Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Introduction

Operative vaginal deliveries are a method of dealing with issues that arise during the second stage of labor with the use of vacuum device or forceps. The decision to use an instrument to deliver the fetus weighs the maternal, fetal, and neonatal consequences of the procedure against the alternative option of cesarean birth. However, evidence on operative vaginal delivery is limited in Ethiopia in general and in the study area in particular.

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the magnitude, indications, and factors associated with operative vaginal delivery among mothers who gave birth at Adama Hospital Medical College, Ethiopia.

Methods

A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted among a sample of 440 mothers who gave birth from 1 to 30 June 2022. A systematic random sampling technique was used to select the study participants. Data were collected using an interviewer-administered structured questionnaire. The data were entered into EPI INFO version 7 and exported to SPSS version 25 for analysis. Bivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify candidate variables at p < .25 and multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify the independent predictors of operative vaginal delivery at p < .05 with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

The magnitude of operative vaginal delivery was 14.8% (95% CI: 10.8, 18.8). Rural residence (adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 2.09; 95% CI: 2.01, 7.41), maternal age 25–34 (AOR, 4.95; 95% CI: 1.62, 9.2), being primigravida (AOR: 3.5, 95% CI: 1.26, 9.98), gestational age ≥42 weeks (3.09; 95% CI: 1.38, 6.9), and antenatal care (ANC) follow-ups <4 times (AOR:3.9; 95% CI: 1.09, 9.45) were significantly associated with operative vaginal delivery.

Conclusion

The magnitude of operative vaginal delivery in the study area was relatively low. Rural residence, maternal age 25 to 34, primigravida, gestational age ≥42 weeks, and ANC follow-ups <4 times were independent determinants of operative vaginal delivery. Thus, health education programs and other multidisciplinary strategies are required to encourage mothers to have regular ANC follow-ups.

Keywords

operative vaginal delivery obstetrics maternal health cross-sectional survey Ethiopia

Introduction

Operative vaginal delivery (OVD) is an important component of obstetric care, which refers to the use of forceps or a vacuum device to avoid poor birth outcomes and reduce the primary cesarean-section rate (Ali & Norwitz, 2009; Ogunwale et al., 2016). It is carried out by skilled health workers to reduce maternal and neonatal complications (No, 2011). Although OVDs were used as an alternative mode of delivery for centuries, recent trends indicate that OVDs use has reduced as the cesarean delivery rate has risen (Johanson & Menon, 1999; Merriam et al., 2017; Sydsjö et al., 2010). In Ethiopia, the prevalence of OVD ranged from 2.10% to 27.90% among mothers who gave birth (Abdo et al., 2020; Yemaneh et al., 2017).

OVD is recommended in any situation where the mother or fetus could be harmed (Berhan & Abdela, 2004). In the setting of indications such as the second stage of labor being extended, having severe preeclampsia or eclampsia, having labor progress slowly due to maternal weariness or exhaustion, or choosing to shorten the second stage of labor are all examples of maternal indications for OVD. Fetal distress and a fetal heart rate that is unsettling are two of the main fetal indicators of OVD (Alegbeleye et al., 2018; Sjödin et al., 2018).

In OVD applications, the operator must be familiar with the indications, contraindications, application, and use of the specific device to minimize fetal and maternal difficulties. OVDs can cause minor maternal complications, including laceration of the vagina and perineum, as well as major complications, such as traumatic hemorrhage, bladder injury, and pelvic muscle injury, if not done by skilled healthcare practitioners (Biru et al., 2019). A low Apgar score is the most common neonatal complication. Yet, OVDs have the potential to lessen both immediate and long-term second-stage cesarean section complications if they are performed by qualified personnel. Moreover, OVDs have the potential to reduce the healthcare costs related to cesarean sections (CSs; Bailey et al., 2017; Vannevel et al., 2019). However, the problem of declining instrumental use was exacerbated by a decline in the number of physicians with the required skills and training to undertake these procedures, along with the fear of litigation (Bailey, 2005). In Ethiopia, to enhance the knowledge and experience of healthcare professionals, operational vaginal birth is being taught as part of basic emergency obstetric management (Sewunet et al., 2022).

