Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Research has shown effective and broadly accessed STEM education drives innovation, economic growth, and national competitiveness. Strategic public funding that supports students can expand capacity, improve STEM readiness, and enhance workforce outcomes. Targeted federal investments help reduce economic barriers for students and promote STEM career pathways. These efforts are especially effective when coupled with holistic supports such as inclusive curricula and pedagogy, mentoring and skill-building opportunities, and student financial aid—all of which enhance students’ ability to learn, persist, and further develop their talents. Turning from student-level investments, funding for community colleges and minority-serving institutions boosts access for low-income and first-generation college students. Coordinated policies that connect STEM education with workforce development can lay the groundwork for sustained innovation. To achieve this, federal and state STEM education efforts should: (1) pair student investments with systemic supports to scaffold the ecosystem for learning and skill-development and (2) align investments with the evolving needs of the workforce and innovation economy. Ongoing public commitment to and investments in STEM education remain essential for a robust and future-ready STEM workforce.

Keywords

STEM education STEM workforce development education policy STEM education policy financial aid and access education funding

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

Dancy

Stearns

Mickelson

Bottia

(2022). Racism, sexism and disconnection: contrasting experiences of Black women in STEM before and after transfer from community college. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00334-2

Anderson

D. M.

Broton

K. M.

Monaghan

D. B.

(2023). Seeking STEM: The causal impact of need-based grant aid on undergraduates’ field of study. The Journal of Higher Education, 94(7), 921–944. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2023.2209003

Archer

DeWitt

Osborne

Dillon

Willis

Wong

(2012). Science aspirations, capital, and family habitus: How families shape children’s engagement and identification with science. American Educational Research Journal, 49(5), 881–908. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211433290

Black

S. E.

Muller

Spitz-Oener

Hung

Warren

J. R.

(2021). The importance of STEM: High school knowledge, skills and occupations in an era of growing inequality. Research Policy, 50(7), 104249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104249

Bottia

M. C.

Mickelson

R. A.

Jamil

Moniz

Barry

(2021). Factors associated with college STEM participation of racially minoritized students: A synthesis of research. Review of Educational Research, 91(4), 614–648. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211012751

Burt

B. A.

Stone

B. D.

Motshubi

Baber

L. D.

(2023). STEM Validation among underrepresented students: Leveraging insights from a STEM diversity program to broaden participation. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 16(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000300

California Community Colleges. (2025). K12 strong workforce program (SWP K12). California Community Colleges. https://www.cccco.edu/About-Us/Chancellors-Office/Divisions/Workforce-and-Economic-Development/K12-Strong-Workforce .

Carnevale

A. P.

Strohl

Melton

(2011). What's It Worth? The Economic Value of College Majors. http://www9.georgetown.edu/grad/gppi/hpi/cew/pdfs/whatsitworth-complete.pdf

Castleman

B. L.

Long

B. T.

Mabel

(2018). Can financial aid help to address the growing need for STEM education? The effects of need-based grants on the completion of science, technology, engineering, and math courses and degrees. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 37(1), 136–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22039

10.

Chen

Soldner

(2014). STEM Attrition: College Students’ Paths Into and Out of STEM Fields (NCES 2014-001). http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014001rev.pdf

11.

Cheryan

Ziegler

S. A.

Montoya

A. K.

Jiang

(2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000052

12.

Clewell

B. C.

Cosentino de Cohen

Deterding

Tsui

(2006). Final report on the evaluation of the National Science Foundation Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation program: Full technical report and appendices. http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=411301

13.

Cobian

K. P.

Hurtado

Romero

A. L.

Gutzwa

J. A.

(2024). Enacting inclusive science: Culturally responsive higher education practices in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM). PLoS One, 19(1), e0293953. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293953

14.

Committee on STEM Education. (2018). Charting a course for success: America's strategy for STEM education. N. S. T. Council. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED590474

15.

Denton

Borrego

(2021). Funds of knowledge in STEM education: A scoping review. Studies in Engineering Education, 1(2), 71. https://doi.org/10.21061/see.19

16.

Dynarski

Scott-Clayton

(2013). Financial aid policy: Lessons from research. The Future of Children, 23(1), 67–91. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2013.0002

17.

Eagan

Hurtado

Figueroa

Hughes

B. E.

(2014). Examining STEM pathways among students who begin college at four-year institutions. E. National Academies of Sciences, and Medicine (NASEM).

18.

Eccles

(2011). Gendered educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(3), 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025411398185

19.

Fernández

Rincón

B. E.

Hinojosa

J. K.

(2023). (Re)creating family and reinforcing pedagogies of the home: How familial capital manifests for students of color pursuing STEM majors. Race Ethnicity and Education, 26(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2021.1997971

20.

