Abstract
The aim of this article is to examine educational technologies that positively influence the development of critical and creative thinking among students in higher education institutions. The study explores the potential of using modern digital tools to enhance students’ cognitive skills and foster a new approach to learning focused on practical tasks and innovative methods. The methodology involved an experiment conducted with 60 fourth-year students at Kyrgyz State University named after I. Arabaev. The experiment employed pedagogical technologies, including the flipped classroom model, the Case method and artificial intelligence (AI) tools. These approaches enabled students to actively engage with the material, develop cognitive abilities, and deepen their understanding of the educational process. The study’s primary findings indicate that the use of educational robots significantly enhances students’ levels of critical and creative thinking. During the experiment, students who worked with robots demonstrated superior performance in areas such as solving complex problems, improving programming skills and developing algorithmic thinking. The increased effectiveness of the educational process is attributed to the interactive and practice-oriented nature of robotics, which enables students to not only acquire theoretical knowledge but also apply it in practical contexts. Furthermore, participation in such processes fosters the development of additional skills, including teamwork, rapid decision-making and adaptability to changing conditions. A notable feature of using digital technologies in education is the substantial motivation they inspire in students. This is evidenced by their heightened activity, greater engagement with the subject, and improved performance in task completion, which collectively contribute to better assimilation of the material. The results of the study confirm that integrating educational robots into the learning process can significantly enhance the development of critical and creative thinking among students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
