Public health professionals are increasingly called on to demonstrate program evaluation skills, a core competency for the field. Learning opportunities that are connected to community organizations with identified evaluation needs give students meaningful opportunities to build and test new skills. When thoughtfully implemented, community-based learning benefits both the student and the community, yet there are several important considerations for designing a course that incorporates this feature. This article describes one approach for teaching graduate public health students how to conceptualize and write a comprehensive program evaluation plan for a community agency, based on the needs, priorities, and capacity of that agency. Lessons learned and recommendations for adopting this model are discussed.
BentleyK. M.SwanS. A. (2017). Service learning: A useful pedagogy to engage community health education students in a resource management and grant writing course. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 4, 83-87. doi:10.1177/2373379917724171
2.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1999). Framework for program evaluation in public health. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 48(No. RR-11), 4-12. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr4811.pdf
ChuppM. G.JosephM. L. (2010). Getting the most out of service-learning: Maximizing student, university, and community impact. Journal of Community Practice, 18, 190-212.
ComeauD. L.PalaciosN.TalleyC.WalkerE. R.EscofferyC.ThompsonW. W.LangD. L. (2019). Community-engaged learning in public health: An evaluation of utilization and value of student projects for community partners. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 5, 3-13. doi:10.1177/2373379918772314
DavisM. V. (2006). Teaching practical public health evaluation methods. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 247-256. doi:10.1177/0198214006286422
12.
ErwinP. C.BrownsonR. C. (2017). Macro trends and the future of public health practice. Annual Review of Public Health, 38, 393-412. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044224
13.
FlorenceJ.BehringerB. (2011). Community as classroom. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 17, 316-323. doi:10.1097/phh.0b013e3182140be7
14.
GlasgowR. E.VogtT. M.BolesS. M. (1999). Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1322-1327.
15.
GreeceJ. A.DejongW.SchonfeldJ. G.SunM.McgrathD. (2018). Practice-based teaching and public health training: Bringing real-world projects to the classroom to teach intervention planning and communication strategies. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 5, 55-61. doi:10.1177/2373379918760929
16.
GreenL.KreuterM. (1991). Health promotion planning: An educational and environmental approach (2nd ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
17.
KidderD. P.ChapelT. J. (2018). CDC’s program evaluation journey: 1999 to present. Public Health Reports, 133, 356-359. doi:10.1177/0033354918778034
18.
McIntireR. K.DiVitoB. M. (2017). An experiential service-learning project on observed smoking behavior to teach practical epidemiologic skills to MPH students, Philadelphia, 2015. Public Health Reports, 132, 392-396. doi:10.1177/0033354917698115
19.
MinklerM.WallersteinN. (Eds.). (2003). Community based participatory research for health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20.
O’ConnorK. M.McEwenL.OwenD.LynchK.HillS. (2011). Literature review: Embedding community engagement in the curriculum: An example of university-public engagement. Bristol, England: National Coordinating Centre for Public Engagement.
