This article examines the case of a rubber grower cooperative in the East Garo Hills of Meghalaya, North East India, which has been crucial in organising the tribal communities for collective action and scaling up rubber development programs in the area. Data were collected from a sample of 200 individual farmers from the Meghalaya rubber plantation and conducted an in-depth interview on inclusive business models in this particular area. The descriptive and explorative research design was applied with an objective to measure the empowerment of Meghalaya rubber farmers, study their problems and find out the scope of the inclusive business model for rubber farmers in Meghalaya. The result of this study demonstrates that start-up choices are emphatically connected to the opening of opportunities, genuine leadership and risk-taking parts of social business.
AbuG. A., & SoomA. (2016). Analysis of factors affecting food security in rural and urban farming households of Benue State, Nigeria. International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), 4(1), 55–68.
2.
AcharjeeM. K., KhayerA., ForhadM. N., & NathS. D. (2015). Assessment of interregional disparity and identification of prevalent factors of women empowerment: Empirical evidence based on Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey, 2011 data. Asian Social Science, 11(26), 154–165.
3.
AmyxC. (2005). Small business challenges–The perception problem: Size doesn’t matter. Washington Business Journal, 5.
4.
AnsariS., MunirK., & GreggT. (2012). Impact at the ‘bottom of the pyramid’: The role of social capital in capability development and community empowerment. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 813–842.
5.
AthanneS. (2017, May11). Entrepreneurship in Kenya. Nairobi. iiste.org/Journals/index:php/EJBM/article/download/33856/34806
6.
BaltiwalsS. (1994). The meaning of women’s empowerment: New concepts from actions. In SenG., GermainA., ChenL. C. (Eds.), Population policies reconsidered: Health, empowerment and rights. Harvard Centre for Population and Development Studies.
7.
BennisW., & NanusB. (1985). Leaders. Harper and Row.
8.
BlauJ. R., & AlbaR. D. (1982). Empowering nets of participation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(3), 363–379.
9.
BornsteinD. (1998). Changing the world on a shoestring. Atlantic Monthly, 28(1), 34–39.
10.
BurkeW. (1986). Leadership as empowering others. In S. S. (Ed.), Executive power (p. 55). Jossey-Bass.
11.
ChahineT. (2016). Introduction to social entrepreneurship. Taylor and Francis.
12.
ChandraP., & TirupatiD. (2002). Managing complex networks in emerging markets: The story of AMUL. Indian Institute of Management.
13.
CongerJ. A., & KanungoR. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471–482.
14.
CookM. (1995). The future of U.S. agricultural co-operatives: A neo-institutional approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77(5), 1153–1155.
15.
DeesG. J. (1998). The meaning of ‘social entrepreneurship’[Seminal White Paper]. Center for Advancement of Social Entrepreneurship (CASE).
16.
EakenE. (2003, December20). How to save the world? Treat it like a business. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/20/arts/how-to-save-the-world-treat-it-like-a-business.html
17.
FrancineP. X., & JosephM. V. (2006). Women empowerment: The psychological dimension. Rajagiri Journal of Social Development, 5(2), 163–176.
18.
GoswamiS. N., & ChallaO. (2007). Economic analysis of smallholder rubber plantations in West Garo Hills District of Meghalaya. Indian Journal of Agricultural and Economics, 657.
19.
HahnR. (2012). Inclusive business, human rights and the dignity of the poor: A glance beyond economic impacts of adapted business models. Business Ethics: A European Review, 21(1), 47–63.
20.
HellerP. (1996). Social capital as a product of class mobilisation and state intervention: Industrial workers in Kerala, India. World Development, 24(6), 1055–1071.
21.
KeyN., SadouletE., & JanvryA. (2000). Transaction costs and agricultural household supply response. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82(2), 245–259.
22.
KimathiJ. (2009). Going it alone. Msafiri, 35.
23.
KrishnakumarA. K., & MeenattoorR. (1999). Cultivation in non-traditional areas. In Jacob P. G. (Ed.), Natural rubber: Agro-management and crop (pp. 487–500). Rubber Research Institute of India.
24.
MMCS. (2005). Origin and background of MMCS with indicators of growth. Mendipathar Multipurpose Co-Operative Society (MMCS) Ltd.
25.
ParkerL. E., & PriceR. H. (1994). Empowered managers and empowered workers: The effects of managerial support and managerial perceived control on workers’ sense of control over decision making. Human Relations, 47(8), 911–928.
26.
PatibandlaM., & SastryT. (2004). Capitalism and cooperation: Cooperative institutions in a developing economy. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(27), 2997–3004.
27.
RajagopalR. (2005). Rural marketing system in the North Eastern states: Problems, diagnosis and strategy perspective(Socio Economic Research Reports, 72). Planning Government of India, 190.
28.
RehmanT. (2017). The role of ICT in gender equality and empowerment of women in India. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology, 3(8), 562–565.
29.
ReisT. K. (1999). Unleashing the new resources and entrepreneurship for the common good: A scan, synthesis and scenario for action. W. K. Kellogg Foundation.
30.
RobbinsT. L., CrinoM. D., & FredendallL. D. (2002). An integrative model of the empowerment process. Human Resource Management Review, 12(3), 419–443.
31.
Rubber Board. (2005). Rubber growers companion. Rubber Board, Government of India.
32.
Rubber Board. (2008). Rubber statistical news. Rubber Board, Government of India.
33.
Sachchidananda. (1989). Shifting cultivation in India. Concept Publishing Company.
34.
SeelosC., & MairJ. (2005). Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor. Business Horizons, 48(3), 241–246.
35.
ShahP. (2017). Gandhiji’s views on basic education and its relevance. Pune Research an International Journal in English, 3(4), 412.
36.
SinghA. (2014). Inclusive development through innovative model: A case of KnidsGreen Pvt Ltd. (India). International Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 3(3), 197–213.
37.
SinghS. S., ChauhanJ. K., & DevaraniL. (2021). Review on rubber producers’ societies in North East India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 10(1), 2814–2819.
38.
SpreitzerG. M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 483–504.
39.
StefansonB., & FultonM. E. (1997). New generation co-operatives: Responding to changes in agriculture. Centre for the Study of Co-Operatives, 6.
40.
SuryanarayanaN. V. S., RaoP., & ShanmukhaH. G. (2011). Educational empowerment of women. Discovery Publishing House Pvt. Ltd.
41.
ViswanathanP. K. (2000). Integrated rubber farming and livelihood systems in Northeastern India. In Agriculture and a changing environment in Northeastern India (pp. 263–288). Routledge.
42.
ViswanathanP. K. (2008). Co-operatives and collective action: Case of a rubber grower co-operative in East Garo Hills in Meghalaya, North East India. Gujarat Institute of Development Research.
43.
WilliamsonO. (2002). The theory of the firm as governance structure: From choice to contract. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(3), 171–195.
44.
ZimmermanM. A. (1990). Taking aim on empowerment research: On the distinction between individual and psychological conceptions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18(1), 169–177.
