Strategic Capabilities for Public Sector-led Innovation: Managing Knowledge Worker Deployment at and Quality Performance of Public R&D Laboratories in India
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2015
Strategic Capabilities for Public Sector-led Innovation: Managing Knowledge Worker Deployment at and Quality Performance of Public R&D Laboratories in India
We investigate critically the relationship between the knowledge, capabilities of
research and development (R&D) personnel, the structure and functions of
public R&D laboratories in India and their quality performance record. Our
objective is to assess whether this relationship create conditions that are
conducive to innovation in developing economy contexts. We draw on theories of
R&D management, organisation learning, knowledge management and strategic
capability to reflect on contextual complexities that arise as a result of the
nature of knowledge-based resources of research organisations.
We deploy correspondence analysis and use this method to explore the structure of
multivariate relationships among the different laboratories in the analysis,
showing how various functions impact on effective R&D management and quality
performance measured in terms of patents, publications and citations.
We find that strategic innovation practices are essential for supporting pilot
plants, experimental field stations and in the engineering and design units. We
generate a map of laboratories capturing the innovation continuum as
distinguished by their in-built strength in basic research, engineering and
design services or the working of pilot plants.
The article has particular implications for public R&D management for
innovation in a developing economy context where the public sector continues to
play a significant role in economic development. It should assist with
organising public R&D management for innovation in an emerging economy, a
relatively under-researched area. It should also help R&D management
practitioners to navigate their way effectively in delivering effective
performance outcomes at a time of rapid economic change.
AlexeisG.P.MitraA. (2007).
Tacit Knowledge Elicitation and Measurement in Research
Organisations: A Methodological Approach,
Electronic Journal of Knowledge
Management, 5(4),
373–386.
2.
AlwisR.S.HartmannE. (2008).
The use of tacit knowledge within innovative companies:
Knowledge management in innovative enterprises.
Journal of Knowledge Management,
12(1),
133–147.
3.
AndreuR.CiborraC. (1996).
Organizational learning and core capabilities development:
The role of IT. Journal of Strategic
Information Systems,
5(2),
111–127.
4.
AroraA.GambardellaA. (1994).
The Changing Technology of Technological Change: General and
Abstract Knowledge and the Division of Innovative Labour,
Research Policy,
23(5),
523–532.
5.
BanerjeeP.RoyS. (1999).
Social partnership and network: CSIR in business. In A.K.
Bagchi (Ed.), Economy and organization:
Indian institutions under the neo-liberal regime (pp.
350–397). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
ISBN: 0-7619-9333-9 (US-hb), 81-7036-798-0 (India-hb).
6.
BarneyJ.B.
(1989). Firm resources and sustainable competitive
advantage. Journal of
Management, 17(1),
99–120.
7.
BeiseM.StahlH. (1999).
Public research and industrial innovations in
Germany. Research Policy,
28,
397–422.
8.
BhojwaniH.R.GuptaA.K.
(1998). Management of publicly funded R&D in
India: Case study of CSIR. New
Delhi: Council of Scientific and Industrial
Research.
9.
BirkinshawJ.NobelR.RidderstraleJ. (2002).
Knowledge as a contingency variable: Do the characteristics
of knowledge predict organization structure?
Organization Science,
13(3),
274–289.
10.
BremserW.M.BarskyN.P.
(2004). Utilizing the Balanced Scorecard for R&D
Performance Measurement, R&D
Management, 34(3),
229–238.
11.
BrockhoffK.K.KochG.PearsonA.W.
(1997). Business process re-engineering: Experiences
in R&D.Technology Analysis and Strategic Management,
9(2),
163–178.
12.
BrownM.G.SvensonR.A.
(1998). Measuring R&D
Productivity, Research Technology
Management, 41(6),
30–35.
13.
CantnerU.JoelK.SchmidtT. (2009).
The use of knowledge management by German
innovators. Journal of Knowledge
Management, 13(4),
187–203.
14.
ChenN.D.LiangP.T.LinB. (2010).
An Ecological Model for Organizational Knowledge
Management, Journal of Computer Information
Systems, 50(3),
11–22.
15.
ChiesaV.MasellaC. (1996).
Searching for an Effective Measure of R&D
Performance, Management
Decision, 34(7),
49–57.
16.
ChooC.W.
(1996). The knowledge organization: How
organizations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge and
make decision. International Journal of
Information Management,
16(5),
329–340.
17.
CollinsD.J.WorthingtonJ.W.ReyesM.P.RomeroM. (2010).
Knowledge management, supply chain technologies, and firm
performance. Management Research
Review, 33(10),
947–960.
DavenportT.H.PrusakL. (1998).
Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they
know. Boston, MA:
Harvard Business School
Press.
20.
DuttaS.WiessA.M.
(1997). The relationship between a firm’s
level of technological innovativeness and its pattern of partnership
agreements. Management
Science, 43(3),
343–356.
21.
FirestoneJ.M.McElroyM.W.
