In July 2023, the grain deal was denounced by Russia. Its termination was followed by massive bombing of Ukraine’s grain infrastructure. However, its signature in July 2022 had been welcomed by international organisations as good news for global food security. This article discusses the relevance of the concept of food security for understanding the difficulties of the grain deal. Ultimately, it suggests a theoretical revision of the concept.
AbayKABreisingerCGlauberJW, et al. (2022) The Russia-Ukraine Crisis: Implications for Global and Regional Food Security and Potential Policy Responses. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
2.
AgnewJ (1994) The territorial trap: the geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy1: 53–80.
3.
Andrione‐MoylanAde WildePRaubeK (2023) Varieties of EU trade politicisation in EU public debates. Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science14(S3): 19–29.
4.
AzarievaJBrudnyYFinkelE (2023) Bread and Autocracy in Putin’s Russia Food, Politics, and Security in Putin’s Russia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
BainesJ (2017) Accumulating through food crisis? Farmers, commodity traders and the distributional politics of financialization. Review of International Political Economy,24(3The Bichler and Nitzan Archives, Toronto): 497–537. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2017.1304434
6.
Ben HassenTEl BilaliH (2022) Impacts of the Russia-Ukraine war on global food security: towards more sustainable and resilient food systems?Foods11: 2301.
7.
BoraSCeccacciIDelgadoC, et al. (2010) Food Security and Conflict. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
8.
BorrasSM (2023) Politically engaged, pluralist and internationalist: critical agrarian studies today. Journal of Peasant Studies50: 449–489.
9.
BrückTd’ErricoM (2019) Food security and violent conflict: introduction to the special issue. World Development117: 167–171.
10.
ClappJ (2015a) Food Security and International Trade: Unpacking Disputed Narratives: The State of Agricultural Commodity Markets 2015-16 Background Paper. Rome: Italy FAO.
11.
ClappJ (2015b) Food security and contested agricultural trade norms. Journal of international law & international relations11(2): 104–115.
12.
ClappJ (2023) Concentration and crises: exploring the deep roots of vulnerability in the global industrial food system. Journal of Peasant Studies50: 1–25.
13.
ClappJHelleinerE (2012) Troubled futures? The global food crisis and the politics of agricultural derivatives regulation. Review of International Political Economy19(2): 181–207.
14.
ClappJMoseleyW (2020) This food crisis is different : COVID 19 and the fragility of the neoliberal food security order. Journal of Peasant Studies47(7): 1393–1417.
15.
De RaymondABGouletF (2020) Science, technology and food security: an introduction. Science Technology & Society25: 7–18.
16.
DeiningerKAliDAFangM (2023) Impact of the Russian Invasion on Ukrainian Farmers’ Productivity, Rural Welfare, and Food Security. Washington DC: The World Bank.
17.
DelgadoCTschunkertK (2022) Food security in conflict and peacebuilding settings: beyond a humanitarian concern. Pathways to Peace and Security2: 38–61.
18.
DibdenJGibbsDCockliC (2013) Framing GM crops as a food security solution. Journal of Rural Studies, Food Security29: 59–70.
19.
DufyC (2021) Le Retour de la puissance céréalière russe. Sociologie des marchés du blé 2000-2018. Lausanne, Switzerland: Peter Lang, Bruxelles.
20.
DufyC (2023) Food security in times of war: double discourse and violent conflicts. The case of Russia, 2014–2022. International Sociology38(6): 722–739.
21.
DuinaF (2019) Why the excitement? Values, identities, and the politicization of EU trade policy with North America. Journal of European Public Policy26: 1866–1882.
22.
D’AmatoSDianMRussoA (2022) Reaching for allies? The dialectics and overlaps between international relations and area studies in the study of politics, security and conflicts. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica52: 1–19.
23.
EdelmanMWolfordW (2017) Introduction: critical agrarian studies in theory and practice: symposium: agrarianism in theory and practice organisers: jennifer baka, aaron jakes, greta marchesi and sara safransky. Antipode49: 959–976.
24.
FAO (2022) Ukraine: Note on the Impact of the War on Food Security in Ukraine. Rome, Italy: FAO.
25.
FAO (2023) Brief on the Interruption of the Black Sea Grain Initiative and its Potential Implications on Global Food Markets and Food Security. Rome, Italy: FAO.
26.
FarsundAADaugbjergCLanghelleO (2015) Food security and trade: reconciling discourses in the food and agriculture organization and the world trade organization. Food Security7: 383–391.
27.
FouilleuxEBricasNAlphaA (2017) Feeding 9 billion people’: global food security debates and the productionist trap. Journal of European Public Policy24: 1–20.
28.
FourcadeMHealyK (2007) Moral views of market society. Annual Review of Sociology33: 285–311.
29.
Garcia-DuranPEliassonLJCostaO (2020) Managed globalization 2.0: the European commission’s response to trade politicization. Politics and Governance8: 290–300.
30.
GlauberJWLaborde DebucquetD (eds) (2023) The Russia-Ukraine Conflict and Global Food Security. Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
GötzLHeigermoserMJaghdaniTJ (2022) Russia’s food security and impact on agri-food trade. In: WegrenSKNilssenF (eds) Russia’s Role in the Contemporary International Agri-Food Trade System, Palgrave Advances in Bioeconomy: Economics and Policies. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 115–137.
33.
HallD (2023) Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and critical agrarian studies. Journal of Peasant Studies50: 26–46.
34.
HellegersP (2022) Food security vulnerability due to trade dependencies on Russia and Ukraine. Food Security14: 1503–1510.
35.
International Food Policy Research Institute (2023) 2023 Global Food Policy Report: Rethinking Food Crisis Responses. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
LawrenceGMcMichaelP (2012) The question of food security. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food19(2): 135–142.
38.
LeblondPViju-MiljusevicC (2019) EU trade policy in the twenty-first century: change, continuity and challenges. Journal of European Public Policy26(12): 1836–1846.
39.
MargulisM (2014) The world trade organization and food security after the global food crises. In: DracheDJacobsL (eds) Linking Global Trade and Human Rights: New Policy Space in Hard Economic Times. New York: Cambridge University Press, 236–258.
40.
MargulisMPorterT (2013) Governing the global land grab: multipolarity, ideas, and complexity transnational governance. Globalizations10(1): 65–86.
41.
MeunierSNicolaidisK (2019) The geopoliticization of European trade and investment policy. Journal of Common Market Studies57: 103–113.
42.
MooneyPHHuntSA (2009) Food security: the elaboration of contested claims to a consensus frame. Rural Sociology74: 469–497.
NaderL (2020) Economics, war, and anthropology economic anthropology. Wiley Blackwell7(1): 147–149.
45.
ParasecoliFVargaM (2023) War in the Ukrainian fields: the weaponization of international wheat trade. Economic sociology. perspectives and conversations24(2): 4–12.
RussoADufyC (2018) Region-making at last in the former soviet area: some suggestions for future research. Мир ?оссии [Mir Rossii]27(4): 120–128.
48.
ShattuckASchiavoniCVan Gelder (2015) Translating the politics of food sovereignty: digging into contradictions, uncovering new dimensions. Globalizations12(4): 421–433.
49.
SommervilleMEssexJLe BillonP (2014) The ‘global food crisis’ and the geopolitics of food security. Geopolitics19(2): 239–265.
50.
TrevinoSAJiaqianCEbekeCH, et al. (2023) Geoeconomic Fragmentation and the Future of Multilateralism Staff Discussion Notes. Washington DC: IMF.