Great Arches Viewed from the Coasts of Bohemia: Reflections Inspired by Tables of Kings 1

Abstract

Considering the differences between the superficial orderliness of the English/British table of royal succession and the apparent anarchy of its Bohemian counterpart, this essay questions aspects of the analysis of English state formation offered in Philip Corrigan and Derek Sayer's 1985 study The Great Arch: English State Formation as Cultural Revolution. Rather than providing a contrast to England's institutional political continuities over centuries, Bohemia's manifestly fractured history furnishes a vantage point from which the ideological character of such claimed historical continuities becomes clear. E. P. Thompson's image of a “great arch” of state formation attributes far too much shape, solidity, and coherence to a process that was always, whether in England or Bohemia, a matter of flux and fluidity – a landscape in constant erosion, upon which coherence is only ever imposed in momentary retrospect.

Keywords

Bohemia state formation England Britain history narratives nationalism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrams

Philip

(1988), ‘Notes on the Difficulty of Studying the State’, Journal of Historical Sociology, 1(1): 58–89.

Anderson

Benedict

(2016), Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, London: Verso.

Borovský

Karel Havlíček

(1979 [1846]), ‘Slovan a Čech’, in Novotný

Jan

(ed.) Obrozenínároda: svědectví a dokumenty, Prague: Melantrich.

Chakrabarty

Dipesh

(2007), Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Corrigan

Philip

, and Sayer

Derek

(1985), The Great Arch: English State Formation as Cultural Revolution, Oxford: Blackwell.

Corrigan

Philip

(1991), ‘The Making of the Boy: Meditations on What Grammar School Did with, to, and for My Body’, in Giroux

Henry A.

(ed.) Postmodernism, Feminism, and Cultural Politics: Redrawing Educational Boundaries, New York: SUNY Press.

Davies

Norman

(2012), Vanished Kingdoms: The History of Half-Forgotten Europe, London: Penguin.

Dvořáková

Zora

(1989), Miroslav Tyrš, prohry a vítězství, Prague: Olympia.

Elton

G. R.

(1953), The Tudor Revolution in Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Engels

Friedrich

(1977 [1849]), ‘Democratic Pan-Slavism’, in Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, Collected Works, Vol. 8, New York: International Publishers.

11.

Foucault

Michel

(1994), The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, New York: Vintage.

12.

Hill

Christopher

(1958), ‘The Norman Yoke’, in Hill

Christopher

, Puritanism and Revolution, London: Secker and Warburg, pp. 50–122.

13.

Hobsbawm

Eric

, and Ranger

Terrence O.

(1992), The Invention of Tradition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Kop

František

(1945), Založení University Karlovy v Praze, Prague: Atlas.

15.

Sayer

Derek

(1990), Capitalism and Modernity: An Excursus on Marx and Weber, London: Routledge.

16.

Sayer

Derek

(1992), ‘A Notable Administration: English State Formation and the Rise of Capitalism’, American Journal of Sociology, 97(5): 1382–1415.

17.

Sayer

Derek

(1998), ‘The Language of Nationality and the Nationality of Language: Prague, 1780–1920’, Past and Present, 153: 164–210.

18.

Sayer

Derek

(1998), The Coasts of Bohemia: A Czech History, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

19.

Sayer

Derek

(2004), Going Down for Air: A Memoir in Search of a Subject, Boulder, CO: Paradigm.

20.

Sayer

Derek

(2013), Prague, Capital of the Twentieth Century: A Surrealist History, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

21.

Taussig

Michael

(1997), The Magic of the State, London: Routledge.

22.

Thompson

E. P.

(1978), ‘The Peculiarities of the English’, in Thompson

E.P.

, The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays, London: Merlin.

23.

Tyršová

Renata

(1932–1934), Miroslav Tyrš, jeho osobnost a dílo, Prague: Český čtenář.