(2005). Defining knowledge management: Knowledge
management or not knowledge management? That is the
question. Strategic Direction,
21(10),
22–24.
22.
FreemanR.B.
(2006). Does globalization of the
scientific/engineering workforce threaten economic
leadership?Innovation Policy and the Economy,
6(1),
123–158. (also NBER Working Paper
11457, Cambridge, MA).
HallR.AndraianiP. (2002).
Managing knowledge for innovation.
Long Range Planning,
35(1),
29–48.
34.
HamelG. (1998),
Strategy Innovation and the Quest for Value,
Sloan Management Review,
39(2),
7–14.
35.
HedlundG. (1994).
A model of knowledge management and the N-form
corporation. Strategic Management
Journal, 15,
73–90.
36.
HolsappleC.W.JoshiK.D.
(2000). An investigation of factors that influence
the management of knowledge in organizations.
Journal of Strategic Information
Systems, 9(2/3),
235–261.
37.
HoribeF. (2003).
The KM grid: Implementing knowledge
management. Performance
Improvement, 42(10),
33–38.
38.
HoribeF. (1999).
Managing knowledge workers: New skills and attitudes to
unlock the intellectual capital in your organization.
New York: John Wiley
Sons.
39.
HowellsJ. (1996).
Tacit knowledge, innovation and technology
transfer. Technology Analysis and Strategic
Management, 8(2),
91–106.
40.
JainR.K.TriandisH.C.
(1990). Management of research and development
organizations: Managing the unmanageable.
New York: John Wiley
Sons.
41.
JoiaL.A.
(2007). Knowledge management strategies: Creating
and testing a measurement scale.
International Journal of Learning and Intellectual
Capital, 4(3),
203–221.
42.
JoiaL.A.LemosB. (2010).
Relevant factors for tacit knowledge transfer within
organizations. Journal of Knowledge
Management, 14(3),
410–427.
43.
KikoskiC.K.KikoskiJ.F.
(2004). The inquiring organization: Tacit
knowledge, conversation and knowledge creation skills for 21st century
organizations. Westport, CT and
London:
Praeger.
44.
KirschL.CummingsL. (1996).
Contextual influences on self control of IS professionals
engaged in systems development. Accounting,
Management and Information Technologies,
6(3),
191–219.
45.
KoskinenK.U.
(2004). Knowledge management to project
communication and implementation. Project
Management Journal,
35(2),
13–19.
46.
KreinerK. (2002).
Tacit knowledge management: The role of
artifacts. Journal of Knowledge
Management, 6(2),
112–123.
47.
LahaA. (2011).
On challenges and opportunities of designing integrated IT
platforms for supporting knowledge works in organizations.
Vikalpa,
36(3),
21–46.
LebartL.MorineauA.WarwickK.M.
(1984). Multivariate descriptive statistical
techniques. New York:
John Wiley and Sons.
50.
MarkidesC. (1998).
Strategic innovation in established
companies. Sloan Management
Review, Spring, 39(3)
1–42.
51.
MashelkarR.A.
(2007). Renewing the national laboratories. In C.W.
Wessner S.J. Shivakumar (Eds),
India’s changing innovation system: Achievements,
challenges and opportunities for cooperation report of a
symposium (pp.
89–93). National
Research Council of the National Academies, Washington, DC:
The National Academies
Press.
52.
MladkovaL. (2011).
Knowledge Management for Knowledge Workers,
Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on
Intellectual Capital, (pp.
260–267), Nicosia, Cyprus: European
Centre for Knowledge Management Research, University of
Nicosia.
53.
MoweryD.C.RosenbergN. (1978).
The influence of market demand upon innovation: A critical
review of some recent empirical studies.
Research Policy,
8(2),
103–153.
54.
MundraN.GulatiK.VashisthR. (2011).
Achieving competitive advantage through knowledge management
and innovation, empirical evidences from the Indian IT
sector. The IUP Journal of
Management, IX (2),
7–25. 195–210.
55.
NagpaulP.S.RoyS. (2000).
Attitude to Collaboration with Industry: A Latent Class
Typology of Academic Scientists in India.
Journal of Scientific and Industrial
Research, 59(8–9),
753–764.
56.
NiosiJ. (1999).
Fourth generation R&D: From linear models to flexible
innovation. Journal of Business
Research, 45(2),
111–117.
57.
NonakaI. (1994).
A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge
oreation. Organization
Science, 5(1),
14–37.
58.
NonakaI.ToyomaR.KonnoN. (2000).
SECI, Ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge
creation. Long Range
Planning, 33,
4–34.
59.
NonakaI.TakeuchiH. (1995).
The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies
create the dynamics of innovation. New
York: Oxford University
Press.
60.
OkuboY.MiquelJ.F.FrigolettoL.DoreJ.C.
(1992). Structure of international collaboration in
science: A typology of countries through multivariate techniques, using a
link indicator.
Scientometrics,
25(2),
321–351.
61.
OmerzelD.G.AntoncicB. (2008).
