Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to considerable advances in medical education through technological integration. The crisis generated by the pandemic in medical practice, education, and evolving technology has led to changes in the skills of medical professionals. This study aimed to examine the competencies required of medical students in the post-pandemic era.

Methods

We conducted 2 mixed-methods studies. Study 1 explored medical students’ necessary competencies after the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted group work with faculty members and students from the Chiba University School of Medicine, captured proposed competencies, discussed them, and qualitatively analyzed the group work data using content analysis to extract the competencies. Study 2 was a secondary data analysis that compared the categories identified in Study 1 with the competencies required prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, which were extracted from the websites of all 82 medical schools and colleges in Japan, to identify the differences in competencies before and after the pandemic.

Results

Study 1 resulted in the identification of 12 categories and 62 subcategories. The results of Study 2 showed that the increased occurrence of competencies was related to the utilization of information and communication technology (ICT) and artificial intelligence (AI), self-management, information gathering and explanation, liberal arts and generic skills, and exploring medicine and medical care/research presentations. The prevalence rates of these factors prior to the COVID-19 outbreak were 17.1%, 28.0%, 39.0%, 41.5%, and 48.8%, respectively.

Conclusions

Competency-based medical education in ICT, self-management, and medical exploration has become increasingly important after the pandemic. Therefore, it is necessary to develop an educational curriculum to enable medical students to acquire these competencies. The study findings contribute to the literature on medical education and offer valuable insight into setting effective academic goals and designing suitable curricula for undergraduate medical students in the post-pandemic era.

Keywords

competency-based medical education content analysis COVID-19 information communication and technology self-management

Introduction

Infectious diseases caused by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in December 2019 spread globally, and the World Health Organization (WHO) declared a pandemic in March 2020.¹ During the pandemic, the number of people infected with COVID-19 rapidly increased worldwide, resulting in substantial changes in medical care and education.^2,3 The value of online and virtual education was widely recognized during this period, and there is a conviction that medical education might change permanently even after the WHO declared the end of the pandemic in May 2023.⁴ In Japan, the pandemic had a tremendous impact on education; various policies and guidelines were implemented during the national emergency, which accelerated the promotion of the use of information and communication technology (ICT) and distance education in schools and universities.⁵

Considerable research on medical education practices during the pandemic has been conducted. One study examined the efficacy of an online simulated clinical practice that relied on a learning management system, illustrating an effective educational method capable of being utilized with minimal preparation and resources.⁶ In addition, attempts have been made to implement active learning such as case-based learning, problem-based learning, team-based learning,^7,8 and asynchronous online learning tools^9–11 that use prerecorded lectures along with simultaneous 2-way communication. The accumulation of previous research on using interactive communication has enabled educational activities that are free from the constraints of time and place.¹²

The COVID-19 pandemic affected not only learning strategies but also learning goals. It has been pointed out that the pandemic had a significant impact on medical education and stimulated a rethinking of concepts pertaining to medical competence.⁴ Outcome-based education is mainstream in current medical education and has been adopted worldwide. The competencies required of medical professionals are influenced by regional, political, social, and economic conditions.^13,14 The “WFME Standards For Basic Medical Education 2015” of the World Federation for Medical Education (WFME) states that “The medical school must define the intended educational outcomes that students should exhibit upon graduation.”¹⁵ Medical schools and medical colleges in Japan are also required to comply with the WFME Global Standards for Quality Improvement. Furthermore, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the learning outcomes of undergraduate medical education has not yet been examined. We considered Japanese medical schools to be suitable for data collection and comparative study because: (1) compared to other countries, the Japanese government required educational institutions to take strict measures regarding COVID-19, which had a major impact on medical education, and (2) many medical schools in Japan have been following WFME Global Standards for Quality Improvement prior to the pandemic. Therefore, the learning outcomes defined by each school were documented. There are 82 medical schools in Japan, undergraduate medical education spans 6 years, and high school graduates are eligible to enter medical school.¹⁶

This study aimed to explore the competencies of medical students after the COVID-19 pandemic as considered by the faculty and students involved in undergraduate medical education by investigating the impact of the pandemic on medical practice, medical education, and developments in technology. The study findings provide valuable insights for establishing academic goals and developing curricula for undergraduate medical students in the post-pandemic era.

