Framing Intra-Team Conflicts in a New Venture: The Interplay of Conflict Resolution Frames and Negotiation Strategies

Abstract

This experiential exercise introduces students to the role that frames play in conflict management and negotiation. Understanding frames is important because they serve as lenses through which negotiators define a conflict and select strategies to resolve it. Students will apply conflict resolution frames to a situation that occurred within an entrepreneurial team, but key details have been disguised and fictionalized. Engaging in this exercise allows students to experience how framing conflicts in terms of interests, rights, or power affects the process of negotiation, the choice of situationally appropriate strategies, and the outcomes for individuals and their organizations. Students will consider ways to reframe negotiations around shared interests to benefit the collective. The exercise can be used across management and entrepreneurship courses, but may fit best in negotiation and organizational behavior. It works well in any format, traditional and online, with graduate and undergraduate students.

Keywords

conflict management strategies entrepreneurial team frames interests negotiation power rights

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Fisher

Ury

(1983). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Penguin.

Gray

(2003). Framing of environmental disputes. In Lewicki

R. J.

Gray

Elliott

(Eds.), Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases (pp. 11–34). Island Press.

Gray

Putnam

L. L.

(2003). Means to what ends? Conflict management frames. Environmental Practice, 5(3), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466046603035634

Klar

Bar-Tal

Kruglanski

(1987). On the epistemology of conflict: Toward a social cognitive analysis of conflict and conflict resolution. In Stroebe

Kruglanski

A. W.

Bar-Tal

Hewstone

(Eds.), Social psychology of intergroup and international conflict (pp. 112–137). Springer-Verlag.

Lewicki

R. J.

Greenhalgh

(2015). Evolution of teaching negotiation: The legacy of Walton and McKersie. Negotiation Journal, 31(4), 465–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12130

Lewicki

R. J.

Hiam

(2006). Mastering business negotiation: A working guide to making deals and resolving conflict. Jossey-Bass.

Lytle

A. L.

Brett

J. M.

Shapiro

D. L.

(1999). The strategic use of interests, rights, and power to resolve disputes. Negotiation Journal, 15(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.1999.tb00178.x

Pinkley

R. L.

(1990). Dimensions of conflict frame: Disputant interpretations of conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.2.117

Pinkley

R. L.

Northcraft

G. B.

(1994). Conflict frames of reference: Implications for dispute processes and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.2307/256777

10.

Salancik

G. R.

Pfeffer

(1977). Who gets power--and how they hold on to it: A strategic-contingency model of power. Organizational Dynamics, 5(3), 2–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(77)90028-6

11.

Savage

G. T.

Blair

J. D.

Sorensen

R. L.

(1989). Consider both relationships and substance when negotiating strategically. Academy of Management Executive, 3(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1989.4277149

12.

Shell

G. R.

(2018). Bargaining for advantage: Negotiation strategies for reasonable people. Penguin Books.

13.

Thomas

K. W.

(1992). Conflict and conflict management: Reflections and update. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130307

14.

Thomas

K. W.

Kilmann

R. H.

(1974). Thomas-Kilmann conflict mode instrument. Xicom, Inc.

15.

Thomas

K. W.

Pondy

L. R.

(1977). Toward an “intent” model of conflict management among principal parties. Human Relations, 30(12), 1089–1102. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872677703001203

16.

Thompson

L. L.

(2012). The heart and mind of the negotiator (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.

17.

Ury

W. L.

Brett

J. M.

Goldberg

S. B.

(1988). Getting disputes resolved: Designing systems to cut the costs of conflict. Jossey-Bass.

18.

Yang

M. Y.

Chen

F. C.

Chuang

(2015). The role of affect in conflict frames and conflict management. International Journal of Conflict Management, 26(4), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-09-2013-0077

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.03 MB

0.00 MB