Review of Literature

Globally, 10% to 20% of all deliveries require some kind of intervention at the time of delivery, and 6% to 12% of these interventions involve OVDs (Lamichhane, 2018; Yeshialem et al., 2019). The global incidence of OVD rates varies greatly between 1% and 15% (Dutywa et al., 2022). In developed countries, the rates vary: from 10% to 15% in the United Kingdom to around 4.5% in the United States of America where the rate has halved in the last 20 years (Vannevel et al., 2019); lower rates are observed in low- and middle-income countries such as South Africa (1% to 3%; Dutywa et al., 2022), and Nigeria (3.6%; Vannevel et al., 2019). These studies indicated that there is a trend toward fewer instrumental deliveries, which is of great worry to the global healthcare system (Sonawane et al., 2021). In developing countries such as Ethiopia, there is a scarcity of evidence demonstrating the magnitude and factors associated with OVD (Shimalis et al., 2022). To lower the rate of CSs and the issues they cause; it would be helpful to evaluate the magnitude of instrumental births and their key indicators. Thus, this study aimed to assess the magnitude, indications, and associated factors of OVD among mothers who gave birth at Adama Hospital Medical College (AHMC), in Ethiopia, 2022

Methods

Design

An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted from June 1 to 30, 2022, at AHMC found in Adama town. Adama town is located approximately 99 km Southeast of the capital, Addis Ababa. According to the Ethiopian Central statistical agency's 2007 census figures, there are approximately 86,069 women of reproductive age out of a total female population of 192,518 (Population & Commission, 2008).

As per AHMC's annual report for 2021, there were 15,951 documented deliveries, with 1,122 (7.03%) of been induced and the rest 14,829 (92.97%) being spontaneous labor. In terms of method of delivery, a large percentage of deliveries, 11,510 (70.5%), were vaginal, preceded by cesarean section (3836; 23.5%), and assisted instrumental delivery (978; 6%; Authority, 2001).

Research Questions

What is the magnitude of OVD among mothers who gave birth at AHMC, Ethiopia?

What are the indications for OVD among mothers who gave birth at AHMC, Ethiopia?

What are the factors that are associated with OVD among mothers who gave birth at AHMC, Ethiopia?

Sample

The sample size for this study was determined by using the single population proportion formula by considering the following assumptions. The proportion of OVD (p = 10.3%) that was taken from a previous study conducted among mothers who gave birth at Jimma University Medical Center (Hubena et al., 2018), a 95% confidence level (CI; Z = 1.96), 3% margin of error (d = 0.03), and by adding 10% for nonresponse rate, the final sample size of the study was 440.

According to the preassessment, the two-month average total deliveries obtained from the hospital's delivery and discharge registration logbooks revealed that there were 1,300 total deliveries. Based on the above information, after K was calculated, the study subjects were selected using a systematic random sampling technique. To determine the sampling fraction, the total number of deliveries was divided by the total sample size of 440, which were approximately 3. Then the lottery method was used to choose a random number from the numbers 1 up to 3. As a result, the selected number was 2, and this number was the first study participant to be included in the sample; their card was then reviewed, as well as every third mother was recruited in the sample until the total sample size of 440 for this study was obtained.

Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

All mothers who gave birth at AHMC were the source population (which included both normal and assisted vaginal deliveries), and all selected mothers who gave birth at AHMC during the study period were the study population. Mothers who gave birth during the data collection period and agreed to participate in the study were included in the study, whereas those who gave birth with CS, were critically ill, and were unable to communicate during the data collection period were excluded.

Data Collection

A data collection tool was developed after reviewing different literature (Gei, 2012; No, 2011). A structured interviewer-administered questionnaire that includes sociodemographic factors (age, residence, occupation, religion, educational status, marital status, and monthly income) was used to interview mothers at the exit. The interview was conducted at the exit and the objective and benefit of the study were described for every participant and written informed consent was obtained to assure their choice of participation or refusal.

The questionnaire was initially prepared in English and then translated into Afaan Oromo and Amharic languages before being returned to English to keep the consistency of the tool. A checklist was used to extract data from patient charts, such as the mothers’ and their neonates’ charts, labor ward reporting logbooks, and instrumental delivery formats. The first part required information about the patient's gravidity, parity, history of stillbirth, antenatal care (ANC) follow-up, number of ANC follow-ups, and gestational age. The second part required the parameters of labor which were nonreassuring fetal heart rate (NRFHR), prolonged second stage of labor (PSSOL), poor maternal exertions fetal distress, and maternal blood pressure. One supervisor and three BSc midwives were trained on how to interview eligible mothers and abstract information from respective charts.