Gámez

Packard

B. W.-L.

Chavous

T. M.

(2021). Graduate bridge programs as nepantla for minoritized students in STEM: Navigating challenges with non-bridge peers and faculty. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000346

21.

Georgia Department of Education. (2024). SSTEM/STEAM certification. https://www.gadoe.org/Curriculum-Instruction-and-Assessment/CTAE/Pages/STEM.aspx

22.

Global Education Monitoring Report Team. (2023). Global education monitoring report, 2023: Technology in education: a tool on whose terms? (9231006096 978-92-3-100609-8). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/notice?id=p::usmarcdef_0000385723

23.

Goldin

C. D.

Katz

L. F.

(2008). The race between education and technology. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. http://books.google.com/books?id=yGlCFqnakCoC

24.

Habig

Gupta

Adams

J. D.

(2021). Disrupting deficit narratives in informal science education: Applying community cultural wealth theory to youth learning and engagement. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 16(2), 509–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-020-10014-8

25.

Hansen

M. J.

Palakal

M. J.

White

L. J.

(2024). The importance of STEM sense of belonging and academic hope in enhancing persistence for low-income, underrepresented STEM students. Journal for STEM Education Research, 7(2), 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-023-00096-8

26.

Hanson

(2008). Swimming against the tide: African American girls and science education. Temple Univ Press.

27.

Hill

Corbett

St. Rose

(2010). Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED509653.pdf

28.

Irizarry

(2021). On track or derailed? Race, advanced math, and the transition to high school. Socius, 7, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023120980293

29.

James

S. M.

Singer

S. R.

(2016). From the NSF: The national science foundation’s investments in broadening participation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education through research and capacity building. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(3), fe7. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0059

30.

Johnson

Elliott

(2020). Culturally relevant pedagogy: A model to guide cultural transformation in STEM departments. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 21(1), 10.1128/jmbe.v1121i1121.2097. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v21i1.2097

31.

Kaiser

Menkhoff

(2017). Does financial education impact financial literacy and financial behavior, and if so, when? The World Bank Economic Review, 31(3), 611–630. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhx018

32.

Kezar

Perez

R. J.

Kitchen

J. A.

Hallett

R. E.

(2021). Learning how to tailor programmatic offerings to support low-income, first-generation, and racially minoritized student success. Journal of Postsecondary Student Success, 1(1), 25–57. https://doi.org/10.33009/fsop_jpss127933

33.

Kruse

Starobin

S. S.

Chen

Baul

Santos Laanan

(2015). Impacts of intersection between social capital and finances on community college Students’ pursuit of STEM degrees. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 39(4), 324–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2014.981893

34.

Lane

T. B.

Id-Deen

(2023). Nurturing the capital within: A qualitative investigation of black women and girls in STEM summer programs. Urban Education, 58(6), 1298–1326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085920926225

35.

Lerman

Loprest

Kuehn

(2019). Training for Jobs of the Future: Improving Access, Certifying Skills, and Expanding Apprenticeship. https://www.urban.org/research/publication/training-jobs-future

36.

Wang

Xiao

Froyd

J. E.

Nite

S. B.

(2020). Research and trends in STEM education: A systematic analysis of publicly funded projects. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00213-8

37.

Linn

M. C.

Palmer

Baranger

Gerard

Stone

(2015). Undergraduate research experiences: Impacts and opportunities. Science, 347(6222), 1261757. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261757

38.

Loyalka

Liu

O. L.

Kardanova

Chirikov

Guo

Beteille

Tognatta

Ling

Federiakin

Wang

Khanna

Bhuradia

Shi

(2021). Skill levels and gains in university STEM education in China, India, Russia and the United States. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(7), 892–904. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01062-3

39.

Major

Godwin

(2018). Towards making the invisible engineer visible: A review of low-socioeconomic students’ barriers experiencing college STEM education. In 2018 IEEE frontiers in education conference (FIE).

40.

Marginson

(2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-7649-x

41.

Marginson

Tytler

Freeman

Roberts

(2013). STEM: Country comparisons. Australian Council of Learned Academies. www.acola.org.au

42.

Martin

J. P.

Stefl

S. K.

Cain

L. W.

Pfirman

A. L.

(2020). Understanding first-generation undergraduate engineering students’ entry and persistence through social capital theory. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00237-0

43.

McGee

E. O.

(2021). Black, Brown, Bruised: How racialized STEM education stifles innovation. Harvard Education Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=N94aEAAAQBAJ

44.

