A Multisite Qualitative Analysis of Perceived Roles in Medication Safety: Older Adults’ Perspectives

Abstract

Older adults and caregivers play an essential role in medication safety; however, self-perception of their and health professionals’ roles in medication safety is not well-understood. The objective of our study was to identify the roles of patients, providers, and pharmacists in medication safety from the perspective of older adults. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were held with 28 community-dwelling older adults over 65 years who took five or more prescription medications daily. Results suggest that older adults’ self-perceptions of their role in medication safety varied widely. Older adults perceived that self-learning about their medications and securing them are critical to avoiding medication-related harm. Primary care providers were perceived as coordinators between older adults and specialists. Older adults expected pharmacists to inform them of any changes in the characteristics of medications to ensure medications were taken correctly. Our findings provide an in-depth analysis of older adults’ perceptions and expectations of their providers’ specific roles in medication safety. Educating providers and pharmacists about the role expectations of this population with complex needs can ultimately improve medication safety.

Keywords

medical decision making provider roles pharmacist roles medication therapy management older adults drug safety patient expectations

Introduction

Older adults’ views of their roles and professionals’ roles in medication safety are not well-understood to reduce preventable medication-related harms, resulting in over 700,000 emergency department (ED) visits annually (1). Older adults are more likely to visit the ED for medication-related harm than any other age group (2). Researchers found that over 65% of older adults in one study used more than five prescribed medications, which increased their risks for medication-related harm in terms of drug–drug interactions and medication use challenges at home (3). For example, nearly 100,000 ED visits are attributed to insulin-related hypoglycemia and other diabetes management errors each year, commonly due to reduced food intake and improper insulin administration at home (4). Such studies highlighted the need to understand the critical roles of patients in preventing medication-related harms. One national retrospective study found significant variations in patient reports of the communication about medicines across U.S. hospitals by location and access to health information technology (5). However, the level of support for using patient evaluations to manage medication safely in outpatient and community settings is highly variable and very limited.

Older adults and caregivers play an essential role in medication safety in community settings compared to acute care settings. Picking up prescriptions, preparing pillboxes, reading drug instructions, and accurately taking medications are among the tasks older adults perform to self-manage medications (6). Medication safety in the outpatient setting may be driven by how older adults view their roles. Older adults may have strong views of their abilities to manage their medications based on their experiences (7). They may also have strong opinions on the roles of prescribers and pharmacists (8). Community-dwelling older adults may prefer to speak with pharmacists rather than primary care providers (PCPs) for medication advice and education (9, 10).

A shared understanding of each person's role in medication safety is necessary for shared decision-making among older adults and health providers (11, 12). Such knowledge is also essential to embody the “coproduction model” of health services, in which patients and health providers form a partnership during the production of health care (13). We set out to discover how community-dwelling older adults taking five or more prescription medications perceived their roles and those of pharmacists and providers in medication safety.

Methods

We used a phenomenological method to obtain perspectives of community-dwelling older adults by conducting semi-structured interviews (14). With Institutional Review Board approval, Spanish and English-speaking individuals 65 years or older were invited to participate with the following inclusion and exclusion criteria: reporting five or more prescription medications, living independently or with a caregiver in the community, and not self-identified as having impaired decision-making capacity. No cognitive screening tools were used. Recruitment occurred at three sites using purposive sampling: a retirement community (independent living) and two-family medicine clinics in an urban area. We also encouraged caregivers to join the interviews.

Recruitment

Recruitment flyers and a project video briefing on the internal residential television channel were used at the retirement community. To improve transferability of study results (14), we informed all retirement community residents (approximately 200 residents) about study participation opportunities through the community's closed-circuit television. At the two clinics, healthcare providers were encouraged to identify all potential older adults who fell into recruitment inclusion-exclusion criteria and permitted to be contacted by the study personnel. Prospective older adults were screened for eligibility and were contacted by study personnel for written consent and time preference for an interview.

