Abstract
Dignity therapy as an intervention has been used for individuals receiving palliative care. The goal of this review is to explore the current state of empirical support to its use for end-of-life care patients. Data sources were articles extracted from search engines PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycINFO. The years searched were 2009 to 2019 (10-year period). The review process was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Results revealed the feasibility, acceptability, satisfaction, and effectiveness of dignity therapy for life-limiting cases/conditions of patients in different age groups. It also highlighted the importance of the therapy setting and the need to apply this in the cultural context. The meaning of dignity therapy to patients and their family care members also emerged. Findings showed most patients displayed the need to leave a legacy and from this their core values surfaced. In conclusion, this review highlighted the contribution of dignity therapy to the holistic care of patients who hope to leave a legacy. The therapy was also relevant to decrease the anxiety; depression, and burden of family members throughout the palliative care period of their loved ones.
Background/ Introduction
Dignity therapy was first developed as a way to assist patients in dealing with the approach to end of life (1). This intervention helped to conserve the dying patient’s dignity by addressing the sources of psychosocial and existential distress. It gave patients a chance to record the meaningful aspects of their lives and leave behind what can benefit loved ones in the future (2). It has relieved psychological and existential distress in patients by using life review as a form of psychotherapy (3).
The relevance of dignity therapy was grounded in the dying patients’ self-reported notions of dignity. It is used to addresses their need to feel that life has had meaning and to leave a sense of self to remain with loved ones beyond their own life. It helped patients to get in touch with accomplishments and experiences that made them unique and valued as human beings (2). Dignity therapy showed promise as a novel therapeutic intervention for suffering and distress at the end of life (1).
Dignity therapy was developed for use among individuals who are near death (4). Patients are asked to write a formal written narrative of their life to the person they choose. The therapeutic part was when the patient would be asked a series of questions about parts of their life that they remember the most and are most important about their life story. Answers to this were transcribed and returned to them for editing, going back and forth with the therapist for a polished documented result. This result can be given to their significant others, family, and friends. With the end goal of alleviating end-of-life suffering, dignity therapy has focused on crafting a person’s legacy by documenting important memories and writing messages for their loved ones to read. However, there was little known about its effect on the family members reading it (3).
The purpose of this literature review was to provide evidence-based information on the effect of dignity therapy as an intervention. The goal was to evaluate the current empirical support to its use for end-of-life care patients. This is congruent with the need to develop and utilize therapeutic interventions that support hopefulness, sense of meaning, and dignity, in order to alleviate psychosocial and existential distress in end-of-life care patients (5).
Methods
A literature review was conducted with the assistance of a medical librarian who refined the terms using search strategies. The key words identified were dignity therapy, terminal care, hospice care, palliative care, hospice and palliative care nursing, palliative medicine, end of life, and terminal illness. MESH terms were also included in the search.
Databases searched were PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycINFO. Articles were included if published within the past 10 years (2009-2019). The authors of the review identified the managing criteria for abstract screening and full-text review. The inclusion criteria were dignity therapy in end-of-life care, palliative care, hospice care, and terminal care across all age groups. The exclusion criteria were other therapeutic interventions and pharmacologic management for palliative, terminal, hospice and end-of-life care, and all systematic reviews on the topic. A total of 451 articles were identified for review. Title and abstract screening were conducted, followed by full-text review, and final lists of 28 were included. Articles were reviewed as guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 2009 framework (Figure 1) (6).

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 2009 flow diagram.
Results
The review showed very extensive studies on the feasibility, acceptability, satisfaction, relevance, and effectiveness of dignity therapy that were conducted from 2009 to 2019 among end-of-life care patients. There were 28 publications included in this review that was further classified into 16 quantitative, 9 qualitative, and 3 mixed-method studies. The reviews were conducted primarily in Western countries, including the United States, Australia, and Canada. There were very few studies conducted in Asia, which only included Japan (7) and Taiwan (8).
