Cultural metaphors are used in intercultural communication to understand the nuances of national cultures. The idea of cultural metaphors elaborated by Gannon and Pillai provided a set of standard metaphors for cultures of several nations. In the case of India, two cultural metaphors, namely the ‘Dance of Shiva’ and the ‘Kaleidoscope’, are provided to understand the dynamics of national culture. This article attempts a theoretical understanding of the relevance of ‘cultural metaphors’ in intercultural communication and examines their appropriateness in the case of India. Furthermore, it re-examines the established cultural metaphors for India through the examination of its metonymic features. Finally, suggesting a cultural metaphor distinctly different from that outlined by Gannon and Pillai for India, this article aims to extend the idea to understand the cultural underpinnings of India.
CoomaraswamyA.2014. The Dance of Shiva: Fourteen Essays. Rupa Publications Private Limited.
2.
CroftW., and CruseA.. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
3.
GannonM. J.2000. Working Across Cultures: Applications and Exercises. Sage Publication.
4.
GannonM. J.2001. Understanding Global Cultures: Metaphorical Journeys Through 23 Nations. Sage.
5.
GannonM., . 2005. ‘Cultural Metaphors as Frames of Reference for Nations: A Six-Country Study’. International Studies of Management and Organization, 35(4): 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2005.11043744
6.
GannonM. J.2009. ‘The Cultural Metaphoric Method: Description, Analysis, and Critique’. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 9(1): 275–87.
7.
GannonM. J., and PillaiR.. 2010. Understanding Global Cultures: Metaphorical Journeys Through 29 Nations, Clusters of Nations, Continents, and Diversity. Sage.
8.
GannonM.2011. ‘Cultural Metaphors: Their Use in Management Practice as a Method for Understanding Cultures’. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 7(1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1065
9.
GilesH., . 2012. ‘In-groups and Out-groups’. In Inter/Cultural Communication: Representation and Construction of Culture, edited by KuryloAnastacia. Sage Publications.
10.
HallE.1959. The Silent Language. Anchor Books.
11.
HallE. and HallM. R.. 1990. Hidden Differences: Doing Business with the Japanese. Anchor Books.
12.
HampdenT. C., and TrompenaarsF.. 2020. Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business. Hachette.
13.
HofstedeG.1984. Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values (Cross-Cultural Research and Methodology). Sage Publications Inc.
14.
HouseR., . 2004. Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Sage Publications.
15.
JacksonR.2002. ‘Cultural Contracts Theory: Toward an Understanding of Identity Negotiation’. Communication Quarterly, 50(3): 359–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370209385672
16.
Jules-RosetteB.1986. ‘The Dual Vision: Insights and Applications of Cross-Cultural Research’. The Journal of Negro Education, 55(2): 125–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/2294876
17.
KluckhohnF., and StrodtbeckF.. 1961. Variations in Value Orientations. Row Peterson.
18.
KövecsesZ.2005. Metaphor in Culture. Universality and Variation. Cambridge University Press.
19.
KövecsesZ.2006. Language, Mind and Culture. A Practical Introduction. Oxford University Press.
20.
KövecsesZ.2010a. Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. Oxford University Press.
21.
KövecsesZ.2010b. ‘Metaphor, Language, and Culture’. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos Em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 26 (SPE): 739–57.
22.
LakoffG., and JohnsonM., 1980. Metaphors We Live By. The University of Chicago Press.
23.
McSweeneyB.2002. ‘Hofstede’s Model of National Cultural Differences and Their Consequences: A Triumph of Faith: A Failure of Analysis’. Human Relations, 55(1): 89–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726702551004
24.
MusolffA.2017. ‘Metaphor and Cultural Cognition’. Advances in Cultural Linguistics, edited by SharifianFarzad. Springer, 325–44.
25.
NielsenC. S., SoaresA. M., and MachadoC. Páscoa. 2009. ‘The Cultural Metaphor Revisited: Exploring Dimensions, Complexities and Paradoxes Through the Portuguese Fado’. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 9(3): 289–308.