Data Collection

The data were collected from a semi-structured interview guide with 12 questions (see Supplemental material). These questions were designed to explore perspectives and experiences on medication safety, including during COVID. To focus our analysis on perceived roles by older adults, we chose to analyze responses to question six; “What is your role in taking medicine safely? What is your pharmacist's role? What is your doctor's role?” In addition, we assessed the responses to other questions to ensure that authors did not miss any substantive responses on roles. Patient demographics (age and sex) and major health conditions (including medications, if participants could recall) were also obtained. A $10 gift card was provided at the end of the interview. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish, and researchers kept interview notes. A native Spanish-speaking team member conducted all Spanish interviews and validated translated transcriptions. Interviews were halted upon data saturation when no new themes emerged.

Data Analysis

The interviews were transcribed and translated professionally. Transcripts were reviewed for accuracy by the interviewers. Six team members coded six of the initial transcripts to develop initial codes. Team members met weekly to compare and discuss codes. At least two team members used the final codebook to code the rest of the transcripts. Braun and Clarke's six stages of inductive thematic analysis were utilized to analyze the transcripts through iterative coding using NVivo Version 12 (QSR International) (15). Themes were identified based on occurrence and agreed upon by the team. The coproduction of healthcare service theoretical framework guided a deductive approach to data analysis (13). To ensure data credibility, skilled researchers conducted peer debriefings throughout the study.

Results

The study included nine residents from the retirement community and 19 patients from two clinics. Two participants were accompanied by their caregivers. The mean age of older adults in this study was 75 years (SD = 7.5). Majority were female (67.9%, n = 19). The average number of daily medications was 7.7 (SD = 2.5). More than half (54%) of the participants had a college education. All Spanish-speaking older adults (n = 8) were recruited from the two clinics. All residents of the retirement community had at least some college education. See Table 1 for more detailed demographic data. Primary health conditions reported by participants were cardiovascular disease, diabetes, depression, kidney disease, osteoarthritis, glaucoma, neuropathy, urinary incontinence, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lymphoma, valve replacement, and back pain. Medications reported by older adults were insulin, citalopram, pregabalin, quinapril, oxybutynin chloride, atorvastatin, metoprolol, losartan, furosemide, clopidogrel, glucosamine, fluoxetine, warfarin, alprazolam, hydrocodone, and carvedilol.

Table 1.

Demographics Summary n = 28.^a

Demographics	n (%)
Gender (male)	9 (32.1)
Language spoken
English	20 (71.4)
Spanish	8 (28.6)
Education
Master's Degree	1 (3.6)
Bachelor's Degree	3 (10.7)
Some College	11 (39.3)
High School	7 (25)
Elementary	2 (7.1)
Unknown	4 (14.3)
Setting
Retirement Community (Independent living)	9 (32.1)
Private Clinic	10 (35.7)
Publicly Funded Healthcare System	9 (32.1)
	Mean (SD)
Age	75.2 (7.5)
Daily medications taken	7.7 (2.5

Notes: *SD, standard deviation.

Percentages may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

We identified several themes that were grouped into three categories: (1) older adult's perception of the provider's role (themes: prescribing safely, monitoring for safety, and keeping up with recalled medications), (2) older adult's perception of the pharmacist's role (themes: notification of changes, monitoring for safety, keeping up with recalled medications, and providing medication package inserts), and (3) the perceived older adult's or caregiver's role (themes: taking fewer medications, not missing doses, securing medications, and learning about medications). A deductive approach to data analysis using the coproduction model revealed several themes that directly fit into the framework (see Table 2). Adapting themes into the coproduction of healthcare service framework added new insight to our understanding of the perceived roles of older adults. The themes are discussed below.

Table 2.

Coproduction of Healthcare Services Framework and Perceived Roles in Medication Safety.

