Integration of computational data science (CDS) into the university curriculum offers several advantages for students, faculty and the institution. This article discusses the benefits to students of introducing CDS into the university curriculum with a focus on developing skills in cheminformatics, data analysis, structure–activity relationships, modelling and simulation. Moreover, CDS can enable students to engage with complex chemical and toxicological data in new and dynamic ways, helping them to develop a more nuanced understanding of the potential hazards and risks associated with different chemicals and substances. On the other hand, it can foster greater collaboration between students and faculty and with external partners in industry and government. This can lead to the development of more effective and efficient toxicological testing methods and tools to screen chemicals for potential hazards and aid the development of environmentally friendly chemicals. Overall, the integration of CDS into the university curriculum will help prepare the next generation of scientists giving them a competitive edge to make considerable contributions to green chemistry, designing safer chemicals and non-animal testing methods. It will enable them to tackle modern challenges facing society including identifying safer and more sustainable chemicals and predicting the health and environmental impacts of novel chemical substances.
AnastasN., & MaertensA. (2018). Integrating the principles of toxicology into a chemistry curriculum. In TörökB. & DransfieldT.(Eds.), Green chemistry: An inclusive approach (pp. 91–108). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809270-5.00004-2
2.
ClaussA. D., & NelsenS. F. (2009). Integrating computational molecular modeling into the undergraduate organic chemistry curriculum. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(8), 955–958.
3.
DongL.-K., LiZ.-H., & ZhangS.-Y. (2021). Using computational chemistry to improve students’ multidimensional understanding of complex electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions: Further analysis of the solvent effect, temperature influence, and kinetic behaviors. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(10), 3226–3236. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00252
4.
EarlB. L., EmersonD. W., JohnsonB. J., & TitusR. L. (1994). Teaching practical computer skills to chemistry majors. Journal of Chemical Education, 71(12), 1065. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed071p1065
5.
EilksI., & LinkwitzM. (2022). Greening the chemistry curriculum as a contribution to education for sustainable development: When and how to start?Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 37, 100662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2022.100662
6.
EsselmanB. J., & HillN. J. (2016). Integration of computational chemistry into the undergraduate organic chemistry laboratory curriculum. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(5), 932–936. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00815
7.
GriegerK., HillB., & LeontyevA. (2022). Exploring curriculum adoption of green and sustainable chemistry in undergraduate organic chemistry courses: Results from a national survey in the United States. Green Chemistry, 24(22), 8770–8782. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2GC02999E
8.
GrushowA., & ReevesM. S.(Eds.). (2019). Using computational methods to teach chemical principles: Overview. In Using computational methods to teach chemical principles (pp. 1–10). American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2019-1312.ch001
9.
JonesM. B. (2001). Molecular modeling in the undergraduate chemistry curriculum. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(7), 867.
10.
KafaiY. B., & ProctorC. (2022). A revaluation of computational thinking in K–12 education: Moving toward computational literacies. Educational Researcher, 51(2), 146–151. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211057904
11.
KelleyE. W. (2023). Computer-aided drug design project for introductory high school students. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(3), 1179–1188. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00989
12.
KiteV., ParkS., & WiebeE. (2021). The code-centric nature of computational thinking education: A review of trends and issues in computational thinking education research. SAGE Open, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211016418
13.
KurokiN., MochizukiY., & MoriH. (2023). Practical computational chemistry course for a comprehensive understanding of organic, inorganic, and physical chemistry: From molecular interactions to chemical reactions. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(2), 647–654. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00837
14.
LehtolaS., & KarttunenA. J. (2022). Free and open source software for computational chemistry education. WIREs Computational Molecular Science, 12(5), e1610. http://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1610
15.
MartinN. H. (1998). Integration of computational chemistry into the chemistry curriculum. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(2), 241. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed075p241
16.
MatsumotoP. S., & CaoJ. (2017). The development of computational thinking in a high school chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(9), 1217–1224.
17.
MetzI. K., BennettJ. W., & MasonS. E. (2021). Examining the Aufbau principle and ionization energies: A computational chemistry exercise for the introductory level. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(12), 4017–4025. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00700
18.
OprisanS. (2022). Interdisciplinary curriculum for computational neuroscience at primarily undergraduate institutions. Journal of Computational Science, 61, 101642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2022.101642
19.
PaschalidouK., SaltaK., & KoulougliotisD. (2022). Exploring the connections between systems thinking and green chemistry in the context of chemistry education: A scoping review. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 29, 100788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2022.100788
20.
PerriM. J., AkinmureleM., & HaynieM. (2019). Chem compute science gateway: An online computational chemistry tool. In GrushowA. & ReevesM. S.(Eds.), Using computational methods to teach chemical principles (pp. 79–92). American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2019-1312.ch007
21.
ReiterR. C., & HouseJ. E.Jr. (1968). Teaching computer methods in undergraduate chemistry courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 45(7), 465. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed045p465
22.
WeissC. J. (2017). Scientific computing for chemists: An undergraduate course in simulations, data processing, and visualization. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(5), 592–597.
23.
WhitnellR. M., & ReevesM. S. (2019). Process oriented guided inquiry learning computational chemistry experiments: Revisions and extensions based on lessons learned from implementation. In GrushowA. & ReevesM. S.(Eds.), Using computational methods to teach chemical principles (pp. 65–77). American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2019-1312.ch006
24.
WolfM. E., NorrisJ. W., FyneweverH., TurneyJ. M., & SchaeferH. F. (2022). An undergraduate chemistry lab exploring computational cost and accuracy: Methane combustion energy. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(3), 1479–1487. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c01243
25.
ZdanovskaiaM. A., SchwarzC. E., HabibA. D., HillN. J., & EsselmanB. J. (2018). Access to computational chemistry for community colleges via WebMO. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(11), 1960–1965. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00310
