Existing models of medical-dental integration, as well as those from behavioral health care integrated with primary medical treatment, provide a basis for a truly synthesized and expanded model incorporating medical, dental, and behavioral components. Such a comprehensive model allows for collaborative health care serving patients seamlessly without disciplinary silos, promoting optimal whole-person health. This innovative approach is consistent with recent developments in the behavioral and social oral health sciences that include an imperative for their full inclusion in dental health care, research, and education.
Methods:
Existing models of medical-dental integration are described, along with current models from integrated primary medical and behavioral health care. Using these existing approaches as a basis, a new multilevel model is proposed to include social and cultural determinants of health.
Results:
Contemporary approaches to providing health care across disciplines include referral to a geographically separate entity, co-location of services, and integrated, side-by-side care. Integration of electronic health records and interoperability are necessary (but not sufficient) factors that affect transdisciplinary health care. Effective communication among health care providers and the need for interprofessional education, comprehensive training, and ongoing cross-disciplinary consultation also are noted as crucial factors in truly collaborative care. Evidence for existing models varies greatly depending on the target population and type of services provided.
Conclusions:
A fully integrated, transdisciplinary model of health care is possible, theoretically and practically. Combining aspects of extant integrated models and extending them provides opportunity for a greater focus on systemic factors and more emphasis on prevention. Consistent with this new model, medical and dental home concepts can be expanded to that of a person-centered health care home that includes interprofessional practice. This transdisciplinary approach contributes to greater health equity given the multilevel approach. Multidirectional integration of diverse disciplines representing the various realms of medicine, dentistry, and behavioral health care is essential for optimal health of all.
Knowledge Transfer Statement:
This article can be used by clinicians, scientists, administrators, and policy makers in developing and implementing integrated systems of care that provide for patients’ medical, dental, and behavioral health needs.
ArendJTsang-QuinnJLevineCThomasD.2012. The patient-centered medical home: history, components, and review of the evidence. Mt Sinai J Med. 79(4):433–450. https://doi.org/10.1002/msj.21326.
3.
AtchisonKARozierRGWeintraubJA. 2018. Integration of oral health and primary care: communication, coordination, and referral. NAM Perspectives. Discussion paper. Washington, (DC): National Academy of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.31478/201810e.
BordeDAgana-NormanDFGLeverenceRPhotosLShusterJLukoseKPinkneyJWrightJWaxenbergLAllenB, et al. 2023. Outcomes of an integrated practice unit for vulnerable emergency department patients. BMC Health Serv Res. 23(1):1449. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10067-9.
9.
CadetTCusimanoJMcKearneySHonakerJO’NealCTaheriRUhleyVZhangYDrekerMCohnJS. 2024. Describing the evidence linking interprofessional education interventions to improving the delivery of safe and effective patient care: a scoping review. J Interprof Care. 38(3):476–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2023.2283119.
CookJABurke-MillerJKRazzanoLASteigmanPJJonikasJASantosA.2021. Serious mental illness, other mental health disorders, and outpatient health care as predictors of 30-day readmissions following medical hospitalization. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 70:10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2021.02.004.
12.
CrenshawK.1997. Intersectionality and identity politics: learning from violence against women of color. In: ShanleyMLNarayanU editors. Reconstructing political theory: feminist perspectives. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. p. 178–193.
13.
DamianoPReynoldsJHerndonJBMcKernanSKuthyR.2019. The patient-centered dental home: a standardized definition for quality assessment, improvement, and integration. Health Serv Res. 54(2):446–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13067.
14.
DielemanJLCaoJChapinAChenCLiZLiuAHorstCKaldjianAMatyaszTScottKW, et al. 2020. US health care spending by payer and health condition, 1996-2016. J Am Med Assoc. 323(9):863–884. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.0734.
GrafeCJHorthRZClaytonNDunnAForsytheN.2020. How to classify super-utilizers: a methodological review of super-utilizer criteria applied to the Utah Medicaid population, 2016–2017. Popul Health Manag. 23(2):165–173. https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2019.0076.
18.
GreenBNJohnsonCD. 2015. Interprofessional collaboration in research, education, and clinical practice: working together for a better future. J Chiropr Educ. 29(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-14-36.
19.
GuptaAAkiyaKGlickmanRSilverDPagánJA. 2022. How patient-centered medical homes integrate dental services into primary care: a scoping review. Med Care Res Rev. 79(4):487–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587211030376.
20.
HaleyWEMcDanielSHBrayJHFrankRGHeldringMJohnsonSBLuEGReedGMWigginsJG. 2004. Psychological practice in primary care settings: practical tips for clinicians. In: FrankRGMcDanielSHBrayJHHeldringM, editors. Primary care psychology. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association. p. 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/10651-005
21.
HargravesDWhiteCFrederickRCinibulkMPetersMYoungAElderN.2017. Implementing SBIRT (Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment) in primary care: lessons learned from a multi-practice evaluation portfolio. Public Health Rev. 38:31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-017-0077-0.
22.
