Few studies of romantic unions focus on interethnic preferences among Asians and Latinos to discern the salience of panethnicity in dating. Using unique mixed-methods data, which disaggregates the ethnic identity of respondents and their preferred partners, we examine patterns of panethnic and non-panethnic dating choices among Asian and Latino college students and their explanations for their preferences. We find that Asian college students, except for Filipinos, desire co-panethnic partners more than Latinos do, although only certain co-panethnics are preferred. Students use narratives about culture, phenotype, family, and familiarity in different ways to justify their preferences. In some cases, these criteria guide them to preferences in line with common understandings of where panethnic boundaries lie. In others, preferences reveal alternative conceptions of group boundaries based on phenotypic and cultural differences with co-panethnics or similarities across panethnic lines. These findings complicate existing understandings of panethnicity and challenge the durability of panethnic boundaries.
BanyJames A.RobnettBelindaFelicianoCynthia. 2014. “Gendered Black Exclusion: The Persistence of Racial Stereotypes among Daters.”Race and Social Problems6(3):201–13.
2.
BrewerJohnHunterAlbert. 2006. Foundations of Multimethod Research. New York: Sage.
3.
BrownHanaJonesJennifer A.2015. “Rethinking Panethnicity and the Race-immigration Divide: An Ethnoracialization Model of Group Formation.”Sociology of Race and Ethnicity1(1):181–91.
4.
ChongKelly H.2017. “‘Asianness’ under Construction: The Contours and Negotiation of Panethnic Identity/Culture among Interethnically Married Asian Americans.”Sociological Perspectives60(1):52–76.
5.
ChowSue. 2000. “The Significance of Race in the Private Sphere.”Sociological Inquiry70(1):1–29.
6.
ChungAngie Y.2016. Saving Face: The Emotional Costs of the Asian Immigrant Family Myth. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
7.
CornellStephen E.HartmannDouglas. 1998. Ethnicity and Race: Making Identities in a Changing World. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
DeterdingNicole M.WatersMary C.2018. “Flexible Coding of In-depth Interview: A Twenty-first Approach.”Sociological Methods & Research50(2):708–39.
10.
DowlingJulie A.2014. Mexican Americans and the Question of Race. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
11.
EspirituYen Le. 1992. Asian American Panethnicity: Bridging Institutions and Identities. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
12.
FelicianoCynthia. 2001. “Assimilation or Enduring Racial Boundaries? Generational Differences in Intermarriage among Asians and Latinos in the United States.”Race and Society4:27–45.
13.
FelicianoCynthiaLeeRennieRobnettBelinda. 2011. “Racial Boundaries among Latinos: Evidence from Internet Daters’ Racial Preferences.”Social Problems58(2):189–212.
14.
FelicianoCynthiaRobnettBelinda. 2014. “How External Racial Classifications Shape Latino Dating Choices.”Du Bois Review11(02):295–328.
15.
FelicianoCynthiaRobnettBelindaKomaieGolnaz. 2009. “Gendered Racial Exclusion among White Internet Daters.”Social Science Research38(1):39–54.
16.
FuVincent K.2007. “How Many Melting Pots? Intermarriage, Pan Ethnicity, and the Black/Non-Black Divide in the United States.”Journal of Comparative Family Studies38(2):215–37.
17.
HollingerDavid A.2011. “The Concept of Post-racial: How Its Easy Dismissal Obscures Important Questions.”Daedalus140(1):174–82.
18.
ItzigsohnJoseDore-CabralCarlos. 2000. “Competing Identities? Race, Ethnicity and Panethnicity among Dominicans in the United States.”Sociological Forum15(2):225–47.
19.
ItzigsohnJoseGiorguliSilviaVazquezObed. 2005. “Immigrant Incorporation and Racial Identity: Racial Self-identification among Dominican Immigrants.”Ethnic and Racial Studies28(1):50–78.
20.
KaoGraceJoynerKara. 2006. “Do Hispanic and Asian Adolescents Practice Panethnicity in Friendship Choices?”Social Science Quarterly87(5):972–92.
21.
KaoGraceJoynerKaraBalistreriKelly Stamper. 2019. The Company We Keep: Interracial Friendships and Romantic Relationships from Adolescence to Adulthood. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
22.
KibriaNazli. 2002. Becoming Asian American: Second Generation Chinese and Korean American Identities. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univer-sity Press.
