Work motivation is a core component of many management courses. However, its effective teaching can be hampered by the fragmentation and seeming incoherence of the various theories of work motivation. To address this challenge, we describe an interactive role-play activity that induces students to synthesize, apply, and compare several theories of motivation. In the first part of the exercise, students work in small groups to prepare a role-play skit illustrating a specific theory of motivation. In the second part, groups present their role-play skits in front of the class, and the rest of the students try to determine which theories were performed. Next, the debriefing session encourages students to discuss, compare, and contrast the theories. Though the present exercise focuses on four theories—the hierarchy of needs, the two-factor theory, expectancy theory, and self-determination theory—the activity can be easily adapted to incorporate other models of motivation.
AdamsJ. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422-436. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040968
2.
AfotaM. -C.RobinsonM. A. (2020, June24-26). Mitigating information overload: An experiential exercise using role-play to illustrate and differentiate theories of motivation [Paper presentation]. Eastern Academy of Management 57th Annual Meeting, Online.
3.
AndersonM. H. (2007). “Why are there so many theories?” A classroom exercise to help students appreciate the need for multiple theories of a management domain. Journal of Management Education, 31(6), 757-776. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562906297705
4.
BrownK. G.CharlierS. D.RynesS. L.HosmanekA. (2013). What do we teach in organizational behavior? An analysis of MBA syllabi. Journal of Management Education, 37(4), 447-471. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562913486469
5.
CampbellJ. P.PritchardR. D. (1976). Motivation theory in industrial and organizational psychology. In DunnetteM. D. (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 63-130). Rand McNally.
6.
ClawsonJ. G. S. (2006). Role playing. In ClawsonJ. G. S.HaskinsM. E. (Eds.), Teaching management: A field guide for professors, corporate trainers and consultants (pp. 141-153). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511617850
7.
CookD. A.ArtinoA. R. (2016). Motivation to learn: An overview of contemporary theories. Medical Education, 50(10), 997-1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13074
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01
10.
DyeK.MillsA. J.WeatherbeeT. (2005). Maslow: Man interrupted: Reading management theory in context. Management Decision, 43(10), 1375-1395. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740510634921
HerzbergF. (1966). Work and the nature of man. World Publishing.
13.
HerzbergF. (1968). One more time: How do you motivate employees?Harvard Business Review, 46(1), 53-62.
14.
HolbrookR. L.ChappellD. (2018). Sweet Rewards: An exercise to demonstrate process theories of motivation. Management Teaching Review, 4(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/2379298118806632
15.
KanferR. A. (1990). Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. In DunnetteM. D.HoughL. M. (Eds.), The handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 75-112). Consulting Psychologists Press.
16.
KolbD. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
17.
LittleL. (1990). Beyond role-play: Character immersion in the organizational behavior class. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 14(4), 46-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256298901400406
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Prentice Hall.
20.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
21.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2004). What should we do about motivation theory? Six recommendations for the twenty-first century. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 388-403. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2004.13670974
22.
MaloneT. W. (1980). What makes things fun to learn? Heuristics for designing instructional computer games. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSMALL Symposium and the First SIGPC Symposium on Small Systems (pp. 162-169). https://doi.org/10.1145/800088.802839
MaslowA. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. Harper & Row.
25.
MinerJ. B. (2003). The rated importance, scientific validity, and practical usefulness of organizational behavior theories: A quantitative review. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2(3), 250-268. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2003.10932132
26.
MinerJ. B. (2006). Organizational behavior 3: Historical origins, theoretical foundations, and the future (Vol. 3). ME Sharpe. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315701998
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
29.
SheldonK. M.TurbanD. B.BrownK. G.BarrickM. R.JudgeT. A. (2003). Applying self-determination theory to organizational re-search. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 22, 357-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-7301(03)22008-9
30.
SkinnerB. F (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
31.
StecherM. D.RosseJ. G. (2007). Understanding reactions to workplace injustice through process theories of motivation: A teaching module and simulation. Journal of Management Education, 31(6), 777-796. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562906293504
SteersR. M.MowdayR. T.ShapiroD. L. (2004). The future of work motivation theory. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 379–387. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2004.13670978
34.
ThorndikeE. L. (1911). Animal intelligence. Macmillan.
35.
VroomV. H. (1964). Work and motivation. John Wiley.
36.
WeinerB. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories, and research. Sage.