Variables

Dependent Variable

Operative vaginal delivery.

Independent Variables

Sociodemographic factors: age, residence, occupation, religion, educational status, marital status, and monthly income; obstetric factors: gravidity, parity, history of stillbirth, ANC follow-up, number of ANC follow-ups, and gestational age; and clinical indication: NRFHR, severe preeclampsia /eclampsia, PSSOL, and poor maternal exertions fetal distress.

Operational Definitions

OVDs: Vaginal deliveries that are performed with the assistance of vacuum or forceps.

Indication of OVD: When the prerequisites are met, it refers to any situation endangering the mother or fetus that is likely to be relieved by immediate delivery.

Data Quality Assurance

From tool development to result analysis, data quality was monitored closely. For two days, the principal investigator trained data collectors and supervisors on sampling methods, interview techniques, as well as the data collection process, and the overall objective of the study.

To ensure the quality and consistency of the checklist and the questionnaire with the objective of the study, a pretest was done on 5% of the total sample size at Bishoftu General Hospital, which was not selected for the study. Questions that were identified to be unclear or understandable were modified accordingly. Completeness and logical consistency were checked during data collection in a setting with close day-to-day supervision.

Statistical Analysis

Following manual verification of data completeness, data were coded, entered, and cleaned by EPI INFO version 7 before exporting to SPSS version 25 for statistical analysis. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to assess the normality of continuous variables. A descriptive statistical analysis was carried out using frequency, percentage, median, interquartile range, mean, and standard deviation (SD). To identify factors that are associated with OVD, both bivariate and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were executed, and the variables in bivariate analysis with p-values < .25 were fitted to the final multivariable binary logistic regression analysis, and to identify the determinant factors of OVD among mothers. To assess the fit of the model, Hosmer and Lemeshow's goodness of fit test was used with a p-value of .05. Variation inflation factor (VIF) was used to determine the presence of multicollinearity, with VIF > 5 indicating the presence of multicollinearity. Variables with p-values of .05 were considered statistically significant in the final model, and an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 95% CI was used to assess the strength of the association. Finally, the findings were presented through narrations, tables, and graphs.

Results

Sociodemographic Characteristics of Participants

A total of 440 mothers participated in this study making a response rate of 100%. The mean (±SD) age of participants was 27.61 (±4.68) years and the majority, (n = 286/440, 65%) of them were in the age group of 25 to 34 years. The majority of the study participants were Orthodox Christians, at (n = 215/440, 48.9%). With regard to their marital status, (n = 357/440, 81.1%) were married, and more than half (n = 261/440, 59.3.9%) of the participants attended elementary school. The median monthly income of the respondents was US$34 (US$20–US$40; Table 1).

Table 1.

Sociodemographic Characteristics of Mothers Who Gave Birth at AHMC, Ethiopia 2022 (n = 440).

Variables (%)	Frequency number (N)	Percent (%)
Age
≤24 years	107	24.3
25–34 years	286	65.0
≥35 years	47	10.7
Residence
Rural	141	31.8
Urban	299	68.2
Occupation
Housewife	216	49.1
Employee	89	20.2
Merchant	113	25.7
Other*	22	5.0
Religion
Muslim	122	27.7
Orthodox	215	48.9
Protestant	95	21.6
Other**	8	1.8
Educational status
No formal education	64	14.5
Primary	261	59.3
Secondary and above	115	26.1
Marital status
Married	357	81.1
Single	54	12.3
Divorced	17	3.9
Widowed	12	2.7
Monthly income
<20 USD	19	4.3
20–40 USD	279	63.4
>40 USD	142	32.3

Notes. AHMC = Adama Hospital Medical College; Others* = daily laborer, students: Others** = Wakefena; USD = United States dollars.

