The article’s central theme is that knowing cannot be equated with knowledge because knowing is an innate process and knowledge is a product. Knowing as an intuitive process is an inalienable experience, whereas knowledge is an alienable property. Knowledge is a discursive construct of human political economy, whereas knowing is the very character of existence. Knowing arises as we interact. It involves awareness, understanding and the experience of intelligence. Knowledge, on the other hand, is a commercial product of the class-ridden world. The argument has its implication for higher education, that is, higher education should primarily focus on nourishing the knowing quotient without being lost in knowledge production. The article traverses various realms of knowing, such as knowing subjects, learning beings, ontologies and epistemologies of knowledge and knowing, as they glimmered from the ancient to the modern both in the east and the west. Towards the end of the article, the arguments culminate with the philosophical narratives of an Indian philosopher Bhartṛhari, especially his sphoța theory, known as sphoța sidhantham.
BadiouA. (2004). Theoretical Writings. (pp 41-50). Ray Brassier and Alberto Toscano.
2.
BadiouA. (2009) Theory of the subject. Continuum. DOI: 10.5040/9781350252042
3.
BernalJ. D. (1954). Science in history: Volume 1: The emergence of science (Vol. 1). Watts & Co.
4.
BrianJ. F., & FordB. J. (2017). Cellular intelligence: Microphenomenology and the realities of being. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 131, 273–287.
5.
CavannaA. E., & NaniA. (2014). Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff. In:Consciousness. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44088-9_27
6.
CowardH. (1990). Derrida and Indian philosophy. State University of New York Press.
7.
DesnitskayaE. (2018). Language and extra-linguistic reality in Bhartṛhari’s Vākyapadīya. Sophia, 57, 643–659.
8.
DeweyJ., & ArchambaultR. D. (1964). John Dewey on education: Selected writings. Modern Library.
9.
EddingtonA. S. (2019). Science and the unseen world. Pickle Partners Publishing.
10.
FieldsC. (2021). What is a theory of consciousness for?Journal of Consciousness Studies, 28(9–10), 104–115.
11.
FieldsC., & LevinM. (2022). Competency in navigating arbitrary spaces as an invariant for analyzing cognition in diverse embodiments. Entropy, 24(6), 819.
12.
FieldsC., GlazebrookJ. F., & LevinM. (2021). Minimal physicalism as a scale-free substrate for cognition and consciousness. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2021(2), niab013.
13.
FoucaultM. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.
14.
FoucaultM. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the College de France, 1977–78. Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
FramptonM. (1988). Psyche in ancient Greek thought. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 31(2), 265–284.
16.
FuchsC. A., & SchackR. (2013). Quantum-Bayesian coherence. Reviews of Modern Physics, 85(4), 1693.
17.
GibsonJ. J. (1978). The ecological approach to the visual perception of pictures. Leonardo, 11(3), 227–223.
18.
GurukkalR. (2019). History and theory of knowledge production. Oxford University Press.
19.
HallwardP. (Ed.). (2004). Think again: Alain Badiou and the future of philosophy. Bloomsbury Publishing.
20.
HameroffS., & PenroseR. (2014). Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘Orch OR’theory. Physics of Life Reviews, 11(1), 39–78.
21.
HeisenbergW. (1958). Physics and philosophy: The revolution in modern science. George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
22.
HerzbergerR. (1986). Bhartṛhari and the Buddhists: An essay in the development of fifth and sixth-century Indian thought (Vol. 8). Springer Science & Business Media.
23.
HoffmanD. D., SinghM., & PrakashC. (2015). The interface theory of perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1480–1506.
24.
HollingerD. A. (1990). Free enterprise and free inquiry: The emergence of laissez-faire communitarianism in the ideology of science in the United States. New Literary History, 21(4), 897–919.
25.
IyerS. (1965). Bharthrhari on Dhvani. Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 46(1/4), 49–65.
26.
