Using Kelly’s (1986) four perspectives on teacher disclosure, I analyze the quality of instruction present in the classrooms of six high school government teachers during their coverage of the 2008 Presidential Election, an event that received widespread media attention and elicited strong feelings on both sides of the political spectrum. Four of the teachers chose to remain neutral throughout their coverage of the election by not revealing their candidate preference to their students, while the remaining two teachers disclosed their preferences early in the semester, although in strikingly different ways. The findings of this study offer a practical approach to evaluating the “disclosure dilemma” encountered by many pre-service and practicing teachers during their classroom instruction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnyonJ. (1981). Social class and school knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 11, 3- 42.
2.
AppleM. W. (1979). Ideology and curriculum. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
3.
AppleM. W. (1982). Education and power. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
4.
AveryP. G.SullivanJ.L.SmithE. S., & SandellS. (1996). Issues-centered approaches to teaching civics and government. In EvansR. W. & SaxeD. W. (Eds.), Handbook on teaching social issues (pp. 199-210). Washington, D. C.: National Council for the Social Studies.
5.
AyersW. (1998). Teaching as an ethical enterprise. The Educational Forum, 63, 52-57.
6.
AyersW. (2006). The hope and practice of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 267-277.
7.
AyersW.HuntJ.A. & QuinnT. (Eds.). (1998). Teaching for social justice: A democracy and education reader. New York: Teachers College Press.
8.
BrandtR. B. (1959). Ethical theory: The problems of normative and critical ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
9.
BrophyJ. (1979). Teacher behavior and its effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 733-750.
10.
BulloughR. V.GoldsteinL.&Holt, L. (1984). Ideology, teacher role, and resistance. Teachers College Record, 86, 339-358.
11.
CamiciaS. P. (2008). Deciding what is a controversial issue: A case study of social studies curriculum controversy. Theory and Research in Social Education, 35, 290-307.
12.
CarspeckenP. F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A practical guide. New York: Routledge.
13.
CountsG. S. (1932). Dare the school build a new social order?New York: John Day.
14.
DenzinN. K.&Lincoln, Y. S. (2003). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In DenzinN. K. & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 1-45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
ElliotJ. (1973). Neutrality, rationality and the role of the teacher. In PetersR. S. , HurstP. H., & SockettH. T. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
16.
FoucaultM. (1991). Govemmentality. In BurchellG., GordonC., & MillerP. (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in govemmentality (pp. 87-104). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
FriereP. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed. (RamosM. B., Trans.). New York: Continuum. (Original work published 1970)
18.
GeertzC. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
19.
GutmannA. (1987). Democratic education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
GutmannA.&Thompson D., (2004). Why deliberative democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
HabermasJ. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action, volume one: Reason and the rationalization of society. (McCarthyT., Trans.). Boston: Beacon. (Original work published 1981).
22.
HessD. (2008). Controversial issues and democratic discourse. In LevstikL. S. & TysonC. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research in social studies education (pp. 124-136). New York: Routledge.
23.
HessD.&GanzlerL., (2007). Patriotism and ideological diversity in the classroom. In WestheimerJ. (Ed.) , Pledging allegiance: The politics of patriotism in America’s schools (pp. 131-138). New York: Teachers College Press.
24.
HessD.&PosseltJ., (2002). How high school students experience and learn from the discussion of controversial public issues. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 17, 283-314.
25.
HessD. E. (2002). Discussing controversial public issues in secondary social studies classrooms: Learning from skilled teachers. Theory and Research in Social Education, 30, 10-41.
26.
HessD. E. (2004). Controversies about controversial issues in democratic education. PS: Political Science & Politics, 37, 257-261.
27.
HessD. E. (2005). How do teachers’ political views influence teaching about controversial issues? Social Education, 69, 47-48.
28.
HessD. E. (2009). Controversy in the classroom: The democratic power of discussion. New York: Routledge.
29.
HessD. E.&McAvoyP., (2009). To disclose or not to disclose: A controversial choice for teachers. In HessD. E., Controversy in the classroom: The democratic power of discussion. New York: Routledge.
30.
JensenR. (2007). Patriotism is a bad idea at a dangerous time. In WestheimerJ. (Ed.), Pledging allegiance: The politics of patriotism in America’s schools (pp. 75-86). New York: Teachers College Press.
31.
JournellA. W. (2009). Teaching politics: A study of high school government courses and the 2008 Presidential Election. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
32.
JoumellW. (2010a). The governmentality of secondary education: Competing influences in three schools during the 2008 Presidential Election. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO.
33.
JoumellW. (2010b). The influence of high-stakes testing on high school teachers’ willingness to incorporate current political events into the curriculum. The High School Journal, 93, 111-125.
34.
JoumellW. (2011). Teaching the 2008 Presidential Election at three demographically diverse schools: An exercise in neoliberal govemmentality. Educational Studies: A Journal of the American Educational Studies Association, 47, 133-159.
35.
JoumellW. (in press). Teachers’ controversial issue decisions related to race, gender, and religion during the 2008 Presidential Election. Theory and Research in Social Education.
36.
KahneJ.ChiB.&MiddaughE., (2006). Building social capital for civic and political engagement: The potential of high-school civics courses. Canadian Journal of Education, 29, 387-409.
37.
KellyD. M.&BrandesG. M., (2001). Shifting out of “neutral”: Beginning teachers’ struggles with teaching for social justice. Canadian Journal of Education, 26, 437-454.
38.
KellyT. E. (1986). Discussing controversial issues: Four perspectives on the teacher’s role. Theory and Research in Social Education, 14, 113-138.
39.
LincolnY. S.&GubaE. G., (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40.
MaxwellJ. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 279-300.
41.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
42.
Miller-LaneJ.DentonE.&May, A. (2006). Social studies teachers’ views on committed impartiality and discussion. Social Studies Research and Practice, 1, 30-44.
43.
NiemiN. S.& NiemiR.G. (2007). Partisanship, participation, and political trust as taught (or not) in high school history and government classes. Theory and Research in Social Education, 35, 32-61.
44.
OultonC.DayV.DillonJ.&GraceM., (2004). Controversial issues— teachers’ attitudes and practices in the context of citizenship education. Oxford Review of Education, 30, 489-507.
45.
PalmerJ. (1983). Who should define the meaning of citizenship? Journal of Teacher Education, 34(6), 51-53.
46.
ParkerW. C.&HessD., (2001). Teaching with and for discussion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 273-289.
47.
PasseJ.&EvansR. W., (1996). Discussion methods in an issued-centered curriculum. In EvansR. W. & SaxeD. W. (Eds.), Handbook of teaching social issues (pp. 81-88). Washington, D. C.: Ntional Council for the Social Studies.
48.
ReichW. (2007). Deliberative democracy in the classroom: A sociological view. Journal of Educational Theory, 57, 187-197.
49.
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
ThorntonS. J. (1991). Teacher as curricular-instructional gatekeeper in social studies. In ShaverJ. P. (Ed.), Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning (pp. 237-248). New York: MacMillan.
51.
WestheimerJ. (2006). Politics and patriotism in education. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 608-620.
52.
WhiteS. K. (1988). The recent work of Jurgen Habermas: Reason, justice, and modernity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53.
ZinnH. (2005). A people’s history of the United States: 1492-present. New York: Harper Perennial Modem Classics.