Obstetric-Related Information

Nearly two-thirds (n = 298, 67.7%) of mothers were multigravida, and (n = 421/440, 95.7%) had at least one ANC visit. In terms of the previous history of stillbirth, (n = 424/440, 96.4%) did not have a stillbirth. Of the total, (n = 364/440, 82.7%) women had a gestational age between 37 and 41 weeks, and 280 (n = 280/440, 63.6%) of them were multipara (Table 2).

Table 2.

Obstetric-Related Characteristics of Mothers Who Gave Birth at AHMC, Ethiopia, 2022 (n = 440).

Variable	Frequency number (N)	Percent (%)
Gravidity
Primigravida	98	22.3
Multigravida	298	67.7
Grand multigravida	44	10.0
Parity
Primipara	160	36.4
Multipara	280	63.6
History of stillbirth
Yes	16	3.6
No	424	96.4
ANC follow up
Yes	421	95.7
No	19	4.3
Number of ANC follow up
<4	256	58.2
≥4	184	41.8
Gestational age
<37 weeks	29	6.6
37–41 weeks	364	82.7
≥42 weeks	47	10.7

Notes. AHMC = Adama Hospital Medical College; ANC = antenatal care.

Research Question Results

Magnitude of Operative Vaginal Delivery

The overall magnitude of OVD was (n = 65/440, 14.8%; 95% CI: 10.8, 18.8), in a separate analysis, vacuum-assisted delivery accounted for (n = 43/65, 66.2%), and forceps (n = 22/65, 33.8%), with a ratio of vacuum to forceps: 2:1 (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Magnitude of operative vaginal delivery among mothers who gave birth at Adama Hospital Medical College (AHMC), Ethiopia, 2022 (n = 440).

Clinical Indication for Operative Vaginal Delivery

Sixty-three (96.9%) of the operative vaginal deliveries were emergency procedures and (n = 2/65, 3.1%) were elective/planned. The delayed second stage of labor, 35 (53.8%) was the most common indication for OVD followed by fetal distress (n = 18/65, 27.7%) and severe preeclampsia/eclampsia (n = 9/65, 13.8%). The majority of (n = 64/65, 98.5%) of the procedures were successful (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Indications for operative vaginal delivery among mothers who gave birth at Adama Hospital Medical College (AHMC), Ethiopia, 2022 (n = 65).

Factors Associated with Operative Vaginal Delivery

In bivariate logistic regression analysis variables such as residence, maternal age, occupation, gravidity, gestational age, monthly income, parity, and the number of ANC follow-ups, and had a p-value of < .25 and were selected as candidate variables for multivariable logistic regression analysis.

In multivariable logistic regression analysis, residence, maternal age, gravidity, gestational age, and the number of ANC follow-ups persisted to be statistically significant variables associated with OVD at a p-value of <.05.

Hence, mothers who reside in rural areas had 2.09 (AOR, 2.09; 95% CI: 2.01, 7.41) times higher odds of OVD as compared to those who came from urban areas. Besides, mothers with maternal ages 25 to 34 had 4.95 times higher odds of OVD than those with ages <24 (AOR, 4.95; 95% CI: 1.62, 9.2). The odds of OVD were 3.5 times more likely in respondents who were primigravid as compared to their counterparts (AOR: 3.5; 95% CI: 1.26, 9.98). Mothers with gestational age ≥ 42 weeks had 3.09 times (AOR: 3.09; 95% CI: 1.38, 6.9) higher odds of having operative vaginal deliveries than mothers with a gestational age of <37 weeks. On the other hand, mothers who have ANC follow-up <4 times were 3.9 times more likely to deliver by OVD as compared to those who have ANC follow-up ≥4 (AOR:3.9; 95% CI: 1.09, 9.45; Table 3).

Table 3.

Factors Associated With Operative Vaginal Delivery Among Mothers Who Gave Birth at AHMC, 2022.

