The objective of the study was to examine the mediating effect of child dental use on the effectiveness of North Carolina Early Head Start (EHS) in improving oral health–related quality of life (OHRQoL). In total, 479 parents of children enrolled in EHS and 699 parents of Medicaid-matched children were interviewed at baseline when children were approximately 10 mo old and 24 mo later. In this quasi-experimental study, mediation analysis was performed using the counterfactual framework analysis, which employed 2 logit models with random effects: 1) for the mediator as a function of the treatment and covariates and 2) for the outcome as a function of the treatment, mediator, and covariates. The covariates were baseline dental OHRQoL, dental need, survey language, and a propensity score. We used in-person computer-assisted, structured interviews to collect information on demographic characteristics and dental use and to administer the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale, a measure of OHRQoL. Dental use had a mediation effect in the undesired direction with a 2–percentage point increase in the probability of any negative impact to OHRQoL (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3%–3.9%). Even with higher dental use by EHS participants, the probability of any negative impact to OHRQoL was approximately 8 percentage points lower if an individual were moved from the non-EHS group to the EHS group (95% CI, −13.9% to −1.2%). EHS increases child dental use, which worsens family OHRQoL. However, EHS is associated with improved OHRQoL overall.
Knowledge Transfer Statement: Study results can inform policy makers that comprehensive early childhood education programs improve oral health–related quality of life (OHRQoL) for disadvantaged families with young children in pathways outside of clinical dental care. This awareness and its promotion can lead to greater resource investments in early childhood education programs. Information about the negative impacts of dental use on OHRQoL should lead to the development and testing of strategies in dentistry and Early Head Start to improve dental care experiences.
AbantoJPaivaSMSheihamATsakosGMendesFMCordeschiTVidigalEABöneckerM. 2016. Changes in preschool children’s OHRQoL after treatment of dental caries: responsiveness of the B-ECOHIS. Int J Paediatr Dent. 26(4):259–265.
2.
AbrahamJRozierRPahelB. 2010. Early childhood caries, treatment and oral health–related quality of life. J Dent Res. 89(Spec Iss A):850.
3.
AlmazMESonmezISObaAAAlpS. 2014. Assessing changes in oral health–related quality of life following dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 38(3):263–267.
American Academy of Pediatrics. 2008. Guidelines for health supervision of infants, children, adolescents. In: HoltK.CassamassimoP, editors. Bright futures in practice: oral health—pocket guide. 3rd ed.Elk Grove Village (IL): American Academy of Pediatrics.
6.
ArrowP. 2016. Responsiveness and sensitivity of the early childhood oral health impact scale to primary dental care for early childhood caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 44(1):1–10.
7.
ArrowPKlobasE. 2015. Child oral health–related quality of life and early childhood caries: a non-inferiority randomised control trial. Aust Dent J. 61(2):227–235.
8.
BarbosaTSGaviãoMB. 2008. Oral health–related quality of life in children: Part II. Effects of clinical oral health status. A systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg. 6(2):100–107.
9.
BaronRMKennyDA. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 51(6):1173–1182.
10.
BerghCUdumyanRFallKAlmrothHMontgomeryS. 2015. Stress resilience and physical fitness in adolescence and risk of coronary heart disease in middle age. Heart. 101(8):623–629.
11.
BornCDDivarisKZeldinLPRozierRG. 2016. Influences on preschool children’s oral health–related quality of life as reported by English and Spanish-speaking parents and caregivers. J Public Health Dent. 76(4):276–286.
12.
BurgetteJMPreisserJSWeinbergerMKingRSLeeJYRozierRG. 2017a. Enrollment in Early Head Start and oral health–related quality of life. Qual Life Res [epub ahead of print] in press. doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1584-7
13.
BurgetteJMPreisserJSWeinbergerMKingRSLeeJYRozierRG. 2017b. The impact of Early Head Start in North Carolina on dental care use among children younger than 3 years. Am J Public Health. 107(4):614–620.
14.
BurgetteJMPreisserJSRozierRG. 2016. Propensity score weighting: an application to an Early Head Start dental study. J Public Health Dent. 76(1):17–29.
15.
The Early Head Start National Resource Center, Office of Head Start, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2016. About Early Head Start. Washington (DC): Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; [accessed 2017 April 19]. http://eclkc.ohs.acf.hhs.gov/hslc/tta-system/ehsnrc/about-ehs/about.html#about.
16.
FerransCEZerwicJJWilburJELarsonJL. 2005. Conceptual model of health–related quality of life. J Nurs Scholarsh. 37(4):336–342.
17.
