My presidential address focuses on three themes. First, I introduce and trouble the idea of literacy research as white property, drawing on my own research and the history of the Literacy Research Association (LRA) as an organization. Second, I argue that even critically oriented scholarship runs the risk of reproducing power relations it sets out to critique without a reflexive look at segregated flows of knowledge. Third, I present a short video project and organizational storybank that highlights how LRA members are using their research to build equitable flows of knowledge. I argue that LRA has contributed a great deal to educational equity and still has farther to go.
Álvarez ValenciaJ. A. (2016). Social networking sites for language learning: Examining learning theories in nested semiotic spaces. Signo y Pensamiento, 35, 66–84.
2.
AnsleyF. L. (1997). White supremacy (and what we should do about it). In DelgadoR.StefancicJ. (Eds.), Critical white studies: Looking behind the mirror (pp. 592–655). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
3.
AnzaldúaG. E. (2012). Borderlands/La Frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.
4.
BellD. (1989). And we are not saved: The elusive quest for racial justice. New York, NY: Basic Books.
5.
BrighamJ. (1987). The bias of constitutional property: Toward compensation for the elimination of statutory entitlements. Law and Inequality, 5, 405–429.
6.
BrooksM. (2017). Other: Multiraciality, community, and cross-racial research. Journal of Literacy Research, 49, 544–558.
7.
ChakravarttyP.KuoR.GrubbsV.McllwainC. (2018). #Communicationsowhite. Journal of Communication Studies, 68, 254–266.
8.
CoatesT. (2015). Between the world and me. New York, NY: Spiegel & Grau.
9.
CollinsP. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge.
10.
Compton-LillyC.RogersR.LewisT. (2012). Analyzing epistemological considerations related to diversity: An integrative critical literature review of family literacy scholarship. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 31–58.
11.
CostaS. (2011). Researching entangled inequalities in Latin America: The role of historical, social and transregional inequalities. desiguALdades.net Working Paper Series 9 Berlin: desiguALdades.net. Research Network on Interdependent Inequalities in Latin America.
12.
DelgadoR. (1992). The imperial scholar revisited: How to marginalize outsider writing, ten years later. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 140, 1349–1372.
13.
De LissovoyN. (2015). Education and emancipation in the neoliberal era: Being, teaching, and power. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
14.
DiAngeloR. (2011). White fragility. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 3, 54–70.
15.
EdwardsP. (2008). The education of African American students: Challenges, controversies, and solutions. In KimY.RiskoV. J.ComptonD. L.DickinsonD. K.HundleyM. K.JimenezR. T.…RoweD. W. (Eds.), 57th yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 1–30). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
16.
EdwardsP. (2010). Chronicling the history of NRC through the voices of past presidents [DVD]. Presented at the 60th Annual Meeting of the Literacy Research Association, Fort Worth, TX.
17.
EnglanderK.López-BonillaG. (2011). Acknowledging or denying membership: Reviewers’ responses to non-anglophone scientists’ manuscripts. Discourse Studies, 13, 395–416.
18.
FaríasM.ObilinovicK.OrregoR.GregersenT. (2014). Evaluating types and combinations of multimodal presentations in the retention and transfer of concrete vocabulary in EFL learning. Revista Signos, 47, 21.
19.
FarquharK. Y. (2004). Images of America: Montgomery County. Charleston, SC: Arcadia Press.
20.
GuinierL. (2004). From racial liberation to racial literacy: Brown v. Board of Education and the interest-divergence dilemma. The Journal of American History, 91, 92–118.
21.
HarrisC. I. (1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 106, 1707–1791.
22.
HenryL.ZawilinskiL.JohnsonD. (2016). The changing face of leadership in a professional research organization. Presentation at the 66th Annual Meeting of the Literacy Research Association, Nashville, TN.
23.
JohnsonL.Gibbs GreyT.Baker-BellA. (2017). Changing the dominant narrative: A call for using storytelling as language and literacy theory, research, methodology, and practice. Journal of Literacy Research, 49, 467–475.
24.
KalmanJ.StreetB. (Eds.), (2013). Literacy and numeracy in Latin America: Local perspectives and beyond. New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
KimbroughM.DagenM. (2000). Victory without violence: The first ten years of the St. Louis Committee of Racial Equality (CORE), 1947-1957. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
26.
KubotaR. (2015). Race and language learning in multicultural Canada: Toward critical antiracism. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36, 3–12.
27.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2005). Beyond the big house: African American educators on teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
28.
LazarA.EdwardsP.Thompson-McMillonG. (2012). Bridging literacy and equity: The essential guide to social equity teaching. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
29.
LensmireT. (2017). White folks. New York, NY: Routledge.
30.