Variables	Mode of delivery		Crude OR (95% CI)	Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Variables	OVD (%)	Normal (%)	Crude OR (95% CI)	Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Residence
Urban	45	254	1.00	1.00
Rural	20	121	3.78 (2.817, 4.121)*	2.09 (2.01,7.41)**
Age
≤24 years	15	92	1.00	1.00
25–34 years	44	242	12 (1.142, 16.12)*	4.95 (1.62,9.2)**
≥35 years	6	41	7.05 (0.838, 70.59)	0.18 (1.0, 7.71)
Occupation
Housewife	34	182	1.00	1.00
Employee	10	79	0.39 (1.57, 10.05)	0.65 (0.40, 1.07)
Merchant	14	99	2.73 (1.05, 7.04)	1.04 (0.52, 2.07)
Others	7	15	3.82 (1.34, 10.91)	1.19 (0.07, 2.5)
Gravidity
Multigravida	41	257	1.00	1.00
Primigravid	17	81	3.3 (1.34, 7.9)**	3.5 (1.26, 9.98)**
Grand multigravida	7	37	0.686 (0.408, 1.999)	0.561 (0.39, 1.86)
Gestational age
<37 weeks	11	18	1.00	1.00
37–42 weeks	34	330	2.6 (1.113–6.311)	0.63 (0.29, 1.36)
≥42 weeks	20	27	0.377 (0.158, 0.89)*	3.09 (1.38,6.9)**
Monthly income
<20 USD	20	122	1.00	1.00
20–40 USD	41	238	2.86 (1.33, 6.14)	0.79 (0.47, 1.33)
>40 USD	4	15	2.08 (1.04, 4.16)*	2.18 (0.19,6.5)
Parity
Primipara	27	126	1.00	1.00
Multipara	38	249	1.445 (0.287, 0.690)	0.49 (0.31, 4.78)
Number of ANC follow up
≥4	20	164	1.00	1.00
<4	45	211	1.311 (1.05, 2.89)*	3.9 (1.09, 9.45)**

Notes. AHMC = Adama Hospital Medical College; OVD = operative vaginal delivery; OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; 1.00 = reference. *Refers to significant at p < .05, **refers to significant at p < .001.

Discussion

This cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the magnitude of OVD and associated factors among mothers who gave birth at AHMC. The overall magnitude of OVD among mothers who gave birth at AHMC was 14.8%. Rural residence, maternal age 25 to 34, primigravida, gestational age ≥42 weeks, and ANC follow-ups less than four times were independent determinants of OVD.

In this study, the overall magnitude of OVD was 14.8% (95% CI: 10.8, 18.8). The findings of this study are comparable to the findings of previous studies in Nigeria (11.6%; Ogunniyi & Sunusi, 1988), Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (11.9%; Abebaw & Kebede, 2021), and Jimma University Medical Center (10.3%; Hubena et al., 2018). But higher than the studies conducted in Sokoto, Ibadan, Enugu, Zaria, and Abakaliki, with reported rates of 1.06%, 1.57%,1.5%, 3.6%, and 3.7%, respectively (Adaji et al., 2009; Aimakhu et al., 2004; Iyoke & Onah, 2006; Onoh et al., 2014; Shehu & Omembelede, 2016). The discrepancies in the findings could be attributed to different methods to clinical circumstances between specialists from various fields, resulting in various behaviors and obstetric interventions. Such national discrepancies also were noted within the various regions of several countries (Ameh & Weeks, 2009; Gei & Pacheco, 2011). However, our finding is lower than that of studies done in TASH (18.7%; Obstetricians & Gynecologists, 2000). The variations in the OVD prevalence could be explained by a lack of trained personnel, equipment availability, and experienced human resources.

In this study, the majority of the instrumental deliveries were conducted by vacuum than the forceps delivery. The preference for vacuum over forceps as the instrument of choice found in this review is similar to findings from previous studies (Aimakhu et al., 2004; Iyoke & Onah, 2006; Shehu & Omembelede, 2016). The use of forceps has gradually given way to the use of vacuums over the years. This could be because the vacuum is safer, the skill is easier to understand and has a designed safety mechanism (Alegbeleye et al., 2018; O'Mahony et al., 2010). Also, on contrary, the use of forceps is more difficult technically and requires a long time to master. Despite increasing cesarean section rates, the rate of OVDs remained relatively constant during the study period, in contrast to developed countries where rates are declining due to litigation (Bahl et al., 2011; Bailey, 2005).

In this study, there was a statistically significant association between residence and OVD. Mothers who reside in rural areas had 2.09 times higher odds of OVD as compared to those from urban areas. This finding is supported by a study done in Suhul, Tigray, Ethiopia (Gebre & Hailu, 2017). The possible reason could be due to rural women arriving at the hospital after a long and complicated labor (Yaya et al., 2018).

