This study aims to explain the determinants of entrepreneurship among Indian individuals. The researchers have examined the role of social (legitimacy) and personal (personality, competency and financial resources) factors related to an individual’s new venture creation in India. This study utilises the data set of 3,403 Indian respondents from the latest available individual-level data collected by the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Binary logistic regression has been employed to test the study’s proposed hypotheses. The results indicate that constructs related to financial resources, entrepreneurial personality and entrepreneurial competencies significantly predict the individual’s decision to start a new venture. However, in contrast to many previous studies, factors related to social legitimacy (social status and professional attraction) were not significant in determining the start-up decision. Policy implications have been discussed.
AaboenL., DuboisA., & LindF. (2013). Strategizing as networking for new ventures. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(7), 1033–1041.
2.
AhmadS. Z., XavierS. R., & BakarA. R. A. (2014). Examining entrepreneurial intention through cognitive approach using Malaysia GEM data. Journal of Organisational Change Management, 27(3), 449–464.
3.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
4.
AndersonM. (2008). Social networks and the cognitive motivation to realize network opportunities: A study of manager’ information gathering behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(1), 51–78.
5.
ArafatM. Y., & SaleemI. (2017). Examining start-up Intention of Indians through cognitive approach: A study using GEM data. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 7(1), 1–11.
6.
ArafatM. Y., AhmadM. J., KhanA. M., KhanM. S., KhanM. M., & DwivediA. K. (2019). Factors influencing women entrepreneurship in India[Paper presentation]. 13th Biennial Conference on Entrepreneurship. http://library.ediindia.ac.in:8181/xmlui//handle/123456789/8123
7.
ArafatM. Y., AliJ., DwivediA. K., & SaleemI. (2020a). Social and cognitive aspects of women entrepreneurs: Evidence from India. Vikalpa, 45(4), 223–239.
8.
ArafatM. Y., KhanA. M., AnsariM. S., & SaleemI. (2022). What drives internationalization of new ventures? Evidence from India. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 1–11.
9.
ArafatM. Y., KhanA. M., SaleemI., KhanN. A., & KhanM. M. (2020b). Intellectual and cognitive aspects of women entrepreneurs in India. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 11(3), 278–297.
10.
ArafatM. Y., SaleemI., & DeviT. P. (2021b). Drivers of EV charging infrastructure entrepreneurship in India. In Developing charging infrastructure and technologies for electric vehicles (pp. 208–219). IGI Global.
11.
ArafatM. Y., SaleemI., & DwivediA. K. (2020c). Understanding entrepreneurial intention among Indian youth aspiring for self-employment. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 13(3), 185–200.
12.
ArafatM. Y., SaleemI., AliJ., KhanA., & BalharethH. H. (Eds.). (2021a). Driving factors for venture creation and success in agricultural entrepreneurship. IGI Global. http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-2349-3
13.
ArafatM. Y., SaleemI., DwivediA. K., & KhanA. (2020d). Determinants of agricultural entrepreneurship: A GEM data based study. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(1), 345–370.
14.
Arenius,P., & Clercq,D. D. (2005). A network-based approach on opportunity recognition. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 249–265.
15.
AreniusP., & MinnitiM. (2005). Perceptual variables and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 233–247.
16.
AudretschD. (2002). Entrepreneurship: A survey of the literature(Enterprise Paper No. 14). Institute for Development Strategies, Indiana University & Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR).
17.
AutioE., PathakS., & WennbergK. (2013). Consequences of cultural practices for entrepreneurial behaviors. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(4), 334–362.
18.
BabbE., & BabbS. (1992). Psychological traits of rural entrepreneurs. Journal of Socio-Economics, 21(4), 353–362.
19.
BakarA. R. A., AhmadS. Z., WrightN. S., & SkokoH. (2017). The propensity to business start-up: Evidence from global entrepreneurship monitor (GEM) data in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 9(3), 263–285.
20.
BalloutH. (2009). Career commitment and career success: Moderating role of self-efficacy. Career Development International, 14(7), 655–670.
21.
