Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2015-7
Can We Find Signals of Inclusive Entrepreneurship in Small Businesses? Exploring the Motives of Small Businesses for Establish Linkages with Non-profit Organisations
This study explores the motives and interests of small businesses (SBs) to establish partnerships with non-profit organisations (NPOs) in a developing country. Social issues in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are a topic of considerable research interest, and in this paper I explore those interactions that link the entrepreneurial nature of the SB with the actions that address social–economic issues. These partnerships enable to the SB to connect its economic purpose with its social function. I argue that the SB acts as a ‘social entrepreneur’ through those interactions.
A sample of Colombian SBs which have established interactions with NPOs in the food sector is examined using an exploratory inductive methodological approach based on case studies. Furthermore, the findings reveal that the establishment of these kinds of partnerships depends on a combination of SBs surrounding conditions, the stage of development of the SB and the motivations of the owner-manager (OM). Those combinations are associated with a variety of logics and interests that give some signs of social and inclusive entrepreneurial behaviour in the SBs.
Asociación Colombiana de Pequeños Industriales (ACOPI). (2012). Retrieved 12 July 2013, from www.acopi.org.co
2.
ArenaM.CiceriN.D.TerziS.BengoI.AzzoneG.GarettiM. (2009). A state-of- the-art of industrial sustainability: Definitions, tools and metrics. International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management, 4(1), 207251.
3.
AustinJ. (2000). Strategic collaboration between nonprofits and business. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly2(1), 6997.
4.
AustinJ.StevensonH.Wei-SkillernJ. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 122.
5.
BaumolW.J. (2010). The micro theory of innovative entrepreneurship.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
6.
BhaveM.P. (1994). A process model of entrepreneurial venture creation. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(3), 223242.
7.
BekkersR.WiepkingP. (2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Non-profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 924973.
8.
BergerI.CunninghamP.DrumwrightM. (2004). Social alliances: Company/nonprofit collaboration. California Management Review, 47(1), 5890.
9.
BurtchB. (2013). Win win for the greater good 1a Ed. USA: Createspace Independent Pub.
10.
BridgeS.O’NeillK.MartinF.CromieS. (2009). Understanding enterprise: Entrepreneurship and small business. Palgrave Macmillan.
11.
BrysonJ.M.CrosbyB.C.StoneM.M. (2006). The design and implementation of crosssector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 4455.
12.
CampbellL.GulasC.S.&Gruca T.S. (1999). Corporate giving behaviour and decision-maker social consciousness. Journal of Business Ethics, 19, 375383.
13.
CarrollA. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38, 268295.
14.
CennamoC.BerroneP.CruzC.Gomez-MejiaL.R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth and proactive stakeholder engagement: Why family-controlled firms care more about their stakeholders. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 11531173.
15.
CEPAL. (2011). Informe sobre experiencias exitosas en innovación, inserción internacional e inclusión social [Inform about successful experiences in innovation, international insertion and social inclusion]. Santiago: CEPAL.
16.
Confecamaras (2012). Programa Comprometer RSE. Retrieved 15 July of 2012, from www.confecamaras.org.co
17.
CropperM.EbersM.HuxhamC.Smith-RingP. (Eds) (2008). The Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations.New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
DávilaC. (2010). Entrepreneurship and cultural values in Latin American 18502000: From modernization, national values and dependency theories towards an economic and business history perspective. In García-RuizJ.L.ToninelliP.A. (Eds), The determinants of entrepreneurship: Leadership, culture, institutions (pp. 143160, 201204). London: Pickering & Chatto.
19.
De ClercqD.DanisM.DakhliM. (2010). The moderating effect of institutional context on the relationship between associational activity and new business activity in emerging economies. International Business Review, 19(1), 85101.
20.
de ArrudaM. (2010). Latin America: Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility in Latin American Small and Medium Sized Enterprises: Challenging Development Chapter 5. In Spence, L. J., & Painter-Morland, M., Ethics in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (pp. 6582). London: Springer.
21.
DeesJ.G. (1998). The meaning of social entrepreneurship. Comments and suggestions contributed from the Social Entrepreneurship Funders Working Group. Palo Alto: Stanford Graduate School of Business.
22.
den HondF.de BakkerF.G.DohJ. (2012). What prompts companies to collaboration with NGOs? Recent evidence from the Netherlands. Business & Society, 54(2), 187228.