The odds of OVD were 4.95 times higher among mothers in the age group of 25 to 34 than those with ages <24. This finding is supported by studies done in Norway and Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Southern Ethiopia (Bago, 2018; Herstad et al., 2015). This association might be explained by the fact that as women's ages increase, so does the maternal complication that leads to OVD.

In this study, the odds of OVD were 3.52 times higher in respondents who were primigravida compared to their counterparts. Similar findings were reported from the studies done in Nigeria and Felege Hiwot Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia (Adaji et al., 2009; Biru et al., 2019) A possible explanation for this might be a higher tendency to second-stage delays, tight perineum to pass the fetus through the pelvic canal, excessive anxiety and inexperience in labor among primigravidas which all contribute to OVD.

Mothers with gestational age ≥ 42 weeks were 3.12 times more likely to undergo operative vaginal deliveries than mothers with gestational age <37 weeks. This report is in agreement with the finding of the study conducted in Norway (Caughey et al., 2007). The finding is plausible because the risk of maternal peripartum complications increases as pregnancy progresses beyond 40 weeks of gestation which in turn increase the chance of OVD.

Mothers who have ANC follow-ups <4 times were 3.9 times more likely to deliver by OVD as compared to those who have ANC follow-ups ≥4. This might be because a high-risk mother is picked during follow-up and advised to deliver using operative procedures. In addition, good ANC links, the mother with the formal health system and increases the chance of using a skilled attendant at birth.

Strengths and Limitations of the Study

This study's major strength was its attempt to address a neglected health issue among mothers in the study area, by collecting data from primary sources. Since the study used a cross-sectional study design, it will be difficult to establish a temporal relationship between the independent and outcome variables.

Implications for Practice and Research

Health professionals working in the hospital's maternity unit are expected to perform a deliberate assessment of OVD needs prior to care, taking into account the identified factors. Researchers may use this study to conduct more in-depth research that includes other variables and triangulation with qualitative data.

Conclusion

The magnitude of OVD in the study area was relatively low. Rural residence, maternal age 25 to 34, primigravida, gestational age ≥42 weeks, and ANC follow-ups less than four times were independent determinants of OVD. Thus, mothers should be encouraged to get the recommended four ANC follow-ups, and more research is needed to identify and address those issues of why mothers do not have the recommended number of ANC visits.

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their heartfelt gratitude and appreciation to mothers and healthcare providers. They also acknowledge Adama General Hospital and Medical College—Institution Review Board for securing ethical letters timely.

Author Contributions

W.K.T., M.S.G., and Y.M.N. contributed to the study's conception, design, data collection, analysis, and the first draft of the manuscript. A.M.G., N.T.B., and T.K.B. provided advice on the study design, data collection, statistical analysis, and final published version. The final manuscript was read and approved by all authors.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Review Board of Adama General Hospital Medical College with an Ethical number of AGHMC/2241/2020 and a support letter was written for AHMC by Adama Health Bureau. Then permission was obtained from the Human Resource Office of the hospital. After getting permission from the office, eligible and volunteer mothers were requested. All respondents were assured of the study's objective and their full right to take part in the study and/or withdraw from the study if they were not comfortable with the interview. Every participant was provided a written consent form that included the study's goal, process, and benefit. Selected mothers who agreed to participate in the study were included, and data were recorded anonymously to protect participants’ privacy and confidentiality. and the names of the informants were not included in the questionnaire.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iDs

Yohannes Mekuria Negussie

Mihiret Shawel Getahun

References

Abdo

A. A.

Hinderaker

S. G.

Tekle

A. G.

Lindtjørn

(2020). Caesarean section rates analysed using Robson’s 10-group classification system: A cross-sectional study at a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia. BMJ Open, 10(10), e039098. https://doi.org/10.1136/ bmjopen-2020-039098

Abebaw

Kebede

(2021). Trends in operative delivery in Tikur Anbessa specialized hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A 5 years’ retrospective review. Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences, 31(6), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v31i6.15.

Adaji

Shittu

Sule

(2009). Operative vaginal deliveries in Zaria, Nigeria. Annals of African Medicine, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.4103/1596-3519.56236

Aimakhu

C. O.

Olayemi

Oladokun

Iwe

C. A.

Umoh

A. V.

(2004). Current practice of forceps and vacuum deliveries by Nigerian obstetricians. Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 21(1), 40–43.

