This article uses a mixed methods design to investigate the effects of social influence on family formation in a sample of eastern and western German young adults at an early stage of their family formation. Theoretical propositions on the importance of informal interaction for fertility and family behavior are still rarely supported by systematic empirical evidence. Major problems are the correct identification of salient relationships and the comparability of social networks across population subgroups. This article addresses the two issues through a combination of qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis. In-depth interviewing, network charts, and network grids are used to map individual personal relationships and their influence on family formation decisions. In addition, an analysis of friendship dyads is provided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Antonucci, T. C. (1986). Measuring social support networks: Hierarchical mapping technique. Generations, 10, 10-12.
2.
Behrman, J. R., Kohler, H.-P., & Watkins, S. (2002). Social networks and changes in contraceptive use over time: Evidence from longitudinal study in rural Kenya. Demography, 39(4), 713-737.
3.
Belsky, J., & Rovine, M. (1984). Social network contact, family support and the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 46, 455-463.
4.
Bernardi, L. (2002). Personal relationships and reproductive choices: Evidence from a low fertility context. Unpublished dissertation, Universita’ di Roma La Sapienza, Rome.
5.
Bernardi, L. (2003). Channels of social influence. Population Research and Policy Review, 22(5-6), 527-555.
6.
Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality & Quantity, 36, 391-409.
7.
Bongaarts, J., & Watkins, S. (1996). Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions. Population and Development Review, 22(4), 639-682.
8.
Burton, L. (2004). Ethnographic protocol for welfare, children and families. A three city study. In C. Ragin, J. Nagel, & P. White (Eds.), Workshop on scientific foundations of qualitative research (pp. 59-69). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
9.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
de Bruijn, B. (1999). Foundations of demographic theory. Choice, process, context. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis.
12.
Ettrich, C., & Ettrich, K. U. (1995). Die Bedeutung sozialer Netzwerke und erlebter sozialer Unterstützung beim Übergang zur Elternschaft—Ergebnisse einer Längsschnittstudie [The relevance of social networks and of perceived social support for the transition to parenthood: Results of a longitudinal study]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 42(1), 29-39.
13.
Flick, U. (1995). Qualitative Forschung. Theorie, Methoden, Anwendung in Psychologie und Sozialwissenschaften [Qualitative research: Theory, methods, applications in psychology and social sciences]. Rein-bek, Germany: Rowohlt.
14.
Flick, U. (2002). An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage.
15.
Futing Liao, T., Balding, D. J., Bloomfield, P., & Cressie, N. A. C. (Eds.). (2002). Statistical group comparison. New York: John Wiley.
16.
Glaser, B. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436-445.
17.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
18.
Hammer, M., Gutwirth, L., & Phillips, S. L. (1982). Parenthood and social networks: A preliminary review. Social Science & Medicine, 16, 2091-2100.
19.
Hülser, O. (1996). Frauenerwerbstätigkeit im Transformationsprozeß der deutschen Vereinigung [Female employment during the transformation process of German unification]. Nürnberg, Germany: Institut für Hür Arbeit (IAB).
20.
Kelle, U. (2001). Sociological explanations between micro and macro and the integration of qualitative and quantitative methods. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 2(1). Retrieved May 27, 2006, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/1-01/1-01kelle-e.htm
21.
Kemper, E. A., Stringfield, S., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Mixed methods sampling strategies in social science research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 273-296). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Kohler, H.-P. (2001). Fertility and social interaction. An economic perspective. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford Press.
23.
Kohler, H.-P., & Bühler, C. (2001). Social networks and fertility. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 14380-14388). Oxford, UK: Pergamon/Elsevier Sciences.
24.
Konietzka, D., & Kreyenfeld, M. (2004). Angleichung oder Verfestigung von Differenzen? Geburtenentwick-lung und Familienformen in Ost-und Westdeutschland [Attenuation or stabilization of differences? Fertility trends and family forms in eastern and western Germany]. Berliner Debatte Initial, 15(4), 26-41.
25.
Konietzka, D., & Kreyenfeld, M. (2005). Nichteheliche Mutterschaft und soziale Ungleichheit: zur sozioökonomischen Differenzierung der Familienformen in Ost-und Westdeutschland [Non-marital motherhood and social inequality: On the socio-economic differences of family forms in eastern and western Germany]. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 57(1), 32-61.
26.
Kreyenfeld, M. (2001). Employment and fertility: East Germany in the 1990s. Unpublished dissertation, University of Rostock, Germany.
27.
Kreyenfeld, M. (2004). Fertility decisions in the FRG and GDR: An analysis with data from the German fertility and family Survey. Demographic Research, 3(11), 276-318.
28.
Nauck, B., & Schwenk, O. G. (2001). Did societal transformation destroy the social networks of families in East Germany? American Behavioral Scientist, 44(11), 1864-1878.
29.
Nee, V., Sanders, J., & Sernau, S. (1994). Job transitions in an immigrant metropolis: Ethnic boundaries and the mixed economy. American Sociological Review, 59, 849-872.
30.
Ragin, C. C. (1996). The comparative method. Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31.
Sandelowski, M. (2000). Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling: Data collection and analysis techniques in mixed methods studies. Research in Nursing and Health, 23, 2046-2055.
32.
Schmelzer (2005). Netzwerkveränderung als Folge der Transformation? Weak Ties und Strong Ties in Ostdeutschland vor und nach der Wende [Changes of networks as a consequence of transformation? Weak ties and strong ties in eastern Germany before and after unification]. Berliner Journal für Soziologie, Arbeitsmarkt-und Berufsforschung der Bundesanstalt fu15(1), 73-86.
33.
Short, S. E., Chen, F., Entwisle, B., & Fengying, Z. (2002). Maternal work and child care in China: A multi-method analysis. Population and Development Review, 28(1), 31-57.
34.
Straus, F. (2002). Netzwerkanalysen: gemeindepsychologische Perspektiven für Forschung und Praxis [Net-work analysis: Community psychological perspectives for research and practice]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.
35.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
36.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 3-50). London: Sage.
37.
Trappe, H. (1995). Emanzipation oder Zwang? Frauen in der DDR zwischen Beruf, Familie und Sozialpolitik [Emancipation or force? Women in the GDR between job, family, and social policies]. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
38.
Uhlendorff, H. (2004). After the wall: Parental educational attitudes in East- and West-Germany. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 71-82.
39.
Voigt, P. (2004). Bevölkerung von Rostock im 20. Jahrhundert [The population of Rostock in the 20th century]. In N. Werz & R. Nuthmann (Eds.), Abwanderung und Migration in Mecklenburg Vorpommern (pp. 113-122). Wiesbaden, Germany: Vs-Verlag.
40.
Völker, B. (1995). Should auld acquaintance be forgot...? Institutions of communism, the transition to capitalism and personal networks: The case of East Germany. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.
41.
Völker, B., & Flap, H. (1995). The effects of institutional transformation on personal networks. East Germany, four years later. Netherlands Journal of Social Sciences, 31, 87-107.
42.
Völker, B., & Flap, H. (2001). Weak ties as a liability: The case of East Germany. Rationality and Society, 13(4), 397-428.
43.
Witzel, A. (1985). Das problemzentrierte Interview [The problem-centered interview]. In G. Jüttemann (Ed.), Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie. Grundfragen, Verfahrensweisen, Anwendungsfelder (pp. 227-255). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