Constructs from Coproduction Model	Definition of Construct	Corresponding Themes	Example Quotes
Civil discourse	Effective and clear communication	Communicating with older adults	“He explained what he was doing, when he was going to do it, how he was doing it. And I was very impressed because some of the older doctors don't do that. They just say take this and not give me a reason or anything.” (OA10) “To let him [provider] know if there is a problem.” (OA9)
Civil discourse	Effective and clear communication	Notification of changes	“I should have notified the pharmacy and brought it to their attention that there was no warning letter to notify me or any patients of the changes, you know. I think it's a responsibility of the pharmacy to do that.” (OA5)
Co-planning	Respecting values and ability	Perceived pharmacist's roles	“You know, they’re very careful to mention get your flu shots, get your whatever. But you know, they never say prepare for emergencies. Get your, at least, three days of medicines stash bag, or get you a week's worth or something.” (OA3)
Co-execution	Trust, accountability shared goals	Learning about medications	“Well, reading the label on the medicine when I’m putting them in my container. I don't want to get the wrong one in there. If I’m supposed to take it at night, I don't want it in the morning.” (OA1) “Any patient needs to understand why it's important, what the benefits are, and what the possible side effects are. And then, you know, it's up to you. Nobody's going to force you, make you. It's up to you to be responsible and do it. And my thing is just to be responsible and do what I know is right and look for side effects, if any, and report them, to be careful to report them.” (OA3)
Co-execution	Trust, accountability shared goals	Prescribing safely	“That I don't have any reaction to what his prescription. If I don't have an adverse reaction, we assume that it's correct.” (OA1) “Being friendly, having a good rapport is 90% of the service. If you feel put off by somebody, you’re not going to feel free to as questions.” (OA2)

Older Adults’ Perception of the Providers’ Role

Older adults acknowledged that providers have a considerable role in medication safety. This perception was rooted in the quality of the patient–provider relationship. These overarching themes of the provider's role are discussed below.

Theme 1: Prescribing Safely

Older adults expected providers to have the necessary knowledge, skills, and qualifications to prescribe their medications safely. Providers were expected to initiate individualized care by knowing all medications older adults took at home. “They’re supposed to know what's good for you and prescribe it when they feel like you need it” (OA6). Providers were expected to be knowledgeable about current medical practice guidelines and changes in healthcare. Providers were expected to have readily available resources to consult whenever necessary.

“His job is to understand what medications I need, and if my labs show a problem, he knows immediately. And if he doesn't know immediately, he has references that he turns to and gets the information he needs.” (OA4)

Subtheme: Coordinating care

PCPs were expected to coordinate care with other providers. Several older adults had specialists who prescribed medications for them. PCPs were expected to perform a comprehensive review of prescribed medicines by all providers seen by the patient: “… and the primary care is supposed to be the one that oversees and coordinates all of the specialists that I’m seeing” (OA2).

Subtheme: Communicating with older adults

Older adults stated that the time spent with providers varied, and some allowed more time for questions regarding medications. The provider was also expected to perform basic physical examinations and order blood tests to help older adults feel at ease. One older adult stated that the provider neither assessed her lungs nor ordered any labs during her visit. She felt that her assessment was inadequate, and she was concerned about the safe prescribing practices of the provider. Regarding shared decision-making, older adults mentioned deferring prescribing decisions to the provider: “I don't ask no questions because I figure the doctor knows what he's doing” (PT4).

Theme 2: Monitoring for Safety

This theme included referencing drug interactions and disease interactions. An older adult emphasized that health providers must consider safety for patients with preexisting conditions such as decreased kidney function before prescribing medications.

“I expect him to know that I have a little bit of issue with kidney function, and he needs to make sure that he gives me what's going to be the safest for my kidneys and yet do the most for whatever he's trying to control.” (OA3)

Providers were expected to monitor drug–drug interactions and avoid prescribing those medications. One older adult shared that they were “already taking so many medicines, so I don't know what will contradict with the other” (PT5).