LeonardoZ. (2002). The souls of white folk: Critical pedagogy, whiteness studies, and globalization discourse. Race Ethnicity & Education, 5, 29–50.
31.
LeonardoZ.BroderickA. (2011). Smartness as property: A critical exploration of intersections between whiteness and disability. Teachers College Record, 113, 2206–2232.
LipsitzG. (2006). The possessive investment in whiteness: How white people profit from identity politics. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
34.
López-BonillaG. (2011). Narratives of exclusion and the construction of self. In RogersR. (Ed.), An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (2nd ed., pp. 46–67). New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
MahiriJ. (2017). Deconstructing race: Multicultural education beyond the color-bind. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
36.
McFarlandJ.HussarB.de BreyC.SnyderT.WangX.Wilksinon-FlickerS.…HinzS. (2017). The condition of education 2017. National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved fromhttps://nces.ed.gov/
37.
MignoloW. (2013). Geopolitics of sensing and knowing: On (de)coloniality, border thinking, and epistemic disobedience. Confero, 1, 129–150.
38.
MilnerR. (2017). Race talk, opportunity gaps, and curriculum shifts in (teacher) education. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 66, 73–94.
39.
MoraR. (2012). Literacidad y el aprendizaje de lenguas: Nuevas formas de entender los mundos y las palabras de nuestros estudiantes. Revista Internacional Magisterio, 58, 52–56.
40.
MorrisonT. (1993). Playing in the dark: Whiteness and the literary imagination. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
41.
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60–92.
42.
NewfieldD.SteinP. (2000). The multiliteracies project: South African teachers respond. In CopeB.KalantzisM. (Eds.), Multiliteracies; Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 292–310). New York, NY: Routledge.
43.
PatelL. (2016). Decolonizing educational research: From ownership to answerability. New York, NY: Routledge.
44.
PérezM. S.SaavedraC. M. (2017). A call for onto-epistemological diversity in early childhood education and care: Centering global south conceptualizations of childhood. Review of Research in Education, 41, 1–29.
45.
PiniM. (2009). Discurso y educación: Herramientas para el análisis critic. San Martin, Argentina: UNSAM Edita.
46.
PrendergastC. (2003). Literacy and racial justice. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
47.
ReichC. A. (1964). The new property. Yale Law Journal, 73, 733–787.
SantosB. S. (2001). Nuestra America: Reinventing a subaltern paradigm of recognition and redistribution. Theory, Culture and Society18, 185–217.
52.
SantosB. S. (2015). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. New York, NY: Routledge.
53.
ShapiroT. (2004). The hidden costs of being African American: How wealth perpetuates inequality. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
54.
SmithG. (2003). Indigenous struggle for the transformation of education and schooling. Keynote address to the Alaskan Federation of Natives (AFN) Convention, Anchorage, AK.
55.
SmithL.SmithG.BolerM.KemptonM.OrmondA.ChuehH.WaetfordR. (2002). “Do you guys hate Aucklanders too?” Youth: Voicing difference from the rural heartland. Journal of Rural Studies, 18, 169–178.
56.
Smith-BurkeT. (1989). Political and economic dimensions of literacy: Challenges for the 1990’s. In McCormickS.ZutellJ. (Eds.), 38th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 1–18). Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.
57.
Smith-BurkeT. (1995). Uncovering the roots of NRC. National Reading Conference Newsletter, 4–7.
58.
StahlN.Smith-BurkeT. (1999). The National Reading Conference: The college and adult reading years. Journal of Literacy Research, 31, 47–66.
59.
TierneyR. J.WeiK. (2016) Knowledge mobilization within and across the People’s Republic of China and the United States: A cross-national study of internationalization of educational research. American Educational Research Journal, 53, 1759–1791.
60.
Trigos-CarrilloL. (2016). A critical approach to academic, community, and family literacies of first-generation college students in Latin America (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from University of Missouri–Columbia Merlin Catalog: http://laurel.lso.missouri.edu:80/record=b12184937∼S1
61.
Trigos-CarrilloL. (2017). Literacy capital: Nurturing the community cultural wealth of marginalized communities. Presented at the 67th Annual Meeting of the Literacy Research Association, Tampa, FL.
62.
Trigos-CarrilloL.RogersR. (2017). Latin American influences on multiliteracies: From epistemological diversity to cognitive justice. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 66, 1–16. doi:10.1177/2381336917718500
63.
Trigos-CarrilloL.RogersR. (in preparation). Reimagining flows of knowledge in multiliteracies research.
64.
Van DijkT. (1993) Analyzing racism through discourse: Some methodological reflections. In StanfieldJ. H.DennisR. M. (Eds.), Race and ethnicity in research methods (pp. 92–134). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
65.
WillisA. (2015). Literacy and race: Access, equity, and freedom. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 64, 23–55.