This study focused on data collected during the review of the pre-COVID-19 learning outcomes of the Chiba University School of Medicine, a national university corporation, which had been formulated in 2008 and revised in 2013. The learning outcomes before COVID-19 consisted of 36 competencies divided into the following 6 categories: (1) Ethics and professionalism, (2) Communication, (3) Medical and related field knowledge, (4) Clinical practice, (5) Disease prevention and health promotion, and (6) Scientific inquiry.¹⁷

We gathered the opinions of the faculty and students who experienced medicine and medical education during the pandemic to understand the post-pandemic competencies. We evaluated the competencies that undergraduate medical students should acquire post pandemic to improve the learning outcomes that have already been established at Chiba University School of Medicine. In addition, we examined how these competencies differed from those required prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

We conducted 2 mixed-methods studies. In Study 1, we performed group work and coded the data using content analysis, a qualitative research method, to extract the competencies. In Study 1, data were collected through group work by faculty, staff, and students at Chiba University School of Medicine. In the group work, the first step was for each group member to write down a competency idea on a card, and the second step was to brainstorm based on the content of the cards. The researchers in this study divided the collected cards into categories and counted the number of each category. The reporting of Study 1 follows the guidelines of the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies 12 (see Supplemental 1).¹⁸

Study 2 was a secondary data analysis that compared the results in Study 1 with those of other universities in Japan before the COVID-19 pandemic and identified the changes in learning outcomes after the pandemic. Data were collected from each university's web page and reviewed based on the data. The number of schools was counted for each category. A series of data collection and analysis was conducted in the Japanese, and the results have been translated into English for paper.

Setting

Study 1: Identification of the Proposed Competencies After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Participants and Contexts

This study was conducted and based on data collected at an annual workshop held at the Chiba University School of Medicine. The workshop required the participation of at least one faculty member from each of the basic and clinical medicine faculties. Twelve students who wished to participate were added to the group. The participants of this workshop were selected as appropriate for conducting a study of the medical school curriculum because the diverse specialties of the participants allowed for the collection of opinions from multiple perspectives. A total of 78 participants participated in the study, including 66 faculty members (16 professors, 11 associate professors, 18 lecturers, 20 assistant professors, and 1 researcher) who belonged to the basic medicine or clinical medicine departments of Chiba University School of Medicine, were engaged in medical education, and wished to participate in the workshop. A total of 12 students (2 first-year, 2 second-year, 2 third-year, 2 fourth-year, 2 fifth-year, and 2 sixth-year students) from Chiba University School of Medicine also participated. Participants were divided into 9 groups of 8 to 10 members each. We tried to ensure that all groups included 1 or 2 students and that the faculty members were not biased toward their specialties. Informed oral consent was obtained from all the participants prior to the group work.

1-1. Group Work

In August 2020, a group work session was held to discuss the topic, “What is the essential competencies for students of Chiba University School of Medicine to acquire upon graduation?”

The workshop sought to initiate a discussion on the proposed competencies among the participants. Participants were informed that this work was not limited to the learning outcomes currently defined by Chiba University School of Medicine and existing theories and research. We encouraged them to provide their opinions based on future social predictions. To ensure that they were given equal opportunities to express their ideas, participants were instructed at the beginning of the workshop to fill out one card for each proposed competency. Only the proposed competencies and no other information, such as the name of the person who completed it, were furnished on the cards.

Facilitators were selected from the faculty of Department of Medical Education, 6 medical education researcher and physician, and 3 medical social science researchers. Facilitators in each group instructed group members how to write the cards, and each participant repeatedly filled out about 5 to 6 cards until the saturation point of opinions was achieved. After filling out the cards, facilitators encouraged the participants to brainstorm the group's suggestions. The time allocated for the entire workshop was 60 min. Depending on the progress of each group, about 20 min were allocated for completing the cards, and the remaining time was used for brainstorming.

