Bak McKennaM (Forthcoming) Designing for international law: the architecture of international organisations 1922–1952. London Review of International Law(on file with authors).
2.
BanhamR (1955) The new brutalism: ethic or aesthetic?The Architectural Review118(2): 354–361.
3.
BleikerR (2019) Visual autoethnography and international security: insights from the Korean DMZ. European Journal of International Security4(3): 274–299.
4.
BrökelmannN (2019) Marcel Breuer’s Embassy. The Hague: West.
5.
ČapkováH (2019) Cultural cut – Bauhaus Imaginista: framing Renshichirō Kawakita’s transcultural legacy. New Perspectives27(1): 159–178.
6.
CraigwoodJ (2011) Sidney, gentili, and the poetics of embassy. In: AdamsRCoxR (eds) Diplomacy and Early Modern Culture. London: Palgrave, pp. 82–100.
7.
DoveyK (1999) Framing Places: Mediating Power in Built Form. London: Routledge.
8.
EslavaL (2017) The materiality of international law: violence, history and Joe Sacco’s The Great War. London Review of International Law5(1): 49–86.
9.
GierynT (2002) What buildings do. Theory and Society31(1): 35–74.
10.
Gill LuiE (2004) Building Diplomacy: The Architecture of American Embassies. Ithaca: Cornell University Press: Four Stops Press.
11.
HatherleyO (2016) Landscapes of Communism. London: Penguin.
12.
JudtT (2006) Postwar. London: Penguin.
13.
HohmannJ (2017) The Treaty 8 typewriter: tracing the roles of material things in imagining, realising and resisting colonial worlds. London Review of International Law5(3): 371–396.
14.
HohmannJJoyceD (eds) (2018) International Law’s Objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
LisleDJohnsonH (2019) Lost in the aftermath. Security Dialogue50(1): 20–39.
16.
LoefflerJ (1998) The Architecture of Diplomacy: Building America’s Embassies. Princeton: Princeton Architectural Press.
17.
McLeodVChurlyC (2018) Atlas of Brutalist Architecture. London: Phaidon.
18.
MeadesJ (2014) Bunkers, Brutalism and Bloodymindedness: Concrete Poetry(BBC documentary).
19.
MulcahyL (2010) Legal Architecture: Justice, Due Process and the Place of Law. London: Routledge.
20.
ParfittR (2019) The Process of International Legal Reproduction: Inequality, Historiography, Resistance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
ResnikJCurtisDE (2011) Representing Justice: Invention, Controversy, and Rights in City-states and Democratic Courtrooms. Yale: Yale University Press.
22.
RoeleI (2018) The making of international lawyers: Winnicott’s transitional objects. In: HohmannJJoyceD (eds) International Law’s Objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
SaugmannR (2019) Military techno-vision: technologies between visual ambiguity and the desire for security facts. European Journal of International Security4(3): 300–321.
24.
SoviakE (2000) The Journal of the Iwakura Embassy. In: KoichiroM (ed) Japan and the Pacific. London: Routledge.
StolkSVosR (2020a) International law in concrete-institutional architecture in Brussels and The Hague. Law and Humanities. DOI: 10.1080/17521483.2020.1724407.
29.
StolkSVosR. (2020b) International legal sightseeing. Leiden Journal of International Law33(1): 1–11. DOI: 10.1017/S0922156519000682.
30.
TallisB (2019) An international politics of Czech architecture; or, reviving the international in international political sociology. Globalizations. DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2019.1676586.
31.
Yoon KangHKendallS (eds.) (2019) Special Issue on legal materiality. Law Text Culture23: 1–293.