CorryOlaf (2018), ‘Societies Are Not the Only Source of Multiplicity’, International Relations, 32(2): 243–245.
2.
HudsonValerie (2005), ‘Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 1(1): 1–30.
3.
JanisIrving L. (1972), Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes, Oxford, UK: Houghton Mifflin.
4.
KaarboJuliet (2015), ‘A Foreign Policy Analysis Perspective on the Domestic Politics Turn in IR Theory’, International Studies Review, 17(2): 189–216.
5.
PeltonenHannes (2018), ‘A Prison Break into the Past? A Comment on Justin Rosenberg's “International Relations in the Prison of Political Science”’, International Relations, 32(2): 245–246.
6.
RosenauJames (1968), ‘Comparative Foreign Policy: Fad, Fantasy, or Field’, International Studies Quarterly, 12(3): 296–329.
7.
RosenbergJustin (2016), ‘International Relations and the Prison of Political Science’, International Relations, 30(2): 127–153.
8.
SchaferMark, and CrichlowScott (2010), Groupthink versus High-Quality Decision Making in International Relations, New York: Columbia University Press.
9.
SimonHerbert A. (1985), ‘Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with Political Science’, American Political Science Review, 79(2): 293–304.
10.
SmithSteve (1986), ‘Theories of Foreign Policy: An Historical Overview’, Review of International Studies12(1): 13–29.
11.
‘t HartPaul (1998), ‘Preventing Groupthink Revisited: Evaluating and Reforming Groups in Government’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73(2-3): 306–326.
12.
WinterDavid G., HermannMargaret G., WeintraubWalter, and WalkerStephen G. (1991), ‘The Personalities of Bush and Gorbachev Measured at a Distance: Procedures, Portraits, and Policy’, Political Psychology, 12(2): 215–245.