This study sought to identify content on the federal budget, national debt, and budget deficit in the 12 most commonly used high school and college-level economics textbooks. Our systematic review of these sources leads to two key findings: (1) Textbooks are similar in how they represent fiscal policy yet treat the federal budget, deficit, and debt differently across the sample, and (2) Textbooks treat the federal budget, budget deficit, and national debt as theoretical, without an examination of values and systemic electoral and budgetary politics. These findings lead us to argue that curriculum is needed that will permit a careful examination of how everyday citizens can gain knowledge, acknowledge values, and work towards a reasoned and realitybased view of what is at stake with regard to these issues in the 21st Century.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BallD., & CohenD. (1996). Reform by the book: What is: Or might be: The role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform?Educational Researcher, 25 (9), 6-8, 14.
2.
BaumolW. & BlinderA. (2006). Economics. New York: South-Western College.
3.
BergerA. (2000). Media and communications research methods. London: Sage Publications.
4.
Bowker, LLC. (2010). Pubtrack. Retrieved from http://www.pubtrackonline.com/products/higher.asp?1oc1=education
5.
ClaytonG. (1995). Economics. New York: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill.
6.
ColanderD. (2001). Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill College.
7.
Congressional Budget Office. (2012). An analysis of the president's 2013 budget. Retrieved May 8, 2012 from http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/03-16-APB1.pdf
8.
Congressional Budget Office (2011). Budget and economic information. Retrieved from http://www.cbo.gov/budget/budget.cfm
9.
Congressional Budget Office (2010). Federal debt and the risk of a fiscal crisis. Economic and Budget Issue Brief (July 27, 2010). Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office.
10.
Council for Economic Education. (2011). Survey of the States 2011: The State of Economic and Personal Finance Education in our Nation's Schools. Retrieved May 8, 2012 from http://www.councilforeconed.org/news-information/survey-of-the-states/
11.
EtizoniA. (1967). Mixed-scanning: A “third” approach to decision making. Public Administration Review,27 (5), 385-392.
12.
HeyneP., BoettkeP., & PrychitkoD. (2005). The Economic Way of Thinking. New York: Prentice Hall.
13.
HolstiO. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
14.
HubbardG., & O'BrienA. (2007). Economics. New York: Prentice Hall.
15.
KrippendorfK. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
KrugmanP., & WellsR. (2006). Economics. New York: Worth Publishers.
17.
MankiwN. G. (2007). Essentials of Economics. New York: South-Western College.
18.
MarriA., CroccoM., ShuttleworthJ.GaudelliW., & GrolnickM. (2012). Analyzing social issues related to teaching about the federal budget, national debt, and budget deficit in fifty state high school social studies standards. The Social Studies, 103 (4), 133-139.
19.
MarriA., AhnM., CroccoM., GrolnickM., GaudelliW., & WalkerE. (2011). Teaching the federal budget, national debt, and budget deficit: Findings from high school teachers. The Social Studies, 102 (5), 204-210.
20.
McCammonL. (1999). Introducing social stratification and inequality: An active learning technique. Teaching Sociology, 27 (1), 44-54.
21.
McConnellC., BrueS., & FlynnS. (2008). Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
22.
MillerS., & VanFossenP. (2008). Recent research on the teaching and learning of pre-collegiate economics. In LevstikL. & TysonC. (Eds.), Handbook of research in social studies education (pp. 284-304). New York: Routledge.
23.
MosherC. (1980). The changing responsibilities and tactics of the federal government. Public Administration Review, 40 (6), 541-548.
24.
Peter G. Peterson Foundation. (2011). The solutions intiative. New York: PGPF.
25.
PikettyT., & SaezE. (2010). Income Inequality in the United States: 1913–1998. In AtkinsonA.B. and PikettyT. (Eds.), Top Incomes: A Global Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
26.
SamuelsonP. (2005). Essentials of Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
27.
SchillerB. (2009). Essentials of Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
28.
SlavinS. (2009). Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
29.
TuckerI. (2008). Survey of Economics. New York: South-Western College.
30.
Van FossenP., & ShiveleyJ. (2003). A content analysis of internet sessions presented at the National Council for Social Studies annual meeting, 1995-2002. Theory and Research in Social Education, 31 (4), 502-521.