Alegbeleye

J. O.

Orazulike

N. C.

Nyengidiki

T. K.

Uzoigwe

S. A.

(2018). A 10-year review of instrumental vaginal delivery at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 35(2), 118–122. https://doi.org/10.4103/TJOG.TJOG_26_18

Ali

U. A.

Norwitz

E. R.

(2009). Vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery. Reviews in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2(1), 5.

Ameh

Weeks

(2009). The role of instrumental vaginal delivery in low resource settings. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 116(Suppl. 1), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02331.x

Authority

C. S.

(2001). Ethiopia demographic and health survey 2000.

Bago

(2018). Prevalence and its associated factors among women undergone operative delivery at Hawassa University comprehensive specialized hospital, southern Ethiopia, 2017. Gynecology and Obstetrics, 8(461), 2161-0932.100046. https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0932.1000461

10.

Bahl

Strachan

Murphy

(2011). Operative vaginal delivery. RCOG Greentop Guidelines, 26.

11.

Bailey

(2005). The disappearing art of instrumental delivery: Time to reverse the trend. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 91(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.05.016

12.

Bailey

Van Roosmalen

Mola

Evans

De Bernis

Dao

(2017). Assisted vaginal delivery in low and middle income countries: An overview. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 124(9), 1335–1344. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14477

13.

Berhan

Abdela

(2004). Emergency obstetric performance with emphasis on operative delivery outcome: Does it reflect the quality of care? The Ethiopian Journal of Health Development, 18, 2.

14.

Biru

Addisu

Kassa

Animen

(2019). Maternal complication related to instrumental delivery at Felege Hiwot Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: A retrospective cross-sectional study. BMC Research Notes, 12(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4530-7

15.

Caughey

A. B.

Stotland

N. E.

Washington

A. E.

Escobar

G. J.

(2007). Maternal and obstetric complications of pregnancy are associated with increasing gestational age at term. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 196(2), 155.e151–155.e156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.08.040

16.

Dutywa

Olorunfemi

Mbodi

(2022). Trends and determinants of operative vaginal delivery at two academic hospitals in Johannesburg, South Africa 2005–2019. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), 16182. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316182

17.

Gebre

Hailu

(2017). Complications of instrumental vaginal deliveries and associated factors in Suhul general hospital, Shire, North-West Tigray, Ethiopia. Journal of General Practice (Los Angeles), 5, 300. https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-9126.10002300

18.

Gei

A. F.

(2012). Prevention of the first cesarean delivery: The role of operative vaginal delivery [Paper presentation]. Seminars in Perinatology. 2012 Oct, 36(5), 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2012.04.021.

19.

Gei

A. F.

Pacheco

L. D.

(2011). Operative vaginal deliveries: Practical aspects. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics, 38(2), 323–349.

20.

Herstad

Klungsøyr

Skjaerven

Tanbo

Forsén

Åbyholm

Vangen

(2015). Maternal age and emergency operative deliveries at term: A population-based registry study among low-risk primiparous women. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 122(12), 1642–1651. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12962

21.

Hubena

Workneh

Siraneh

(2018). Prevalence and outcome of operative vaginal delivery among mothers who gave birth at Jimma University Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia. Journal of pregnancy, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7423475

22.

Iyoke

C. A.

Onah

H. E.

(2006). Vacuum deliveries at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu. Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 23, 23–26. https://doi.org/10.4314/tjog.v23i1.14560

23.

Johanson

Menon

. (1999). Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000224

24.

Lamichhane

(2018). Outcome of instrumental vaginal delivery at Patan Hospital. Nepal Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 13(3), 10–12. https://doi.org/10.3126/njog.v13i3.23507

25.

Merriam

Ananth

Wright

Siddiq

D'Alton

Friedman

(2017). Trends in operative vaginal delivery, 2005–2013: A population-based study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 124(9), 1365–1372. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14553

26.

G. T. G.

(2011). Operative vaginal delivery. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

27.

Obstetricians

A. C. O.

, & Gynecologists. (2000). Operative vaginal delivery. ACOG Practice Bulletin.

28.