23.
LamontMichèleMolnarVirag. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.”Annual Review of Sociology28(1):167–95.
24.
LeeHannah. 2021. “Understanding Neighborhood Patterns Across Asian Ethnic Groups and Immigrant Destinations.”Spatial Demography9:413–42.
25.
LeeSara S.2006. “Love Sees No Color or Boundaries? Interethnic Dating and Marriage Patterns of Dominican and Cep (Colombian, Ecuadorian, and Peruvian) Americans.”The Journal of Latino-Latin American Studies2(1):84–102.
26.
LinKen-HouLundquistJennifer. 2013. “Mate Selection in Cyberspace: The Intersection of Race, Gender, and Education.”American Journal of Sociology119(1):183–215.
27.
LopezDavidEspirituYen. 1990. “Panethnicity in the United States: A Theoretical Framework.”Ethnic and Racial Studies13(2):198–224.
28.
MartínezDaniel E.GonzalezKelsey E.2021. “Panethnicity as a Reactive Identity: Primary Panethnic Identification among Latino-Hispanics in the United States.”Ethnic and Racial Studies44(4):595–617.
29.
MinPyong GapKimChigon. 2009. “Patterns of Intermarriages and Cross-generational In-marriages among Native-born Asian Americans.”International Migration Review43(3):447–70.
30.
MinPyong GapKimRose. 2000. “Formation of Ethnic and Racial Identities: Narratives by Young Asian-American Professionals.”Ethnic and Racial Studies23(4):735–60.
31.
MoraG. Cristina. 2014. Making Hispanics: How Activists, Bureaucrats, and Media Constructed a New American. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32.
MoraG. CristinaOkamotoDina. 2019. “Boundary Articulation and Emergent Identities: Asian and Hispanic Panethnicity in Comparison 1970-1980.”Social Problems67:56–76.
33.
MorganCharlie. 2012. “Toward a More Nuanced Understanding of Intercoupling Second-Generation Mixed Couples in Southern California.”Journal of Family Issues33:1423–49.
34.
O’BrienEileen. 2008. The Racial Middle: Latinos and Asian Americans Living beyond the Racial Divide. New York: New York University Press.
35.
ObolerSuzanne. 1995. Ethnic Labels, Latino Lives: Identity and the Politics of (Re)presentation in the United States. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
36.
OcampoAnthony Christian. 2016. The Latinos of Asia: How Filipino Americans Break the Rules of Race. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
37.
OkamotoDina G.2007. “Marrying Out: A Boundary Approach to Understanding the Marital Integration of Asian Americans.”Social Science Research36:1391–414.
38.
OkamotoDina G.2014. Redefining Race: Asian American Panethnicity and Shifting Ethnic Boundaries. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
39.
OkamotoDina G.MoraG. Cristina. 2014. “Panethnicity.”Annual Review of Sociology40:219–39.
40.
PortesAlejandroRumbautRubén G.2014. Immigrant America: A Portrait. 4th ed.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
41.
QianZhenchaoCobasJose A.2004. “Latinos’ Mate Selection: National Origin, Racial, and Nativity Differences.”Social Science Research33(2):225–47.
42.
QianZhenchao C.LichterDaniel T.2007. “Social Boundaries and Marital Assimilation: Interpreting Trends in Racial and Ethnic Intermarriage.”American Sociological Review72(1):68–94.
43.
RobnettBelindaFelicianoCynthia. 2011. “Patterns of Racial-ethnic Exclusion by Internet Daters.”Social Forces89(3):807–28.
44.
RosenfeldMichael J.2001. “The Salience of Pan-national Hispanic and Asian Identities in US Marriage Markets.”Demography38(2):161–75.
45.
RothWendy D.2010. “Racial Mismatch: The Divergence between Form and Function in Data for Monitoring Racial Discrimination of Hispanics.”Social Science Quarterly91(5):1288–311.
46.
SchachterAriela. 2014. “Finding Common Ground? Indian Immigrants and Asian American Panethnicity.”Social Forces92(4):1487–1512.
47.
SmallMario Luis. 2011. “How to Conduct a Mixed Methods Study: Recent Trends in a Rapidly Growing Literature.”Annual Review of Sociology37:57–86.
48.
VasquezJessica M.2015. “Disciplined Preferences: Explaining the (Re)Production of Latino Endogamy.”Social Problems62:455–475.
