Building on previous research conducted over the past thirty years, this study attempts to inquire about students’ attitudes towards social studies. Using a phenomenological research approach, two groups of eighth and eleventh grade students were interviewed. A total of forty-eight students were selected to participate in the study.
With teacher and learning variables, previous research, and the research questions in mind, there was an emergence of two dominant themes that related to the analysis of the information provided by the students. The first theme suggested active involvement and teacher enthusiasm led to positive images of social studies by middle and high school students. While the second theme suggested perceived utilitarian value or lack of it, was a major factor regarding both middle and high school students’ views of social studies. Generally, students were not as negative toward social studies as indicated in previous research studies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BonwellC. & EisonJ. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classrooms. Washington D.C.Eric Clearinghouse on Higher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 340272).
2.
BosowskiE.F. (1981). The formation of cognitive images of the world: An analysis of sketch maps. Unpublished dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder.
3.
ByerJ.L. (1999). Measuring the effects of students ’ perceptions of classroom social climate on academic selfconcept. Paper presented to the annual meeting of Louisiana Education Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED429088).
4.
ChuckleyK. (1997). The first seven and the eighth. Educational Leadership ,9, 8- 13.
5.
CorbinS. (1994). Lessons from the classroom: Male and female high school students’ attitudes toward and achievement in social studies. New York: Research and Evaluation Consultant.
6.
CurryR.L. & HughesH. (1965). Subject areas preferred by high school juniors. Peabody Journal of Education, 42, 236- 240.
7.
DeMossS. (1998). A conceptual analysis of a parent-culture’s perceptions of parent involvement. Unpublished dissertation, University of Oklahoma, Norman.
8.
DienerE. & CrandallR. (1978). Ethic in social and behavioral research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
EllisA., FoutsJ. & GlennA. (1992). Teaching and learning social studies. New York: Harper-Collins Press.
11.
FernandezC., MasseyG.C. & DombuschS.M. (1975). High school students’ perceptions of social studies. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Research and Development in Teaching. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED113241).
12.
FernandezC., MasseyG.C. & DombuschS.M. (1976). High school students’ perceptions of social studies. The Social Studies, 57 (2), 51-57.
13.
FisherD.L. & FrasherB.J. (1984). Using the short form of the classroom environment scale to assess and improve classroom psychological environment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Dallas, TX.
14.
FoutsJ.T. (1987). High school social studies classrooms and attitudes: A cluster analysis approach. Theory and Research in Social Education, 15 (2), 105-114.
15.
FoutsJ.T., ChanJ.C. & BiaoL. (1993). Secondary social education in the People’s Republic of China: A quantitative study of classroom environments in the Guangdong Province. Theory and Research in Social Education, 10, 1-26.
16.
FraserB.J. (1981). Deterioration in high school students’ attitudes toward the social studiesThe Social Studies, 72, 65-68.
17.
GardnerH. (1983). Frames of Mind. New York: Basic Books.
18.
GreenblattE.L. (1962). An analysis of school subject preferences of elementary school children of the middle grades. Journal of Educational Research, 55, 554-556.
19.
HahnC. (1982). Are there gender differences in high school economics in the eighties?The Journal of Economic Education, 14, 57-65.
20.
HaladynaT.M. (1982). Correlates of attitude toward the social studies. Theory and Research, 10, 1-26.
21.
HaladynaT.M. & ShaughnessyJ.M. (1982). A manual for the inventory of affective aspects of schooling. Monmouth, OR: Teaching Research.
22.
HaladynaT.M. & ThompsonG.P. (1979). The attitudes of elementary school and subject matters. Journal of Experimental Education, 48, 18-23.
23.
HermanW.L. (1965). How intermediate children rank the subjects. Journal of Educational Research, 58, 225-228.
24.
HessM. (2001). Teaching student to discuss controversial public issues. Bloomington, IN. ERIC Clearing House for Social Studies/Social Science Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 334658).
25.
InskeepJ. & RowlandR. (1963). An analysis of school subject preferences of elementary school children of the middle grades: Another look. Journal of Educational Research, 56, 435-436.
26.
JersildA.T. (1949). Children’s interests and what they suggest for education. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.
McGowanT.M., SuttonA.M. & SmithP.G. (1990). Instructional elements influencing elementary students attitudes toward social studies. Theory and Research in Social Education, 18, 37-52.
29.
McTeerJ.H. (1986). Gender differences in relationship to likes and dislikes of four subject areas. High School Journal, 69, 260-263.
30.
McTeerJ.H., BlantonF.L. & LeeH.W. (1975). The relationship of selected variables to student interest in social studies in comparison with other academic areas. Journal of Educational Research, 67, 238-240.
31.
McTeerJ.H. (1978) Differences in students’ interest toward five areas of the social studies. (ERIC Reproduction Sen-ice No. ED161807).
32.
McTeerJ.H., , (1979). Student interest in social studies content and methodology. (ERIC Reproduction Sen-ice No. ED139712).
33.
MerriamS.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
34.
MillsC.J. & DurdenW.G. (1992). Cooperative learning and ability grouping: An issue of choice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36 (1), 11-16.
NiemiR.G. & ChapmanC. (1999). The civic development of 9th through 12th grade students in the United States: 1996. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
37.
SchugM.C.ToddR.J. & BeeryR. (1982). Why kids don’t like social studies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council for the Social Studies. Boston, MA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Scnice No. ED224765).
38.
ShaughnessyJ.M. & HaladynaT.M. (1985). Research on student attitude toward social studies. Social Education, 49, 692-695.
39.
SlavinR.E. (1991). Synthesis of research on cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 48 (5), 71-82.
40.
SlavinR.E. (1994). A practical guide to cooperative learning. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon Press.
41.
SilerC.R. (1988). Spatial dynamics: An alternative teaching tool in social studies. Bloomington. In ERIC Clearinghouse for social studies/social science education. (ERIC Reproduction No. ED 415179).
42.
SylwesterR. (2000). A biological brain in a cultural classroom: applying biological research in classroom management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
43.
WheelerR.C. (1992). A comparison of the effects and competitive grouping situationson perceptions, attitudes and achievement of elementary school students engaged in social studies inquiry activities. Unpublished dissertation, University of Minnesota.
44.
WheelerR.C. & RyanR.L. (1973). Effects of cooperative and competitive grouping situations on the perceptions, attitudes and achievement of elementary school students engaged in social studies inquiry activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 402-407.
45.
ZevinJ. (1983). Future citizens: children and politics. Social Education, 10(3), 119- 126.