1-2. Data Collection and Content Analysis

We collected the cards after the group work was completed. Each card was listed as a unit of analysis.^19–21 One medical education researcher and physician (HY) and 2 medical social science researchers (ZT and MO) performed coding for the units of analysis. These 3 researchers were experienced in qualitative research with content analysis.

First, the subcategories were coded. The 3 researchers independently conducted the investigations, and opinions were not exchanged during coding. Second, they repeatedly exchanged opinions based on the coding results until they reached an agreement. When consensus could not be reached, a supervisor who was a researcher in medical education and a physician (SI) advised them on how to determine the final subcategories. They then grouped the subcategories into categories using the same method used for coding the subcategories. Figure 1 presents examples of the coding process.

Figure 1.

Examples of Coding Process.

Study 2: Comparison of the Required Competencies Before and After COVID-19

2-1. Data Collection

We gathered data on the learning outcomes prior to the COVID-19 pandemic from the websites of all 82 medical schools and colleges in Japan between April 2021 and March 2022. These universities posted lists of the competencies to be acquired by the time of graduation at the end of the curriculum on their respective web pages “Outcomes at Graduation,” “Competencies at Graduation,” or “Diploma Policies.”

2-2. Data Analysis

The learning outcomes developed before the pandemic were compared with the categories in Study 1. For each university, we made a judgment on whether a category was mentioned. If we found an identical term in a document, we considered it even if the wording was partially different. In this survey, the full texts of these documents were reviewed and tabulated according to each school to determine whether they were listed or not. The schools’ names were anonymized.

Three researchers (HK, ZT, and MO) independently conducted the study; if they did not agree on the results, they discussed it with the supervisor. The comparison criteria were repeatedly reviewed until a consensus was reached among the researchers. The relevant criteria are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Criteria for How Often the Competencies Identified in Study 1 were Mentioned Before the Pandemic.

Category	Criterion
1. Medical practice/Patient safety	This category includes only statements that refer to both “medical practice” and “patient safety”
2. Professionalism/Ethics	This category includes statements related to “ethics” and “professionalism,” including expressions with similar meanings, such as ‘professional responsibility,’ even if the terms themselves are not explicitly used
3. Teamwork and communication	Statements are included that refer to “teamwork” and “communication”
3. Teamwork and communication	Statements that mention only ‘leadership’ are excluded from this category
4. Exploring medicine and medical care/Research presentation	This category includes oral and written forms of research presentation, such as conference talks or academic papers
	Items containing the phrase “presented in English” are included based on the context
	This category is not limited to presentations of original research findings
5. Knowledge of medicine and medical care	References to medical and medical care knowledge
6. Information inputs and outputs	Items referring to ‘dissemination’ or ‘use of information,’ are evaluated based on context
	Discussion and debate may be interpreted as forms of dissemination in a broader context
	Knowledge-based information rather than information obtained from patients
	This category does not include items that are explicitly identified as research, as these are classified under “exploring medicine and medical care/research presentation”
7. Respect and building trusting relationships with patients	This category includes expression such as “respect” and “building trust,” as well as related terms with similar meanings”
8. Use of ICT and AI	This category includes references to “information science and technology,” even when not explicitly labeled as “ICT” or “AI”
9. International perspective and language skills	This category is not limited to the phrase “international perspective” and also includes expressions with similar meanings, such as “international orientation”
10. Lifelong learning	This category is not limited to “lifelong learning” and also includes concepts such as ‘self-improvement,’ ‘active learning’ and ‘self-directed learning’
10. Lifelong learning	This category includes terms that reflect the concept of ‘continuous study’
11. Self-management	This category includes aspects, such as self-management of physical and mental health
	This category includes the concepts of ‘managing one's work–life balance’
	“Self-improvement” is excluded from this category is instead considered a part of “lifelong learning”
12. Liberal arts and generic skills	This category includes references to ‘utilize the liberal arts’
12. Liberal arts and generic skills	Expressions such as “culture-based communication” and “problem-solving” are regarded as generic skills

Abbreviations: AI, artificial intelligence; ICT, information and communication technology.