23.
DoddS.D.AndersonA.R. (2007). Mumpsimus and the mything of the individualistic entrepreneur. International Small Business Journal, 25(4), 341360.
24.
DonaldsonL. (2001). Chapter 1: Core paradigm and theoretical integration (pp. 133). In DonaldsonL. (Ed.), The contingency theory of organizations.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
25.
EisenhardtK. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532550.
26.
EisenhardtK.M. (1991). Better stories and better constructs: The case for rigor and comparative logic. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 620627.
27.
EisenhardtK.GraebnerM. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 2532.
28.
FosterM.K.MeinhardA.G. (2002). A regression model explaining predisposition to collaborate. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(4), 549564.
29.
Fundación Corona (2011). Programa Nacional de Alianzas [National Program of Alliances]. Retrieved July 2012, from www.fundacioncorona.org.co
30.
GalaskiewiczJ. (1985). Interorganizational relations. Annual Review of Sociology, 11(1), 281304.
31.
GibbertM.RuigrokW.WickiB. (2008). Research notes and commentaries what passes as a rigorous case study? Strategic Management Journal, 29(3), 14651474.
32.
GutiérrezR. (2004). En busca del diálogo y la transformación: consecuencias de los supuestos detrás de la investigación social [In search of dialog and the transformation: consequences of the assumptions behind social research]. Revista de Estudios Sociales, 17, 1118.
33.
HanksS.H.WatsonC.J.JansenE.ChandlerG.N. (1993). Tightening the life-cycle construct: A taxonomic study of growth stage configurations in high-technology organizations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(2), 529.
34.
HolmbergS.R.CummingsJ.L. (2009). Building successful strategic alliances: Strategic process and analytical tool for selecting partner industries and firms. Long Range Planning, 42(2), 164193.
35.
HwangH.PowellW.W. (2009). The rationalization of charity: The influences of professionalism in the non-profit sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2), 268298.
36.
JamaliD.KeshishianT. (2009). Uneasy alliances: Lessons learned from partnerships between businesses and NGOs in the context of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(2), 277295.
37.
KammJ.B.NurickA.J. (1993). The stages of team venture formation: A decision making model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17(2), 1727.
38.
KenisP.N.OerlemansL.A.G. (2008). The social network perspective: Understanding the structure of cooperation. In CropperS.EbersM.HuxhamC.RingP.S. (Eds), Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relationships (pp. 289312). New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
LewisV.L.ChurchillN.C. (1983). The five stages of small business growth. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 3050.
40.
LipmanA. (1966). Capítulo 3: El empresario como un desviado [The entrepreneur as a deviant]. En El Empresario Bogotano (pp. 3865). Bogotá: Tercer Mundo.
41.
LipsetS. (1967). Values, education and entrepreneurship. In LipsetS.SolariA. (Eds), Elites in Latin America (pp. 3960). New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
MaddenK.ScaifeW.CrissmanK. (2006). How and why small to medium size enterprises (SMEs) engage with their communities: An Australian study. International Journal Non-profit Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11(1), 4960.
43.
MairJ.MartiI. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41, 3644.
44.
MartinR.OsbergS. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: The case for definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5(2), 2839.
45.
McMahonR.G. (1998). Stage models of SME growth reconsidered. Small Enterprise Research, 6(2), 2035.
46.
MitraJ. (2012). Entrepreneurship, innovation and regional development.Abingdon: Routledge.
47.
MurilloD.LozanoJ.M. (2006). SMEs and CSR: An approach to CSR in their own words. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 227240.
48.
OliverC. (1990). Determinants of inter-organizational relationships: Integration and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 15, 241265.
49.
ParmigianiA.Rivera-SantosM. (2011). Clearing a path through the forest: A meta- review of inter-organizational relationships. Journal of Management, 37(4), 11081136.
50.
PeredoA.M.McLeanM. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 5665.
51.
Pérez-AlemánP.SandilandsM. (2008). Building value at the top and the bottom of the global supply chain: MNC-NGO partnerships. California Management Review, 51(1), 2648.
52.
PorterM.E.KramerM.R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1), 6277.
53.
RodríguezA.G. (2003). La realidad de la Pyme colombiana: desafío para el desarrollo. Programa Mejoramiento de las condiciones del Entorno Empresarial [The reality of Colombian SMEs: A challenge for development. Improvement Program Policies for Business Environment].Fundes Colombia.