BaronR. A. (2000). Psychological perspectives on entrepreneurship: Cognitive and social factors in entrepreneurs’ success. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(1), 15–18.
22.
BaronR. A., & ShaneS. (2008). Entrepreneurship: A process perspective(2nd ed.). South-Western College Publishing.
23.
BatesT. (1990). Entrepreneur human capital inputs and small business longevity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 72(4), 551–559.
24.
BegleyT. (1995). Using founder status, age of firm and company growth rate as the basis for distinguishing entrepreneurs form managers of smaller businesses. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(3), 249–263.
25.
Begley,T. M., & Tan,W. L. (2001). The socio-cultural environment for entrepreneurship: A comparison between East Asian and Anglo-Saxon countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 537–553.
26.
Bitektine,A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–179.
27.
BurtR. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.
28.
BygraveW. D. (2003, April). Financing entrepreneurs and their businesses. In The entrepreneurial advantage of nations: First annual global entrepreneurship symposium. United Nations Headquarters. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.457.3424&rep=rep1&type=pdf
29.
Camelo-OrdazC., Diánez-GonzálezJ., & Ruiz-NavarroP. (2016). The influence of gender on entrepreneurial intention: The mediating role of perceptual factors. Business Research Quarterly, 19(4), 261–277.
30.
CarreeM., & ThurikA. (2003). The impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth. In AudretschD. & AcsZ. (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 437–471). Springer.
31.
CetindamarD., GuptaV. K., KaradenizE. E., & EgricanN. (2012). What the numbers tell: The impact of human, family and financial capital on women and men’s entry into entrepreneurship in Turkey. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 24(1–2), 29–51.
32.
ChristensenP., & KlyverK. (2006). Management consultancy in small firms: How does interaction work?Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 13(3), 299–313.
33.
CromieS. (2000). Assessing entrepreneurial inclinations: Some approaches empirical evidence. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9(1), 7–30.
34.
DavidssonP., & HonigB. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301–331.
35.
DiMaggio,P. J., & Powell,W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 147–160.
36.
do PaçoA., Alves,H., & Nunes,C. (2012). Ecotourism from both hotels and tourists’ perspective. Economics & Sociology, 5(2), 132.
37.
ElliotA. J., & McGregorH. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501–519.
38.
EntrialgoM., FernandezE., & VazquezC. (2000). Characteristics of managers as determinants of entrepreneurial orientation: Some Spanish evidence. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 1(2), 187–205.
39.
Evans,D. S., & Leighton,L. S. (1989). The determinants of changes in US self-employment, 1968–1987. Small Business Economics, 1(2), 111–119.
40.
FornahlD. (2003). Entrepreneurial activities in a regional context. In FornahlD. & BrennerT. (Eds.), Cooperation, networks and institutions in regional innovation systems (pp. 38–57). Edward Elgar.
41.
GilmoreA., CarsonD., & O’DonnellA. (2004). Small business owner-managers and their attitude to risk. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 22(3), 349–360.
42.
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, GEM. (2015). ttps://www.gemconsortium.org/
43.
GollierC. (2002). What does the classical theory have to say about household portfolios? In GuisoL., HaliassosM., & JappelliT. (Eds.), Household portfolios (pp. 27–54). MIT Press.
44.
GuisoL., HaliassosM., & JappelliT. (2003). Household stockholding in Europe: Where do we stand and where do we go?Economic Policy, 18(36), 123–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0327.00104
45.
HassanA., AnwarI., SaleemA., AlalyaniW. R., & SaleemI. (2021a). Nexus between entrepreneurship education, motivations, and intention among Indian university students: The role of psychological and contextual factors. Industry and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F09504222211053262
46.
HassanA., AnwarI., SaleemI., IslamK. B., & HussainS. A. (2021a). Individual entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intention: The mediating role of entrepreneurial motivations. Industry and Higher Education, 35(4), 403–418.
47.
HassanA., SaleemI., AnwarI., & HussainS. A. (2020). Entrepreneurial intention of Indian university students: The role of opportunity recognition and entrepreneurship education. Education + Training, 62(7–8), 843–861.