Theme 3: Keeping Up with Recalled Medications

Older adults expected providers to keep up with recalled drugs and “to make sure that they’re not giving…medicine that has been recalled” (OA9). In addition, they want to be notified when a replacement medication is prescribed for a previously recalled drug: “let me know that they are going to give me another prescription for the purpose of … the one that has been recalled” (OA9).

Older Adults’ Perception of the Pharmacists’ Role

Older adults acknowledged having a positive relationship with the pharmacy staff. Some of the perceived roles of pharmacists overlapped with the providers’ roles.

Theme 1: Notification of Changes

Older adults mentioned that they relied on the appearance of medications to ensure they were taking them safely. Therefore, they expected the pharmacist to notify them of any changes to their medications’ dosage, shape, size, or color.

“I got a medication with no warning, and then I was to cut it in half. The one I was taking before, I didn't have to cut it in half. I took it one time, a full pill, but then I saw on the label that I’m supposed to cut it and only take half. So obviously, they changed the company. They didn't tell me that I needed to cut it in half.” (OA5)

Theme 2: Monitoring for Safety

This theme was similar to the expected role of the provider. An older adult mentioned that their pharmacist had a list of all their medications; therefore, the pharmacist should also monitor potential drug interactions.

“Pharmacists, they’re supposed to be able to know if there's any conflict between any medications. They know what I’m taking and the local pharmacy also has the list that I get for my 90-day stuff, so they can look at any of that.” (OA1)

Theme 3: Keeping Up with Recalled Medications

This theme was similar to the provider's expected role. Pharmacists were expected to function as a second layer of security when dispensing prescribed medications, especially routinely ordered medications. Pharmacists were expected not to dispense expired or recalled drugs, even if the provider ordered them. Older adults also mentioned that the pharmacist's role was to notify them of replacement medications.

Theme 4: Providing Medication Package Inserts

Older adults preferred reading the medication package inserts for specific drug information. The inserts were essential to help older adults understand the medication and its side effects. “[The role of the pharmacists is] filling the prescription that's given [to] them and giving me a sheet of paper that tells me the side effects or any warning that's on it” (OA6). However, some older adults said they were hesitant to ask the pharmacist drug-related questions; they expected pertinent drug information from the provider.

Perceived Older Adults’ and Caregivers’ Role

Older adults recognized that their role in medication safety went beyond taking pills as prescribed.

Theme 1: Taking Fewer Medications

Although older adults acknowledged taking several medications, they also believed it was necessary. Older adults perceived their role in medication safety as taking fewer medications by “eating healthier” (PT8) so that they “don't need to take so many pills” (PT8). “In response to the question of “what is your role in taking medications safely?” one older adult commented, “take less and less, I don't like to take more than I have to, nobody wants to, unless they just like medicine, nobody wants to take any more than they have to” (OA6).

Theme 2: Not Missing Doses

Additionally, older adults perceived that it was their role to take medications and not miss any doses. This perceived role was similar to caregivers’ perception as well: “to make sure she [patient] doesn't miss any, that she has all of them, that she has all the normal medication there at the house, to prepare it for her weekly” (PT3). However, several of the older adults reported forgetting to take their medications despite using tools such as pillboxes: “there have been days when I forget, and I’ll know because I’ve checked the day before, and they’re still there [in the pillbox]” (OA5).

Theme 3: Securing Medications

Older adults mentioned that some of the medications they took were controlled substances and had the potential for abuse. Consequently, another perceived role was locking away such medications to avoid them falling into the wrong hands. “They are locked up for one thing because occasionally I have to take hydrocodone, and my doctor told me to lock them up” (OA8). Older adults also expressed their awareness of the potential to abuse some of these drugs: “I don't like to take more than I have to. I don't want to get addicted to anything” (OA10). An older adult mentioned that her role was to ensure that medications were kept away from pets.

Theme 4: Learning About Medications

Older adults stated that asking questions was a crucial part of their role in learning about their medication. According to older adults, it was their role to read and follow prescription instructions. The medication inserts were used as a source of primary information, and the provider was consulted if there were further questions. “They’ll send an information sheet and so I read that very thoroughly. And if I have any questions about it, I’ll ask my doctor when I see him” (OA5).