54.
SaundersM.N.LewisP.ThornhillA. (2011). Research methods for business students (5th ed.). India: Pearson Education India.
55.
SalamonL.AnheierH. (1992). In search of the non-profit sector I: The question of definitions. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Non-profit Organizations, 3(2), 125151.
56.
SargeantA.CrissmanK. (2006). Corporate giving in Australia: An analysis of motives and barriers. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 41(4), 477492.
57.
SchumpeterJ. (1912). On the concept of social value. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 23(2), 213232.
58.
ScottM.BruceR. (1987). Five stages of growth in small business. Long Range Planning, 20(3), 4552.
59.
SeitanidiM.M.RyanA. (2007). A critical review of forms of corporate community involvement: From philanthropy to partnerships. International Journal of Non-profit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 12(3), 247266.
60.
SeitanidiM.M.CraneA. (2009). Implementing CSR through partnerships: Understanding the selection, design and institutionalisation of nonprofit-business partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 413429.
61.
SeitanidiM.M.KoufopoulosD.N.PalmerP. (2010). Partnership formation for change: Indicators for transformative potential in cross sector social partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 139161.
62.
SeitanidiM.LindgreenA. (2010). Editorial: Cross-sector social interactions. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(912), 17.
63.
SEKN (2004). Social partnering in Latin America. USA: Harvard University David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies.
64.
SEKN (2004). Social partnering in Latin America.USA: (2006). Effective management of social enterprises: Lessons from businesses and civil society organizations in Iberoamérica.USA: Harvard University, David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies.
65.
SelskyJ.W.ParkerB. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31(6), 849873.
66.
ShumateM.O’ConnorA. (2010). Corporate reporting of cross-sector alliances: The portfolio of NGO partners communicated on corporate websites. Communication Monographs, 77(2), 207230.
67.
SpenceL.RutherfordR. (2003). Small business and empirical perspectives in business ethics (Editorial). Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1), 1.
68.
SpenceL.J.PerriniF. (2009). Practice and politics: Ethics and social responsibility in SMEs in the European Union. African Journal of Business Ethics, 4(2), 20.
69.
SpenceL.Painter-MorlandM. (Eds) (2010). Ethics in small and medium sized enterprises: A global commentary. V. 2. Springer.
70.
StoreyD. (1994). Understanding the small business sector.London: Routledge.
71.
StreetC.T.CameronA.F. (2007). External relationships and the small business: A review of small business alliance and network research. Journal of Small Business Management, 45(2), 239266.
72.
TorresE. (2003). Funciones empresariales y desarrollo económico (pp. 314). En C. Dávila (Comp.), Empresas y empresarios en la historia de Colombia. Siglos XIX-XX. Una colección de estudios recientes [Companies and entrepreneurs in the history of Colombia. XIX-XX centuries. A collection of recent studies] Bogotá: Editorial Norma, Ediciones Uniandes, Facultad de Administración de la Universidad de los Andes, Cepal, 2 tomos.
73.
TurcotteM.F.PasqueroJ. (2001). The paradox of multistakeholder collaborative roundtables. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 37(4), 447464.
74.
UdayasankarK. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and firm size. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 167175.
75.
ValdalisoJ.M.LópezS. (2000). El empresario visto por los economistas; ¿héroe, villano o inútil? [The businessman seen by economists; ¿Hero, villain or useless?] (pp. 139).En Historia económica de la empresa [Economic history of the company].Barcelona: Crítica.
76.
VillalongaB.McGahanA. (2005). The choice among acquisitions, alliances, and divestitures. Strategic Management Journal, 26(13), 11831208.
77.
VivesA.CorralA.IsusiI. (2005). Responsabilidad Social de la Empresa en las PyMEs de Latinoamérica [Business Social Responsibility in SMEs in Latin America].Publicación del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. Ed. BID- IKEI New York.
78.
VurroC.DacinM.T.PerriniF. (2010). Institutional antecedents of partnering for social change: How institutional logics shape cross-sector social partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 3953.
79.
WaddockS. (1988). Building successful social partnerships. Sloan Management Review, 29(4), 723.
80.
WymerW.SamuS. (2003). Dimensions of business and nonprofit collaborative relationships. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 322.
81.
YinR.K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods.Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