Ogunniyi

Sunusi

(1988). Instrumental vaginal delivery in Ile-Ife and Ilesha, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Medicine, 7(3), 105–108.

29.

Ogunwale

A. N.

Coleman

M. A.

Sangi-Haghpeykar

Valverde

Montealegre

Jibaja-Weiss

Anderson

M. L.

(2016). Assessment of factors impacting cervical cancer screening among low-income women living with HIV-AIDS. AIDS Care, 28(4), 491–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2015.1100703

30.

O'Mahony

Hofmeyr

G. J.

Menon

(2010). Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 11.

31.

Onoh

Ezeonu

Chijioke

Onoh

Saidu

Ezeonu

(2014). Disappearing art of forceps delivery and the trend of instrumental vaginal deliveries at Abakaliki, Nigeria. African Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 13(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.4103/2384-5589.144577

32.

Population

E. O. O. T.

Commission

H. C.

(2008). Summary and statistical report of the 2007 population and housing census: Population size by age and sex. Population Census Commission, Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia.

33.

Sewunet

Abebe

Zeleke

L. B.

Aynalem

B. Y.

Alemu

A. A.

(2022). Immediate unfavorable birth outcomes and determinants of operative vaginal delivery among mothers delivered in East Gojjam Zone Public Hospitals, North West Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One, 17(6), e0268782. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268782

34.

Shehu

C. E.

Omembelede

J. C.

(2016). Instrumental Vaginal Delivery-an assessment of use in a tertiary care centre. Orient Journal of Medicine, 28(1–2), 22–27.

35.

Shimalis

Hasen

Regasa

M. T.

Desalegn

Mulisa

Upashe

S. P.

(2022). Complications of instrumental vaginal deliveries and associated factors in hospitals of Western Oromia, Ethiopia. SAGE Open Medicine, 10, 20503121221113091. https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121221113091

36.

Sjödin

Rådestad

Zwedberg

(2018). A qualitative study showing women’s participation and empowerment in instrumental vaginal births. Women and Birth, 31(3), e185–e189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2017.09.006

37.

Sonawane

A. A.

Gadappa

S. N.

Gaikwad

R. A.

(2021). Study of feto maternal outcome in instrumental vaginal deliveries at a tertiary teaching hospital. The New Indian Journal of OBGYN, 7, 2.

38.

Sydsjö

Brynhildsen

Josefsson

(2010). Trends in caesarean section and instrumental deliveries in relation to body mass index: A clinical survey during 1978–2001. Reproductive Health, 7(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-7-18

39.

Vannevel

Swanepoel

Pattinson

R. C.

(2019). Global perspectives on operative vaginal deliveries. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 56, 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.09.004

40.

Yaya

Bishwajit

Uthman

O. A.

Amouzou

(2018). Why some women fail to give birth at health facilities: A comparative study between Ethiopia and Nigeria. PLoS One, 13(5), e0196896. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196896

41.

Yemaneh

Sahile

Alehegn

Girma

Robles

(2017). Assessment of the proportion and associated factors of episiotomy at Public Health Institutions of Axum Town, Tigray Region, North Ethiopia, 2015. Critical Care Obstetrics Gynecology, 3, 11.

42.

Yeshialem

Abera

Tesfay

(2019). Determinants of adverse pregnancy outcomes among mothers who gave birth from Jan 1–Dec 31/2015 in Jimma University Specialized Hospital, case control study, 2016. Ethiopian Journal of Reproductive Health, 11(1), 10.

Magnitude,Indications,and Factors Associated With Operative Vaginal Delivery Among Mothers Who Gave Birth at Adama Hospital Medical College,Ethiopia,2022

Abstract

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keywords

Introduction

Review of Literature

Methods

Design

Research Questions

Sample

Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

Data Collection

Variables

Dependent Variable

Independent Variables

Operational Definitions

Data Quality Assurance

Statistical Analysis

Results

Sociodemographic Characteristics of Participants

Obstetric-Related Information

Research Question Results

Magnitude of Operative Vaginal Delivery

Clinical Indication for Operative Vaginal Delivery

Factors Associated with Operative Vaginal Delivery

Discussion

Strengths and Limitations of the Study

Implications for Practice and Research

Conclusion

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

Data Availability Statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Funding

ORCID iDs

References