Discussion

Our findings build upon the growing literature on medication safety by providing an in-depth analysis of older adults’ perceptions and expectations of their providers’ specific roles in medication safety. Pharmacists and providers were perceived to have some overlapping roles (see Figure 1). In contrast, older adults perceived their roles in medication safety as independent of health professionals’ roles. Older adults assumed a passive role in shared decision-making surrounding safe prescribing due to trust in the provider's knowledge, skill, and expertise. The role of safe medication management was viewed as achieved by attending to the physical appearance of drugs. Hence, pharmacists were expected to notify older adults of any changes to the appearance of medications. By contrasting the roles of prescribers, pharmacists, and patients, our study provided new insights on gaps and misconceptions in the coproduction of medication safety in ambulatory settings. For instance, older adults in our study expected coordination of PCPs with specialists and pharmacists. Also, they expect PCPs to have complete knowledge of their medications. Our study on perceived roles may inform the implementation of strategies to engage patients in medication safety. For example, Sharma et al (2018) assessed several strategies, including self-monitoring and titrating of anticoagulants, but for such strategies to be effective, patients and professionals must address the differences in perceived roles in medication safety (16).

Figure 1.

Coproduction of medication safety model: Older adults' perspective.

Similar to our findings, researchers found that older adults’ trust in healthcare providers contributed to their reluctance to participate in decision-making (17). During clinical encounters, providers should be aware of such tendencies and create opportunities for patients to express desired health outcomes (18). Among older adults in our study, “learning about medications” was perceived as their responsibility. Therefore, providers should assess and encourage older adults’ desire to learn about their medications. Individuals vary in how they view their role in medication management; thus, it is important to understand each individual's perceived role in medication safety (19).

Older adults in our study sample relied on the pharmacist for drug safety information, such as the medication inserts that came with their prescriptions. Besides providing medical advice without an appointment, the pharmacist could also be an intermediary between the patient and the provider (20). However, researchers found a lack of two-way communication between providers and pharmacists (21). Researchers also discovered that pharmacists’ lack of access to patient medical records was a significant barrier to making recommendations to providers regarding patients’ medications (22). Therefore, pharmacists need to have access to electronic medical records to make informed medication safety recommendations to clinicians (23).

In our sample, some older adults deferred prescribing decisions to the provider even though they would like to be “taking fewer medications.” Providers should respect and be aware of older adults’ desire to take fewer medications and assess for possible self-dosing practices. Viewed from the perspective of coproduction of health services, further education is needed to align perceived roles by older adults and caregivers regarding the long-term use of medication and the need to stop when necessary. Clinicians would agree that sometimes deprescribing medication is necessary; however, some older adults hesitate to stop their medications because they fear the consequences. Australian researchers also found that older adults were hesitant to participate in deprescribing (20). A jointly made decision between the pharmacist, the provider, and the patient must be made regarding deprescribing (21). Although many older adults do not want to be “missing doses,” they can sometimes be forgetful. Therefore, clinicians should assess cognitive barriers and access to tools to help mitigate risks.

Our findings confirm that older adults expected providers to be knowledgeable and maintain continuing education requirements (24). Older adults in our study also expected providers to review all their medications thoroughly during each visit due to concerns about drug interactions (17). These findings indicate that a comprehensive medication reconciliation should be the role of PCPs, who were also expected to coordinate and oversee the care patients received from other health specialists. Older adults in another study stated that medication reconciliation was one of the top five critical things to them during an annual wellness visit (25). Therefore, providers should incorporate an in-depth medication review during each visit. Unfortunately, the standard 15- to-25-minute office visits may not allow a thorough review of medications. Researchers found that a pharmacist spends an average of 34 minutes during a medication review session (22). Fast-paced clinic visits (26), lack of workflow integration (27), lack of privacy (28)’ and limited support staff (29) create organizational barriers to comprehensive medication therapy management (MTM) within outpatient clinics. In addition, poor information sharing between prescribers (28) and lack of pharmacist reimbursement (30) was also found to be a barrier to MTM.

