This study explores how the intersection of race and emotions, or racialized emotions, influenced Black high school students’ civic reasoning. Drawing from the students’ photo-elicitation and focus group interviews, we found that racialized emotions not only informed how students conceptualized civic engagement during the Civil Rights Movement but also shaped their civic participation and their critiques of legal systems and other democratic processes. These findings highlight the significant role that racialized emotions had on students’ civic reasoning, suggesting that the intersection of race and emotions is not just a peripheral aspect of civic education but rather a central component. We contend that ignoring emotions in civics instruction, standards, and curriculum not only diminishes students’ learning experiences but can also be harmful and inauthentic. To address this issue, we offer strategies for educators on how to center students’ racialized emotions in their civics instruction.
BartonK. C.McCullyA. (2010). “You can form your own point of view”: Internally persuasive discourse in Northern Ireland students’ encounters with history. Teachers College Record, 112(1), 142–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811011200102
2.
BlevinsB.LeCompteK.WellsS. (2016). Innovations in civic education: Developing civic agency through action civics. Theory & Research in Social Education, 44(3), 344-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1203853
3.
BolerM. (1999). Feeling power: Emotions and education. Routledge.
4.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2019). Feeling race: Theorizing the racial economy of emotions. American Sociological Review, 84(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418816958
5.
BrugarK. A. (2021). Centering history instruction around primary sources. In BrugarK. A.RobertsK. L. (Eds.), Real classrooms, real teachers: The C3 inquiry in practice (pp. 33–45). Information Age Publishing.
6.
BuseyC. L.Dowie-ChinT. (2021). The making of global Black anti-citizen/citizenship: Situating BlackCrit in global citizenship research and theory. Theory & Research in Social Education, 49(2), 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2020.1869632
CruzB.ThorntonS. (2009). Social studies for English language learners: Teaching social studies that matters. Social Education, 73(6), 271–274.
10.
DuncanK. E. (2023). Civic engagement in communities of color: Pedagogy for learning and life in a more expansive democracy. Teachers College Press.
11.
DurlakJ. A.MahoneyJ. L.BoyleA. E. (2022). What we know, and what we need to find out about universal, school-based social and emotional learning programs for children and adolescents: A review of meta-analyses and directions for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 148(11), 765–782. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000383
12.
EvansR.AveryP. G.PedersonP. V. (1999). Taboo topics: Cultural restraint on teaching social issues. The Social Studies, 90(5), 218–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377999909602419
13.
FlanaganC. (2013). Teenage citizens: The political theories of the young. Harvard University Press.
14.
GreenT. K. (2012). Racial emotion in the workplace. Southern California Law Review (86)5, 959-1023.
15.
HallJ. D. (2005). The long civil rights movement and the political uses of the past. The Journal of American History, 91(4), 1233–1263. https://doi.org/10.2307/3660172
HarrisL. M. (2014). Making connections for themselves and their students: Examining teachers’ organization of world history. Theory & Research in Social Education, 42(3), 336–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2014.937547
18.
HarrisA.LeonardoZ. (2018). Intersectionality, race-gender subordination, and education. Review of Research in Education, 42(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18759071
19.
HessD. E.McAvoyP. (2015). The political classroom: Evidence and ethics in democratic education. Routledge.
20.
HolbeinJ. B.HillygusD. S. (2020). Making young voters: Converting civic attitudes into civic action. Cambridge University Press.
21.
HurworthR. (2004). Photo-interviewing. Qualitative Research Journal, 4(1), 73–79.
22.
JacobsenR.HalvorsenA. L.FrasierA. S.SchmittA.CroccoM.SegallA. (2018). Thinking deeply, thinking emotionally: How high school students make sense of evidence. Theory & Research in Social Education, 46(2), 232–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2018.1425170
23.
JagersR. J.Rivas-DrakeD.WilliamsB. (2019). Transformative social and emotional learning (SEL): Toward SEL in service of educational equity and excellence. Educational Psychologist, 54(3), 162–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1623032
24.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (2000). Civil political discourse in a democracy: The contribution of psychology. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 6(4), 291–317. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327949PAC0604_01
25.
JonesB. L. (2022). Feeling fear as power and oppression: An examination of Black and white fear in Virginia’s US history standards and curriculum framework. Theory & Research in Social Education, 50(3), 431–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2022.2069529
26.
JonesB. L. (2023). Learning from black perspectives: A case for making space to feel race in high school U.S. history classrooms (Publication No. 30529252) [Doctoral Dissertation, Michigan State University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
27.