JeeS. L. (1988). Kashmir Shaivism: The secret supreme. State University of New York Press.
27.
KadicA. S., & KurjakA. (2018). Cognitive functions of the fetus. European Journal of Ultrasound, 39(02), 181–189.
KuhnT. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
30.
LangeS. (2010). A discussion of some consequences of Gödel’s incompleteness theorems. Macalester Journal of Philosophy, 7(1), 6.
31.
LatourB. (1990). On actor-network theory: A few clarifications plus more than a few complications. Philosophia, 25(3), 47–64.
32.
LevinM. (2022). Technological approach to mind everywhere: an experimentally-grounded framework for understanding diverse bodies and minds. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 17. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.768201
33.
MalickiM. (2015). Matheme and mathematics: On the main concepts of the philosophy of Alain Badiou. Logique et Analyse, 58(231), 417–432. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44084995
34.
MatsuoT., YamaguchiS., MitsuiS., EmiA., ShimodaF., & OkamuraH. (2003). Control mechanism of the circadian clock for timing of cell division in vivo. Science, 302(5643), 255–259.
35.
McGilchristI. (2019). The master and his emissary: The divided brain and the making of the Western World. Yale University Press.
36.
MertonR. K. (1972). Insiders and outsiders: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge. American Journal of Sociology, 78(1), 9–47.
37.
NietzscheF. (2005). On truth and lies in a nonmoral sense. In Truth: Engagements across philosophical traditions (pp. 14–25). Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470776407.ch1
38.
PadouxA. (1990). Väc: The concept of the word in selected Hindu Tantras. State University of New York Press.
39.
PillaiK. R. (1951). Studies in the ‘Vakyapadiya’. University of London, School of Oriental and African Studies.
40.
PinchardA. (2013). The history of Sphoṭa: from ontology to epistemology. In FrancoE. (Ed.), Periodization and historiography of Indian Philosophy (pp. 327–345). Verein.
41.
PonteD. V., & SchäferL. (2013). Carl Gustav Jung, quantum physics and the spiritual mind: A mystical vision of the twenty-first century. Behavioral Sciences, 3(4), 601–618.
42.
SchäferL. (1993). Bacon’s project: Should it be given up?Man and World, 26(3), 303–317.
43.
ShahbaziM. N., JedrusikA., VuoristoS., RecherG., HupalowskaA., BoltonV., & Zernicka-GoetzM. (2016). Self-organization of the human embryo in the absence of maternal tissues. Nature Cell Biology, 18(6), 700–708.
44.
SinghJ. (Ed.). (1982). Pratyabhijñāhṛdayam: The secret of self-recognition. Motilal Banarsidass.
45.
SmithW. (1984). Cosmos & transcendence breaking through the barrier of scientistic belief. Sophia Perennis.
46.
SmithW. (1999). From Schrödinger’s cat to Thomistic ontology. The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review, 63(1), 49–63.
47.
SmithW. (2003). The Wisdom of ancient cosmology: Contemporary science in light of tradition. Foundation for Traditional Studies.
48.
SmithW. (2019). Physics and vertical causation. Angelico Press.
49.
TononiG. (2004). An information integration theory of consciousness. BMC Neuroscience, 5, 1–22.
50.
WheelerJ. A. (1989). Information, physics, quantum: The search for links. InZurekW.(Ed.), Complexity, entropy and the physics of information (pp. 3–28). Addison-Wesley.
51.
WhiteheadA. N. (2010). Process and reality. Simon and Schuster.
52.
YamaguchiS., MitsuiS., EmiA., ShimodaF., & OkamuraH. (2003). Control mechanism of the circadian clock for timing of cell division in vivo. Science, 302(5643), 255–259.
53.
ZekiS. (2015). A massively asynchronous, parallel brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370(1668), 20140174.
54.
ZysiakA., & MarzecW. (2020). Historicizing the asynchronous modernity in the Global East. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 61(6), 663–685.
