Abstract
In India there is a lamentable absence of planned historical writing, and in such writing as there is, a social perspective, in which the past’s links with the present are grasped, is often lacking. The ‘People’s History of India’ represents a welcome step; but it too makes substantive concessions to conventional archaeology and history. The titles Prehistory and Indus Civilization themselves are indicative of such concessions. Societies with modest archaeological remains are as important for us as those with more substantive ones. We need also to work back from how our people today live and think, in the manner of H.D. Sankalia and D.D. Kosambi.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