Critical entrepreneur knowledge dimensions for the SME
performance. Industrial Management and Data
Systems, 108(9),
1182–1199.
62.
PimentelA.C.M.AlbinoJ.P.
(2010). An Approach for Implementing Knowledge
Management in Small and Medium Enterprise in Brazil, inProceedings of the 11th European Conference on Knowledge
Management, (pp.
647–652). Famalicao, Portugal:
Universidade Lusíada de Vila Nova de Famalicão.
63.
PisanoG.P.
(1990). The R&D boundaries of the firm: An
empirical analysis. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 35(1),
153–176.
64.
PisanoG. (2006).
Science Business: The Promise, The Reality, and the
Future of Biotech.
Mass: Harvard Business
Press.
65.
PittM.ClarkeK. (1997).
Frames of significance: Technological agenda forming for
strategic advantage. Technology Analysis and
Strategic Management,
9(3),
251–269.
66.
PolanyiM. (1967).
The tacit dimension.
New York: Anchor
Books.
67.
PolanyiM. (1969).
The logic of tacit inference. In M. Greene (Ed.), Knowing
and being. London:
Routledge Keagan Paul.
68.
PriceR.M.
(1996). Technology and strategic
advantage. California Management
Review, 38(3), Spring,
38–56.
69.
QuinnJ.B.
(1992). The intelligent enterprise: A new
paradigm. Academy of Management
Executive, 6(4),
48–63.
70.
RhyneL.C.TeagardenM.B.
(1995). International technology-based competitive
strategy: A literature review and integrative model.
The Journal of High Technology Management
Research, 6(2),
157–178.
71.
RosenbergN. (1982).
Inside the black box: Technology and
economics. Cambridge:
Cambridge University
Press.
72.
RosenbergR.M.
(1977). Analytical Dynamics of Discrete
Systems. New York:
Springer.
73.
RoyS. (2006).
Networking as a strategy for technology transfer and
commercialization from R&D laboratories.
Industry and Higher Education,
20(2),
123–133.
74.
RoyS..
(2009). Technology transfer from R&D centres in
India and development of industrial clusters. In M.J. Manimala, J. Mitra V.
Singh (Eds), Enterprise support systems: An
International Perspective (pp.
217–227). New
Delhi: SAGE Publications.
ISBN: 978-81-7829-927-3.
75.
RoyS.BanerjeeP. (2007).
Developing regional clusters in India: The role of national
laboratories. International Journal of
Technology Management and Sustainable Development,
66(3),
193–210.
76.
RoyS.GuptaB.M.KumarS. (2007).
Exploring scientific productivity and the impact of age,
research area and rank: Case of CSIR, India.
Journal of Information Management and
Scientometrics, 3(1),
16–26.
77.
RoyS.JainA.MohapatraP.K.J.
(2001). Forecasting and simulation of scientific
manpower under various policy regimes: Case study of an R&D laboratory
in India. Manpower
Journal, XXXVII(1),
23–45.
78.
RoyS.MitraJ. (2012,
November 07–08). Managing R&D for Innovation and
Strategic Deployment of Knowledge Workers in Technology-Driven
Organizations: A Case Study from India, 35th ISBE Conference
2012, Dublin, Ireland, Institute for
Small Business and Entrepreneurship, London,
UK (Received the Best Paper Award in the Science and
Technology Track).
79.
RoyS.RanjanJ. (2012).
Strategic Deployment of Knowledge Workers: A Case
Study, Journal of Knowledge Management
Practice, 13(2),
Retrieved June (http://www.tlainc.com/articl303.htm).
80.
SengeP.
(1990a). The fifth discipline.
New York:
Doubleday/Currency.
81.
SengeP.
(1990b). The leader’s new work: Building
learning organizations. Sloan Management
Review, 32(1),
7–23.
82.
ShaftT.M.VesseyI. (1995).
The relevance of application domain knowledge: The case of
computer program comprehensiveness.
Information Systems Research,
6(3),
286–299.
83.
ShuklaM. (1997).
Competing through knowledge: Building a learning
organization. New
Delhi: Response
Books.
84.
SteinE.W.
(1992). A Method to Identify Candidates for
Knowledge Acquisition, Journal of Management
Information Systems,
7(1):
111–134.
85.
TasseyG. (2010).
Rationales and Mechanisms for Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
R&D Strategies, Journal of Technology Transfer: National
Institute of Standards and Technology, Retrieved on 29
January 2010 (http://www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=912234).
86.
TsoukasH. (1996).
The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist
approach. Strategic Management
Journal, Winter Special Issue, 17,
11–25. 116.
87.
VonKrogh, G.IchijoK.NonakaI. (2000).
Enabling knowledge creation.
Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
88.
Von KroghG.RoosJ. (1995).
A perspective on knowledge: Competence and
strategy. Personnel
Review, 24(3),
56–76.
89.
WolfeR.A.
(1994). Organizational innovation: Review, critique
and suggested research directions. Journal
of Management Studies,
31(3), 405.
