdominal aortic plaque and coronary artery disease. Clin Interv Aging 2016; 11: 683–688.

31.

Van der Meer

Bots

Hofman

, et al. Predictive value of noninvasive measures of atherosclerosis for incident myocardial infarction: the Rotterdam Study. Circulation 2004; 109: 1089–1094.

32.

Rolfs

Fazekas

Grittner

, et al. Acute cerebrovascular disease in the young: the Stroke in Young Fabry Patients study. Stroke 2013; 44: 340–349.

33.

Johnsen

Mathiesen

. Carotid plaque compared with intima-media thickness as a predictor of coronary and cerebrovascular disease. Curr Cardiol Rep 2009; 11: 21–27.

34.

Rashid

Hughes

SJBJC

. Risk factors for femoral arterial complications and management. Br J Cardiol 2016; 23: 155–158.

35.

Higgins

. Epidemiology and prevention of coronary heart disease in families. Am J Med 2000; 108: 387–395.

36.

Leng

Liebeskind

. Intracranial atherosclerosis. In: Saba

Raz

(eds) Neurovascular Imaging: From Basics to Advanced Concepts. New York, NY: Springer; 2014, 1–30.

Prevalence of atherosclerosis and association with 5-year outcome: The Norwegian Stroke in the Young Study

Abstract

Objectives:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusion:

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Participants

Baseline procedures

Prevalent atherosclerosis

Stroke classification

Follow-up data

Ethical considerations

Statistics

Results

Study population

Clinical and ultrasonographic findings

Missing data

Prevalence of atherosclerosis

Stroke classification

Follow-up data

CVEs and mortality

Discussion

Prevalent atherosclerosis

Surrogate markers for atherosclerosis

Stroke classification by TOAST

Strengths and limitations

Conclusion

Footnotes

Acknowlegdements

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

Ethical approval

Informed consent

Trial registration

Guarantor

Contributorship

ORCID iD

References