Adler-NissenRebecca (2015), ‘Conclusion: Relationalism: Why Diplomats Find International Relations Strange’, in SendingOle Jacob, PouliotVincent, and NeumannIver B. (eds.) Diplomacy and the Making of World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 284–308.
2.
BliddalHenrik, SylvestCasper, and WilsonPeter (eds.) (2013), Classics of International Relations. Essays in Criticism and Appreciation, New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
CampbellDavid (1998), Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Revised Edition, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
4.
De CarvalhoBenjamin, LeiraHalvard, and HobsonJohn M. (2011), ‘The Big Bangs of IR: The Myths That Your Teachers Still Tell You About 1648 and 1919’, Millennium, 39(3): 735–758.
5.
Der DerianJames (1987a), On Diplomacy: A Genealogy of Western Estrangement, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
6.
Der DerianJames (1987b), ‘Mediating Estrangement: A Theory for Diplomacy’, Review of International Studies, 13(2): 91–110.
7.
KnutsenTorbjørn L. (2016), A History of International Relations Thought.3rd ed., Manchester: Manchester University Press.
8.
LeiraHalvard (2008), ‘Justus Lipsius, Political Humanism and the Disciplining of 17th Century Statecraft’, Review of International Studies, 34(4): 669–692.
9.
LeiraHalvard (2016), ‘A Conceptual History of Diplomacy’, in ConstantinouCostas M., SharpPaul, and KerrPauline (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Diplomacy, London: Sage, pp. 28–38.
10.
NeumannIver B. (1999), Uses of the Other. ‘The East’ in European Identity Formation, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
11.
WalkerRBJ (1993), Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
WarrenMark (1989), ‘On Diplomacy: A Genealogy of Western Estrangement. by James Der Derian’, The Journal of Politics, 51(1): 208–211.