HarnageaHLamotheLCouturierYEsfandiariSVoyerRCharbonneauAEmamiE.2018. From theoretical concepts to policies and applied programmes: the landscape of integration of oral health in primary care. BMC Oral Health. 18(1):23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0484-8.
Institute of Medicine, (US) Committee on the Future of Primary Care, DonaldsonMYordyKVanselowN editors. 1994. Defining primary care: an interim report. Washington (DC): National Academies Press.
26.
Interprofessional Education Collaborative. 2016. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: 2016 update. Washington (DC): Interprofessional Education Collaborative. https://ipec.memberclicks.net/assets/2016-Update.pdf.
27.
LaiteerapongNKirbyJGaoYYuTSharmaRNoconRLeeSMChinMHNathanAGNgo-MetzgerQ, et al. 2014. Health care utilization and receipt of preventive care for patients seen at federally funded health centers compared to other sites of primary care. Health Serv Res. 49(5):1498–1518.
28.
LinabargerMBrownMPatelN.2021. A pilot study of integration of medical and dental care in 6 states. Prev Chronic Dis. 18:210027. http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd18.210027.
29.
LoresTGoessCMikocka-WalusACollinsKLBurkeALJChur-HansenADelfabbroPAndrewsJM. 2020. Integrated psychological care reduces health care costs at a hospital-based inflammatory bowel disease service. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 19(1):96–103.e3.
McNeilDW. 2023. Behavioural and cognitive-behavioural theories in oral health research: current state and future directions. Community Dent Oral. 51(1):6–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12840.
33.
McNeilDWRandallCLBakerSBorrelliBBurgetteJMGibsonBHeatonLJKitsarasGMcGrathCNewtonJT. 2022. Consensus statement on future directions for the behavioral and social sciences in oral health. J Dent Res. 101(6):619–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345211068033.
34.
McNeilDWRandallCL. 2023. Introduction to the special issue: advancing the behavioural and social sciences to promote oral health. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 51(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12833.
McNaughtonSMFloodBMorganCJSaravanakumarP.2021. Existing models of interprofessional collaborative practice in primary healthcare: a scoping review. J Interprof Care. 35(6):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2020.1830048.
37.
McNeilDWRandallCLBakerSBorrelliBBurgetteJMGibsonBHeatonLJKitsarasGMcGrathCNewtonJT. 2022. Consensus statement on future directions for the behavioral and social sciences in oral health. J Dent Res. 101(6):619–622.
38.
MongelliFGeorgakopoulosPPatoMT. 2020. Challenges and opportunities to meet the mental health needs of underserved and disenfranchised populations in the United States. Focus. 18(1):16–24. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.20190028.
39.
MosenDMBanegasMPDickersonJFFellowsJLBrooksNBPihlstromDJKershahHMScottJLKeastEM. 2021. Examining the association of medical-dental integration with closure of medical care gaps among the elderly population. J Am Dent Assoc. 152(4):302–308.
National Drug Control Policy. 2012. Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) in behavioral care. Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). [2011 Apr 1; accessed 2024 Jan 24]. https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/sbirtwhitepaper_0.pdf.
42.
National Institutes of Health. 2021. Oral health in America: advances and challenges. Bethesda (MD): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research.
43.
NoconRSLeeSMSharmaRNgo-MetzgerQMukamelDBGaoYWhiteLMShiLChinMHLaiteerapongN, et al. 2016. Health care use and spending for Medicaid enrollees in federally qualified health centers versus other primary care settings. Am J Public Health. 106(11):1981–1989. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2016.303341.
O’DonnellMP. 2009. Definition of health promotion 2.0: embracing passion, enhancing motivation, recognizing dynamic balance, and creating opportunities. Am J Health Promot. 24(1):iv. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.24.1.iv.
RandallCLMcNeilDW. 2023. Harnessing the behavioral and social sciences to promote oral health: where do we go from here?Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 51(1):149–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12834.
48.
SantoftFAxelssonEÖstLGHedman-LagerlöfMFustJHedman-LagerlöfE.2019. Cognitive behaviour therapy for depression in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 49(8):1266–1274.
49.
SawchukCNCranerJR.2017. Evidence-based psychotherapy in primary care. Focus. 15(3):264–270.
50.
SmithBThewesBTurnerJGilchristJFardellJSharpeLBellMLGirgisAGrierMByrneD, et al. 2015. Pilot of a theoretically grounded psychologist-delivered intervention for fear of cancer recurrence (Conquer Fear). Psychosoc Oncol. 24(8):967–970. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3775.
TuerkPWMuellerMEgedeLE. 2008. Estimating physician effects on glycemic control in the treatment of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 31(5):869–873. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc07-1662.
VelezmoroR. 2018. The role of the psychologist in the Veterans Administration’s patient aligned care team and huddle: a review, practical recommendations, and a call to action. Health Psychol Res. 6(1):7393.
58.
ZhangABorhneimerLAWeaverAFranklinCHaiAHGuzSShenL.2019. Cognitive behavioral therapy for primary care depression and anxiety: a secondary meta-analytic review using robust variance estimation in meta-regression. J Behav Med. 42(6):1117–1141.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