Mobley

Brawner

C. E.

(2019). “Life prepared me well for succeeding”: The enactment of community cultural wealth, experiential capital, and transfer student capital by first-generation engineering transfer students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 43(5), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2018.1484823

45.

Morales-Chicas

Gomez

Gussman

Kouyoumdjian

(2022). A cultural wealth approach to understanding Latin@s’ STEM mentee and mentor experiences. Equity & Excellence in Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2022.2047411

46.

Muller

Riegle-Crumb

Schiller

K. S.

Wilkinson

Frank

K. A.

(2010). Race and academic achievement in racially diverse high schools: Opportunity and stratification. Teachers College Record, 112(4), 1038–1063. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811011200406

47.

Museus

S. D.

Palmer

R. T.

Davis

R. J.

Maramba

D. C.

(2011). Racial and ethnic minority Students’ success in STEM education. ASHE higher Education Report, 36(6), 1–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/aehe.3606

48.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2024). K-12 STEM education and workforce development in rural areas. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/28269

49.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, & Medicine. (2016). Barriers and opportunities for 2-year and 4-year STEM degrees: Systemic change to support students’ diverse pathways. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/21739

50.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, & Medicine. (2018). Minority serving institutions: America's underutilized resource for strengthening the STEM workforce. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25257

51.

National Science Board. (2022). The State of U.S. Science and Engineering 2022. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20221

52.

National Science Board, National Science Foundation. (2021). The STEM Labor Force of Today: Scientists, Engineers, and Skilled Technical Workers. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20212

53.

Nguyen

T. D.

Kramer

J. W.

Evans

B. J.

(2019). The effects of grant aid on student persistence and degree attainment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 89(6), 831–874. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319877156

54.

Nguyen

H.-H. D.

Ryan

A. M.

(2008). Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1314–1334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012702

55.

Nhien

Perez-Felkner

(2024). Pathways into computing fields by Florida's community college students: An intersectional descriptive analysis. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2024.2425323

56.

Nix

Perez-Felkner

(2019). Difficulty orientations, gender, and race/ethnicity: An intersectional analysis of pathways to STEM degrees. Social Sciences, 8(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8020043

57.

OECD (2024). Education at a glance 2024: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.

58.

Palid

Cashdollar

Deangelo

Chu

Bates

(2023). Inclusion in practice: A systematic review of diversity-focused STEM programming in the United States. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00387-3

59.

Palmer

R. T.

Davis

R. J.

Moore

J. L.

III Hilton

(2010). A nation at risk: Increasing college participation and persistence among African American males to stimulate U.S. global competitiveness. Journal of African American Males in Education, 1(2), 105–124.

60.

Palmer

R. T.

Maramba

D. C.

Gasman

(Eds.). (2013). Fostering success of ethnic and racial minorities in STEM: The role of minority serving institutions. Routledge. https://books.google.com/books?id=eo6gPEFGbYUC

61.

Perez-Felkner

Erichsen

Chen

Ramirez Surmeier

Shore

(2025). Computing education interventions to increase gender equity from 2000 to 2020: A systematic literature review. Review of Educational Research, 95(3), 536–580. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241241536

62.

Ployhart

R. E.

Nyberg

A. J.

Reilly

Maltarich

M. A.

(2014). Human capital is dead; long live human capital resources!. Journal of Management, 40(2), 371–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313512152

63.

Quadlin

(2017). Funding sources, family income, and fields of study in college. Social Forces, 96(1), 91–120. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sox042

64.

Riegle-Crumb

King

Irizarry

(2019). Does STEM stand out? Examining racial/ethnic gaps in persistence across postsecondary fields. Educational Researcher, 48(3), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19831006

65.

Rincón

B. E.

George-Jackson

C. E.

(2016). STEM Intervention programs: Funding practices and challenges. Studies in Higher Education, 41(3), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.927845

66.

Robnett

R. D.

(2016). Gender bias in STEM fields: Variation in prevalence and links to STEM self-concept. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315596162

67.

Rodriguez

Hernandez-Hamed

(2020). Understanding unfulfilled AP potential across the participation pipeline by race and income. Teachers College Record, 122(9), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012200909

68.

Romero

A. L.

Cobian

K. P.

Martín

P. A.

(2025). Understanding the complexities of financial support for students in grant-funded STEMM training programs. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1445151

69.

Sahlberg

(2021). Finnish lessons 3.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press.

70.

Scheiner

McCrary-Dennis

Olawale

D. O.

Okoli

O. I.

(2014). NSF-retaining engineers through research entrepreneurship and advanced–materials training (RETREAT). American Society for Engineering Education.

71.

Schneider

Broda

Judy

Burkander

(2013). Pathways to college and STEM careers: Enhancing the high school experience. New Directions for Youth Development, 2013(140), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20076

72.