Results

Study 1: Group Work and Content Analysis to Identify the Required Competencies After COVID-19

The 351 cards from the group work were collected. The 3 coders and supervisor discussed and classified them into 12 categories and 62 subcategories. The category names and number of cards in each category were as follows: (1) Medical practice/Patient safety (n = 49), (2) Professionalism/Ethics (n = 45), (3) Teamwork and communication (n = 44), (4) Exploring medicine and medical care/Research presentations (n = 43), (5) Knowledge of medicine and medical care (n = 41), (6) Information inputs and outputs (n = 31), (7) Respect and building trusting relationships among patients (n = 27), (8) Use of ICT and AI (n = 19), (9) International perspectives and language skills (n = 19), (10) Lifelong learning (n = 14), (11) Self-management (n = 12), and (12) Liberal arts and generic skills (n = 7) (Table 2). As shown in Figure 2, the categories of competencies can be divided into “Medical competencies” and “Scientific competencies.”

Figure 2.

The Essential Competencies for Medical Education.

Table 2.

Themes and codes identified in the content analysis

Category	Subcategory	Quotes
1. Medical practice/Patient safety (49)*	1-1. Practices related to evidence-based medicine (12)	“Research and practices on evidence-based medicine”
	1-2. Basic techniques (11)	“Basic medical examination and testing techniques”
	1-3. Telemedicine/Remote diagnosis (5)	“Remote medical system”
	1-4. Patient safety (5)	“Ability to ensure patient safety”
	1-5. Treatment practice (3)	“Ability to treat patients”
	1-6. Writing medical records (2)	“Ability to describe diagnoses”
	1-7. Transdisciplinary care (2)	“Dealing with diseases that surpass practice areas”
	1-8. Knowledge-based medical practice (2)	“Ability to acquire basic medical knowledge”
	1-9. Preventive medicine (2)	“Preventive medicine”
	1-10. Responding to unknown situations (2)	“Ability to respond to unknown situations (such as COVID-19)”
	1-11. Responding to unidentified complaints (1)	“Flexible responses to unidentified complaints”
	1-12. Case presentation skills (1)	“Case presentation skills”
	1-13. Clinical skills (1)	“Clinical skills”
2. Professionalism/Ethics(45)	2-1. Ethics (17)	“Ethical behaviors”
	2-2. General common sense and humanity (15)	“General common sense as a member of society”
	2-3. Responsibility as a medical professional (7)	“Responsible behavior as a medical professional”
	2-4. Professionalism (4)	“Able to act with professionalism”
	2-5. Contribution to education (1)	“Contribution to education”
	2-6. Determination of expertise (1)	“Acquiring an intellectual background to determine expertise”
3. Teamwork and communication (44)	3-1. Communication skills (14)	“Ability to communicate well”
	3-2. Ability to listen attentively and to empathize (9)	“Ability to listen attentively”
	3-3. Multidisciplinary cooperation (7)	“Understanding and cooperation with individuals from other professions”
	3-4. Communication within teams (5)	“Appropriately communicate with colleagues”
	3-5. Role in the medical team (4)	“Recognizing their role in the healthcare team”
	3-6. Leadership (3)	“Able to demonstrate leadership in a healthcare team”
	3-7. Ability to cooperate (2)	“Cooperation/Teamwork skills”
4. Exploring medicine and medical care/Research presentation (43)	4-1. Research mindset (11)	“Research-minded individuals pursuing medical advances”
	4-2. Reading and writing papers (10)	“Read and understand current medical papers”
	4-3. Exploring medicine and medical care (9)	“Translational research capabilities”
	4-4. Ability to present at conferences and publish papers (4)	“Disseminating research to the world”
	4-5. Medical statistics (4)	“Research and medical statistics”
	4-6. Interest in medical care (2)	“Awareness and absorption of the latest medical treatments”
	4-7. Literature search (2)	“Ability to find and read appropriate literature”
	4-8. Identifying the issue (1)	“Ability to identify problems”
5. Knowledge of medicine and medical care (41)	5-1. Acquisition of medical knowledge (18)	“Acquisition of broad medical knowledge”
	5-2. Health resources/Health economics (11)	“Appropriate allocation of medical resources”
	5-3. Understanding the medical insurance system (5)	“Understanding the medical insurance system”
	5-4. Community healthcare (5)	“Understanding of community healthcare”
	5-5. Medical cooperation (2)	“Appropriate cooperation with surrounding institutions”
6. Information inputs and outputs (31)	6-1. Information inputs (8)	“Ability to seek information”
	6-2. Information technology literacy (7)	“Ability to manage personal information”
	6-3. Examination and appropriate use of information (6)	“Examining the authenticity of the information”
	6-4. Information transmission (4)	“Transmitting correct medical information”
	6-5. Considerate presentation (4)	“Considerate presentation to the listener”
	6-6. Appropriate use of social media (2)	“Suitable use of social media”
7. Respect and building trusting relationships with patients (27)	7-1. Communication with patients (11)	“Ability to clearly explain things to patients”
	7-2. Respect for and developing trusting relationships with patients (8)	“Ability to respect the patient’s wishes”
	7-3. Trusting relationships with patients and families (5)	“Ability to gain patient trust”
	7-4. Patient-centered medicine (3)	“Patient-centered medical practice”
8. Use of ICT and AI (19)	8-1. Utilization of ICT (14)	“Effective use of ICT”
	8-2. Utilization of AI(4)	“Appropriate use of AI”
	8-3. Programming skills (1)	“Programming”
9. International perspective and language skills (19)	9-1. International perspective (10)	“International perspective”
	9-2. Language skills (9)	“Language skills”
10. Lifelong learning(14)	10-1. Lifelong learning (12)	“Attitude of lifelong learning”
	10-2. Competitive spirit (1)	“Competitive spirit and ambition”
	10-3. Self-learning (1)	“Ability to self-learn”
11. Self-management(12)	11-1. Self-health management (7)	“Independently maintain one’s health”
	11-2. Self-management ability (4)	“Self-management ability”
	11-3. Resilience (1)	“Resilience (ability to withstand hardships)”
12. Liberal arts and generic skills (7)	12-1. Liberal arts (5)	“Broad education in non-medical fields”
	12-2. Generic skills (2)	“Generic skills based on personal growth”