Friedman-KraussABarnettWS. 2013. Early childhood education: pathways to better health. New Brunswick (NJ): National Institute for Early Education Research. Policy Brief Issue25; [accessed 2017 April 19]. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED556248.
18.
GlymourMMSpiegelmanD. 2017. Evaluating public health interventions: 5. Causal inference in public health research—do sex, race, and biological factors cause health outcomes?Am J Public Health. 107(1):81–85.
19.
Head Start Bureau, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2016. Oral health—revision ACF-PI-HS-06-03. Washington (DC): Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; [accessed 2017 April 19]. http://eclkc.ohs.acf.hhs.gov/hslc/standards/PIs/2006/resour_pri_00109_122006.html.
20.
ImaiKKeeleLTingleyD. 2010. A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychol Methods. 15(4):309–334.
21.
ImaiKKeeleLTingleyDYamamotoT. 2010. Causal mediation analysis using R. In: VinodHD, editor. Advances in social science research using R. New York (NY): Springer (Lecture Notes in Statistics). p. 129–154.
22.
JankauskieneBNarbutaiteJ. 2010. Changes in oral health–related quality of life among children following dental treatment under general anaesthesia: a systematic review. Stomatologija. 12(2):60–64.
23.
JankauskieneBVirtanenJIKubiliusRNarbutaiteJ. 2014. Oral health–related quality of life after dental general anaesthesia treatment among children: a follow-up study. BMC Oral Health. 14:81.
24.
KarolyLKilburnMCannonJ. 2005. Early childhood interventions: proven results, future promise. Santa Monica (CA): RAND Corporation.
25.
KramerPFFeldensCAFerreiraSHBervianJRodriguesPHPeresMA. 2013. Exploring the impact of oral diseases and disorders on quality of life of preschool children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 41(4):327–335.
26.
KumarSKroonJLallooR. 2014. A systematic review of the impact of parental socio-economic status and home environment characteristics on children’s oral health related quality of life. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 12:41.
27.
LockerD. 1997. Concepts of oral health, disease and the quality of life. In: SladeGD, editor. Measuring oral health and quality of life. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, Dental Ecology.
28.
LockerDAllenF. 2007. What do measures of ‘oral health–related quality of life’ measure?Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 35(6):401–411.
29.
MartinABHardinJWVeschusioCKirbyHA. 2012. Differences in dental service utilization by rural children with and without participation in Head Start. Pediatr Dent. 34(5):107-111.
30.
MofidiMRozierRGKingRS. 2002. Problems with access to dental care for Medicaid-insured children: what caregivers think. Am J Public Health. 92(1):53-58.
31.
MofidiMZeldinLPRozierRG. 2009. Oral health of early head start children: a qualitative study of staff, parents, and pregnant women. Am J Public Health. 99(2):245–251.
32.
NelsonTMHuebnerCEKimAScottJMPickrellJE. 2015. Parent-reported distress in children under 3 years old during preventive medical and dental care. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 16(3):283–290.
33.
NowakAJCasamassimoPS. 2002. The dental home: a primary care oral health concept. J Am Dent Assoc. 133(1):93-98.
34.
OnoriobeURozierRGCantrellJKingRS. 2014. Effects of enamel fluorosis and dental caries on quality of life. J Dent Res. 93(10):972–979.
35.
Oral Health in America: a report of the Surgeon General. 2000. Rockville (MD): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
36.
PahelBTRozierRGSladeGD. 2007. Parental perceptions of children’s oral health: the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 5:6.
37.
RobinsJMGreenlandS. 1992. Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology. 3(2):143–155.
38.
ScarpelliACPaivaSMViegasCMCarvalhoACFerreiraFMPordeusIA. 2013. Oral health–related quality of life among Brazilian preschool children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 41(4):336–344.
39.
Serrano-PozoAQianJMonsellSEBetenskyRAHymanBT. 2015. APOEepsilon2 is associated with milder clinical and pathological Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 77(6):917–929.
40.
TalekarBRozierRZeldinL. 2005. Spanish version of the early childhood oral health impact scale. J Dent Res. 84(Spec Iss A):2653.
41.
TingleyDYamamotoTHiroseKKeeleLImaiK. 2014. Mediation: R package for causal mediation analysis. J Stat Software. 59(5):1–40.
42.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. 2005. Head Start impact study: first year findings. Washington (DC): Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
43.
WongHMMcGrathCPKingNMLoEC. 2011. Oral health–related quality of life in Hong Kong preschool children. Caries Res. 45(4):370–376.
44.
YaoCChenBHJoehanesROtluBZhangXLiuCHuanTTastanOCupplesLAMeigsJBet al. 2015. Integromic analysis of genetic variation and gene expression identifies networks for cardiovascular disease phenotypes. Circulation. 131(6):536–549.
