Trump 2.0 has contested and sought to upturn the so-called liberal international order. Within Europe this entailed leveraging geoeconomic dependence to force NATO members to publicly commit to spending 5% of GDP on defence and the EU into an asymmetrical trade deal. Europe is thus undergoing a guns versus butter debate that threatens the social contract and the solvency of Europe. Taking stock of the scramble across Europe to keep NATO keeping on - and drawing upon research that explores the transnational and economic roots of the rise of the far right - this essay argues that to effectively respond to Trump 2.0 and stem tide of anti-democratic currents will require rethinking contemporary EU economic doxa – imperfectly captured by the term neoliberalism. Such a reckoning should involve a systematic reconsideration of how far and how deep markets and market logics should be institutionalised within European societies. In short, Europe should seek to proactively shape the emerging post-neoliberal trend to seek to ensure that what comes next retains the existing order’s stated commitments to democracy, tolerance, and human dignity. Conversely, failure to rethink Europe’s commitment to neoliberalism risks strengthening those that are convinced the status quo embodies little worth salvaging.
BabbSKentikelenisA (2018) International financial institutions as agents of neoliberalism. The Sage Handbook of neoliberalism16–27.
2.
BeaumontPDWilhelmsenJGjerdeKL (2024) Reimagining NATO after crimea: defender of the rule-based order and truth?Contemporary Security Policy45(3): 396–425.
3.
CarrMDWiemersEE (2016) The Decline in Lifetime Earnings Mobility in The US: Evidence From Survey-Linked Administrative Data. Washington Center for Equitable Growth.
4.
CompagnucciFGentiliAValentiniE, et al. (2021) Have jobs and wages stopped rising? productivity and structural change in advanced countries. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics56: 412–430.
5.
DaviesWGaneN (2021) Post-neoliberalism? an introduction. Theory, Culture & Society38(6): 3–28.
6.
DavisAE (2020) Waves of populism: a recent manifestation of Polanyi’s “double movement”. Journal of Economic Issues54(2): 398–403.
FieldsDJHodkinsonSN (2018) Housing policy in crisis: an international perspective. Housing Policy Debate28(1): 1–5.
12.
FiorentinoSGlasmeierAKLobaoL, et al. (2024) Left behind places’: what are they and why do they matter?Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society17(1): 1–16.
13.
FraserN (2023) Cannibal Capitalism: How Our System Is Devouring Democracy, Care, and the Planet and what We can Do about it. Verso Books.
GurievSPapaioannouE (2022) The political economy of populism. Journal of Economic Literature60(3): 753–832.
16.
HardyBLKrauseEZiliakJP (2024) Income inequality in the United States, 1975–2022. Fiscal Studies45(2): 155–171.
17.
HarveyD (2007) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
18.
HirschmanAO (1972) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Harvard University Press.
19.
HolmM (2020) On The Double Exceptionalism of Liberal States. Freedom Of Expression In Universities And University Colleges, 55.
20.
HolmM (2025) A Postliberal Global Order? Challenge (R) S to the Liberal West. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI).
21.
HolmMMichelsenN (2021) The new Right’s internationalism. New Perspectives29(4): 317–319.
22.
HolmesC (2018) Polanyi in Times of Populism: Vision and Contradiction in the History of Economic Ideas. Routledge.
23.
HopkinJ (2017) When Polanyi met farage: market fundamentalism, economic nationalism, and Britain’s exit from the European Union. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations19(3): 465–478.
JonesLHameiriS (2022) COVID-19 and the failure of the neoliberal regulatory state. Review of International Political Economy29(4): 1027–1052.
26.
LimSH (2023) Look up rather than down: Karl Polanyi’s fascism and radical right-wing ‘populism. Current Sociology71(3): 526–544.
27.
MichelsenNDe OrellanaPCosta BuranelliF (2025) The reactionary internationale: the rise of the new right and the reconstruction of international society. International Relations39(1): 3–29.
28.
PelopidasBVerschurenSCJ (2023) Writing IR after COVID-19: reassessing political possibilities, good faith, and policy-relevant scholarship on climate change mitigation and nuclear disarmament. Global Studies Quarterly3(1): ksad006.
29.
PolanyiK (1944) The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Farrer and Rinehart.
30.
Rodríguez-PoseADijkstraLPoelmanH (2024) The geography of EU discontent and the regional development trap. Economic Geography100(3): 213–245.
31.
RodrikD (2021) Why does globalization fuel populism? Economics, culture, and the rise of right-wing populism. Annual Review of Economics13(1): 133–170.
32.
RuggieJ (1982) Embedded liberalism in the post-war economic order. International Organization36(2): 379–415.
Van Der ErveLKrutikovaSMacmillanL, et al. (2023) Intergenerational mobility in the UK. IFS Deaton Review of Inequalities. Institute for Fiscal Studies.