Healthcare services depend on the coproduction of all team members, such as patients, providers, and pharmacists (13). Researchers have used the coproduction model to analyze clinicians’ perceptions of the model (31). Other researchers have used it to explore patients, refugees, and immigrants’ perceptions of the coproduction of their healthcare services (32 –34). In our study, coproduction between older adults, providers, and pharmacists was essential in ensuring medication safety. The theoretical model of coproduction of healthcare service proposes that patients participate in civil discourse, co-planning, and co-execution during health service production (13). This model is appropriate in our study because older adults are participants rather than just consumers of health services (see Table 2). Civil discourse requires effective and clear communication between patients, providers, and pharmacists. The goal of co-planning is to respect individual values and expertise, such as older adults’ experiences and strategies used at home to improve medication safety. Co-execution mandates trust, shared goals, accountability, and responsibility between patients and health providers.(13) Providing this level of service increases trust in the provider-patient relationship and the provider's competence. Understanding and supporting coproduction between older adults and health providers are key to promoting medication safety.

Limitations

The study had limitations. We did not screen for cognitive impairment or frailty, and those with cognitive impairment may face different challenges regarding medication management at home. However, the issues raised by the participants are common issues experienced by other age groups, and thus we believe our findings are transferable to populations with complex medication needs. This study was also limited by the age range of 65–84 years of the recruited participants. Future studies should target the oldest-old (>85 years) to capture the possible varying needs of this population. Deductive thematic analysis was guided by the coproduction of healthcare service theoretical framework, which may have introduced biases. Future studies focusing exclusively on the framework should refine the proposed coproduction model of medication safety. For instance, a cost-based approach to medication safety might be explored.

The modality of data collection varied in this study. The interviews were conducted remotely due to COVID-19 protocols. Some interviews were via video, while most were conducted via voice calls. Some retirement community residents used mail-in pharmacy services primarily; consequently, their interactions with pharmacists differed from those who used community-based pharmacies. Qualitative research seeks to transfer rather than generalize findings. Despite our study limitations, our results are transferable to similar samples and could improve medication safety practices.

Conclusion

Understanding the specific medication safety-related role expectations between older adults and health providers could prevent medication-related harm. Our findings should encourage providers and pharmacists to create opportunities to involve older adults and caregivers in decision-making to facilitate the coproduction of quality healthcare services and a clear delineation of roles. The implications for organizations and policymakers are improving care delivery and allowing health providers to spend more time caring for older adults with complex needs. Future studies should examine providers’ and pharmacists’ perceptions of their roles and evaluate how to ensure all stakeholders understand their respective roles regarding medication safety.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-jpx-10.1177_23743735231158887 - Supplemental material for A Multisite Qualitative Analysis of Perceived Roles in Medication Safety: Older Adults’ Perspectives

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-jpx-10.1177_23743735231158887 for A Multisite Qualitative Analysis of Perceived Roles in Medication Safety: Older Adults’ Perspectives by Fatoumata Jallow, Elisa Stehling, Zara Sajwani-Merchant, Kathryn M Daniel, Kimberly G Fulda, Anna M Espinoza, Ayse P Gurses, Alicia I Arbaje and Yan Xiao in Journal of Patient Experience

Footnotes

Author Contributions

Study concept and design: YX, KD, APG, AIA. Data collection: FJ, AE, ES, ZSM, and KD. Data analysis and interpretation: FJ, ES, ZSM, AE, KD, KF, APG, AIA, and YX. Drafting of the manuscript: FJ, ES, ZSM, AE, KF, and KD. Critical review of manuscript: KD, YX, APG and AIA. Obtaining funding: YX. Supervision: YX, KD. All authors contributed to the critical revision of the manuscript's intellectual content and approved the final draft.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the University of Texas at Arlington's Institutional Review Board.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, (grant number R18HS027277).

