Before we can fruitfully discuss what Europe ought to do about its various policy dilemmas, we need to re-examine the lens through which we view these dilemmas. I will highlight two problems with the habitual lens on Europe’s future: firstly, it’s unrealistic emphasis on clarity and coherence and, secondly, its state-centrism and state-envy. I explore the ways in which we can reverse the lens to examine familiar problems from unfamiliar angles.
AgnewJ (2007) Know-where: geographies of knowledge of world politics. International Political Sociology1(2): 138–148.
2.
KuusM (2014) Geopolitics and Expertise: Knowledge and Authority in European Diplomacy. Hoboken: Wiley.
3.
KuusM (2017) Locating Europe’s power, or the difference between passports and passporting. In: McConnellFKuusMJeffreyASmithAVaughan-WilliamsNCrawleyH, ‘Europe’s Political Futures’ (discussion forum), Political Geography60: pp. 262–263.
4.
KuusM (2020) Regulatory power and region-making in the Arctic: China and the European Union. European Urban and Regional Studies. Epub ahead of print 12 June 2020. DOI: 10.1177/0969776420925539.
5.
RachmanG (2019) The EU needs to be a power project. The Financial Times, 7 October.