An Author “Under Attack”: The Case of Publishers Soliciting Dental Manuscripts

Abstract

Keywords

ethics publishing publications conflict of interest dentistry peer review

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beall

. 2016. Dangerous predatory publishers threaten medical research. J Korean Med Sci. 31(10):1511–1513.

Björk

Solomon

. 2012. Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact. BMC Med. 10:73.

Clark

Smith

. 2015. Firm action needed on predatory journals. BMJ. 350:h210.

Jefferson

Alderson

Wager

Davidoff

. 2002. Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review. JAMA. 287(21):2784–2786.

Journal of Dental Research Blog. 2018. International Association for Dental Research [accessed November 15, 2018. https://dentalresearchblog.org/jdr/?p=338.

Liesegang

Schachat

Albert

. 2005. The open access initiative in scientific and biomedical publishing: fourth in the series on editorship. Am J Ophthalmol. 139(1):156–167.

Mimouni

Braun

Mimouni

Blumenthal

. 2017. Beall’s list removed: what stands between us and open access predators? Am J Med. 130(8):e371–e372.

Redberg

. 2018. JAMA Internal Medicine—the year in review, 2017. JAMA Intern Med. 178(4):456–457.

Shamseer

Moher

Maduekwe

Turner

Barbour

Burch

Clark

Galipeau

Roberts

Shea

. 2017. Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison. BMC Med. 15(1):28.

10.

Wager

. 2017. Why we should worry less about predatory publishers and more about the quality of research and training at our academic institutions. J Epidemiol. 27(3):87–88.

11.

Weineck

Koelblinger

Kiesslich

. 2015. Medical habilitation in German-speaking countries: Quantitative assessment of content and elaboration of habilitation guidelines [in German]. Chirurg. 86(4):355–365.

12.

Xia

Harmon

Connolly

Donnelly

Anderson

Howard

. 2015. Who publishes in “predatory” journals? J Assn Inf Sci Tec. 66(7):1406–1417.