Scott

K. A.

White

M. A.

(2013). COMPUGIRLS’ standpoint: Culturally responsive computing and its effect on girls of color. Urban Education, 48(5), 657–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085913491219

73.

Sharma

Yarlagadda

P. K.

(2018). Perspectives of ‘STEM education and policies’ for the development of a skilled workforce in Australia and India. International Journal of Science Education, 40(16), 1999–2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1517239

74.

Smith

J. L.

Cech

Metz

Huntoon

Moyer

(2014). Giving back or giving up: Native American student experiences in science and engineering. Educational Publishing Foundation. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036945

75.

Smith

K. N.

Gayles

J. G.

(2018). “Girl power”: Gendered academic and workplace experiences of college women in engineering. Social Sciences (2076-0760), 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7010011

76.

Stevens

Andrade

Page

(2016). Motivating young native American students to pursue STEM learning through a culturally relevant science program. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(6), 947–960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9629-1

77.

Tan

J. R.

Gopinathan

(2000). Education reform in Singapore:Towards greater creativity and innovation? NIRA Review, 7(3), 5–10.

78.

Tashakkori

Norris

Searcy

M. E.

(2018). The components of a successful S-STEM program: What works at Appalachian state university. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM technical symposium on computer science education, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159600

79.

Taylor

J. A.

Kowalski

S. M.

Askinas

K. M.

Watson

(2023). Analyzing funding patterns in science education research: Establishing a baseline for improved monitoring of research to advance science education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), 100445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100445

80.

Tellhed

Bäckström

Björklund

(2017). Will I fit in and do well? The importance of social belongingness and self-efficacy for explaining gender differences in interest in STEM and HEED majors. Sex Roles, 77(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0694-y

81.

Tilbrook

Shifrer

(2022). Field-specific cultural capital and persistence in college majors. Social Science Research, 103, 102654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102654

82.

Tri-Agency Workforce Initiative. (2025). Linking education and workforce: Spurring economic growth across Texas. Texas Education Agency (TEA), the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB), and the Texas Workforce Commission (TWC). https://triagency.texas.gov/

83.

Urso

Kim

Cadenas

G. B.

Maia

Rickman

Klopp

S. Q.

Vasu

(2025). Hands-on acoustic impedance activity for high school aerospace education and training. In AIAA SCITECH 2025 Forum. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2025-2556

84.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Innovation and Improvement. (2016). Computer Science for All. https://innovation.ed.gov/what-we-do/stem/computer-science-for-all/

85.

Wang

Wickersham

Lee

S. Y.

Lor

N. B.

Gaskew

Prevost

(2020). The road to becoming a scientist: A mixed-methods investigation of supports and barriers experienced by first-year community college students. Teachers College Record, 122(2), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012200208

86.

Warburton

E. C.

Bugarin

Núñez

A.-M.

(2001). Bridging the gap: Academic preparation and postsecondary success of first-generation students. Statistical analysis report. Postsecondary education descriptive analysis reports. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2001/2001153.pdf

87.

Ward

Topham

Dixon

Peterson

Rieder

Duffin

Coburn

(2024). Culturally inclusive STEM learning: Mentored internships for native American undergraduates at a tribal college and a university. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 17(3), 443–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000413

88.

Watt

H. M. G.

Eccles

J. S.

(2008). Gender and occupational outcomes: Longitudinal assessments of individual, social, and cultural influences. American Psychological Association.

89.

Wilson

Z. S.

Iyengar

S. S.

Pang

S.-S.

Warner

I. M.

Luces

C. A.

(2012). Increasing access for economically disadvantaged students: The NSF/CSEM & S-STEM programs at Louisiana state university. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(5), 581–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9348-6

90.

Wilson

J. P.

Moritz

(2015). Helping high-needs schools prioritize CS education through teacher advocacy & experiences. ACM Inroads, 6(3), 73–74. https://doi.org/10.1145/2800790

91.

Wofford

A. M.

Perez-Felkner

Staudt Willet

Nhien

(2025). Geography of Computing Graduate Degree Opportunities: Examining the Characteristics of Minority-Serving Institutions. Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-025-09848-4

92.

Yan

Chen

(2024). Global comparison of STEM education (pp. 389–443). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5861-0_9

93.

Zhang

(2011). Does merit-based aid affect degree production in STEM fields? Evidence from Georgia and Florida. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(4), 389–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2011.11777210

94.

Zhao

Perez-Felkner

(2024). The impact of merit aid on STEM Major choices: A propensity score approach. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 01623737241254842. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737241254842

Public Financing of STEM Education: Research Evidence and Policy Recommendations

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References