Presentation

Abstract accepted for poster presentation for the Gerontological Society of America Annual Scientific Meeting 2022 in Indianapolis.

Abstract Title: Perceived Roles in Medication Safety—Patients’ Perspectives

Abstract accepted for poster presentation at May 2022 Annual Meeting of the American Geriatrics Society:

Abstract title: Perceived Roles of Community Dwelling Multimorbid Older Adults in Medication Safety

Select findings from this study were presented on a poster at the 2021 Annual Scientific Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA).

Abstract Title: Opportunities and Barriers to Medication Safety in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Sponsor's Role

Sponsors had no role in the design, methods, recruitment, data collection, data analysis, and the development of this manuscript.

Statement of Human and Animal Rights

All procedures in this study were conducted in accordance with the University of Texas at Arlington's Institutional Review Board (IRB #: 2019-0439.17) approved protocol.

Statement of Informed Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for their anonymized information to be published in this article.

ORCID iDs

Fatoumata Jallow, MSN

Kathryn M Daniel, PhD, AGSF

Yan Xiao, PhD

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Budnitz

Pollock

Weidenbach

Mendelsohn

Schroeder

Annest

. National surveillance of emergency department visits for outpatient adverse drug events. JAMA. 2006;296(15):1858-66. doi:10.1001/jama.296.15.1858

Budnitz

Shehab

Lovegrove

Geller

Lind

Pollock

. US Emergency department visits attributed to medication harms, 2017–2019. JAMA. 2021;326(13):1299-309. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.13844

Young

Pan

Yap

Reveles

Bhakta

. Polypharmacy prevalence in older adults seen in United States physician offices from 2009 to 2016. PLoS One. 2021;16(8):e0255642. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0255642

Geller

Shehab

Lovegrove

, et al. National estimates of insulin-related hypoglycemia and errors leading to emergency department visits and hospitalizations. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):678-86. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.136

Mullings

Sankaranarayanan

. Quality of communication about medicines in United States hospitals: a national retrospective study. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017;13(4):849-56. doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.09.005

Look

Stone

. Medication management activities performed by informal caregivers of older adults. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018;14(5):418-26. doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.05.005

Shoemaker

Ramalho de Oliveira

. Understanding the meaning of medications for patients: the medication experience. Pharm World Sci. 2008;30(1):86-91. doi:10.1007/s11096-007-9148-5

Lyson

Sharma

Cherian

, et al. A qualitative analysis of outpatient medication use in community settings: observed safety vulnerabilities and recommendations for improved patient safety. J Patient Saf. 2021;17(4):e335-42. doi:10.1097/PTS.0000000000000590

Bulsara

. Seniors prefer pharmacists for advice on medications. J Pharm Pract Res. 2013;43(1):7-8.

10.

Aimaurai

Jumpated

Krass

Dhippayom

. Patient opinions on medicine-use review: exploring an expanding role of community pharmacists. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:751-60. doi:10.2147/PPA.S132054

11.

Elwyn

Laitner

Coulter

Walker

Watson

Thomson

. Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. Br Med J. 2010;341(7780):c5146. doi:10.1136/bmj.c5146

12.

Phipps

Giles

Lewis

, et al. Mindful organizing in patients’ contributions to primary care medication safety. Health Expect. 2018;21(6):964-72. doi:10.1111/hex.12689

13.

Batalden

Margolis

, et al. Coproduction of healthcare service. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(7):509-17. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004315

14.

Munhall

. Nursing research : a qualitative perspective. Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2012.

15.

Braun

Clarke

. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

16.

Sharma

Rivadeneira

Barr-Walker

Stern

Johnson

Sarkar

. Patient engagement in health care safety: an overview of mixed-quality evidence. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018;37(11):1813-20. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0716

17.

Holmqvist

Thor

Ros

Johansson

. Older persons’ experiences regarding evaluation of their medication treatment—an interview study in Sweden. Health Expect. 2019;22(6):1294-303. doi:10.1111/hex.12967

18.