In the quantitative studies, many used the pretest and post-test intervention design (1,5,9,10 –12); while the qualitative literature used a case study (13) and grounded theory (14) design.
Four of the studies used the protocol of Chochinov (13,15 –17). As cited by Andreis et al (13), the Chochinov protocol was used primarily with people who were terminally ill. It consists of a short-term psychotherapy intervention that includes 3 major aspects: the physical aspects related to the disease and symptoms, existential/spiritual aspects based on the patient’s life history, and the social relationships aspect linked to the quality of the relationship between the patient, practitioners, and family members.
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Satisfaction
Feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction of patients and family caregivers to dignity therapy were usually assessed by completing a self-report questionnaire or participant feedback questionnaire. Many of the studies reported high acceptability and satisfaction to dignity therapy (9 –12,18,19).
Effectiveness
Effectiveness of dignity therapy were measured using the Patient Dignity Inventory to assess dignity-related distress, Herth Hope Index for hopefulness, and FACIT sp 12 for spiritual well-being (9,11). While for family caregivers, assessment of burden used were Zarit Burden Interview, Herth Hope Index for hopefulness, and HADS for anxiety and depression (9).
Meaning to Patients
For patients, dignity therapy promotes self-expression, connection with loved once, sense of dignity, purpose, and continuity/improved sense of self; strengthens identity (1,10,11,13,20); and increases hopefulness and dignity (1,11,15,21) and spirituality (20). Most importantly, dignity therapy decreases distress symptoms such as depression, desire for death, or suicidal thoughts (4,22). One study stated that dignity therapy promotes self- expression, connection with loved ones, sense of purpose, and continuity of self (20).
Legacy Project
Specifically, the development or creation of a legacy project, also called “generativity” documents (22), promotes independent reflection, autonomy, and opportunities for family interaction, which can lead to better relationships (11,13,20) and helping to address unfinished business (9,10). The generativity document provides a safe therapeutic environment that can deliver a detailed message to family members and caregivers to facilitate early palliative care, thus allowing the patient to reappraise aspects of their lives positively and enjoy the opportunities to reminisce (19). Through this, the core values of the patient become apparent (14). A patient who has developed the generativity documents can promote independent reflection, autonomy, and opportunities for family interaction during the review and discussion of the project (20).
To accomplish this, Dose et al (22) asked patients to produce a generativity document, which the patient can later share with their family. The document can also be made into a form of a life plan, which is a type of “bucket list” wherein the patient document future hopes and dreams.
Core Values
The core values identified in the various studies were (1) family (1,11,20), (2) autonomy (7,9,10,20), (3) sense of self or sense of identity (9 –11,13,20), (4) spirituality (5,15,21), (5) hopefulness (5), (6) acceptance (11), and (7) sense of purpose or meaning (1,22) in life.
Meaning to Family Care Members
Dignity therapy was reported as a source of comfort for family care members during bereavement (9 –11,23). Furthermore, the therapy decreased the burden, anxiety, and depression among family members and even increased their hopefulness (5,11) for their loved ones. Some family care members believed that a dignity therapy document would be a comfort during their time of bereavement (10).
Cases and Age groups
Most of the studies observed middle and older adults with advanced cancer and motor neurone disease (MND), but Newman (24) completed a study on the efficacy of dignity therapy to patients who need allogenic bone marrow transplant (BMT) and Rodriguez (25) has assessed the benefits of dignity therapy to a group of adolescents with advanced cancer. Similarly, to other studies, dignity therapy was found to be beneficial to patients with BMT in reducing existential distress after transplantation (24). The adolescent group with advanced cancer reported similar responses. However, their main concern was being worried about death and dying. According to them, they need to identify to whom and in which way they can verbalize their worries (25).
The literature reviews for Dignity Therapy.
Abbreviations: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DT, digital therapy; MND, motor neurone disease; RCT, randomized controlled trial; LP, lumbar puncture; LR, life review; QoL, quality of life; WDT, waitlist DT.
aThe number of reviewed literatures in Table 1 per research category.