JonesB. L. (2024). Critically analyzing historical sources for racialized emotions (CARE). Social Education.
28.
KeeganP. (2021). Critical affective civic literacy: A framework for attending to political emotion in the social studies classroom. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 45(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2020.06.003
29.
LaMotheR. (2012). Potential space: Creativity, resistance, and resiliency in the face of racism. The Psychoanalytic Review, 99(6), 851–876. https://doi.org/10.1521/prev.2012.99.6.851
30.
LeeC. D.WhiteG.DongD. (Eds.). (2021a). Educating for civic reasoning and discourse. National Academy of Education.
31.
LeeC. D.WhiteG.DongD. (Eds.). (2021b). Executive summary. Educating for civic reasoning and discourse. Committee on Civic Reasoning and Discourse. National Academy of Education.
32.
LeCompteK.BlevinsB.Riggers-PiehlT. (2020). Developing civic competence through action civics: A longitudinal look at the data. Journal of Social Studies Research, 44(1), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2019.03.002
33.
LevinsonM. (2014). Action civics in the classroom. Social Education78(2), 68–70.
34.
LevyB. L. M.SolomonB. G.Collet-GildardL. (2016). Fostering political interest among youth during the 2012 presidential election: Instructional opportunities and challenges in a swing state. Educational Researcher, 45(9), 483–495. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0013189X16683402
35.
LinA. R.LawrenceJ. F.SnowC. E.TaylorK. S. (2016). Assessing adolescents’ communicative self-efficacy to discuss controversial issues: Findings from a randomized study of the word generation program. Theory & Research in Social Education, 44(3), 316–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1203852
36.
MattsonR. (2009). Using visual historical methods in K–12 classroom: Tactical heuristics. In DesaiD.HamlinJ.MattsonR. (Eds)., History as art, art as history: Contemporary art and social studies education (pp. 15–34). Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203870303
37.
MilesJ. (2019). Seeing and feeling difficult history: A case study of how Canadian students make sense of photographs of Indian Residential Schools. Theory & Research in Social Education, 47(4), 472–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2019.1626783
38.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.
MurthyV. H. (2022). The mental health of minority and marginalized young people: An opportunity for action. Public Health Reports, 137(4), 613–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549221102390
41.
National Center for Education Statistics (2022). Common core data of public schools. https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/
42.
National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS) (2013). The college, career, and civic life (C3) framework for social studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of k-12 civics, economics, geography, and history. National Council for the Social Studies.
43.
RabieeF. (2004). Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 63(4), 655–660. https://doi.org/10.1079/PNS2004399
44.
RichardV. M.LahmanM. K. (2015). Photo-elicitation: Reflexivity on method, analysis, and graphic portraits. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2013.843073
45.
RodriguezN. N.VickeryA. (2020). Much bigger than a hamburger: Disrupting problematic picturebook depictions of the civil rights movement. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 22(2), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.18251/ijme.v22i2.2243
46.
RoseG. (2023). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (5th ed.). Sage.
47.
SheppardM.KatzD.GroslandT. (2015). Conceptualizing emotions in social studies education. Theory & Research in Social Education, 43(2), 147–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2015.1034391
48.
SmithJ. A.FieldsendM. (2021). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In CamicP.M. (Ed.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 147–166). American Psychological Association.
49.
StarrL. R.HershenbergR.ShawZ. A.LiY. I.SanteeA. C. (2020). The perils of murky emotions: Emotion differentiation moderates the prospective relationship between naturalistic stress exposure and adolescent depression. Emotion, 20(6), 927–938. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000630
50.
SucharC. S. (1989). The sociological imagination and documentary still photography: The interrogatory stance. Visual Studies4(2), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725868908583637
51.
SwalwellK.PellegrinoA. M.ViewJ. L. (2015). Teachers’ curricular choices when teaching histories of oppressed people: Capturing the US civil rights movement. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 39(2), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2014.11.003
52.
ThompsonK.AustinH. (2014). Examining the evidence: Seven strategies for teaching with primary sources. Capstone.
53.
TuckE.YangK. W. (2014). Unbecoming claims: Pedagogies of refusal in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 811–818. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414530265
WiseC. N.SandırazB. D.McCormickM. M.HalvorsenA. L. (2024). Powering up: Interdisciplinary project-based learning for young engaged citizens. Young Children, 79(1), 22–29.
56.
ZarrettN.EcclesJ. (2006). The passage to adulthood: Challenges of late adolescence. New Directions for Youth Development, 111(7), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.179
57.
ZembylasM. (2007). Theory and methodology in researching emotions in education. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 30(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437270701207785