48.
HoangH., & AntoncicB. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 165–187.
49.
Honjo,Y. (2015). Why are entrepreneurship levels so low in Japan?Japan and the World Economy, 36, 88–101.
50.
HussainS. A., AhmadG., KhanA., HassanA., & ShamimM. (2022). Cognitive antecedents of the agricultural entrepreneurship intentions of Indian university students. In Driving factors for venture creation and success in agricultural entrepreneurship (pp. 121–140). IGI Global.
51.
KahnemanD. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. The American Psychologist, 58(9), 697–720.
52.
KhanA. M., ArafatM. Y., & SaleemI. (2021). Does social legitimacy matter in Indian’s decision to start new venture?Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies. (UGC, & Scopus).
53.
KhanA. M., ArafatM. Y., RaushanM. A., & SaleemI. (2020). Examining the relevance of intellectual capital in improving the entrepreneurial propensity among Indians. International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), 16(1), 123–140.
54.
KhanA. M., ArafatM. Y., RaushanM. A., KhanM. S., DwivediA. K., KhanM. M., & SaleemI. (2019a). Role of intellectual capital in augmenting the start-up intentions of Indians—An analysis using GEM data. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9(1), 1–14.
55.
KhanA. M., ArafatM. Y., RaushanM. A., SaleemI., KhanN. A., & KhanM. M. (2019b). Does intellectual capital affect the venture creation decision in India?Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 1–15.
56.
KimP., AldrichH., & KeisterL. (2006). Access (not) denied: The impact of financial, human and cultural capital on entrepreneurial entry in the United States. Small Business Economics, 27(1), 5–22.
57.
KirznerI. (1985). Discovery and the capitalist process. University of Chicago Press.
58.
KolvereidL. (1996). Organizational employment versus self-employment: Reasons for career choice intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 20(3), 23–31.
59.
Kolvereid,L., & Isaksen,E. (2006). New business start-up and subsequent entry into self-employment. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(6), 866–885.
60.
KruegerN., ReillyM., & CarsrudA. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5–6), 411–432.
61.
Langowitz,N., & Minniti,M. (2007). The entrepreneurial propensity of women. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3), 341–364.
62.
LazearE. (2004). Balanced skills and entrepreneurship. American Economic Review, 94(2), 208–211.
63.
LazearE. (2005). Entrepreneurship. Journal of Labor Economics, 23(4), 649–680.
64.
Liñán,F., & Chen,Y. W. (2009). Development and cross-cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593–617.
65.
Liñán,F., Rodríguez-Cohard,J. C., & Rueda-Cantuche,J. M. (2011). Factors affecting entrepreneurial intention levels: a role for education. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(2), 195–218.
66.
MarchJ., & ShapiraZ. (1987). Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science, 33(11), 1404–1418.
67.
MarkusH. R., & KitayamaS. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 420–430.
68.
MaulaM., AutioE., & AreniusP. (2005). What drives micro-angel investments?Small Business Economics, 25(5), 459–475.
69.
McGeeJ. E., PetersonM., MuellerS. L., & SequeiraJ. M. (2009). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: Refining the measure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(4), 965–988.
70.
Obschonka,M. (2010). Psychische Belastung bei deutschsprachigen jugendlichen und heranwachsenden Inhaftierten in der Hafteingangssituation. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 59(2), 101–118.
71.
OysermanD., & LeeS. W. S. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 311–342.
72.
PalichL., & BagbyD. (1995). Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk-taking: Challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(6), 425–438.
73.
PindadoE., & SánchezM. (2017). Researching the entrepreneurial behaviour of new and existing ventures in European agriculture. Small Business Economics, 49(2), 421–444. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9837-y
74.
ReynoldsP., BygraveW., & HayM. (2003). Global entrepreneurship monitor 2003: Global report. E. M. Kauffmann Foundation.
75.
ReynoldsP., BygraveW., AutioE., CoxL., & HayH. (2002). Global entrepreneurship monitor, 2002: Executive report. Babson College, London Business School and Kauffman Foundation.
