Despite increased recognition of the importance and need for pedagogical training for public health and health promotion instructors in best-practices and inclusivity, formal training is often overlooked. This disregard for pedagogical training necessitates exploration of alternative and innovative approaches to enhance teaching and learning such as generative AI. This paper describes applied uses of generative AI, specifically ChatGPT, to enhance pedagogy in public health and health promotion education in the areas of curriculum design, instructional strategies, assessment and feedback, and diversity, equity, and inclusion. Generative AI as a supplemental tool shows immense promise for improving teaching and learning, however, inherent limitations and ethical considerations require caution and continued scrutiny.
BellA.MladenovicR.PriceM. (2013). Students’ perceptions of the usefulness of marking guides, grade descriptors and annotated exemplars. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(7), 769–788.
3.
BiggsJ.TangC.KennedyG. (2022). Teaching for quality learning at university (5th ed.). Open University Press.
4.
BrewerK.DiehrA.BlissK. (2021). Why don’t we just ask them? A qualitative study regarding college student perceptionson what topics should be included in an introductory health course. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 7(3), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/2373379920926193
5.
CarlessD. (2015). Excellence in university assessment: Learning from award-winning practice. Routledge.
Darling-HammondL. (2010). Performance counts: Assessment systems that support high-quality learning. Council of Chief State School Officers.
8.
Dell’AcquaF.McFowlandE.MollickE. R.Lifshitz-AssafH.KelloggK.RajendranS.KrayerL.CandelonF.LakhaniK. R. (2023). Navigating the jagged technological frontier: Field experimental evidence of the effects of AI on knowledge worker productivity and quality. Harvard Business School Technology & Operations Mgt. Unit Working Paper (24-013). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4573321
EatonL. (2023). The questions to be AIsking in education [Keynote address]. Husson University.
12.
EllisA. R. (2022). Development and Implementation of a Fully Online Introductory Data Analysis Course to Better Prepare Students for the Public Health Workforce. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 8(4), 309–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/23733799211060742
13.
FerraraE. (2023). Fairness and bias in Artificial intelligence: A brief survey of sources, impacts, and mitigation strategies. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.07683
14.
GambesciaS. F. (2015). Message from the editor in chief. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 1(1), 3–4.
15.
GambesciaS. F. (2018). Message from the editor in chief: “Nobody Taught Me How to Teach.”Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 4(3), 171–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/2373379918792933
16.
GayG. (2015). The what, why, and how of culturally responsive teaching: International mandates, challenges, and opportunities. Multicultural Education Review, 7(3), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/2005615X.2015.1072079
17.
GodleyS.AumillerB.HorigianV.KhalilN.KrugerJ.PennelC.YouattE.KiviniemiM. T. (2021). Evidence-based educational practices for public health: How we teach matters. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 7(2), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/2373379920978421
18.
JamesT. G.SullivanM. K.VarnesJ. R. (2022). Improving representation of people with disabilities in health education. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 8(3), 174–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/2373379920978822
LavaniaM.NorF. B. M. (2020). Barriers in differentiated instruction: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(6), 293–297.
21.
MerzelC. R. (2022). Diversity, equity, and inclusion on the frontlines of education. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 8(3), 171–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/23733799221113510
MollickE.MollickL. (2022). New modes of learning enabled by ai chatbots: Three methods and assignments. Social Science Research Network. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4300783
MollickE.MollickL. (2023b). Using AI to implement effective teaching strategies in classrooms: Five strategies, including prompts. Social Science Research Network. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4391243
National Commission for Health Education Credentialing. (2020). A competency-based framework for health education specialist-2020. National Commission for Health Education and Society for Public Health Education.
28.
Nelson-HurwitzD. C.LeeT. H. (2021). Redesigning an undergraduate global health course to increase student engagement and incorporate high-impact educational practices. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 7(3), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/2373379920974396
29.
NilsonL. B. (2016). Teaching at its best: A research-based resource for college instructors. John Wiley & Sons.
SantangeloT.TomlinsonC. A. (2009). The application of differentiated instruction in postsecondary environments: Benefits, challenges, and future directions. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(3), 307–323.
34.
WalkerE. R.LedererA. M.StolowJ. A. (2022). A qualitative examination of barriers and facilitators to providing pedagogical training for doctoral students in behavioral and social sciences programs at US schools of public health. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 8(4), 332–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/23733799221107606
35.
WigginsG. P.McTigheJ. (2005). Understanding by design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
