This paper describes an in-class experiential exercise for teaching expectancy theory, with a focus on understanding how individuals choose from multiple potential behaviors. The exercise is comprised of four simple games: one a “control” and three with clear and memorable manipulations of the key components of expectancy theory (expectancy, instrumentality, and valence).
AfotaM. C.RobinsonM. A. (2023). Mitigating information overload: An experiential exercise using role-play to illustrate and differentiate theories of motivation. Management Teaching Review, 8(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/2379298120933999
2.
HolbrookR. L.Jr.ChappellD. (2019). Sweet rewards: An exercise to demonstrate process theories of motivation. Management Teaching Review, 4(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/2379298118806632
3.
MinerJ. B. (2003). The rated importance, scientific validity, and practical usefulness of organizational behavior theories: A quantitative review. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2(3), 250–268. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2003.10932132
4.
OrganD. W. (2018). Organizational citizenship behavior: Recent trends and developments. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104536
5.
OrganD. W.PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452231082
6.
SpectorP. E.FoxS. (2005). The stressor-emotion model of counterproductive work behavior. In FoxS.SpectorP. E. (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 151–174). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10893-007