Asare

McIntosh

Culakova

, et al. Assessing physical activity behavior of cancer survivors by race and social determinants of health. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2019;40(1):7-16. doi:10.1177/0272684X19857427

19.

Swanlund

Scherck

Metcalfe

Jesek-Hale

. Keys to successful self-management of medications. Nurs Sci Q. 2008;21(3):238-46. doi:10.1177/0894318408319276

20.

Reeve

Low

Hilmer

. Beliefs and attitudes of older adults and carers about deprescribing of medications: a qualitative focus group study. Br J Gen Pract. 2016;66(649):e552-60. doi:10.3399/bjgp16X685669

21.

Holden

Abebe

Russ-Jara

Chui

. Human factors and ergonomics methods for pharmacy research and clinical practice. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021;17(12):2019-27. doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.04.024

22.

Clark

LaValley

Singh

Mustafa

Monte

Wahler

. A pharmacist-led pilot program to facilitate deprescribing in a primary care clinic. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020;60(1):105-11. doi:10.1016/j.japh.2019.09.011

23.

Snyder

Ahmed-Sarwar

Gardiner

Burke

. Community pharmacist collaboration with a primary care clinic to improve diabetes care. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020;60(3S):S84-90. doi:10.1016/j.japh.2020.02.005

24.

Stewart

Hanke

Kucemba

Levine

Mendez

Saad

. A qualitative analysis of older adults’ views of healthcare provider attributes and communication skills. J Patient Exper. 2022;9:23743735221092564. doi:10.1177/23743735221092564

25.

Solinsky

Rochester-Eyeguokan

Brandt

Pincus

. A multicenter focus group analysis of medicare beneficiaries perception of annual wellness visits. J Healthc Qual. 2021;43(3):e33-42. doi:10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000273

26.

Wallis

Andrews

Henderson

. Swimming against the tide: primary care physicians’ views on deprescribing in everyday practice. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(4):341-6. doi:10.1370/afm.2094

27.

Smith

Ferreri

Brown

Wines

Shea

Pfeiffenberger

. Implementing an integrated care management program in community pharmacies: a focus on medication management services. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017;57(2):229-235.e1. doi:10.1016/j.japh.2016.12.074

28.

Hattingh

Kelly

Fowler

Wheeler

. Implementation of a mental health medication management intervention in Australian community pharmacies: facilitators and challenges. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017;13(5):969-79. doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.05.017

29.

Isetts

. Integrating medication therapy management (MTM) services provided by community pharmacists into a community-based accountable care organization (ACO). Pharmacy (Basel). 2017;5(4):56. doi:10.3390/pharmacy5040056

30.

Tewksbury

Bozymski

Ruekert

Lum

Cunningham

Covington

. Development of collaborative drug therapy management and clinical pharmacy services in an outpatient psychiatric clinic. J Pharm Pract. 2018;31(3):272-8. doi:10.1177/0897190017710521

31.

Holland-Hart

Addis

Edwards

Kenkre

Wood

. Coproduction and health: public and clinicians’ perceptions of the barriers and facilitators. Health Expect. 2019;22(1):93-101. doi:10.1111/hex.12834

32.

Baim-Lance

Tietz

Lever

Swart

Agins

. Everyday and unavoidable coproduction: exploring patient participation in the delivery of healthcare services. Sociol Health Illn. 2019;41(1):128-42. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12801

33.

Van Citters

Holthoff

Kennedy

, et al. Point-of-care dashboards promote coproduction of healthcare services for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Int J Qual Health Care. 2021;33(Supplement_2):ii40-7. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzab067

34.

Radl-Karimi

Nielsen

Sodemann

Batalden

von Plessen

. When I feel safe, I dare to open up": immigrant and refugee patients’ experiences with coproducing healthcare. Patient Educ Couns. 2022;105(7):2338-45. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2021.11.009

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB