This paper describes the theoretical framework, process, and results of a new instructional approach, the political prudential model (PPM) that may improve political competence among students. Initially, the author identifies why the model is needed. The texts and ideas of four prominent political scientists that undergird the PPM are briefly reviewed. A description of how the model was implemented and what resulted are then elaborated. Finally, the author offers some thoughts on how the approach might be improved.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerryJ.M. (1996). The interest group society. New York: Longman.
2.
BimbaumJ.H. & MurrayA.S. (1987). Showdown at Gucci Gulch. New York: Random House.
3.
CrottyW. (1984). American parties in decline. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
4.
DahlR.A. (1966). The American oppositions: Affirmation and denial. In RobertA. Dahl (Ed.), Political Oppositions in Western Democracies (pp. 34-69). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5.
DahlR. A. (1961). Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven: Yale University Press.
6.
DahlR.A. (1956). A preface to democratic theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
DeweyJ. (1927). The public and its problems. Athens, OH: Swallow Press.
8.
DixonD.A. (2000). A political prudential model for social studies instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
9.
DixonD.A. (1996). Teaching democracy as a practical science: Reorganizing the curriculum at institutions of higher education for active citizenship. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
10.
DownsA. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
11.
DoyleW. (1990/1989). The oxford history of the French revolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
DyeT.R. (1992). Understanding public policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13.
EngleS.H. & OchoaA.S. (1988). Education for democratic citizenship: Decision making in the social studies. New York: Teachers College Press.
14.
EpsteinS. (1996). Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
FritschlerA.L. (1989/1969). Smoking and politics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Simon & Schuster.
16.
GuinierL. (1994). The tyranny of the majority. New York: The Free Press.
17.
HahnC. & Tomey-PurtaJ. (1999). The IEA civic education project: National and international perspectives. Social Education, 65(7), 425-431.
18.
HeilbronerR. & BernsteinP. (1989). The debt and the deficit. New York: W.W. Norton
19.
HuntM.P. & MetcalfL.E. (1955). Teaching high school social studies: Problems of reflective thinking and social understanding.Harper & Brothers Publishers.
20.
HylandJ.L. (1995). Democratic theory: The philosophical foundations. New York: Manchester University Press.
21.
KeyV.O. (1949). Southern politics: In nation and state. New York: Random House.
22.
KuhnD.WeinstockM. & Flaton. (1994). Historical reasoning as theory-evidence coordination. In Mario Carretero and Voss James (Eds.), Cognitive and Instructional Processes in History and the Social Sciences (pp. 377-402). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23.
KyvigD.E. (1979). Repealing national prohibition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
LippmannW. (1922). Public opinion. New York: The Free Press.
25.
MadisonJ. (1787/1961). Federalist no. 10. In ClintonRossiter (Ed.), The Federalist Papers (pp. 77-84). New York: New American Library.
26.
MansbridgeJJ. (1983). Beyond adversary democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
MathewsD. (1994). Politics for people: Finding a responsible public voice. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
28.
McCordW. & McCordJ. (1960). Origins of alcoholism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
29.
NewmannF.M. (1975). Education for citizen action. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
30.
NewmannF.M. & OliverD.W. (1970). Clarifying public controversy: An approach to teaching social studies. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
31.
OliverD.W. & ShaverJ.P. (1966). Teaching public issues in the high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
32.
ParkerW.C. & ZumetaW. (1999). Toward an aristocracy of everyone: Policy study in the high school curriculum. Theory and Research in Social Education, 27(1), 9-44.
33.
PatemanC. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
RedmanE. (1973). The dance of legislation. New York: Simon & Schuster Inc.
35.
SansoneS.C. (1999). Get your students involved in civics. Social Education, 63(4), 228-232.
36.
SchattschneiderE.E. (1975). The semisovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
37.
ShaverJ.P. (1996). Afterword. In EvansR.W., & SaxeD.W. (Eds.). Handbook on teaching social issues (pp. 380-386). Washington, D.C.: National Council for the Social Studies.
38.
TheisenR. (2000). Social studies education: A challenge, a choice, a commitment. Social Education, 64(1), 6-7, 63-64.
39.
TrumanD.B. (1951). The governmental process: Political interests and public opinion. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
40.
VossJ.F.PerkinsD.N. & SegalJ.W. (1991) Informal reasoning and education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41.
WattenbergM.P. (1984). The decline of American political parties: 1952-1984. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
42.
WhalenC. & WhalenB. (1985). The longest debate: A legislative history of the 1964 civil rights act. New York: New American Library.
43.
YankelovichD. (1991). Coming to public judgment: Making democracy work in a complex world. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