76.
Reynolds,P., Bosma,N., Autio,E., Hunt,S., De BonoN., Servais,I., … & Chin,N. (2005). Global entrepreneurship monitor: Data collection design and implementation 1998 -2003. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 205–231.
77.
Roy,R., Akhtar,F., & Das,N. (2017). Entrepreneurial intention among science & technology students in India: Extending the theory of planned behavior. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(4), 1013–1041.
78.
SaleemA., AliJ., & ArafatM. Y. (2021a). Women entrepreneurs and agricultural start-ups: Cognitive and social capital perspective. In Driving factors for venture creation and success in agricultural entrepreneurship (pp. 191–212). IGI Global.
79.
SaleemI., ArafatM. Y., BalharethH. H., HussainA., & DwivediA. K. (2021b). Cognitive aspects of disadvantaged entrepreneurs: Evidence from India. Community Development, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2021.1972016
80.
Sexton,C. (1994). Self-managed work teams: TQM technology at the employee level. Journal of Organizational Change Management.
81.
SchumpeterJ. (1934). The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press.
82.
SchumpeterJ. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper & Brothers.
83.
ShaneS., & CableD. (2002). Network ties, reputation and financing of new ventures. Management Science, 48(3), 364–381.
84.
Shepherd,D. A., Saade,F. P., & Wincent,J. (2020). How to circumvent adversity? Refugee-entrepreneurs’ resilience in the face of substantial and persistent adversity. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(4), 105940.
85.
Shinnar,R. S., Aguilera,M. B., & Lyons,T. S. (2011). Co-ethnic markets: Financial penalty or opportunity?International Business Review, 20(6), 646–658.
86.
SinghR. (2000). Entrepreneurial opportunity recognition through social networks. Garland Publishing.
87.
SmeltzerL., Van HookB., & HuttR. (1991). Analysis and use of advisors as information sources in venture startups. Journal of Small Business Management, 29(3), 10–20.
88.
Sorenson,O., & Audia,P. G. (2000). The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989. American Journal of Sociology, 106(2), 424–462.
89.
StarrJ., & BygraveW. (1991). The assets and liabilities of prior start-up experience: An exploratory study of multiple venture entrepreneurs. In ChurchhillN., BygraveJ., CovinD., SextonD., SlevinK., VesperK., & WetzelW. (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 213–227). Babson College.
90.
StoreyD. (1994). Understanding the small business sector. Routledge.
91.
StuetzerM., ObschonkaM., BrixyU., SternbergR., & CantnerU. (2014). Regional characteristics, opportunity perception and entrepreneurial activities. Small Business Economics, 42(2), 221–244.
92.
SuchmanM. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
93.
ThomasA. S., & MuellerS. L. (2000). A case for comparative entrepreneurship: Assessing the relevance of culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2), 287–299.
94.
TkachevA., & KolvereidL. (1999). Self-employment intentions among Russian students. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 11(3), 269–280.
95.
TsaiK. H., ChangH. C., & PengC. Y. (2016). Refining the linkage between perceived capability and entrepreneurial intention: Roles of perceived opportunity, fear of failure, and gender. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(4), 1127–1145.
96.
UrbanB. (2012). The venture creation process, entrepreneurial self-efficacy and competitiveness: A focus on technology enterprises. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability, 7(3), 66–83. www.nabusinesspress.com
97.
VecianaJ. M. (2007). Entrepreneurship as a scientific research programme. In CuervoA., RibeiroD., & RoigS. (Eds.), Entrepreneurship (pp. 23–71). Springer.
98.
WarnerR. M. (2012). Applied statistics: From bivariate through multivariate techniques. SAGE Publications.
99.
WeberE. U., & MillimanR. A. (1997). Perceived risk attitudes: Relating risk perception to risky choice. Management Science, 43(2), 123–144.
100.
WyrwichM., StuetzerM., & SternbergR. (2016). Entrepreneurial role models, fear of failure, and institutional approval of entrepreneurship: A tale of two regions. Small Business Economics, 46(3), 467–492.