Therapy Setting
Dignity therapy was commonly done at home and given by someone who specializes in palliative care. However, one study explored the use of an acute care hospital in Austria for the feasibility and acceptance of dignity therapy (26). This study met a major challenge in identifying a target group, since the patients spent a very short time in the hospital. The study necessitated an immediate and quick conduction of the therapy. As a result, the notable observation was to realize that dignity therapy conducted within a short amount of time requires a sufficient number of human resources to be successful (26).
Cultural Context
Dignity therapy’s theoretical and cultural congruence has also been explored in literatures (8). There was a study that concluded the concept of dignity as culturally bound and understood differently in the Asian culture compared to the Western context. From an Asian cultural perspective, a person’s value was the core meaning of their dignity and a dynamics relationship exists between extrinsic and intrinsic factors. Similarly, another study (7) suggested that there was an underlying difference regarding the general attitude of a person toward a “good death” between the Western and Japanese culture. Thus, this difference in perspectives may influence a lower participation rate to dignity therapy in Japan.
Limitations
The review was limited to the use of dignity therapy among end-of life care patients. Other therapies in combination to this were not included. The pharmacodynamics of the patients was also not included in the review. Similar studies and systematic reviews were excluded in this project.
The patient’s gender did not emerge as a factor for consideration in doing dignity therapy. There was also no mention of negative consequences that arise from its use.
Conclusions
Dignity therapy represents an appreciated and valuable contribution to holistic care of patients with palliative care needs. Even in acute care hospitals under the condition of open communication, the therapy can also address the life-limiting characteristics of a disease (26). Therapy outcomes are encouraging, beneficial, and effective in enhancing the end-of-life experience for patients who hope to leave a legacy.
For family care members, dignity therapy was essential to decrease anxiety, depression, and burden associated with end-of-life care. It was suggested that dignity therapy could influence various important aspects of the end-of-life experience for the family (9), including helping patients attend to unfinished business and make them feel like they were still themselves (11).
Dignity therapy was used for patients in different age groups with terminal illness, such as cases of advanced cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and other neurodegenerative conditions including BMT patients in a home-based setting. However, for dignity therapy to be meaningful and relevant, it is essential to provide adequate time when conducting sessions.
The factors to consider in implementing and delivering effective dignity therapy were (1) differences in general attitude toward good death, especially those patients who deny the impending death (7); (2) information on patients resources and spiritual challenges (15); (3) the importance of family ad autonomy to patients (20); and (4) mild cognitive decline and pseudobulbar effect to patients with MND (10,11). Nurses in delivering dignity therapy to end-of-life care patients must consider these factors.
Cultural differences were considered when planning and delivering dignity therapy (27). The meaning of dignity to end-of-life patients from different countries was considered to be culture based. One example demonstrated that “unawareness of death” was a relevant concept of good death in Japan (7).
The study by Akechi et al (7) suggested that terminally ill cancer patients in Japan may try to cope with their terminal condition by denying their impending death, and this must be noted upon assessment. Additionally, the importance that patients place on family should not be underestimated. Nurses caring for end-of-life patients should honor their autonomy (20). The nurse as a dignity therapist may provide a better experience for the family members when they are aware of acceptance levels and quality of partner relationships (11). Nurses must offer ongoing psychosocial support to patients with life-limiting diseases. This is a way to identify suitable dignity therapy participants and to know the right moment to offer it to patients (26).
Since the review attested to the effectiveness of dignity therapy, it was suggested that this brief psychotherapeutic intervention be tested on future larger trials (12). Although dignity therapy may be bound with cultural considerations, this therapy was promising for patients who hope to leave a legacy (7). Dignity therapy could fill in a gap and provide a possible solution to psychosocial distress at the end of life, an area of palliative care widely acknowledged as in need of improvement (5).
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