Abbreviations: AI, artificial intelligence; ICT, information and communication technology. *( ) = numbers of codes.

Study 2: Results of the Comparison of the Competencies Extracted in Study 1 With Those Required Before COVID-19

Figure 3 shows the total number of schools and percentage of mentions in domestic universities for the 12 categories. The categories that were not given much importance before the COVID-19 pandemic but emerged as crucial during the COVID-19 pandemic were: 8. Use of ICT and AI (17.1%), 11. Self-management (28.0%), 6. Information inputs and outputs (39.0%), 12. Liberal arts and generic skills (41.5%), and 4. Exploring medicine and medical care/research presentations (48.8%). Many universities had considered other categories as vital prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Figure 3.

The Number of Universities that have the Same Learning Outcomes Extracted in Study 1.

Discussion

This pioneering study examines the competencies of medical students after the COVID-19 pandemic in mixed groups of faculty members and students and explores the changes caused by the pandemic. We identified the following competencies as necessary after the pandemic: Use of ICT and AI, self-management, information inputs and outputs, medical exploration and presentations, and liberal arts and generic skills. The findings revealed that professionalism/ethics, knowledge of medicine and medical care, teamwork and communication, and lifelong learning had been defined as competencies by more than 90% of universities in Japan before the COVID-19 pandemic.

The use of ICT and AI has been the focus of research because the development of telemedicine in actual clinical settings was promoted at a rapid pace along with the introduction of ICT and AI in medical education. ICT and AI are increasingly used in the field of medicine. In addition, the application of AI and programming raises expectations for increased work efficiency. These technologies will continue to advance in the future, and medical students are expected to be proficient in using such cutting-edge technologies. It is suggested that medical educators should gain expertise in ICT and AI too.^22,23 The use of ICT and AI in healthcare has been focused on before the pandemic and would have developed even if the pandemic had not occurred. This result suggests that participants believed that the pandemic played a role in driving the development of ICT.

Self-management is associated with burnout among healthcare professionals. Burnout among healthcare workers was consistently high.²⁴ It became a cause of great concern for healthcare staff working during the COVID-19 pandemic, and its impact was more burdensome for front-line physicians.²⁵ In addition, the shortage of doctors remained a major challenge.²⁶ This proved to be an opportunity for physicians to become more aware of their own physical and mental health needs. Improving awareness about effective mental healthcare practices and resilience to prevent burnout among physicians is crucial.

Information inputs and outputs are essential for better medical practice and development. Publishing research, presentations at conferences, and medical statistics are also important. Ten Cate et al found that competent physicians are not always aware of what is best for their patients and are overwhelmed by uncertainty.⁴ Sackett et al pointed out the need to develop skills to continue to select the best care based on evidence-based medicine.²⁷ Recently, the rapid increase in the amount of available medical information has become a challenge in medical education.²⁸ Therefore, it is necessary to identify credible information from numerous resources. In their experience with the COVID-19 pandemic, Lungeanu et al noted that knowledge of data science and the ability to understand the results of research papers can be critical complements to clinical practice.²⁹ Thus, it is essential for medical professionals to stay updated on the latest research trends and continue to explore new findings. Maintaining up-to-date knowledge is a competency related to lifelong learning.

With the development of medicine, presenting individual and collective experiences is crucial. In recent years, publication methods have extended beyond conventional oral presentations and written papers to include social media. Acquiring skills to deliver information through new media platforms is gaining attention. The subcategories of information transmission, considerate presentation, and appropriate use of social media are essential competencies, suggesting that they are not only input but also output methods of information.

The term liberal arts and generic skills are used to describe a broad range of knowledge and skills that are not limited to the field of medicine. Zouaoui et al emphasized that skills such as knowledge, communication, and planning are essential for facing complex challenges.³⁰ It is believed that these skills are necessary to cope with the increasing amount of medical information and to improve problem-solving abilities.

Japan's national curriculum, the Model Core Curriculum for Medical Education, was revised in 2022. A section on “Information Technology” that reflects the increased use of information science and technology in medicine and healthcare was added.³¹ The use of information science and technology in medicine is expected to increase in the future.

Additionally, a new system for reforming the way doctors work was introduced by Japan's Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in April 2024. This law regulates doctors’ long working hours and promotes task-shifting and task-sharing of some duties among medical professionals.³² This system is expected to make it easier for doctors to manage their own health.

Limitations

There are several limitations to this study. First, there is a limitation regarding the research sampling. The participants were limited to teachers and students at a single institution in Japan. Most of the participants were faculty members, so it may have been complicated for 1 or 2 students in each group, or even for physicians in the early stages of their careers, to candidly express their opinions. It was also challenging to gather opinions from the public at large.

Second, a secondary data analysis was made only at the category level and not at the subcategory level. Third, only the presence or absence of each category mentioned on the website of the colleges was aggregated without considering the number of mentions within the same university's learning outcomes, whether at the headline or main text level or the importance of the category in the context. Future research should address these limitations. Fourth, although the impact of COVID-19 was significant, the changes in attitudes toward ICT and AI in medical education and self-management cannot be attributed solely to the impact of COVID-19. Research on technological advances, health worker burnout, and self-management had been accumulating prior to the onset of the novel coronavirus infection pandemic. It is necessary to consider the impact of factors other than COVID-19.

Conclusions

Competency-based medical education through ICT, self-management, information inputs and outputs, and medical exploration has become increasingly important since the COVID-19 pandemic. The study results indicate that it is necessary to design an appropriate educational curriculum to enable medical students to acquire these skills. The findings of this study have valuable implications for policymakers to promote competency-based medical education in the post-pandemic era.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-mde-10.1177_23821205251333502 - Supplemental material for Exploring the Essential Competencies for Medical Education in the Post-COVID-19 Pandemic Era: A Mixed-Methods Investigation at a Japanese Medical School

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-mde-10.1177_23821205251333502 for Exploring the Essential Competencies for Medical Education in the Post-COVID-19 Pandemic Era: A Mixed-Methods Investigation at a Japanese Medical School by Misaki Onodera, Zaiya Takahashi, Hajime Kasai, Hidetaka Yokoh, Kiyoshi Shikino, Yasuhiko Kimura, Ikuo Shimizu, Kazuyo Yamauchi, Mayumi Asahina and Shoichi Ito in Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development

Footnotes

List of Abbreviations

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to all the study participants for their cooperation. The authors would also like to thank Editage () for English language editing.

ORCID iDs

Misaki Onodera

Zaiya Takahashi

Hajime Kasai

Hidetaka Yokoh

Kiyoshi Shikino

Yasuhiko Kimura

Ikuo Shimizu

Kazuyo Yamauchi

Mayumi Asahina

Shoichi Ito

Ethical Considerations

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Chiba University (approval no. 3425). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects prior to commencement of the study. The study database was anonymized.

Consent to Participate and Publication

Informed consent for participation and publication was verbally obtained from the participants before the study commenced.

Author Contributions

MO, ZT, HY, and SI planned, designed, and conceived the study. MO, ZT, HY, KS, HK, and MA facilitated the group work and collected data on the proposed competencies in Study 1. MO, ZT, HY, and HK performed the coding in Studies 1 and 2. SI reviewed the findings of Studies 1 and 2. MO drafted the manuscript. ZT, HK, KS, IS, KY, and SI performed the manuscript review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Preprints

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at , first published March 12, 2024.

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

Notes

References

Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic [Internet] Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024 [cited 2024 Jun 14]. Available from: https://www.who.int/europe/emergencies/situations/covid-19

Tabatabai

. COVID-19 impact and virtual medical education. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2020;8(3):140–143. https://dx.doi:10.30476/jamp.2020.86070.1213

Gai

Tobe

. Managing healthcare delivery system to fight the COVID-19 epidemic: experience in Japan. Glob Health Res Policy. 2020;5(1):23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-020-00149-0

Ten Cate

Schultz

Frank

, et al.

Questioning medical competence: should the COVID-19 crisis affect the goals of medical education?

Med Teach. 2021;43(7):817–823. https://dx.doi:10.1080/0142159X.2021.1928619

Goda

Takabayashi

Suzuki

. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on education in Japan and the role of the Japan society for educational technology. In: Dennen

Dickson-Deane

Ifenthaler

Murthy

Richardson

, eds. Global Perspectives on Educational Innovations for Emergency Situations. Springer; 2022:275–284.

Kasai

Shikino

Saito

, et al. Alternative approaches for clinical clerkship during the COVID-19 pandemic: online simulated clinical practice for inpatients and outpatients—a mixed method. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):149. https://dx.doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02586-y

Jumat

Wong

Foo

, et al. From trial to implementation, bringing team-based learning online—Duke-NUS medical school’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Med Sci Educ. 2020;30(4):1649–1654. https://dx.doi:10.1007/s40670-020-01039-3

Steehler

Pettitt-Schieber

Studer

Mahendran

Pettitt

Henriquez

. Implementation and evaluation of a virtual elective in otolaryngology in the time of COVID-19. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;164(3):556–561. https://dx.doi:10.1177/0194599820951150

Roy

Ray

Saha

Ghosal

. A study on students’ perceptions for online Zoom-app based flipped class sessions on anatomy organised during the lockdown period of COVID-19 epoch. J Clin Diagn Res. 2020;14(6):AC01–AC04. https://dx.doi:10.7860/JCDR/2020/44869.13797

10.

Beer

Gray

Carbajal

, et al. “Megaflip,” a novel approach to national collaboration for flipped classroom education. Acad Pediatr. 2020;20(6):758–759. https://dx.doi:10.1016/j.acap.2020.05.027

11.

Naidoo

Akhras

Banerjee

. Confronting the challenges of anatomy education in a competency-based medical curriculum during normal and unprecedented times (COVID-19 pandemic): pedagogical framework development and implementation. JMIR Med Educ. 2020;6(2):e21701. https://dx.doi:10.2196/21701

12.

Sud

Sharma

Budhwar

Khanduja

. Undergraduate ophthalmology teaching in COVID-19 times: students’ perspective and feedback. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68(7):1490–1491. https://dx.doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_1689_20

13.

Albanese

Mejicano

Mullan

Kokotailo

Gruppen

. Defining characteristics of educational competencies. Med Educ. 2008;42(3):248–255. https://dx.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02996.x

14.

Mortaz Hejri

Jalili

. Competency frameworks: universal or local. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2013;18(4):865–866. https://dx.doi:10.1007/s10459-012-9426-4

15.

The World Federation for Medical Education. Basic Medical Education WFME Global Standards for Quality Improvement, the 2015 Revision[Internet]. Ferney-Voltaire: The World Federation for Medical Education; 2015 [cited 2024 Jun 14]. Available from: https://wfme.org/download/wfme-global-standards-for-quality-improvement-2015-bme/

16.

Kozu

. Medical education in Japan. Acad Med. 2006;81(12):1069–1075. https://dx.doi:10.1097/01.ACM.0000246682.45610.dd

17.

Mission statement and goals to be achieved by graduates. Graduate School of Medicine and School of Medicine, Chiba University [Internet]. Chiba: Chiba University; 2013 [cited 2024 Oct 10]. Available from: https://www.m.chiba-u.ac.jp/en/mission/

18.

Tong

Sainsbury

Craig

. Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042

19.

Graneheim

Lindgren

Lundman

. Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: a discussion paper. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;56:29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002

20.

Gerbner

Holsti

Krippendorff

Paisley

Stone

. The Analysis of Communication Content: Developments in Scientific Theories and Computer Techniques. Wiley; 1969.

21.

Elo

Kyngäs

. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–115. https://dx.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

22.

Grafton-Clarke

Uraiby

Gordon

, et al. Pivot to online learning for adapting or continuing workplace-based clinical learning in medical education following the COVID-19 pandemic: a BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 70. Med Teach. 2022;44(3):227–243. https://dx.doi:10.1080/0142159X.2021.1992372

23.

Daniel

Gordon

Patricio

, et al. An update on developments in medical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a BEME scoping review: BEME Guide No. 64. Med Teach. 2021;43(3):253–271. https://dx.doi:10.1080/0142159X.2020.1864310

24.

Raudenská

Steinerová

Javůrková

, et al. Occupational burnout syndrome and post-traumatic stress among healthcare professionals during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2020;34(3):553–560. https://dx.doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2020.07.008

25.

Lasalvia

Amaddeo

Porru

, et al. Levels of burn-out among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and their associated factors: a cross-sectional study in a tertiary hospital of a highly burdened area of north-east Italy. BMJ Open. 2021;11(1):e045127. https://dx.doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045127

26.

Gai

Tobe

. Managing healthcare delivery system to fight the COVID-19 epidemic: experience in Japan. Glob Health Res Policy. 2020;5(1):23. https://dx.doi:10.1186/s41256-020-00149-0

27.

Sackett

Rosenberg

WMC

Gray

JAM

Haynes

Richardson

. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996;312(7023):71–72. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71

28.

Densen

. Challenges and opportunities facing medical education. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2011;122:48–58. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3116346/pdf/tacca122000048.pdf

29.

Lungeanu

Petrica

Lupusoru

Marza

Mederle

Timar

. Beyond the digital competencies of medical students: concerns over integrating data science basics into the medical curriculum. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(23):15958. https://dx.doi:10.3390/ijerph192315958

30.

Zouaoui

Drolet

Briand

. Defining generic skills to better support the development of future health professionals: results from a scoping review. High Educ Res Dev. 2023;43(2):503–520.

31.

Saiki

Asada

Imafuku

, et al.

3. A newly established quality and competency “making use of information, science and technology.”

Igaku Kyoiku Med Educ Jpn. 2023;54(2):149–156. https://doi.org/10.11307/mededjapan.54.2_149

32.

Araki

. Physician’s work style reforms and work-life balance from the perspective of a lawyer. Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol Jpn. 2024;45(2):97–100. https://doi.org/10.11374/shonijibi.45.97

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB